Evolution vs. Creation

Babylonian contributions to the world stem from about 3000-1600 BC., When the Babylonian writing system spread throughout the Near East. It brought with it the knowledge of astronomy, Mathematics and some sciences which the Greeks borrowed. Darwin studied the Babylonians and discovered that the soothsayers, of that time, had come up with an idea that man came from animals(a lower form of life). A type of evolution was being pushed but never made any headway. Darwin took this idea and added his own ideas to it. And these ideas have been past as Darwin's ideas and been given the names Evolution and Natural selection. Darwin had been given credit for thinking this idea up when actually He was not the first. Darwin just added a working mechanism (a science term) which made it more feasible sounding and it was soon accepted by those in the scientific world.

Soothsayer: One who claims to be able to foretell events or predict the future; a seer. They often used occultist objects to conjure up spirits to do their bidding's and to gain their knowledge to predict the future. They performed, what today would be considered witchcraft. And it was through their knowledge they gained that they came up with the idea of man coming from animals. In witchcraft, if you became high enough in the arts of doing this and becoming closer to Baal or Satan. You would gain powers that would allow you to do things that most other witches could not do. Which is morphing into another form. Usually an animal. Morphing in witchcraft does not require a complete transformation. Sometimes it just a change of appearance or sex ( male to female or female to male), but still remain human. I believe that this morphing is where the soothsayers got the idea of evolution. If you want to find out more on "morphing" using "witchcraft", just type those two words in any search engine.

Coming from the soothsayers of that day should give you an idea of it origination. Because it took an soothsayer to even think it up! But, what you don't know is science is now trying to get back to it's roots and become a religion? One type religion is called OEC(old earth creationist). Where God's word is replaced with science where ever science sees fit to do so. So here's some links so you can take a look your self and make up your own mind.

http://www.metanexus.net/      http://www.bvu.edu/~sspr/    http://www.science-spirit.org/   http://www.srforum.org/     http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/tt/2003/sep10/lama.html  http://zygoncenter.org/

Then we have science and the religion of witchcraft.

http://www.witchvox.com/words/words_2000/e_science1.html     http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/29/hallowen/main527379.shtml   http://www.biorationalinstitute.com/shownews.php?nid=30   

This site says witchcraft made science. They use a story and give dates and people's names.  http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/books/fodor/chapter19.htm

I do not see science complaining about witchcraft being mixed with science. Only when God is mixed do I see them having a problem. The word science is first mentioned in the bible Daniel 1:4 4.  Children in whom was no blemish, but well favoured, and skillful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king's palace, and whom they might teach the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans. 

Notice the word "Chaldeans". Chaldeans were inhabitants of southern Babylonia. Babylon was the capital of Babylonia. Remember, Babylon is where evolution was first thought up. Funny how Babylon, by the mention of the Chaldeans, gets into the same verse together where science is first mentioned in the bible. I think God put that there for a reason.

Note: Babylon is 55 mile south of present day Baghdad.

And here we see a warning to Timothy concerning science: Timothy 6:20-21, 20.  O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
 21.  Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen. Here we see a warning, and also an error(erred) in professing it concerning faith. So here we see God's word saying not to mix science with faith.

Science becoming a religion

When ever you mix anything together that has opposing views. One day you will be forced to have to choose which it is that you want to believe. As you do so, you make your own religion. The reason I say this is because someone else in the same dilemma might make a different decision. Since this may be hard for some people to imagine what exactly I'm talking about. I'll make a chart with examples on how along the way you will have to make a decision. I will use the OEC belief as an example.

What God says:	What science says:
Created man.	Man evolved.
Created in 6 days.	4.5 billion years.
He spoke everything into existence.	Came from an explosion.
Written word for creation.	Theories and stuff they dig up.

I could go on. But you can see that decisions have to be made. You either go with one or the other. And since God and his word is truth, to go with what science is saying, is to omit God. To omit God's word, is to omit God. So do you say we are 6 thousand years old, or 6 billion? Yeah, but science has found etc..... Yeah but you and science just omitted and replaced God with etc.... It does not matter how small the thing is that you choose that goes against the word of God is. As long as it omits any part of his word it also in turn replaces God word with another belief.

Neither 6 thousand or 6 billions years can really be proven scientifically. Why? Because of certain conflicts. There is evidence that the earth is young and old at the same time. And because science has decided to go with the old and throw away the young, they have to find and push all that supports the old. And in turn discredit, hide and destroy all that supports the young earth. For if they did not, they would not have come as far as they have in pushing what they believe.

But what about morality? Science has no morals to guide themselves with. God on the other hand has laws written in his word we are supposed to follow. But then again, we are not perfect.

Now in the chart you see above, do you see any middle ground? Does God have middle ground in his word? So you have to choose, right? And if your a Christian why would you put yourself in a situation where you would have to choose between God and science (man)?

There is only one God, one word, one son(Jesus), one cross, and one way to heaven (salvation). To say anything else is to deny all of what God stands for.