Something from nothing?

Share this page!

In the big bang theory, it’s basically something from nothing. Science does not know where the matter came from, or the energy that made it expand (inflate or blow apart). In fact if you ask 10 different people, you will get at least 3 different stories about how the origins of everything happened. So what is believed is that matter and energy come from nothing. Why believe something they cannot even begin to prove empirically? It is because the alternative points to an intelligent being. But since most everyone knows about the big bang, let’s see how many answers the intelligent creation can answer that big bang does not and cannot.

1) Because God is eternal, He lives in a eternal dimension. Using matter and energy from that dimension to form this dimension answers many questions.
a) Where did the matter and energy come from? It always existed because it came from a dimension that has always existed.
b) How do laws come into being fully balanced to create order and not chaos? An intelligent being from an eternal dimension created them and balanced them.
etc…

When using deductive logic and reasoning, and you remove all that will not work. What is left is creation by an intelligent being. Science is supposed to follow the evidence where ever it leads, yet it is taboo to follow any evidence that points to the supernatural. Basically that rule makes science more about conformism, in the effect that all evidence has to conform to the naturalistic view of evolution or be rejected. Science cannot find the Creator because their own rules won’t allow it.

In the something from nothing argument below, both Krauss and Dawkins only prove they can B.S. with the best of them. Why do I say that? With all that talk there is zero evidence and a whole lot of assuming going on. Which by the way does not even qualify this as a hypothesis aka educated guess. That is because it’s more about opinions and a worldview then it is about science.

When something takes over 2 hours to explain and yet no one can observe this. It becomes more of selling it then proving it. And there is a big difference between the two.

Video

And if you do not think this is about worldviews, then explain why most atheists cannot leave out trying to discredit God?

Video

My response to Aron Ra is that even your side’s beliefs existed before you claimed them to be science. The belief that man came from animals existed back in Egyptians times and by the way, was called science. They even had an abiogenesis type belief where they thought all life came from the slime that existed around the water’s edge of the Nile River. Hence the reason it was often referred to as the life giver as often worshiped as a deity of sorts.

Darwin having zero scientific degrees but one degree in theology, where do you think his theory came from anyway? He just took one of the pagan beliefs that he read about, repackaged it as science, and you guys bought it.

Share this page!
...8

 

 

 

YouTube

 

 

 

FaceBook Feed
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Ray Comfort
Ray Comfort
Kirk Cameron said, This movie might be the best thing Ive ever seen from my friend Ray Comfort. Watch freely at 7ReasonsMovie.com

Kirk Cameron said, "This movie might be the best thing I've ever seen from my friend Ray Comfort." Watch freely at 7ReasonsMovie.com ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Que tal chicos! Me gustaria saber cuando saldra en español latino? Gracias los veos siempre

It is incredibly powerful.

I watched it just a few days ago. Very well done and thought provoking!

Please. Tell me the name of the Movie I wish to watch it !

I'll share the video when everyone is calm in regards to the ban in Alabama. That way they'd be thinking a bit clearly.

Kirk, Rays partner, gave it a glowing review, what a surprise.

Propaganda with a smirk 🤣😂

View more comments

YecHeadquarters
YecHeadquarters
Well FaceBook, you really starting to piss people off. So drunk on absolute power to censor free speech. People see what you are. And I know you are filtering everything I post. Because it takes 5 - 10 time longer for it to go up. Your AIs are slow in scanning to filter things. Real slow.

And you wonder why I no longer boost my posts? I found out that you filter that too. Got screen shots of graphs to prove it. Heres a picture i saw *someone else post*. Thought you might like to see it since you take the time to read everything else I post. ~ Issac

Well FaceBook, you really starting to piss people off. So drunk on absolute power to censor free speech. People see what you are. And I know you are filtering everything I post. Because it takes 5 - 10 time longer for it to go up. Your AI's are slow in scanning to filter things. Real slow.

And you wonder why I no longer boost my posts? I found out that you filter that too. Got screen shots of graphs to prove it. Here's a picture i saw *someone else post*. Thought you might like to see it since you take the time to read everything else I post. ~ Issac
... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Athiest: *makes vulgar posts* Facebook: ........ Christian's: I believe in doing the right thing. Facebook: This goes against our rules. Don't you know you have to abide by our own personal opinions?

I CANT WAIT til theres another social media site so we can all make the exodus to it!....

So they equate gun post with posting about the Bible humm lawdie

Ark Encounter
Ark Encounter
Truth is found in Gods holy word.

Truth is found in God's holy word. ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

It is worth the trip! I loved it!

We will be there next month.

My favorite part of the ark!!

I would love to go see this!

We'll be back in August!

Lori Ann Colf can’t wait to experience this again.

Amen!

Amen. Chapter by chapter and verse by verse.

View more comments

Hidden History of Evolution
Hidden History of Evolution
~ Issac

~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Evolution is a lie, based on unsupported assumptions.

Science leads to God
Science leads to God
Had to stop the test, cant have evolution proven wrong. ~ Issac

Had to stop the test, can't have evolution proven wrong. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

180 Movie
180 Movie

Are you one of the over 49,500 views who’s watched “7 Reasons” on YouTube since its release a week ago?

We’ve been so encouraged to read the many online comments, such as this one from YouTube:

"This is THE first time I’ve ever cried (quietly flowing down my cheeks and dripping off my chin kinda tears), regarding the abortion I had 9 years ago. I’ve LITERALLY NEVER felt convicted, not once before…And after watching this.. well, yeh.. I’ve just sat here frowning, now my eyes have dried, and thinking to myself, “Wow, what IS happening to me?!”…I’m a feminist, pro-choice (I thought), equality, love and peace to all kinda person. I guess I better think again................. Mind = blown. Thank you for this video."

If you haven't watched and shared it yet, watch "7 Reasons" free on YouTube at 7ReasonsMovie.com
... See MoreSee Less

Creation Research Society
Creation Research Society
Contradictions, Part 7

The following article, Interdisciplinary Contradictions in Evolutionary Theory by Dave Woetzel, appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 23, No. 3, May/June 2018.

Creationists are sometimes accused of being “scientific generalists” who broadly discuss the origins issues. It is true that specialized experience often helps in understanding the context of an issue and having familiarity with the relevant literature prepares one to intelligently engage the issues, but it is also true that the era of specialization has brought an isolationism that can be unhealthy for largescale theoretical model building. Because interdisciplinary expertise is missing, it is easier for contradictions to be maintained in models. 

Paleontologists, for example, may not appreciate how their proposed accommodation to a particular problem stands in stark contradiction to historical scenarios envisioned by the biologists, who are working to resolve their own problems. Evolutionary theory has increasingly become a smorgasbord of competing theories, some of which are mutually exclusive. While multiauthored papers using experts from multiple disciplines are helpful, significant contradictions remain. 

We here surveyed half a dozen areas where opposing hypotheses are entertained by different evolutionary specialties.

Darwinists have been very creative in constructing endless hypotheses and numerous specialized scenarios which are designed to address particular challenges to evolutionary theory. While these tailored solutions might seem to patch over some specific problems, the various scenarios are not plausible within the broader origins model. The fact that such contradictions are allowed to persist should raise serious doubts about the validity of the entire theoretical structure. 

Acknowledgments: I want to express my appreciation to Jean Lightner, Matthew Speights and Walter ReMine for helpful comments.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

Contradictions, Part 7

The following article, Interdisciplinary Contradictions in Evolutionary Theory by Dave Woetzel, appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 23, No. 3, May/June 2018.

Creationists are sometimes accused of being “scientific generalists” who broadly discuss the origins issues. It is true that specialized experience often helps in understanding the context of an issue and having familiarity with the relevant literature prepares one to intelligently engage the issues, but it is also true that the era of specialization has brought an isolationism that can be unhealthy for largescale theoretical model building. Because interdisciplinary expertise is missing, it is easier for contradictions to be maintained in models.

Paleontologists, for example, may not appreciate how their proposed accommodation to a particular problem stands in stark contradiction to historical scenarios envisioned by the biologists, who are working to resolve their own problems. Evolutionary theory has increasingly become a smorgasbord of competing theories, some of which are mutually exclusive. While multiauthored papers using experts from multiple disciplines are helpful, significant contradictions remain.

We here surveyed half a dozen areas where opposing hypotheses are entertained by different evolutionary specialties.

Darwinists have been very creative in constructing endless hypotheses and numerous specialized scenarios which are designed to address particular challenges to evolutionary theory. While these tailored solutions might seem to patch over some specific problems, the various scenarios are not plausible within the broader origins model. The fact that such contradictions are allowed to persist should raise serious doubts about the validity of the entire theoretical structure.

Acknowledgments: I want to express my appreciation to Jean Lightner, Matthew Speights and Walter ReMine for helpful comments.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Ray Comfort has mental retardation ... See MoreSee Less

Pray for Militant Atheist Page.
Pray for Militant Atheist Page.
n case you did not know this. ~ Issac

n case you did not know this. ~ IssacIn case you did not know this. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Where is the evolution?
Where is the evolution?
Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until its rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/living-fossils.html
The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australias earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or little mountain monkey - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina.
Reference: http://www.create.unsw.edu.au/news/2008-03-25_monito.html
The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”
reference: http://www.eartharchives.org/articles/scientists-uncover-two-new-species-of-elusive-south-american-marsupial/

Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until it's rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/…
"The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australia's earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or "little mountain monkey" - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina."
Reference: http://create.unsw.edu.au/news/…
"The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”"
reference: http://eartharchives.org/articles/…
... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Your picture makes it seem like the two species shown are found 55 Ma apart even though they are both modern species. Rather, it was the genus Djarthia (whose exact taxonomic position is uncertain) that occurs in the Paleocene, as noted in the PLOS paper you provided. This graphic is either a misunderstanding or diliberate misrepresentation of the references cited. May I ask what formal training in paleontology the admin of this page has had?

We didn't claim the skulls were from a 55 million year old fossil, it is the references that claim Monito del Monte is regarded as a living fossil and thought to exist: 55 million years ago.

Colby, please stop spamming the contrasts. There is no need to post the same link multiple times, Thank you.

I was just doing a one shot on each post. I didnt even think anyone even looked at this page anymore. I apologize.

Looks like the Colbinator deleted his post 😭

View more comments

Load more