Theistic evolution

First we will hit on the main points as to why evolution is incompatible with God:

What God's word says.	What evolution theory says.	Exact opposite?
1) Earth before sun.	1) Sun before earth.	Yes
2) Oceans before land.	2) Land before oceans.	Yes
3) Light before sun.	3) Sun before light.	Yes
4) Land plants first.	4) Marine life first.	Yes
5) Fruit tree before fish.	5) Fish before fruit tree.	Yes
6) Fish before insects.	6) Insects before fish.	Yes
7) Plants before sun.	7) Sun before plants.	Yes
8) Man was created from solid matter.	8) Man evolved from lquid.	Yes
9) Bird before reptiles.	9) Reptiles before birds.	Yes
10) Man brought death in the world.	10) Death brought man into the world.	Yes
11) God created man.	11) Man created God (out of need).	Yes
12) Atmosphere between 2 layers of water.	12) Atmosphere above water	Yes
13) All life was created by God.	13) All life just happened, and evolved.	Yes
14) There is a Creator.	14) There is no Creator.	Yes
15) There are moral rules (sin).	15) There are no rules (no sin).	Yes
16) There is a purpose and goal to life.	16) There is no purpose, no goal.	Yes
17) There is a soul.	17) There is no soul.	Yes
18) There is eternity.	18) There is no eternity.	Yes.
19) Life after death.	19) No life after death.	Yes.
20) Jesus died for our sins.	20) Jesus was a myth.	Yes
21) Heaven and Hell exists.	21) Heaven and Hell does not exist.	Yes.

After reading the above comparison, can anyone explain how evolution became the exact opposite of God's creation? According to God's word, there is only one thing that is the direct opposite of what good is (God). And that is evil. Pure evil is the only thing that can be the "exact" opposite. But maybe this is not convincing enough for the reader? Okay, let's take it a step further.

If God used evolution to create, then evolution should be used to bring people to salvation. I have yet to see anyone saved, or come to Christ do to a sermon on evolution. An idea that cannot lead to the kingdom of God, is not of God. Salvation is the main goal of the gospel. So if the gospel of evolution cannot lead someone to salvation in our schools, colleges, or where ever it is taught. Then God did not use it to create. It is just that simple. For what does not bring you to salvation, actually denies it. And what denies salvation can destroy your faith in what brings salvation through doubt.

As one evolutionist puts it:

Science, is fundamentally, a game with one over riding and defining rule:

Let's see how far, and to what extent we can explain the behavior of the physical and material universe in terms of  purely physical and material causes without "EVER" invoking the supernatural. [Involving God] in the explaination constitutes a form of intellectual cheating. A chess player is perfectly capable of smashing his opponents king on the floor during a tournament, but this does not make him a champion because the rules were not followed. Evolution is not promoted because of overwhelming evidence in it's favor, nor is creation rejected for lack of evidence. The biblical creation model is simply ignored because scientists are trained to ignore this possibility. They would be accused of "cheating" if they did accept the evidence for creation. Richard Dickerson (Biochemist-evolutionist) Member of National Academy of science. Febuary 1, a closer look at the evidence.

Thus the very reason every scientist is thrown out of scientific circles, discredited, and barred. If they accept the creation model, and happen to become a Christain in the process.

Click next to continue...