Evolutionists claim there was no way to keep the word of God true.
It is claimed by skeptics that writing was not done much, before the flood. In fact it is said that most of God's word was past through word of mouth. Which would open God's words to several types of errors, and story changes. Which is exactly what the evolutionists and skeptics want everyone to believe. But if you ever notice, they never back this up with the earliest writings ever found. Here are some links where it can be read about the earliest known writings.
5,500 years.
8,600 years.
Etc...
And if creation is true, there would be no writings past 10,000 years old (giving 2000 year leeway for dating mess ups). And that is what we find.
Having a form of writing, and a way to write means that records can be kept, and passed down from generation to generation. Therefore keeping the events in God's word true. Skeptics, scoffers, evolutionists, atheists etc... Will often make claims about the word of God, in which they really have no backing for. They are hoping that you will take their word for it, and that would be the end of discussion. But as I have shown here, and in other sections of my site. A lot of them lie, and they really don't care about truth. I used to take them at their word, but I have caught so many of them lying, I only trust about 10% of what they say or claim when it comes to the word of God, or the evolution vs. creation debate. Leaving out information is a deception. And something that is supposedly proven (evolution), should not require deceptions. The evidence should be able to stand on it's own.
Only a lie requires more lies to continue it's deception.
There's only one source for the word of God, as to what happened during that time period, and that the Bible has been rewritten so many times, it can't be true:
This is another claim made by the same people who say that the word of God was passed down by word of mouth only. Problem is, they are wrong and they know it.
