First video in player below shows where I worked out a debunk for abiogenesis using Miller's experiment.
Page updated: July 17, 2010
Site has been transferred to a faster server. So all pages will now load much faster.
In the video player above. There is videos of a new singer song writer who is so good at what she does she gets 5 stars on every video she leaves on youtube. (link) Her voice is so amazing I figure it's worth a mention here. Just click on the "Kari Jobe" name and listen. You will be hooked like so many on youtube already are. Also in the video player above there are 3 full length creation videos. Fine tuned universe (Priviledge Planet), Case for the Creator, Unlocking the mysteries of life.
Some facts about Darwin and Lyell that most evolutionists don't want you to know:
1) Neither Darwin or Lyell had "any" degrees in science.
2) Darwin's only degree was in theology. He was going to be a preacher before he boarded the Beagle (ship).
3) Lyell had a degree in being a lawyer. But he wrote the book that made Darwin question God.
4) In the day that Darwin earned his degree in theology, what they taught was Bible literalism. Which also means that Darwin was taught and believed in the literal six day creation. Which would make him a YEC before he rejected God to write his theory.
5) Lyell was basically a Bible scoffer who hated God, and used a type of intelligent peer pressure technique to convince people to his way of thinking. Which basically told people that unless they believed the way he did, they would be deemed as ignorant and uneducated. And as you probably know this same technique is used by evolutionists even today.
So if you ever wondered why evolution seemed so well put together to conflict with YEC. You have to remember that the person who wrote it turned against YEC because of the peer pressure Lyell wrote in his book. And if you wonder where the actual idea came from for man coming from animals. It was from part of Darwin's teachings where he had to learn about other pagan religions while earning that theology degree. But his father had already wrote a book of his own. One Darwin used to write his first book on evolution. So the idea that man came from animals can be traced back to the time of Moses. Where Egyptian religion believed this (man came from slime from the Nile river), and their gods were half man half animal. So evolution actually has it's roots in Pagan religion, and Darwin was not the originator of that idea. He just made it popular, and introduced it to science as a way to replace God and the Bible that he had rejected.
Darwin and plagiarism?
Darwin's father, Erasmus Darwin wrote a book called: Zoonomia, The laws of organic life. Most all of Darwin's book, Origin of species, was based on his father's writings and ideas. But Darwin never gave credit to his father. Which means he took credit for his father's writings. This has been known by the scientific world for years. It is not talked about because they do not want to tarnish the person whom takes credit from someone else for the main theory of science. Evolutionists do not even like using the word plagiarism concerning this issue. They will claim that Charles Darwin more fully developed the book his father wrote (link), even though his son takes full credit.
Was evolution written to combat the Christian faith?
Here is a letter from Charles Darwin to his son George:
P.S. Oct 22d. Hen. has taken your M.S. to London, & will write.— I have lately read Morley's Life of Voltaire & he insists strongly that direct attacks on Christianity (even when written with the wonderful force & vigour of Voltaire) produce little permanent effect: real good seems only to follow from slow & silent side attacks.— I have been talking on this head with Litchfield, & he strongly concurs, & insists how easily a man may for ever destroy his own influence.
Science, is fundamentally, a game with one over riding and defining rule:
Let's see how far, and to what extent we can explain the behavior of the physical and material universe in terms of purely physical and material causes without "EVER" invoking the supernatural. [Involving God] in the explanation constitutes a form of intellectual cheating. A chess player is perfectly capable of smashing his opponents king on the floor during a tournament, but this does not make him a champion because the rules were not followed. Evolution is not promoted because of overwhelming evidence in it's favor, nor is creation rejected for lack of evidence. The biblical creation model is simply ignored because scientists are trained to ignore this possibility. They would be accused of "cheating" if they did accept the evidence for creation.
Answers to questions that evolutionists like to ask a creationist:
1) Why was the appendix created? It has no purpose. In other words, the evolutionists are trying to pass this off as a redundant organ, and that there was no intelligence involved in creating it. Which in their view proves evolution. But as usual, they stuck their foot in their mouth on this one, because God does not create redundant junk. The appendix acts as a safe house for good bacteria in our digestive tract (link).
2) Why was the Coccyx created? The Coccyx not only has nerves that go through, but several muscles in the buttocks area are connected to this. Including some that help you evacuate. So with it removed you would have some problems.
The evolutionists are trying to claim that the Coccyx (part of our tail bone) is left over from us evolving from Chimps. And that it has basically no function in our bodies. You can read more about this here: Wikipedia . You will also notice their attempt to use this for evolution. In every instance you find this done on any site promoting evolution, you will notice that what muscles connect to the Coccyx are omitted. Leaving out known information like this is a planned deception by evolutionists. For why else do they do this? To sell to the masses what is not true. Giving only half of the information is lying. And in a court of law, withholding truth is breaking the law.
3) Why do we have wisdom teeth? Wisdom teeth are a throw back from the giants that used to exist in Biblical times.
Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
These giants also had double row teeth. And is why some are still born with double row teeth.
Giants had bigger jaw bones, which means they held more teeth. We have smaller jaw bones which means these extra teeth have to come in as wisdom teeth. Also, this would explain why wisdom teeth come in, in later years. For even the giants jaw, as children, was not big enough yet to take them. So coming in the later years (teen to adult years) was encoded into the DNA instead of coming in when all the other teeth did. Which would have caused problems for children and many would have died from infections of the abscessed wisdom teeth in times when medical help was not available. The videos below are on giants.
4) Why was the spleen created? It has no purpose (what one evolutionist told me in an e-mail).
a) Spleen acts as a filter against foreign organisms that infect the blood stream.
b) Filters out old red blood cells from the blood stream and recycles them.
c) It also manufactures red blood cells as a minor role, and can take over this task if the bone marrow quits doing this for what ever reason.
5) Who created God? The question is self cancelling, and here's why. Once you figure out who created God, then you would have to figure out where that came from. And this can go on for infinity. Just like asking the question: Where did the first matter come from for the big bang. If you could answer that, and apply the same logic, you would also have to answer where the source for that matter came from, and that would go on for infinity. So the question is in no way scientific. It is a lame attempt to disprove God. And shows to what lengths evolutionists will go to, when their theory is weak.
6) Why is their so much violence in the old testament? In the old testament, when people die, they did not go to heaven or hell. They did what the Bible terms as: slept with his fathers. Which basically means that your soul stayed with your body. Being that there was no punishment for sin after a person died in the OT, that punishment was carried out on earth instead. And the reason children were included in this punishment was because the sins of the father affected the whole family, This is why the Bible warned fathers about this. But people don't listen, so the suffering will be their fault. Christ making a new covenant where everyone went to where they are supposed to (no more slept with the fathers) changed all that. The punishment for sin is now "after death" instead of before it. Just do a bible search in the OT on the words: "Slept father". And you will see several verses on this.
Does the human heart prove evolution wrong?
Recent medical findings have found that the human heart plays several roles with how we actually feel and think. In fact, the human heart is the only organ that can communicate with the brain in 4 different ways:
1) Neurological communication (nervous system)
2) Biophysical communication (pulse wave)
3) Biochemical communication (hormones)
4) Energetic communication (electromagnetic fields)
This would explain why our heart hurts when we lose some one near and dear to us. And it is now believed that one of the functions of the heart deals with our emotions and attitude. But because heart transplants have become more of the norm for a failing heart. Another unexpected side effect has come up. The people who received the donor heart can often experience:
1) The other person's memories.
2) The other person's food cravings.
3) Some of the other person's attitudes.
4) And some of the fears, hates, and loves of different things.
Here is the picture of the little brain that is found in the human heart.
As the video below will show as several heart transplant people tell their stories.
This would explain why Christ resides in a person's heart when they are saved. It also explains why God said that He hardened Pharaoh's heart towards Moses instead of changing his mind. God knew, even before medical science, that emotion of love and hate reside in the heart and not in our minds. If you would like to do more study on this new area of research. Google these words: Heart brain, Heart brain connection, Heart math , Heart transplant memories. Those who would like to do a Biblical research, just use a Bible search engine and search for the word heart. You will see the word of God start to make sense in this area, when before this information came out, it did not.
Does medical science prove this as well?
When you take an antidepressant. What is the main side effect that is a warning if you try and get off of it all at once? Heart attack. Now are we treating the heart or the brain for depression? If the side effect is a heart attack, and not a brain meltdown, what do you think is most affected by the antidepressant drug? The heart is. So even though I have read many atheist blogs and websites that make fun of the claim about the heart playing a big role in our emotions. They cannot deny the fact that their own research supports it. Because there is not one ingredient in antidepressants that affect the heart muscle in any way. So what is it that causes the heat attack any how? Proof of what is claimed here but denied by those who know such proof proves design and not random chance.
Mother and Babies heart must work together?
When a woman is pregnant. There are two hearts beating in the same circulatory system. This can cause problems unless there is a design in allowing these two hearts to work in parallel function. If there is not a design allowing this, the two hearts can cease to function. Or just the babies heart will cease to function. This design has to be in place, and functioning the very moment the woman becomes with Child. If not, one or both will die. The problem this poses for evolution is that there is no "TIME" available for natural selection, or survival of the fittest to take place. It was either there and function when needed, or the species goes extinct because the offspring dies. More can be read here: http://www.yecheadquarters.org/catalog7.2.html It's about half way down the page. If you ever wondered what the term: "Hole in the heart" means. And why it can be deadly to a child. This page is what you want to read.
How long can a mother and child survive when these things are not in place and functioning correctly? A few days, maybe a few weeks. Which does not support the millions of years that is required for evolution to work.
Heart muscle a special design?
The heart has to pump blood 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Or you will die. In order for the heart to achieve this, it has to have a muscle that never gets tired. If you have ever done anything where you got tired and had to sit and rest, think of how it would be if your heart had to quit beating to take a rest? But yet people can work all day, run marathons, work out, sleep etc... And the heart just keeps on beating. So if the muscle of the heart is not the type that allows the continued use of this organ once life needed it. The species dies and becomes extinct. The heart's function requires that each ability to be there and fully functioning. And because it will cause death if it is not, there is no room for error that is required for natural selection or survival of the fittest. And "TIME" does not help because "TIME" is not the factor. Being perfect upon it's creation, the very first time, is. And that leaves no room for it to have evolved. How long can one survive with a heart that does not have this special muscle? One day. Which does not support the millions of years that evolution requires.
Heart rate control disproves evolution?
Upon the heart being able to function comes a problem of how it should function. Such things as:
1) At what rate should it beat?
2) How hard should it beat?
3) What rhythm should it beat?
Why is this important? Continued high blood pressure can damage many things in the body. Every organ can be damaged including the brain. The blood vessels suffer damage as high blood pressure makes them stretch and expand as they try to hold in the high pressure. This damage to the blood vessels causes aneurysms as blood vessels burst. And on the other extreme, to low of a blood pressure can make you pass out, weak, and unable to function. So a variable heart rate controller has to be in place and functioning "correctly" once the heart is functioning. Anyone who has to take meds to control their heart because of a malfunction in this area can relate to what I am speaking of.
Does medical science prove this as well?
Yes, there are several medications available for all kinds of heart problems:
1) Ace inhibitors.
2) Beta blockers.
3) Calcium Channel blockers.
None of these were available during the evolution process which means the life form would die, or suffer all it's life.
The heart also requires 2 substances for the muscle to function without getting tired and stop beating. These substances also regulate how the heart functions.
If either substance is either low, or to high. The heart will not function which can lead to heart attack or death. So a balance is needed so that life can survive. But because evolution is about need and then the need is met. It does not work here because the need has to be instantly met. Or the life-form dies. Providing what is needed before it's in the DNA that it's needed. Shows that intelligence is involved because for-thought is involved. Otherwise it would be like building a car that burns gasoline before technology found a way to make gasoline. The car won't function without gasoline just like the heart will not function without the balance of those two substances.
How long can one survive without proper heart beat regulation? Days, weeks, or maybe months. But being unable to care for one's self due to being sickly because of heart problems makes surviving not an option. And therefore the millions of years that is required for evolution to work does not work here.
Heart valve design disproves evolution?
Anyone who has had a heart valve replacement can relate to what I am about to speak of. The heart valve has to be designed correctly in order to not allow back flow or leakage as the blood flows in one direction. It also has to not damage the blood cells that flow through it as it opens and closes. If the blood cells become damaged, the body reacts to this as bleeding in that area. At which point blood clots will be made to try and correct what the body thinks is where bleeding is going on. But what this does is send blood clots to the brain, legs, and other organs. Which can cause death or organ damage. This is why heart valve replacement recipients have to take blood thinners to block the clotting process. So what this proves is that if the heart valve is not perfectly designed the very first time, clots will form and the offspring dies. There is no room for "TIME" to be a factor, and therefore natural selection and survival of the fittest will not work when millions of years are not available for something that has to be perfect the very first time.
Does the blood brain barrier prove evolution wrong?
The brain requires tight border security to maintain levels of nutrients and keep out toxic substances. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a virtually impermeable network of tight junctions between endothelial cells that prevents para-cellular flow of materials. Because we don't always eat the right things, the Blood Brain Barrier is needed to keep the wrong things out of the brain. The brain is full of chemicals that are balanced and allow it to work the way that it does. If that balance is thrown off, it can cause several mental problems including total insanity, or a brain so damaged the person becomes a vegetable. So how does a tight junction network evolve and know exactly what to allow in, and what to keep out of the brain? Any insane species will die or kill their own offspring. Or not take care of themselves or their offspring. And because this Blood Brain Barrier has to be working when the Brain was needed. Here again there is no time for trial and error that is required for natural selection. Why?
Think about it. If the blood brain barrier does not filter out the harmful stuff, then how is the species supposed to develop a learning capability? A damaged brain cannot develop. And if the blood brain barrier filters out to much, the brain will starve of the nutrients needed to function and quit functioning. So it has to function correctly the first time it's needed or the species dies.
Does the Pancreas prove evolution wrong?
The pancreas provides insulin so that our bodies can metabolize sugar. Not enough insulin and you die. To much insulin and you die. Which means there is no room for trial and error here and natural selection to work. Either the pancreas was ready to work like it should, fully able to regulate blood sugar and how much insulin is needed. Or the species dies. It has to be there and functioning correctly or death is certain. Anyone with type 1 or 2 diabetes can relate to what I am speaking of. Just imagine if you were born in an age were there was no treatment for your problem? You would die. Not being able to regulate blood sugar gives the evolving subject only a few days to live. And since evolution has to have millions of years, it does not work here.
See a fish that defies evolution.
A fish with a clear head like a jet canopy? How and why would something like ths evolve?
How to use this site:
Each section of this site is made like a book. When you read one webpage, you just click the next button at the bottom to continue. Most sections have a set of links on the first page to where you can skip forward in reading if you like. Some sections have several pages, others do not. And when you reach the end of one section, the next button at the bottom will not work. Which means there is nothing more to read.
If you are a frequent visitor to this site, we have a what's new section (link to the left) that shows any new info, or web pages. I try and keep it updated every two weeks.
In order to view this site correctly, flash player is needed. It's free and you can download it here: Flash File size: 476k. Installs automatically into Explorer browser. To view animated gifs that are on this website. You must have JAVA plugin: Java plugin. There are quite a few flash movies on this website. Just click on some of the links to your left. Yec, E vs. C, OEC, Flood, and study all have flash movies. Click and enjoy.