Evolution's hall of shame.

Science always likes to discuss mutations like they are "always" beneficial. Or at least 99.9 % that way. But, here we are, at the top of the food chain, and it is a known medical fact that cancer is a mutation. And cancer is an example of how a mutation can kill you. Not bring you to a higher life form, but put you six feet under. You would think as long as cancer has been around, our bodies would have mutated some type of defense to combat against it. But what most people don't understand, the cancer was actually the bodies reaction to the problem presented.

Cancer is caused by several different things. But they all point to one problem. Something that is in the body, that has an effect at the cellular level. Whether it be chemicals, genetic, or lack of oxygen. The reaction is the human body trying to survive, but instead mutates something that kills it instead. Why is not these types of mutations discussed with the so called major mutations of evolution? It is because as long as science can sell evolution as an easy to do thing, like baking a cake. The public will not question it. But if the whole truth about mutations were put along side what science claims about evolution, it would make people think. People who think on their own, in ways that do not go along with the scientific view, are a huge threat to all that science is.

Here's a picture of cells mutating to form cancer. Is cancer the higher form of evolution? If natural selection is a form of the strongest survive. Then cancer is the winner. For we did not have the technology we do now to fight cancer, so over the millions of years of mutations. Why did we not be over come by what kills so many? And even with what we are already doing, the treatment itself often kills us. Cancer is the dominating mutation, like what you see in that picture. What dominates also survives, correct? Cancer will stop evolution in it's tracks, because the evolving subject does not survive.