Religion has caused more deaths than secular science, or atheism?

Share this page!

I am often told that if it were not for religion, we would not have so much violence in the world. Also that all wars are religious based. And all mass murders are due to religion. So I thought I would set the record straight and give some real numbers, and how the secular atheists and science are currently killing people and most don’t even realize it.

Here are some numbers of secular deaths from past history.

128,168,000 VICTIMS: THE DEKA-MEGAMURDERERS
61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State.
35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill.
20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State.
10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime.

19,178,000 VICTIMS: THE LESSER MEGA-MURDERERS
5,964,000 Murdered: Japan’s Savage Military.
2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State.
1,883,000 Murdered: Turkey’s Genocidal Purges.
1,670,000 Murdered: The Vietnamese War State.
1,585,000 Murdered: Poland’s Ethnic Cleansing.
1,503,000 Murdered: The Pakistani Cutthroat State.
1,072,000 Murdered: Tito’s Slaughterhouse.

4,145,000 VICTIMS: SUSPECTED MEGAMURDERERS
1,663,000 Murdered? Orwellian North Korea.
1,417,000 Murdered? Barbarous Mexico.
1,066,000 Murdered? Feudal Russia.

Smokers are mostly secular atheists: Annual deaths due to smoking just in the U.S. is 435,000.
“Reported” deaths due to adverse reactions to medical science prescription drugs: 32,000
etc…

Through science weapons to kill are made:
1) Guns.
2) Hydrogen bombs.
3) Atomic bombs.
3) Nuclear bombs.
4) Chemical warfare.

Through science, the chemicals that make most bombs are now used to fertilize our crops, pollute or lands and waters. Kill fish, animals. and humans. These same chemicals cause cancer. 569,490 deaths from cancer in 2010. Medical science puts out drugs that are known to cause cancer, and also sudden death. And continue as if killing this way is okay. Is killing in the name of science justified if it’s for research? I mean we are animals, according to them, so killing us in the name of science progression should be just fine. So let’s have science put out an ad to see who will volunteer for such a noble task to willing die for science to gain knowledge?

Medical science, as a whole, is a multi-trillion dollar business. And is why they are not interested in the treatments through HBOT, that some are listed on this page: HBOT video documentaries (link). There is no money for the pharmaceutical companies who run the medical field, so the doctors in the videos have to document their findings on youtube.

Abortion Worldwide:

Number of abortions per year: Approximately 42 Million
Number of abortions per day: Approximately 115,000
And most who support abortion also would like to have infanticide (killing babies that are born alive even up to several months or years old) legalized.

But the population is to stupid (their logic) to understand why they die (medical drugs) so it’s all done in secret while journals are kept on people who live and die at the hands of medical doctors who want their names printed (not all doctors are this way, but many are) for their “human” experiments. How do you think they find out that a drug has a side effect of sudden death, or cancer unless it was tested on a human subject that this happened to? Do you see them saying: some rats died so you might also? Or No actual humans did…. And as long as they say this as a warning (the side effects), you can die from it and your family cannot sue them for it. We told you, so that leaves us not liable. This logic is like saying that printing on guns that guns can kill, then you go out and murder someone and that makes it okay. Killing by drugs or guns is no different. A dead person at the hands of another is the result.

So is killing in the name of science justified?

Example: Guns can kill. Everyone knows this. So when you buy a gun you are taking that knowledge of what it can do with you. And if you kill someone with that gun and it was not self defense, insanity is about the only thing that will get you off. But let’s take drugs for instance. The doctor writes you a prescription for a drug he “knows” can kill you (he has foreknowledge of possible death just like the person with the gun). You later have a bad reaction and die. The difference between the one who shot someone and the doctor, is that only one did it in the name of science. Only one went to school to learn how to do this, and was taught science.

Share this page!

 

 

 

 

 

 

FaceBook Feed
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

... See MoreSee Less

Thousands not Billions: How Old is the Earth?

For our friends and supporters near St. Louis, the CUS Society of Creation is hosting its 7th annual conference 14 and 15 June. 

http://www.societyofcreation.org/conferences.php

Several CRS members are speaking, and we’d love to have you there.

Thousands not Billions: How Old is the Earth?

For our friends and supporters near St. Louis, the CUS Society of Creation is hosting its 7th annual conference 14 and 15 June.

http://www.societyofcreation.org/conferences.php

Several CRS members are speaking, and we’d love to have you there.
... See MoreSee Less

This is something you don't see everyday. 2 dolphins and 2 whales playing together. ~ Issac

https://facebook.com/SciencePhileOfficial/videos/…
... See MoreSee Less

The Living Quarters on the ark are practical but comfortable.

The Living Quarters on the ark are practical but comfortable. ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

i have driven by a cattle farm...i bet that place stunk bad lol

Just remember, this is all artistic license...

Does everyone see the irony in the ark flooding? Wasn’t it suppose to survive the great flood? Do you not know unless you have flood insurance, you are not covered. Flooding is an “act of God”. Ask Louisiana residents how they faired after the flood. How about Puerto Rico? Maybe Missouri or even your neighbor, WV. Did you donate money to help those flood victims? Were the dinosaurs ok???

I'm sorry but I just don't think the ark was that comfortable....In fact I doubt that Noah's home was that comfortable.

They were probably better and more comfortable than my quarters on board the USS Abraham Lincoln! 😂

I doubt it.

It doesn’t seem they would’ve been that comfortable.

View more comments

Video image

May we be as bold as this young lady to speak up at our city council meetings: https://youtu.be/oQ8eob45f1I ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Indeed such a strong faith!

I also would not be here Miriam!

love her.

Ray Comfort has mental retardation ... See MoreSee Less

n case you did not know this. ~ Issac

n case you did not know this. ~ IssacIn case you did not know this. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until its rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/living-fossils.html
The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australias earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or little mountain monkey - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina.
Reference: http://www.create.unsw.edu.au/news/2008-03-25_monito.html
The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”
reference: http://www.eartharchives.org/articles/scientists-uncover-two-new-species-of-elusive-south-american-marsupial/

Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until it's rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/…
"The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australia's earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or "little mountain monkey" - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina."
Reference: http://create.unsw.edu.au/news/…
"The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”"
reference: http://eartharchives.org/articles/…
... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Your picture makes it seem like the two species shown are found 55 Ma apart even though they are both modern species. Rather, it was the genus Djarthia (whose exact taxonomic position is uncertain) that occurs in the Paleocene, as noted in the PLOS paper you provided. This graphic is either a misunderstanding or diliberate misrepresentation of the references cited. May I ask what formal training in paleontology the admin of this page has had?

We didn't claim the skulls were from a 55 million year old fossil, it is the references that claim Monito del Monte is regarded as a living fossil and thought to exist: 55 million years ago.

Colby, please stop spamming the contrasts. There is no need to post the same link multiple times, Thank you.

I was just doing a one shot on each post. I didnt even think anyone even looked at this page anymore. I apologize.

Looks like the Colbinator deleted his post 😭

View more comments