Monthly Archives: "April, 2011"

Living Fossils cause problems for Fossil Record

Living Fossils cause a problem for the Fossil Record because no evidence is found in the in between supposed time eras. Example: The coelacanth fish. It is found in the Devonian period layer and found alive today. Yet it is not found in any other supposed time era above where it was found showing it survive to this point and time. That is 7 supposed time eras it is missing from.

Appearing in the other supposed time eras would prove they survived and did not change. That is if the fossil record is correct in supporting evolution. What we would expect to find, if the fossil record does not support evolution, is no record of living fossils surviving until present time at all. And that’s what we see.

Example: Claiming that the fossil record is accurate even though it does not support living fossils surviving until present time. Would be like saying a big gap in time in your family tree means the records were accurate. It just does not work in supporting evolution. Evolution of the gaps.

If you would like to do more research on this, here is a list of living fossils: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_fossil You can look each one up yourself then ponder why not one is found in any other layer. An accurate record of time would show living fossils surviving. That is if evolution were true. Over 100 times this happens and never is it any other way. Observable repeatable evidence over 100 times is very strong empirical* evidence against evolution, not for it.

Living fossils also have a major problem for evolution. No matter what supposed time era they are found in and alive, their physical appearance is always unchanged aka unevolved.

The Pancreas proves evolution wrong!

The pancreas has to produce just the right amount of insulin at all times. To much blood sugar drops and death occurs. To little and blood sugar rises and death can occur. Anyone who has diabetes can tell you how vital it is to keep blood sugar under control.

Improper blood sugar also leads to secondary problems. Circulation problems, wound healing problems, kidney problems, and eye damage. How would evolution deal with being able to evolve a system that would tell the pancreas what to excrete, when to excrete it, and exactly how much to excrete?

Video

Video

Reversing type 2 diabetes.

Video

The Human Body Systems prove evolution wrong!

There are 10 systems in the human body as shown above. Each system is interdependent upon another in order to work. Which means they could not have evolved separately over long periods of time. They had to be there all at once, ready to work at the very same second all the other systems were. But the evolution excuse is: They all evolved at the same time. There are 2 problems with that answer.

1) It’s not scientific, and is more about making said evidence conform to the current accepted theory. Which is more or less conformism. Conformism is not science.
2) No 2 systems have the same complexity. What this means is that every system would require a different number of mutations in order to form. This means that there is no possible way for all the systems to evolve at the very same time.

Video

Video

Video

The Human Heart proves evolution wrong!

1) Neurological communication (nervous system)
2) Biophysical communication (pulse wave)
3) Biochemical communication (hormones)
4) Energetic communication (electromagnetic fields)

This would explain why our heart hurts when we lose some one near and dear to us. And it is now believed that one of the functions of the heart deals with our emotions and attitude. But because heart transplants have become more of the norm for a failing heart. Another unexpected side effect has come up. The people who received the donor heart can often experience:

1) The other person’s memories.
2) The other person’s food cravings.
3) Some of the other person’s attitudes.
4) And some of the fears, hates, and loves of different things.

Picture of brains from under a microscope from inside the heart

This would explain why Christ resides in a person’s heart when they are saved. It also explains why God said that He hardened Pharaoh’s heart towards Moses instead of changing his mind. God knew, even before medical science, that emotion of love and hate reside in the heart and not in our minds. If you would like to do more study on this new area of research. Google these words: Heart brain, Heart brain connection, Heart math , Heart transplant memories. Those who would like to do a Biblical research, just use a Bible search engine and search for the word heart. You will see the word of God start to make sense in this area, when before this information came out, it did not.

Does medical science prove this as well?

When you take an antidepressant. What is the main side effect that is a warning if you try and get off of it all at once? Heart attack. Now are we treating the heart or the brain for depression? If the side effect is a heart attack, and not a brain meltdown, what do you think is most affected by the antidepressant drug? The heart is. So even though I have read many atheist blogs and websites that make fun of the claim about the heart playing a big role in our emotions. They cannot deny the fact that their own research supports it. Because there is not one ingredient in antidepressants that affect the heart muscle in any way. So what is it that causes the heat attack any how? Proof of what is claimed here but denied by those who know such proof proves design and not random chance.

Heart muscle a special design?

The heart has to pump blood 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Or you will die. In order for the heart to achieve this, it has to have a muscle that never gets tired. If you have ever done anything where you got tired and had to sit and rest, think of how it would be if your heart had to quit beating to take a rest? But yet people can work all day, run marathons, work out, sleep etc… And the heart just keeps on beating. So if the muscle of the heart is not the type that allows the continued use of this organ once life needed it. The species dies and becomes extinct. The heart’s function requires that each ability to be there and fully functioning. And because it will cause death if it is not, there is no room for error that is required for natural selection or survival of the fittest. And “TIME” does not help because “TIME” is not the factor. Being perfect upon it’s creation, the very first time, is. And that leaves no room for it to have evolved. How long can one survive with a heart that does not have this special muscle? One day. Which does not support the millions of years that evolution requires.

Heart rate control disproves evolution?

Upon the heart being able to function comes a problem of how it should function. Such things as:
1) At what rate should it beat?
2) How hard should it beat?
3) What rhythm should it beat?

Why is this important? Continued high blood pressure can damage many things in the body. Every organ can be damaged including the brain. The blood vessels suffer damage as high blood pressure makes them stretch and expand as they try to hold in the high pressure. This damage to the blood vessels causes aneurysms as blood vessels burst. And on the other extreme, to low of a blood pressure can make you pass out, weak, and unable to function. So a variable heart rate controller has to be in place and functioning “correctly” once the heart is functioning. Anyone who has to take meds to control their heart because of a malfunction in this area can relate to what I am speaking of.

Does medical science prove this as well?
Yes, there are several medications available for all kinds of heart problems:
1) Ace inhibitors.
2) Beta blockers.
3) Calcium Channel blockers.
4) Nitrates.
etc…
None of these were available during the evolution process which means the life form would die, or suffer all it’s life

Heart valve design disproves evolution?

Anyone who has had a heart valve replacement can relate to what I am about to speak of. The heart valve has to be designed correctly in order to not allow back flow or leakage as the blood flows in one direction. It also has to not damage the blood cells that flow through it as it opens and closes. If the blood cells become damaged, the body reacts to this as bleeding in that area. At which point blood clots will be made to try and correct what the body thinks is where bleeding is going on. But what this does is send blood clots to the brain, legs, and other organs. Which can cause death or organ damage. This is why heart valve replacement recipients have to take blood thinners to block the clotting process. So what this proves is that if the heart valve is not perfectly designed the very first time, clots will form and the offspring dies. There is no room for “TIME” to be a factor, and therefore natural selection and survival of the fittest will not work when millions of years are not available for something that has to be perfect the very first time.

The Blood Brain Barrier proves evolution wrong!

Think about it. If the blood brain barrier does not filter out the harmful stuff, then how is the species supposed to develop a learning capability? A damaged brain cannot develop. And if the blood brain barrier filters out to much, the brain will starve of the nutrients needed to function and quit functioning. So it has to function correctly the first time it’s needed or the species dies.

Video

Video

Video