Global warming vs Evolution
Page udated: Saturday, June 07, 2008
So in the first instance pollution from volcanic eruptions created our clean atmosphere that we have today (over billions og years). In the second instance, due to Global Warming, those same gases now destroy the atmosphere and eventually all life. Their excuse? The 1-3 degree change is happening to fast. Really? There is no observable way to know how fast the tempreture changed in past history where there were no records kept. So here again we have speculation. Why? Because that is how it had to happen, is what they will claim. And all this is based on believing that given enough time all things are possible.
So what creates our atmosphere now destroys it? That's like an oxymoron claim. This is because our atmosphere was able to recover from a much worse condition than Global Warming, but yet Global Warming is going to kill us? Evolutionists should be proud of the Global Warming fact. Why? What was not observable will now be observable and we will be the only generation to see it.
What will we see? Evolution is about adapting to our enviroment, right? So Global Warming is going to force all life to adapt or die (survival of the fittest). So what's the problem? Don't like the struggle for life? Or maybe Global Warming is fixing to prove that life can only adapt so much, and everything will die. Won't that be great? We will finally get to see first hand if evolution is true. And that we all stake our lives that it is, and if not we become extinct. So you see, top of the chain animals (as evolution would name us) are very fragile that we could become extinct. Now does that sound like evolution is working, the fittest (Humans) will survive? Global Warming says we won't. And that some how, our cars and industry, has out done all the volcanic eruptions nature has ever produced that supposetly created the clean atmosphere. Sounds more like the truth is finally coming out.
Global Warming is basically making all life have to face the facts of the "real world" situation that science is not always right. And that speculation does not change reality. And that there are absolute laws that allow us to exist on this planet. We will only adapt up to a certain point, after that we all die. Because if the crazy weather does not kill us. Lack of food, and the heat waves will. Sound scary? That is the part that science won't tell you. But they will claim: If we stop pollutting, the earth will some how correct itself. Let's put that claim to a test...
| 1) Can it be proven that if we stop polluting that the earth "will" correct itself and all will become normal? Nope. |
| 2) Is this claim provable? Nope. |
| 3) Is this claim testable and retestable in a lab? Nope. |
| 4) Is there any evidence what so ever that this will happen? Nope. |
So all of this is basically made on specualtion with no garuntees what so ever. Some even suggest that we may have already crossed the threashhold of no return. If that is so, then how did early earth recover from all the volcanic pollution? So show us, scientific people, that the pollution we produce today is more than what was produced back then. Then explain how the earth recovered from that, but we cannot recover from supposed Global Warming? You cannot not because "all" claims made by scientific world are done on speculations. Specualtions that one day we learn the truth about the hard way. And that is by first hand experience.
Don't believe me? Ask any Global alarmist if he can give you 100% proof that all that is claimed about Global is true. He cannot. So all life on this earth now hangs on the specualtions of science that cannot even be proven, tested, or any evidence that it will happen just how they claim it will. So instead of science being the hero of the science fiction movies. They actually become the villian in real life reality. Because they really have no answers that are testable, provable, or any evidence. Just specualtion.
Click next to continue...
