Shame part 2

And here is why creationists don't do peer reviews:

And here is what happens if your a scientist, and find irrefutable evidence for creation and refuse to suppress it so that evolution can remain supreme.

Dr. Gentry looking through his microscope at the evidence that started all the trouble between him, science, and several universities. Why? Only because it put all theories that are the support pillars for evolution into question. It had not one thing to do with the evidence not being right, or faked. But had everything to do with where the evidence pointed.

Lawsuit over Religious Discrimination and Censorship.

Like so many other scientists who dared to speak the truth about the myriad of scientific problems with evolutionism, Dr. Gentry was persecuted for his beliefs several years ago by a scientific community determined to suppress any opposition to their religion of evolution. He is one of three scientists featured in a video titled: The case for the Creator. Dr. Gentry is cited as one of three examples of scientists who've been the victims of this kind of bigotry.  In September of 2002, Dr. Gentry filed a lawsuit against the National Science Foundation, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Cornell University and others because of alleged censorship of his ten scientific papers that he believes falsifies the Big Bang theory (this lawsuit is unrelated to the original censorship from several years ago).

Dr. Gentry even went as far as to challenge the whole National Academy of Sciences to a debate. Here's the letter:

Earth Science Associates P. O. Box 12067 Knoxville, TN 37912 March 22, 2000 Dr. Bruce Alberts, President National Academy of Sciences 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 Dear Dr. Alberts: On page ix of the 2nd edition, Science and Creationism, A View from the National Academy of Sciences, you state: "Scientists have considered the hypotheses proposed by creation science and have rejected them because of a lack of evidence." On page 7 of the 1st edition, we find: "The hypothesis of special creation has, over nearly two centuries, been repeatedly and sympathetically considered and rejected on evidential grounds by qualified observers and experimentalists." I assume you and other prestigious Academy members are open to changing your views on this topic if you become aware of validated scientific evidence supporting the Genesis creation record. I am therefore inviting you, and as many of your Academy colleagues that you wish to bring or send, to my 7:00 pm. presentation, at Wichita State University on March 30. There I intend to review: (i) the scientific evidence for Earth's rapid creation, evidence which I published in Science, Nature, and Annual Reviews of Nuclear Science during my thirteen-year-long Guest Scientist position in the Chemistry Division at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, (ii) how the ACLU failed to refute this evidence during my testimony at the Arkansas creation trial in December 1981, (iii) how the highest echelons of America's scientific establishment have worked to suppress this evidence from further dissemination since that trial, (iv) the contradiction between, on one hand, the Academy's claims of having rejected the evidence for the Genesis creation on evidential grounds and, on the other hand, its deafening silence concerning my widely published and unrefuted scientific evidence for Earth's rapid creation, and (v) the fact that the Academy's silence about my results cannot be due to ignorance because some of the authors of both editions of the Academy's booklets were aware of my participation at the Arkansas creation trial. I am genuinely hoping that you and your colleagues will respond positively to my invitation and do all in your power to come and explain exactly why the Academy has rejected the published scientific evidence for the Genesis creation, which has now stood unrefuted in the open scientific literature for over twenty-five years. With all the power of the world's most eminent evolutionists to call upon, you certainly shouldn't have any difficulty finding any number who would be most happy to do this, if it can be done. This will he a most opportune time to present your case and then see if I have a valid scientific response to your objections. Be assured that the Academy's absence will speak volumes. In that case I intend to challenge the media to arrange for the Academy to meet me on a live, prime-time TV special to settle this issue publicly. If, as I believe the evidence shows, God left irrefutable scientific evidence, in accord with the Fourth Commandment, that He created the Earth ex nihilo in six literal days (Exodus 20: 8-11), then it is also time that America's taxpayers ask Congress to determine why the Academy continues to suppress free and open scientific inquiry, into what may be the greatest scientific question of our time. Cordially, Robert V. Gentry http://www.halos.com/faq-replies/gentry-to-nas-3-22-2000.htm

They refused to debate Dr. Gentry because they knew they were wrong. So what was it that Dr. Gentry found that started this? Polonium halos with a half life of less than 3 minutes embedded in granite rock. The were two types found.

Here is a picture of what they look like under a microscope. This means that at the most, granite rock has to form around these halos in less than three minutes. But since the other Polonium (PO 214) has a half life of less than 1 second.  The granite rock would have had to form in an instant. This totally denies evolution, old earth, and the age of the universe. Science totally proven wrong, and God plus creation proven right. Censoring, or with holding scientific information to control the conclusion. Is scientific deception. And science is full of this where they will suppress evidence for creation, just so their theories can always look correct.

Here is a picture of granite rock. To see the polonium halos, you break a piece off the rock. Then take a clear piece of tape and put it on a dark spot, where the rock was just broken. The tape will pull off a halo from the rock, so all you have to do is put the tape on a slide. And look for yourself through a microscope. This is what evolutionists do not like about this find. It's so easy to see for yourself. And it's not something that only they can suppress and control. For granite rock can be found anywhere, and all have these halos for everyone to see.

This is one of the many evidence for creation that both student and teachers are getting fired, or thrown out of school for.