Evolution's hall of shame.

This is one of God's creations that just gives evolutionists headaches. Why? As simple as this life form can be, God made it just so it would show that there is no way it could have evolved. The problem for evolution is that this design is just like an electric motor.

Being that the design is the same would mean that both objects were created. Why? Did the metal electric motor evolve? Why not? So now apply the why not to the other picture and you will see it is impossible. For the bacteria could have evolved fins to swim through liquid much easier than evolving a molecular motor. Do you know what else makes this a created only design? It's size as seen below.

So what is evolutionists explanation for things they cannot explain? Make jokes about it, like the comic below:

Science 101 at it's best. For when they do not have an answer, make a joke about what they know was created, and who created it. It makes real good evidence for their theory. Putting God into the picture above is an actual admission that there is a God. And also goes along with this verse:

rom 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

So they waste their time puttting up websites to make even more jokes. The search engines searches below prove that the battle for so called truth has nothing with truth. But the removal of God. For you will find that the same people who call creationist stupid to make their theories look better. Also say the same about anyone who believes in God. So the arguments are not of a scientific nature, they are of a bias racist nature that seeks to force, and control the thoughts of everyone through the peer pressure of being categorized with a group they deem as stupid, ignorant, uneducated, weak, fundies (fundamentalists), etc... Which by the way is a Hitler tactic.

So if you narrow down all the searches to what each one has in common, it would be God. So if you have anything to do with God, everything that is said in the searches below applies to you.

Words used in search.	Search engine used to make search (click on link).
Stupid Creationist	Yahoo.
Stupid Christian.	Google.
Stupid Christian.	Yahoo.
Christian fundies.	Yahoo.
Christian fundies (fundamentalists).	Google.

Most searches get over a million hits of things to read about how stupid any God fearing person is. This is what our tax dollar goes and funds in our schools. And this is why science need not be a government funded organization as long as they have evolution as their main theory. Because this is what the claimed smartest minds are doing. And a lot of them do this from their desks where they are getting paid by our tax dollars. I guess figuring out ways to cover up mistakes, lies, and deceptions, is more important then finding cures. For if they spent same amount of time working on their science projects that they spend worrying about God's influence. They would have more answers for questioned asked.

But I suspect they have gone about as far as they can go in this theory of evolution. And the mess they left in the wake of just throwing stuff out their for people to believe. Is taking most of their time to cover up. This is why think tanks are needed. More than 50% of a think tanks time is taken up by trying to figure out ways for damage control. Damage control for the existing mess they have left that is now in question. So they resort to cartoons, forums, think tanks, secret forums, etc... All for what reason? To move science forward, or damage control? I estimate there is 30-50% lies in school text books that science refuses to remove. Theories and ideas that have been proven wrong over a 100 years ago, are still in there. Funny how new findings get put into a text book in the next issue, but disproved finding get left in there. And people wonder why I don't like science? For as long as evolution is part of it, science will always be full of lies. Leaving dis-proven theories in school text books is evidence of this.

Their excuse for leaving lies in the text books to be taught to our children? What will we replace it with if we remove them? So the scientific teaching here is: It's better to teach lies then have nothing to teach at all. Makes a lot of sense don't it?

Only a lie has to be covered by another lie, or deception. With holding truth is lying to those you wish not to tell this to.