Fair usage comment: Site is used to educate people about creation, and is an ongoing research to find truth. It is also a critisism of any untruth evidence that may be found.
Not much to go on is it? But yet evolutionists will claim that Lucy had human feet and hands. Can you even tell what the feet and hands look like from that picture above? Can you tell whether the face was almost human as evolutionists will claim it is. Need evidence of that claim?
And when asked about this, their reply was nothing short of having faith in what is impossible to prove.
This is a fine example of a dececption impression evolutionists want to sell our kids and anyone else who would believe what this exhibit represents. It is no different from the Piltdown man scam. (link) Sell to the public what cannot be proven, and use known false representation of the evidence. Why else put human feet and hands on Lucy when there is no evidence of either? I wonder which evolutionists scientist will expose this lie and deception (this is how they get out of it by saying it was another evolutionists that exposed it, like they do with Piltdown man). The reason only another evolutionists can expose something like this is because no creationist can "ever" prove a evolutionist wrong. Because evolutionist are always right, and have all the answers (link).
So here we have a creationist site exposing the lie and deception Saturday, May 12, 2007 . And which evolutionist will take the credit when this becomes more than they can handle? Not that I would want credit for this, but you watch and see what happens.
So, when does the fake husband, kids, and tools get made? Just like they did with Piltdown man. What this is, is a fine example of what happens when there are no checks and balances in the scientific community. Where no one really speaks out because science is so full of peer pressure, it's like letting off a nuclear bomb if they are challenged on anything that is considered a main foundation of one of their theories. Because most will become relentless on destroying the person who challenged them. They will tell lies about them, their family. Make threats. Which proves that their scientific minds actually know that their scientific ideas are wrong. Personal attacks are just proof that the evidence they claim to have cannot stand up to question. And so the only way to protect such evidence, and keep people quite, is through fear. This is why I don't put my name on this website. I'm not going to be one who has to conceed to their peer pressure.
Did the St. Louis zoo-museum use the scietific method to reach the conclusion about Lucy?
Here is step one of the Scientific Method:
Step one: First, never accept anything as true that I did not know evidently to be so; that is, carefully to avoid precipitous judgment and prejudice; and to include nothing more in my judgments than what presented itself to my mind with such clarity and distinctness that I would have no occasion to doubt it. http://www.lessonplans.com/sci_1.htm
Putting human hands and feet upon Lucy is accepting that Lucy was mainly human with absolutely no evidence to support that. So they are accepting that this is true, even though they evidently did know this. In hopes that it will become true. This is why I often call evolution a religion because a lot of the foundation for it is laid on faith and not fact.
