Evolution vs. Creation

Why God and science don't mix very well!

Most of what was in God's creation was spoken into existence. Example: God said: Let there be light!... And light appeared. To understand this more clearly on what God has done by speaking something into existence. Imagine, for a minute, that you now have this power. What would your limitations be? Could you not have or create what ever you wanted just by saying it? There would be nothing you could not do. And because all of what God does is in the spiritual realm(eternal), then why do we try to explain Him and all that He has done in the physical(what we see)?

Does time, as we know it, control God? He is eternal so it cannot. For if it did, there would not be an eternity because it would have limitations of time... So science says the earth is over 4 billion years old. Is that time a physical time, or a spiritual time? Since science relies on what it can see, and evidence that they find, and the time referred to(over 4 billion years) is physical because they are relying on physical evidence. But since God can speak things into existence, why would he wait 4 billion years to use element that was needed for 6 day creation? This is why dating techniques aren't accurate(accurate only for the physical evidence, not the evidence for God or what God has created). The power of God to speak things into existence is not added to the equation so therefore the dating will never support God. It will only support the physical evidence that God left behind. His power to create an element, that usually takes millions of years to form, should tell you that His power and ability has no bounds and no physical limitations as we know of.

Some, would then say: You mean God leaves false evidence for us to find? Or that he lied through this evidence?... Knowing that God cannot lie should give you the answer to that. But where does that leave us on the first question?.... Because we do not, and will probably never understand God and the realm he lives in, we can only have faith that what was left that looks much older(physical) is what God(spiritual) left behind during His awesome creation(a by-product of quick creation). For if God could not speak into existence what was needed to create, then he could not have created anything because of this limitation(physical) placed upon Him(spiritual).

Since speaking things into existence has no limitation, as shown above, which of the laws of science would apply to God and why? Which of the laws of science would apply to the power of speaking things into existence, and why?

First off, science would have to be able to study this power(speaking things into existence) in action to make an assessment on it. And until they can, the laws of science cannot apply to what God can or cannot do. And as long as science always looks into the physical, they will never find God(spiritual), nor will they ever know his power to create with no limitations. And because there will be those who will use this physical evidence against God, God and science will always have a bridge that cannot be crossed. And this will always separate God's people from those who believe and support the theories of science. For the two will always conflict because they will always be different.

So are dating techniques correct? For physical evidence, yes it is. But for God's creation and the ability to speak things into existence, it is not and never will be until science gives the possibility of a God and goes at finding the physical evidence from that angle.

This ability to speak things into existence also explains the flood . Science says there is not enough water on the earth to flood it to the point the Bible speaks of. So if God can speak into existence what He needs, then why is there a water problem? Here again, another example of the physical vs. the spiritual.

You see, when you allow the physical(what we can see) to control what God can do, then you are denying the power of God to work in the spiritual realm. This is why it is said that the power is in the word, because God said it, then it happened.

New: The percentage of how close we are to chimps has changed again. Now it's 99.4 percent. This percent changes about as much as their theories change. I thought DNA testing was accurate? For you will be convicted in a court of law with just one DNA test, but yet science just keeps testing this DNA difference and changing it's out come. Which makes me ask the question: Are they tweaking the results so they will support their findings? Or is DNA testing inaccurate? For if they keep doing this, someone may one day use this in a court of law to explain themselves out of a crime. And when that happens, science will find itself trying to explain why they ran these tests so many times, and why each test gave different results?

Note: Science cannot seem to make up it's mind on the difference in DNA percentage between humans and chimps. I have been told that it is now at 96%. Which tells me, they really can't figure out what their talking about. But, I guess that the reason theories were invented. You can be wrong, tell a lie, teach a lie, and the theory makes it all OK. You can read more about it here: AIG I will keep the info below the same as a testament to how scientist can and will twist things to their advantage. I wonder if any of them are in any hurry to correct this mistake in our children's text books? Na, As they would say: It's a theory, what do you expect? So now every child that reads those books will believe a lie of 98.3 %. It's a shame that Christian websites don't know when we are posting lies when it comes to posting theories. And they claim creation is a lie?

"A faithful witness will not lie; but a false witness will utter lies. Proverbs 14:5"

Currently science says that chimpanzees have 98.3 percent the same DNA as humans. Does this mean we are related to them? First I'm gonna give an example of things that are related by 2%. Then we will break down the DNA and see what science is actually saying. And I will try to keep it in terms we all can understand.

A watermelon, a cloud and a Jellyfish only differ by 2%! But are they related? They all contain 98% water. So they are only different by 2%. What is not told I am about to tell you. If you ever had any doubts about this Evolution-Creation thing, you won't after I explain this.

You see the information above at the top of page?

1) Each cell has 2 meters of DNA

2) Average person has 75 trillion cells.

3) Length of DNA in a person=150 x 10 to the 12th power in meters or 46,500,000,000 miles.

4) Distance from earth to sun= 150 x 10 to the 9th power in meters or 93,000,000 miles.

Some answers:

1) If you were to stretch out the DNA in one cell in a straight line it would be 2 meters long.

2) From head to toe, a person has 75 trillion cells. Blood cells, bone cells, brain cells etc... Everything in your body is made up of living cells!

3) If you took all the DNA that's in your body and stretched it out. You could go the the sun from earth and back again, 500 times!

4) Distance to the sun 93,000,000 miles. 93,000,000m x 500 = 46,500,000,000 miles is how long your DNA is in your whole body!

How much information can DNA hold?

The DNA molecule found in the nucleus of all cells can hold more information in a cubic centimeter than a trillion music Cd's. A spoonful of Shapiro's "computer soup" contains 15,000 trillion computers. And its energy-efficiency is more than a million times that of a PC.

Now since you have read all this. How big is 2%?

2% of 75 trillion cells

2%  of 46,500,000,000 miles of DNA

2% of a trillion music Cd's( each CD holds 700 megs of data).If "one" music cd can hold 700 megs, 2% of that would be 14 megs(the 2% of one cd). So 14 megs times 1 trillion = 14 trillion megs! This is how much information 1 DNA molecule holds at the 2% level. And since there are 75 trillion cells, average, in the human body to get the total DNA information, it would be 14 trillion(information on one DNA molecule) times 75 trillion molecules(average DNA molecules in a human body). So 14 trillion times 75 trillion = 1050 trillion megs of  DNA information through out your whole body. 2% of that is 21 trillion megs. Get the picture?

The 2% that science speaks of is so big that science has very well hidden it. What I have told you is why the watermelon, the cloud and the jelly fish really are not related and neither are we when it comes to chimpanzees. But this story goes even further.

Since science makes The "2%" claim. Then why is it we cannot use organs or tissue from the chimpanzees for different things that medical science use tissue for.

Like the heart valve. Doctors don't use a chimp's tissue to make a heart valve. They use either a pig or a cow for it's tissue to make the valve. Why? Because it's tissue is very close to a human and will not be rejected like the Chimpanzees will be. Maybe they should look into whether we came from a pig or cow? But then again, we don't even resemble either one of those animals. And that would make it even harder for science to explain evolution.

Did you know that the DNA of a child will only have 94% of it's parents DNA? There's a 6% difference! But yet an organ transplant can be done between them. But not with the chimpanzee, that supposedly, is a closer match to humans than even the human offspring(according to science). This makes me wonder if this 98.3 percent DNA thing has been doctored up a little to help science explain and push the idea of evolution. How would they Get away with it? Think about it for a second. DNA is a specialized field of work. Most DNA workers are in the medical field. The rest are scientist. And there is not many in this field doing this kind of work. So how hard would it be to doctor up DNA reports and keep someone from checking them? Very easy! How many people you know actually can test DNA, have free run of the machine used to do this so that tests between humans and chimps can be thoroughly tested? So in this field of science you or me or most everyone else has no way to check what is found.

Then we have where a few years ago they (the scientists) tried to prove the relationship between humans and baboons by transplanting a baboon heart in a human. They did this more than once. Everyone they tried it on died in less than a year. Some within days or hours. People dying at the expense of science trying to prove something? Funny how science never uses this mistake as an example. It's not used because it totally goes against evolution. But just think if it had worked, you'd never hear the end of it.

I have been told that my calculations as well as information above is false (about DNA percentages). It is funny that I got the information off of a scientific website that had nothing to do with creation or God. I guess this is a perfect example of science and how it continues to disagree with itself. I guess that's what you get when your facts are just mere theories (a guess, with a working mechanism).

How complicated is our DNA?  New, click on link!

The picture above is a picture of a bird that is only found in the outback. Now, these birds have the mouth of a frog. Yet not one bird evolution diagram I have seen even relates birds to frogs. They use the word reptile, and how many reptiles are there? Science does this because they really don't have enough evidence where they could actually list the exact animals or reptiles birds came from. So a broad answer is needed to cover all bases. Now as you read about evolution of things, make note of all the broad answers given. Answers that never point to one exact thing. Notice also how things are worded when speaking about what they think they know. The word guess is replaced with theorize. This is because it makes the guess not sound stupid. And as they will tell you, there is a difference between a guess that is educated and one that's not. Is there a course to take on this? Guess 101 class sign here. How to turn your uneducated guesses in educated ones.