Geologic Column, did Noah’s flood create it?

We all have been taught about the Geologic Column in school. It’s the Holy Grail of the Theory of Evolution. The evidence has never been pondered to support anything else but evolution. This is because science has an unwritten rule that prohibits anyone involved to ever pursue evidence that leads in any other direction but to the Theory of Evolution. Don’t believe it? Name one person who has ever challenged the Theory of Evolution that did not have his credibility destroyed for doing so? Just one person. What this does is that it shows everyone else that even though evolution has to remain falsifiable to be a theory, you better not try to falsify it. Which also means that evolution is more about conformism than science. Need more proof? Why is it that only all things that support Darwinian evolution are the only things:

1) Being funded? How can anything challenge Theory of Evolution to make sure it’s a true proven fact if the person who challenges it has to use his own money to do it?
2) Why is there not any other ideas besides evolution being worked upon? Proving evolution is like a horse race. Where all contenders line up in the gates, and when the gate opens, the evolution horse is the only one allowed to run the race. If you think about it in terms of a race like that, would it be fair? Would you pay money to go see a race where the outcome is “always” rigged?

So let’s take a look at what else could have created the Geologic Column.

Genesis 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

The key phrase here is: fountains of the “great” deep were broken up. Now for as much water needed to flood the earth, there would be a lot of sediments coming up with the water. It would look very similar to the black smoker in the Picture above that is spewing black sediments. Except during the flood it would be erupting like a huge volcanoes. Sea creatures caught up in this would be buried according to where they lived in the seas because the burial would be so quick, the sea creature would have zero chance to escape. So if you notice, the Geologic Column has bottom dwellers first which is the correct order it would be for the flood. Then you have the mid-dwellers. And then the top dwellers. The exact order of how such a huge flood would bury the sea creatures.

Then after all the sea creatures are buried, then comes the land animals. Which is correct order of what we see in the Geologic Column if the flood created it. It is ironic that even though science claims the column only supports evolution, that it also goes in the correct order of how things would have been buried in the flood.

Most all evolutionists believe that the geologic column was laid over millions of years of time. But they do not have a working mechanism or explanation as to why each layer is different, and some are the same. Or why the fossil record did not record living fossil time-line (where they are found, until present time). But instead of going into the problems with how the geologic column has the fossils ordered, we will instead concentrate on the formation of it. So do evolutionists have a working process showing how the layers would form over millions of years, or do they base this solely on age dating of each layer?

And do the Creationists have a working process for how the layers were laid by the Flood? In fact they do. The video below is different from anything you will see on the flood. It’s not your average creation video. So it’s well worth the watch as they make a working model for how the flood laid down the layers.

Video

And you would have everyday normal activity of fish being caught in the flood. Such as the fish below eating dinner and being covered up.

Mass graves from being caught in flood.

Soft tissue fossils.

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Check out this size comparison of Falcon Heavy, SpaceX Starship, and Noahs Ark!  

Learn more about the size of the Ark at: https://arkencounter.com/noahs-ark/size/

Check out this size comparison of Falcon Heavy, SpaceX Starship, and Noah's Ark!

Learn more about the size of the Ark at: arkencounter.com/noahs-ark/size/
... See MoreSee Less

... See MoreSee Less

Say hello to the newest resident of the Ararat Ridge Zoo: Gomer the dromedary camel! 🐪

Gomer has transferred to the Ark Encounter from the Creation Museum, where he’s resided since 2008. He is retired from rides, so he will live here with our three llamas and two alpacas to create an exhibit displaying the amazing variation within the camelid biblical kind. Be sure to stop by and see Gomer during your next visit!

Say hello to the newest resident of the Ararat Ridge Zoo: Gomer the dromedary camel! 🐪

Gomer has transferred to the Ark Encounter from the Creation Museum, where he’s resided since 2008. He is retired from rides, so he will live here with our three llamas and two alpacas to create an exhibit displaying the amazing variation within the camelid biblical kind. Be sure to stop by and see Gomer during your next visit!
... See MoreSee Less

Good news! 🎉 The Ararat Ridge Zoo’s petting area is now open from 10:00 - 5:00 every day! 

Our 25 goats like Abednego here can’t wait for guest interaction again. We have sinks and hand sanitizing stations as well as a bathroom facility in the zoo for guests to wash their hands before and after interacting with the goats.

Be sure to swing by the petting area during your visit to the Ark Encounter!

Good news! 🎉 The Ararat Ridge Zoo’s petting area is now open from 10:00 - 5:00 every day!

Our 25 goats like Abednego here can’t wait for guest interaction again. We have sinks and hand sanitizing stations as well as a bathroom facility in the zoo for guests to wash their hands before and after interacting with the goats.

Be sure to swing by the petting area during your visit to the Ark Encounter!
... See MoreSee Less

Origins and Independence

How old is the USA? This is not meant as a trick question. While we could make a case for several different dates of the United States’ founding, Americans celebrate the Fourth of July as the nation’s birthday.

Given the date of 4 July 1776 as the declaration of the nation’s independence, it’s easy to calculate the age of the United States of America.

Imagine that we didn’t know the date and instead had to rely on natural processes such as population growth or technological level to estimate the country’s age. How reliable would these natural calendars be? They would only be as reliable as the assumptions put into their model’s framework. 

While a natural process might be useful in some situations (given correct assumptions), the only way to know the precise age is by a reliable witness. We base age on the testimony of a reliable witness, whether it’s a birth certificate for a person or the Declaration of Independence for the United States of America.

How old is planet earth? Some believe that natural processes can provide an estimate for the age of the earth. The only way to know with certainty is by the testimony of a reliable witness. The plain words of God in the Bible show that the earth is less than 10,000 years old. There is much scientific evidence to collaborate this age also.

We can celebrate the fact that we have reliable witnesses to the founding of nations and to the founding of the planet itself.

GHL

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

Origins and Independence

How old is the USA? This is not meant as a trick question. While we could make a case for several different dates of the United States’ founding, Americans celebrate the Fourth of July as the nation’s birthday.

Given the date of 4 July 1776 as the declaration of the nation’s independence, it’s easy to calculate the age of the United States of America.

Imagine that we didn’t know the date and instead had to rely on natural processes such as population growth or technological level to estimate the country’s age. How reliable would these natural calendars be? They would only be as reliable as the assumptions put into their model’s framework.

While a natural process might be useful in some situations (given correct assumptions), the only way to know the precise age is by a reliable witness. We base age on the testimony of a reliable witness, whether it’s a birth certificate for a person or the Declaration of Independence for the United States of America.

How old is planet earth? Some believe that natural processes can provide an estimate for the age of the earth. The only way to know with certainty is by the testimony of a reliable witness. The plain words of God in the Bible show that the earth is less than 10,000 years old. There is much scientific evidence to collaborate this age also.

We can celebrate the fact that we have reliable witnesses to the founding of nations and to the founding of the planet itself.

GHL

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

May we have faith like Noah to do what God has called us to do.

May we have faith like Noah to do what God has called us to do. ... See MoreSee Less

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 7

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.” 

Numerical Model Development of Earth’s Mantle Dynamics during the Genesis Flood: Multiphase Mantle Compositions and the Effects on Solid Mantle’s Dynamics 

Computer simulations of Catastrophic Plate Tectonics (CPT) will be performed using improved numerical modeling approaches to study the realistic rock deformational behavior under conditions of the Genesis Flood. The model will include the multiple mineral phases of the Earth’s mantle, and thereby will take into account the effects of those phases on overall rock’s mechanical properties. The microscopic features (e.g., grain size, recrystallization, and phase transformation) and the associated macroscopic thermal and mechanical properties of the rocks will be treated in more detail than ever before, in an attempt to model runaway plate movements. 

This study will provide crucial new understanding on how the microstructures and mechanical properties of multiple mineral phases cooperatively acted together to produce the extreme weakening that allowed the global Flood cataclysm to unfold as it did.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 7

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.”

Numerical Model Development of Earth’s Mantle Dynamics during the Genesis Flood: Multiphase Mantle Compositions and the Effects on Solid Mantle’s Dynamics

Computer simulations of Catastrophic Plate Tectonics (CPT) will be performed using improved numerical modeling approaches to study the realistic rock deformational behavior under conditions of the Genesis Flood. The model will include the multiple mineral phases of the Earth’s mantle, and thereby will take into account the effects of those phases on overall rock’s mechanical properties. The microscopic features (e.g., grain size, recrystallization, and phase transformation) and the associated macroscopic thermal and mechanical properties of the rocks will be treated in more detail than ever before, in an attempt to model runaway plate movements.

This study will provide crucial new understanding on how the microstructures and mechanical properties of multiple mineral phases cooperatively acted together to produce the extreme weakening that allowed the global Flood cataclysm to unfold as it did.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Video image

I'm live now with Emilio Ramos from Red Grace Media! Join us and say hi. www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpZgY4L1rKs ... See MoreSee Less

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 6

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.” 

Catastrophism in the Type Area of the Lance Formation (Maastrichtian, Cretaceous) 

In Wyoming there is an Edmontosaurus dinosaur bone bed in the Upper Maastrichtian Lance Formation. The exact stratigraphic position of the bone bed in the Lance is of interest, seeing as it is very close to the famed Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (the uppermost stratigraphic record of the dinosaurs, and a possible Flood/post-Flood boundary). However, since the stratigraphy of the roughly 2500-foot-thick Lance has never been worked out, the stratigraphic position of the bone bed in the Lance is unknown. Both the bone bed and associated strata appear to be underwater debris flows covering at least hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of square miles, and having traveled at least scores, and probably hundreds of miles. This, combined with evidence of massive earthquake activity, suggests the Lance Formation was formed in the Flood or soon thereafter. 

The research will look for evidence of these types of catastrophism in the region.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 6

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.”

Catastrophism in the Type Area of the Lance Formation (Maastrichtian, Cretaceous)

In Wyoming there is an Edmontosaurus dinosaur bone bed in the Upper Maastrichtian Lance Formation. The exact stratigraphic position of the bone bed in the Lance is of interest, seeing as it is very close to the famed Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (the uppermost stratigraphic record of the dinosaurs, and a possible Flood/post-Flood boundary). However, since the stratigraphy of the roughly 2500-foot-thick Lance has never been worked out, the stratigraphic position of the bone bed in the Lance is unknown. Both the bone bed and associated strata appear to be underwater debris flows covering at least hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of square miles, and having traveled at least scores, and probably hundreds of miles. This, combined with evidence of massive earthquake activity, suggests the Lance Formation was formed in the Flood or soon thereafter.

The research will look for evidence of these types of catastrophism in the region.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Emilio Ramos from Red Grace Media will be interviewing me tomorrow at 7pm CST (5pm PST, 8pm Eastern). Catch it here: youtube.com/redgracemedia

Emilio Ramos from Red Grace Media will be interviewing me tomorrow at 7pm CST (5pm PST, 8pm Eastern). Catch it here: youtube.com/redgracemedia ... See MoreSee Less