I recently debated a person on youtube named "h8uall66" who presented himself in one of his videos as a open minded person about not ruling out a god. But earlier he had posted some stuff under one of my videos in which he used the "all creationist are stupid card" and also cussed. In which I blocked him. He got mad and decided to make a video about one of my videos which I saw a month later and responded. He was still mad over the block and acted as if he did not want to talk to me. His ego boiling now for over a month his pride got the best of him so he started to anyway.
I sent him a personal message where I explained to him what made God's word scientific. And he did not respond. He did not want to respond to my questions as I pointed out some facts in the Bible. So I debated him on his blog under his youtube video. And I reminded him on more than one occasion about him not responded to my personal message. A more than a day later he told me that he had made a video of what was on my personal message. Now comes the example of how a evolutionist will attack the messenger because he cannot debunk the message.
He read my personal message on his video. Which is an example of how what you send to a evolutionist, has a very good chance of ending up on the net so that you can be made a mockery of by said person and his friends. So you have to watch what you say to one. They cannot be trusted to keep personal stuff personal as illustrated in his own video. But, he still he did not address one question or subject in the message. This is because he is focused on his unscientific idea of debunking evidence by "attacking the messenger". Still refusing to answer my questions. But more or less tried to make a mockery of what he could not debunk as seen below.
He mixes niceness with snide remarks (a common tactic). And then lies for his cause of defending evolution by telling everyone I'm a child. Which lying for evolution is very common in evolution circles. So if you are going to debate them, get used to it. At this point I got more curious of what type of person h8uall66 is. So I Googled his user name and found that he is a Bible scoffer creationist-Christian hater. Who pretty much buys into the ideas of Richard Dawkins and the Rational Response Squad. He is no different from the people who run this website: http://www.blasphemychallenge.com/
Bible scoffers hate people for what they believe and nothing else. This person has never met me. But I can honestly say he does not like me. And the reason is because what I believe disagrees with his views of what he thinks everyone else has to accept as truth. But his main hate and contempt is for the Bible and "anyone" who believes it. But because I took "his word" in one of his videos that he had not discounted a god that made all this (creating the universe). I allowed myself to be suckered into his bait video. This is why you need to do research on a person who debates you. 9 times out of 10 you can find them lying on several issues about what they actually believe, because they want to bait you into a debate under false understanding of what they believe (false world views).
As one member of a forum said about his genetics training (lied about it): Pic from forum.
They will even claim false world views to try and gain an advantage (Claim to be a Christian who believes in evolution): Pic from forum.
It's a game where they like to toy with creationists because they hate God and any believer that much. Why else make mocking videos that call creationist names etc...? It is certainly not out of love. But it is a fine example of what evolutionists have to do to keep their theory top dog, and as the top accepted theory. Attack all others that disagree in anyway shape or form. Even through unscientific tactics.
The need to be right on every issue:
Just to show you how those like h8uall66 have to be right on every issue, and every comment. He makes another video to the praise of his trolling friends.
How many people do you know that respond to your personal messages with a public video? I have never had this happen but h8uall66 thinks it's an everyday event as I should have done research to find this out. Now I want you to notice the times that he quotes on this video above, which made me go look up a comment he made which can be read here:
You see, he did not "tell me" he made the video response to my personal message until 5 hours ago. In his rage of hate he most have forgot. Knowing that he made this video instead of just responding as most people would. He could have just told me sooner instead of making a "deception" like this. You can see his response here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiWHnndRD_I Now lets see if he will delete it to also show that he is never wrong. And then accuse me of lying, and make another video to claim this.
But what does all of this really show? That debating a person like this on any level is a waste of time. You cannot tell when they are lying or telling the truth. And they get so mad if you happen to out do them on any issue, they will never let you forget. Here is one of the comments that I suspect set him off:
Me: (responding to his answer that everything that needs to evolves together). Because that is a cop out answer. It's like saying: Poof there it is. Why? Think about it. Anything that is more complexed takes more mutations, correct? So is every thing in the human body made with the same exact complexity? No. So more mutations to evolve = more time needed. You see, by actually saying this. You are actually adhering to the creation idea where it was all created at the same time. All evolved together = all created together.
What happened here is that I asked him the question: Which evolved first. Then I listed some human systems, organs and body parts that have to work together in order to work or even exist. He used the "god did it type excuse": Why can't they just evolve together? Easy and feasible sounding until you start to look at all the variables. Some systems, organs, and body parts are more complexed than others which means more mutations are needed for them to form. Which can be safely concluded they could not evolve together. So h8uall66's "god did it type answer" does not work. And I showed him this using "his own evolutionist logic" which he could not refute. And I showed him how it looks like the same type of answer from the people he hates most (creationists). He did not like being categorized like that, so I suspect he blew a fuse at this point. Proof? It was just 10 hours later that the other video showed up.
So you have to note that when you use the evolutionist logic of reasoning against them to show them they are wrong, some will get pissed to the point that h8uall66 did. Now I suspect his next move will be to get mad once he finds this page, which like the video where he did not inform me of, I'm not going to tell him about this page either. If he says anything, I'll just refer him to doing his research as he did me. But with all that you do h8uall66, what did you expect? That you could just post negative stuff about everyone else that you disagree with and no one would pay you back in kind?
You see, h8uall66 thought he could brow beat me into submission with his logic, insults, snide remarks, and now personal attacks. As he says in one response, after I told him I was no longer responding, which is one of his goals:
The last sentence is his goal since he cannot debunk or respond to some of my comments where I used his own logic against him. If I run away, as he suggests, it lets him off the hook. I left because as I said before, it's useless to debate someone like this. If I stayed, where do you think this debate would have went when it's already at this level, and to what point would I want it to get any worse? This youtube member pretty much sums up why I cut off this debate with h8uall66.
Stupid reaction to words.
Kent Hovind. The common escape goat for evolutionists not wanting to ponder God or creation:
Not only will evolutionists blame Hovind for not believing. But they will also categorize "all" creationists to this man. This is why I pull the Hitler connection to evolution card when they try this. Their goal here is guilt by association. To allow one man's views to effect a whole choice shows that they were "looking" for an excuse not to believe. And Hovind, being used as the excuse, fits the bill nicely.
Narcissism: Self love based on self image or ego.
Because of his excessive will to prove me wrong on every video I have put up on youtube. He is trying to justify himself, and feed his ego and self image, that he is right, and always will be. He is not satisfied by calling me a liar, but because I bruised his Narcissistic ego, he now wants to take it to an extreme as he now says this:
I have currently, 43 videos. Now what do you think of someone that would waste time, from their life, to view 43 videos, extract what he wants to make fun of, make a video using himself as the star trying to prove me wrong on every issue (Narcissistic action)? I don't mind people who disagree, but to the point this person has become obsessed with this. It has come to the point I may have to report him to youtube. If he makes the video that he speaks of, I will have to start another page. This one has become to long.
