Monthly Archives: "May, 2011"

Forest fires make more trees then they destroy?
Share this page!

Some pine trees, including Monterey Pine and Pond Pine, have cones that stay tightly closed, making it impossible for the seeds to get out, until they are exposed to high temperatures such as are found in a forest fire. These are called fire climax pines. Seeds cannot germinate to form new trees until the parent trees have been destroyed in a forest fire, assuring that the new trees will not have to struggle in darkness among adult trees, but will only be among trees of the same age. When there is a fire, the number of seeds released is great enough to assure survival of enough new trees to reforest the area. Fire climax pines are able to maintain their presence against the incursion of other species of trees because fire destroys all of the adult trees, but only the pines are naturally replanted.
Reference: Fire climax pines (link)

So how does evolution explain how a tree evolves the ability to only reproduce after a fire? And to also know to put a chemical around it’s seedlings so that they are not destroyed by the fire the parent trees are destroyed by? Maybe it has something to do with trees having a consciousness (link). And how some pine trees also know when to put up crosses for Easter (link).

Share this page!
Is Evolution falsifiable?
Share this page!

According to the rules of how a theory works, it must “always” remain falsifiable. The minute it becomes unfalsifiable is also the same minute it’s no longer a theory. And when it’s no longer a theory, it has to become one of 2 things. Proven wrong, or what is considered an unchangeable law. In the video below you will see the attempt to make evolution an historical fact. Historical facts are not falsifiable.

Video

Notice in the video that she says that to have students “question” evolution is to mislead them. Then of course the Christian problem of challenging evolution is brought up. What I find ironic is that a real scientific theory would never compete with religion. Example: Does the theory of how electricity works compete with religion? The word weakness is being removed because it puts evolution into question. Then it’s brought up again, to question evolution is to mislead students. So basically historians can now enter the ranks of people who can prove evolution even though they generally don’t have any degrees in biology.

Next video is where a discussion is being held over evolution. Notice how the advocate, Eugene Scott, makes every attempt to say: If you question evolution you are basically stupid. And then what really is an eye opener is what she says about our kids in schools: I would question whether high school students are capable of evaluating high level science. Because according to Eugene Scott, you only being taught the basics. Why send them to school at all if they cannot learn how to evaluate? So basically instead of a high school student being able to make up his or her own mind, and test whatever they are taught. Instead they have to believe it. That’s not education, that’s indoctrination. In other words, you have to believe in evolution, with no questions asked. Let’s look at the definition of indoctrination.

Indoctrination: teaching someone to accept doctrines uncritically.

Video

Basically to teach someone a way to think and not be able to question it. So are our schools teaching mindless clones the doctrine of evolution? But what I find ironic is that evolutionists will use education and ignorance to say that people who don’t believe are uneducated and ignorant. But lets look at what happens to a person who is very educated and questioned evolution.

Video

Ben Stein graduated from Columbia University in 1966 with honors in economics and as valedictorian of the 1970 Yale Law School class. Now did his opinions matter when he is well educated? Nope.

Video

As this video illustrates, you are a fool, regardless of education, just because you disagree with evolution. And what funny is that this guy claims there is no such thing as Darwinism. I suggest you Google it: Darwinism (link) The reason the word Darwinism was made up in the first place was that there were different beliefs about evolution as it was being researched. Basically how evolution progression happened. So a separation was needed thus the word Darwinism was born. Then he brings up the Nobel Prize deal. Sorry, but ever since Gore and Obama got Noble Prizes, I have totally no respect for it. Scientist Dr. Raymond Damadian who invented the technology for the MRI. He was not been given a Nobel prize for his work, but as a slap in the face it was awarded to Paul Lauterbur and Sir Peter Mansfield for their discoveries related to MRI instead. All because Dr. Raymond Damadian was a creationist. Reference: Wikipedia

So is the invention of the MRI worthy of a Nobel Prize or not? To further inflict insult, I can guarantee it will not be awarded until after he is dead. And If I were in Damadian’s family, I would reject it if they hold it until he dies. This goes along with the page I did on evolution being about conformism. Which by the way, the video above is a perfect example of.

So is evolution falsifiable? Not if:
1) It can no longer be questioned.
2) Naturalism remains the only thing science will investigate.
3) Indoctrination is the only way it will ever be taught.
4) And fear of character assassination, or loss of job because one does not conform to evolutionary beliefs. Basically using fear to spread their beliefs.

Every time I see a video, website, forum, or blog making fun of creationists, I laugh. You know why? It’s because it shows that when the evidence fails for evolution, character assassination is all that they have left. So ham it up, it only shows how lame evolution is that it would require a person to resort to such things. In fact, while I’m on this subject of how evolutionist “have to” act badly to prove their theory. Let’s see where their ideas to do this really came from… Saul Alinsky’s book on communism called: Rules for Radicals. Gives a point by point action in defeating your non-communist foe and be able to take over. See if any of these tactics look familiar.

7. Tactics

“Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. … Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.” p.126

Always remember the first rule of power tactics (pps.127-134):

1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat…. [and] the collapse of communication.

3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.”

6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time….”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside… every positive has its negative.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and ‘frozen.’…

“…any target can always say, ‘Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?’ When your ‘freeze the target,’ you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments…. Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the ‘others’ come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target…’

“One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other.” (pps.127-134)

I find it ironic that almost every evolutionist resorts to these tactics during debates. Militant atheists are the worst and will train the wannabes by example. So is it really science they are promoting while using evolution as their tool, or is there another agenda? And all of these tactics make evolution unfalsifiable. Fear of having their beloved theory proven wrong requires such actions. if not. maybe one can post here and explain why?

Share this page!
Earth, Moon, and Sun. Proof of creation
Share this page!

And the picture to the left shows how correct sizes and placement of 3 objects to create the angles required to cause a total eclipse of the sun. And to allow life to exist on this planet. Change any of these and things would be very different. And life would not exist. Now you might think this is all I can come up with, but you would be wrong. There is some extraordinary math involved in all this direct placement and size thing.

1) The distance between the moon and the sun is 400 times greater than the distance from the earth and the moon.
2) The Sun happens to be 400 times the Moon’s diameter, and 400 times as far away. This means the Sun and Moon appear to be the same size when viewed from Earth. A total solar eclipse, in which the Moon is between the Earth and Sun, blocks the bright light from the Sun’s photosphere, allowing us to see the faint glow from the corona, the Sun’s outer atmosphere.

So not only do you have all the other factors that go into what is needed to support life, but you have mathematics as well. This shows that it took intelligence to do this. And if you think all of this is amazing, I have not even gone into all the laws of physics that allow this to work the way that it does. And how these laws won’t let it work any other way. And so you can enjoy the Creator’s handy work, here is a video showing a total eclipse of the sun in less then 9 minutes.

Video

The moon’s orbit decays about 1.5 inches a year. if we go back in time:
1 million years ago = 23.57 miles closer.
300 million years ago = 9281.00 miles closer.
4 Billion years ago = 94,682 miles closer (that’s almost half the distance closer).

According to the Inverse Square Law, when two objects have gravity and get closer. That gravity quadruples between both objects. So we are talking about earthquakes so bad it destroys even the land masses and actually shakes the whole planet every time the moon orbits the earth. So the time-line that fits the supposed “perfect” age dating does not work.

The part where it says in the picture: “The energy twice as far from the source is spread over four times the area, hence 1/4 the intensity”. If you reverse that and bring in the object 1/2 the distance the intensity increases by 4 times. And 1/4 closer means intensity increases by 2 times. Yet everything today works just as listed above just as we are able to understand it. Yet 4.8 billion years have past?

Now why does not science acknowledge this? Science is not about finding truth “wherever” it may be. It’s only about finding a certain kind of self made truth that supports the naturalistic view, a view basically where there is no God. So “anything” that does not support naturalism is automatically rejected. Why do you think all the top positions in science are filled by atheistic-naturalists? God not allowed. My questions is: What are they afraid of if they found out that God does exist?

More amazing facts about the earth:

The circumference of the earth at the equator is 24,901.55 miles. The earth’s rotation speed is 1037.5646 mph. If you divide 24,901.55 by 1037.5646 you get 24. Which is the number of hours in a complete day. Just enough rotation speed compared to it’s size to equal a perfect exposure to both sun light and darkness so that life could exist here. Example of why that is important: If you take and double the hours in a day, the days would get so hot, and the nights so cold, that if life could exist here it would have a hard time doing it. In these conditions you could have 110 plus degrees f in the daytime, and below freezing at night in the same place everyday So rotation speed of the earth is important to support life.

The earth orbits our sun at 66,660 mph, and makes a complete orbit every 365.2425 days. This speed along with the tilt of the earth’s axis allows seasonal changes every 3 months. If the earth were going half that speed, which would double the time in each season. The extremes for each season (polar winters around zero degrees f, and above 100 degree f summers) would be so different that life could not exist here. So like the situation above, we are at the right orbital speed for life to exist.

Solar wind is particles that leave the sun’s surface. They can reach very high speeds and are made up of mainly protons and electrons. Solar wind also has the capability of striping away a planet’s atmosphere. The only defense a planet has against this is the strength of it magnetic field, which if strong enough will deflect these particles and protect the current atmosphere. Because earth has a molten core that is comprised mainly of nickel and iron. It can produce a magnetic field strong enough to deflect the solar wind particles. And example of this not happening is the planet mars. Mar’s magnetic field is weak compared to earth. So the solar wind slowly strips it’s upper atmosphere away into space. A thin atmosphere, such as exist on mars, would make life almost impossible.

Ozone layer is also protected by the magnetic field. If the magnetic field of the earth were as weak as the planet mars, the solar wind would strip away the ozone layer which is our natural filter from the sun. Allowing the full rays of the sun in, means all life would die. The UV rays of the sun are deflected by the ozone layer. Full amount of UV rays would kill everything, basically sterilizing all life. UV rays are the most damaging to life because they alter DNA to the point life cannot exist. Example: The reason welders have to wear eye protection is because the welding light produces intense UV rays similar to the sun. Staring at a welding light for just 5 minutes can damage you eyes to the point you can become blind. Now imagine that same type of light coming at you from the sun several 1000 times more intense. And because UV light alters DNA, it’s one of the main causes of skin cancer. So having a planet filter like the ozone layer, is a must have. A must have that mars does not have.

Gravity not only holds things in orbit and on the surface of our planet. But is the main reason our atmosphere does not float off into space. Gravity also controls the barometric pressures on the surface of this planet. The barometric pressures control the boiling point of water. And it allows warm blooded animals to live here without their blood boiling. How? On mar the barometric pressure is 1/4 to 1/8 that of earth. That makes water boil at about 50 degrees f. Our body is mainly made up with water. Our body normal body temperature is 98.6 f. Which means our blood would boil on that planet unless we were in a pressurized suit the simulated earth’s barometric pressure. Water in a complete vacuum will boil at any temperature.

The exact strength of our gravity holds the barometric pressures of our planet at about 14.7 psi at sea level. This barometric pressure allows water to exist in 3 forms (solid, liquid, and gas). In fact our planet is the only known planet that this happens everyday. This cycle is known as the hydrologic cycle. It allows water to evaporate, make clouds, and rain and freeze when temps get low enough. Water existing in 3 forms is also essential for life to exist here. So correct barometric pressures and temperatures are vital.

Share this page!
Fused #2 chromosome
Share this page!

Evolutionist try to use the fused chromosome #2 argument for proving evolution. I will use their own video to explain from a man who “claims” to be a theist and at the end of the video will try to use guilt as to the reason you should believe as he does.

Video

1) Now notice that the whole argument is based on the assumption that evolution has already been proven. In other words, an implied absolute. This chromosome #2 has to support evolution and nothing else. That is what he is basically saying. But remember, “all” theories have to remain falsifiable.
2) He also bases the evidence on the assumption that the chromosome was apart at one time. How can he prove the chromosome was ever apart to begin with so that it could be fused? Only under the assumption that evolution is a true proven fact (implied absolute).
3) He then reads from a paper that agrees with him and his conclusion. Does words from a paper prove this?
4) And as usual, He cannot show us “any observable process” showing this happening, which by the way would make his claims empirical.
5) And at the end he sums it up as either God did it this way, or He’s lying. And if you believe God did not do it this way, then you are calling God a liar.
6) Also we have the placement difference of chromosomes between humans and primates. The chromosome #2 in humans they claimed fused is chromosome #13 in primates. This is details they leave out on purpose because their evidence is based more on selling the idea of evolution then proving it.The reason they left this out is because people who have a little knowledge about things would figure out that it’s more than a simple fusion taking place. It’s moving of information 20% (11 steps) away from where it originally was. So that’s a lot more change than what;s implied. This is why Ken Miller pushes so hard to close the deal in convincing the viewer by saying what he did in #5 example. Actual truth does not have to be sold, it prove itself on it’s on merits.

You see number 5 goes right along with this page: Evolution, conform or fail (link). The guy basically leaves you no other way to believe (conformism). And by the way, conformism is not science.

But let’s look at an example of what changing the number of chromosome can do. Down Syndrome (link) is caused by the presence of an extra chromosome. You see the evolutionists are betting that you won’t go do the research to find if what they claim about evolution is true. And what we find about doing anything with the chromosomes that is different from the norm causes all kinds of problems including death.

When the chromosome’s structure is altered. This can take several forms:

1) Deletions: A portion of the chromosome is missing or deleted. Known disorders in humans include Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, which is caused by partial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 4; and Jacobsen syndrome, also called the terminal 11q deletion disorder.
2) Duplications: A portion of the chromosome is duplicated, resulting in extra genetic material. Known human disorders include Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A which may be caused by duplication of the gene encoding peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) on chromosome 17.
3) Translocations: When a portion of one chromosome is transferred to another chromosome. There are two main types of translocations. In a reciprocal translocation, segments from two different chromosomes have been exchanged. In a Robertsonian translocation, an entire chromosome has attached to another at the Centromere – in humans these only occur with chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 21 and 22.
4) Inversions: A portion of the chromosome has broken off, turned upside down and reattached, therefore the genetic material is inverted.
5) Rings: A portion of a chromosome has broken off and formed a circle or ring. This can happen with or without loss of genetic material.
6) Isochromosome: Formed by the mirror image copy of a chromosome segment including the centromere.

Here are some examples: Rings (link)Prostate cancer (link). etc…

Chromosome instability syndromes are a group of disorders characterized by chromosomal instability and breakage. They often lead to an increased tendency to develop certain types of malignancies.

Reference: Wikipedia (link).

So basically there is not even one good example of changing Chromosome numbers. So the claim about Chromosome #2 is just a bunch of evolutionists desperate to prove a theory.

Share this page!
Evolution, a test of our faith?
Share this page!
Share this page!
Is evolution a religion?
Share this page!

The reason I ask this question is because quite often during debates there will be a atheist-evolutionist that will claim: I was a Christian and believed in creation until I heard about evolution. So the question applied is: If evolution is purely science, why did you have to quit believing in a God?

The logic behind the question is simple. Only religion can compete with religion. Only a religion requires conversion (non-belief to belief, or belief to non-belief). And only religion requires evangelism. Atheists go all over the web trying to convince people that evolution is true (evangelism). They put up websites, forums, and blogs with that same goal. They meet and discuss evangelism ideas. They even put up webpages to show how an atheist can ask questions to weaken ones faith so that conversion from one belief to another can take place (evangelism).

And the evolutionist goal is to convert every Christian to evolution. Don’t believe me? Look at the shirt pen you can buy on one of their sites:

Atheism conversion will lead to a belief in evolution. So even attempted conversions to atheism prove evolution is a religion. And here are some examples:

Wiki How to convert a Christian to atheism (link).Yahoo answers on converting Christian to atheist (link).Was Darwin the first to think up the idea about man evolving from animals?

This belief dates way back even before Darwin. Back to Egyptian time and Egyptian gods (link).Evolution in Egyptian religion

Other creation myths depicted creation as proceeding from out or primordial chaos, or from a primordial slime, which had eight elements, namely matter and space, darkness and obscurity, the illimitable and the boundless and the hidden and concealed). The annual flooding by the Nile, leading to new life, may lie behind this mythology.

1) Primordial chaos = Big bang.
2) Primordial slime = Abiogeneisis.

So basically, the idea of evolution is really a Pagan creation belief. This is why evolution competes with religion so well, because it is a religion itself. Now how did this idea, that has Pagan roots, get into Darwin’s head? Darwin had a degree in theology. Which means he had to learn about Pagan beliefs as well as the Christian ones. So he had that Pagan idea in his mind when he boarded the ship named the Beagle. He read Charles Lyell’s book on the geologic column. He then saw the animals on Galapagos Island and his new founded idea started to look like that it makes sense. Problem was, it still has it’s roots in Paganism. And pure science would in no way conflict with religion, but evolution does and the reason why is clear.

So here is what we have so far:

1) Evolution idea from animals to man can be traced back to Egyptian pagan religions.
2) Darwin had a degree in theology which means he knew about Egyptian Pagan religions.
3) A believer has to totally give up his belief in God to 100% believe in evolution. True science needs no conversion from religion.
4) Evolutionists and atheists, often surf the web trying to see who they can convert (evangelism) from the Christian belief.
5) Evolutionists often get together on blogs, forums, etc… To discuss ways to convert more Christians to evolution. Basically discussing evangelism among like minds in what can be considered a ministry for evolution.
etc…

The Theory of Evolution has all the earmarks of being a religion. No other non-evolution theory in science has this. Which tells us a lot.

Does the Bible mention evolution (indirectly) and the people who believe it?

Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

deut 32:18 Of the Rock that begat thee thou art unmindful, and hast forgotten God that formed thee.

Here is a list of some theories, and if they require a person to totally convert from God in order to believe them:

1. Atomic theory does not require conversion.
2. The Theory of Matter and Energy does not require conversion.
3. The Cell Theory does not require conversion.
4. The Germ Theory does not require conversion.
5. The Theory of Plate Tectonics does not require conversion.
6. The Theory of Evolution does require conversion to totally believe it.
etc…

Are any of those theories, besides evolution, currently being used to convert people?
Example: Does an atheist go to a blog or forum trying to use the Atomic theory to convert someone to atheism?

Share this page!
Religion has caused more deaths than secular science, or atheism?
Share this page!

I am often told that if it were not for religion, we would not have so much violence in the world. Also that all wars are religious based. And all mass murders are due to religion. So I thought I would set the record straight and give some real numbers, and how the secular atheists and science are currently killing people and most don’t even realize it.

Here are some numbers of secular deaths from past history.

128,168,000 VICTIMS: THE DEKA-MEGAMURDERERS
61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State.
35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill.
20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State.
10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime.

19,178,000 VICTIMS: THE LESSER MEGA-MURDERERS
5,964,000 Murdered: Japan’s Savage Military.
2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State.
1,883,000 Murdered: Turkey’s Genocidal Purges.
1,670,000 Murdered: The Vietnamese War State.
1,585,000 Murdered: Poland’s Ethnic Cleansing.
1,503,000 Murdered: The Pakistani Cutthroat State.
1,072,000 Murdered: Tito’s Slaughterhouse.

4,145,000 VICTIMS: SUSPECTED MEGAMURDERERS
1,663,000 Murdered? Orwellian North Korea.
1,417,000 Murdered? Barbarous Mexico.
1,066,000 Murdered? Feudal Russia.

Smokers are mostly secular atheists: Annual deaths due to smoking just in the U.S. is 435,000.
“Reported” deaths due to adverse reactions to medical science prescription drugs: 32,000
etc…

Through science weapons to kill are made:
1) Guns.
2) Hydrogen bombs.
3) Atomic bombs.
3) Nuclear bombs.
4) Chemical warfare.

Through science, the chemicals that make most bombs are now used to fertilize our crops, pollute or lands and waters. Kill fish, animals. and humans. These same chemicals cause cancer. 569,490 deaths from cancer in 2010. Medical science puts out drugs that are known to cause cancer, and also sudden death. And continue as if killing this way is okay. Is killing in the name of science justified if it’s for research? I mean we are animals, according to them, so killing us in the name of science progression should be just fine. So let’s have science put out an ad to see who will volunteer for such a noble task to willing die for science to gain knowledge?

Medical science, as a whole, is a multi-trillion dollar business. And is why they are not interested in the treatments through HBOT, that some are listed on this page: HBOT video documentaries (link). There is no money for the pharmaceutical companies who run the medical field, so the doctors in the videos have to document their findings on youtube.

Abortion Worldwide:

Number of abortions per year: Approximately 42 Million
Number of abortions per day: Approximately 115,000
And most who support abortion also would like to have infanticide (killing babies that are born alive even up to several months or years old) legalized.

But the population is to stupid (their logic) to understand why they die (medical drugs) so it’s all done in secret while journals are kept on people who live and die at the hands of medical doctors who want their names printed (not all doctors are this way, but many are) for their “human” experiments. How do you think they find out that a drug has a side effect of sudden death, or cancer unless it was tested on a human subject that this happened to? Do you see them saying: some rats died so you might also? Or No actual humans did…. And as long as they say this as a warning (the side effects), you can die from it and your family cannot sue them for it. We told you, so that leaves us not liable. This logic is like saying that printing on guns that guns can kill, then you go out and murder someone and that makes it okay. Killing by drugs or guns is no different. A dead person at the hands of another is the result.

So is killing in the name of science justified?

Example: Guns can kill. Everyone knows this. So when you buy a gun you are taking that knowledge of what it can do with you. And if you kill someone with that gun and it was not self defense, insanity is about the only thing that will get you off. But let’s take drugs for instance. The doctor writes you a prescription for a drug he “knows” can kill you (he has foreknowledge of possible death just like the person with the gun). You later have a bad reaction and die. The difference between the one who shot someone and the doctor, is that only one did it in the name of science. Only one went to school to learn how to do this, and was taught science.

Share this page!
Evolutionists contradict themselves often
Share this page!

While in debates, I often notice that evolutionists will:
1) Contradict themselves.
2) Get confused on what they believe.
3) Outright equivocate so they can always look right.
4) Move the goalposts for the same reason as above.
5) Change the definitions of words so that their theory will work (micro and macro are the samething).

Here is a video that is the perfect example. 2 teachers of evolution doing this.

So if you ever wondered why you (a creationist) can never seem to win a debate, this is why. You cannot come close to winning a debate when your debate opponent “changes their belief” every 5 minutes. And every person you debate that believes the same thing (evolution) contradict one another from debate to debate. The only way a creationists can counter this is to get all the references he can that explain each part of evolution to an exact. And when the evolutionists start moving goalposts, changing definitions, etc… You can whip out that reference and correct them.

Also evolutionists love to equivocate (lie on purpose). Either as a game to make you mad, or on purpose so they can always look correct. You can show them they are wrong, and because they can never accept correction from a creationist, they will continue in that lie as if you never said anything. A person who debates like this is not worth your time. Just point out their equivocation and back out of the debate. You cannot win anything with a person who will continually lie. Besides, when is the last time you found a liar that was interested in truth? As the Bible says: Do not cast your pearls (truth) before swine. Swine is used in that verse to relay that they would not know what to actually do with actual pearls. I won;t debate a person like this and will ban them from this blog for wasting my time and everyone Else’s.

My motto: If you want to debate evolution, debate it. If you have evidence, present it. If you have observable processes show us. The rest is a waste. And the sooner you the creationist realize this, the easier your debates will be. And you will know when to back out, and when to stay in. You will look much worse debating someone who has clearly shown they are not interested in truth.

Share this page!
Evolution, conform or fail?
Share this page!

The more I debate evolutionists on the web, the more I see that evolution is about conformism more than anything else. The video below pretty much sums this up:

Video

Share this page!
Geologic Column, did Noah’s flood create it?
Share this page!

We all have been taught about the Geologic Column in school. It’s the Holy Grail of the Theory of Evolution. The evidence has never been pondered to support anything else but evolution. This is because science has an unwritten rule that prohibits anyone involved to ever pursue evidence that leads in any other direction but to the Theory of Evolution. Don’t believe it? Name one person who has ever challenged the Theory of Evolution that did not have his credibility destroyed for doing so? Just one person. What this does is that it shows everyone else that even though evolution has to remain falsifiable to be a theory, you better not try to falsify it. Which also means that evolution is more about conformism than science. Need more proof? Why is it that only all things that support Darwinian evolution are the only things:

1) Being funded? How can anything challenge Theory of Evolution to make sure it’s a true proven fact if the person who challenges it has to use his own money to do it?
2) Why is there not any other ideas besides evolution being worked upon? Proving evolution is like a horse race. Where all contenders line up in the gates, and when the gate opens, the evolution horse is the only one allowed to run the race. If you think about it in terms of a race like that, would it be fair? Would you pay money to go see a race where the outcome is “always” rigged?

So let’s take a look at what else could have created the Geologic Column.

Genesis 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

The key phrase here is: fountains of the “great” deep were broken up. Now for as much water needed to flood the earth, there would be a lot of sediments coming up with the water. It would look very similar to the black smoker in the Picture above that is spewing black sediments. Except during the flood it would be erupting like a huge volcanoes. Sea creatures caught up in this would be buried according to where they lived in the seas because the burial would be so quick, the sea creature would have zero chance to escape. So if you notice, the Geologic Column has bottom dwellers first which is the correct order it would be for the flood. Then you have the mid-dwellers. And then the top dwellers. The exact order of how such a huge flood would bury the sea creatures.

Then after all the sea creatures are buried, then comes the land animals. Which is correct order of what we see in the Geologic Column if the flood created it. It is ironic that even though science claims the column only supports evolution, that it also goes in the correct order of how things would have been buried in the flood.

Most all evolutionists believe that the geologic column was laid over millions of years of time. But they do not have a working mechanism or explanation as to why each layer is different, and some are the same. Or why the fossil record did not record living fossil time-line (where they are found, until present time). But instead of going into the problems with how the geologic column has the fossils ordered, we will instead concentrate on the formation of it. So do evolutionists have a working process showing how the layers would form over millions of years, or do they base this solely on age dating of each layer?

And do the Creationists have a working process for how the layers were laid by the Flood? In fact they do. The video below is different from anything you will see on the flood. It’s not your average creation video. So it’s well worth the watch as they make a working model for how the flood laid down the layers.

Video

And you would have everyday normal activity of fish being caught in the flood. Such as the fish below eating dinner and being covered up.

Mass graves from being caught in flood.

Soft tissue fossils.

Share this page!

 

 

 

 

 

 

FaceBook Feed
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Imagine what it was like to live in biblical times when you saddle up a camel for a family-friendly activity. ... See MoreSee Less

Imagine what it was like to live in biblical times when you saddle up a camel for a family-friendly activity.

Comment on Facebook

We were there last year but rode the camels at Creation and did NOT know they were here too till we went afterwards. Do not only think it is for kids, they are so much fun and do it!!!!

Irene Touchtone

I got to go on the camel ride when we went there last year. It was fun! Not just for kids!

Family fun

Brittany Sosebee imagine

Kathy Charles wanna ride a camel? Lol

Cherylene, do your boys want to ride a camel? haha!

Brady Moore!!

View more comments

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 5

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.”

Ice Age Megafauna Bone Beds

Dense concentrations of fossilized bones, called “fossil bone beds,” point to catastrophic flood destruction and deposition. Dinosaur bone beds are straightforward evidence of the Genesis Flood. “Ice age megafauna” are also found in dense bone beds. These megafauna can include mammoth, mastodon, saber tooth lion, “cave” bear, hippopotamus, wolf, sloth, and others. The term “ice age” is used because these particular animals are associated with the Ice Age in secular literature. Creation literature often agrees with the concept of a time of thick sheets of ice covering portions of the globe, but specifies an ice “age” of much shorter duration, and occurring several hundred years after the Deluge, according to an idea proposed by Michael Oard.

Note that the actual degree of ice sheet coverage during that time is not known and many geomorphic features used to indicate areas that were formerly ice covered were quite possibly formed by water and not by ice. The time period or periods during which the megafauna bone beds were deposited is not clear in the creation literature. Were they deposited during the Genesis Flood, at the end of the flood, or years later during post-Deluge megaflood catastrophes?

This project seeks to clarify the occurrence pattern of the deposits and to interpret the timings and events involved.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 5

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.” 

Ice Age Megafauna Bone Beds 

Dense concentrations of fossilized bones, called “fossil bone beds,” point to catastrophic flood destruction and deposition. Dinosaur bone beds are straightforward evidence of the Genesis Flood. “Ice age megafauna” are also found in dense bone beds. These megafauna can include mammoth, mastodon, saber tooth lion, “cave” bear, hippopotamus, wolf, sloth, and others. The term “ice age” is used because these particular animals are associated with the Ice Age in secular literature. Creation literature often agrees with the concept of a time of thick sheets of ice covering portions of the globe, but specifies an ice “age” of much shorter duration, and occurring several hundred years after the Deluge, according to an idea proposed by Michael Oard. 

Note that the actual degree of ice sheet coverage during that time is not known and many geomorphic features used to indicate areas that were formerly ice covered were quite possibly formed by water and not by ice. The time period or periods during which the megafauna bone beds were deposited is not clear in the creation literature. Were they deposited during the Genesis Flood, at the end of the flood, or years later during post-Deluge megaflood catastrophes? 

This project seeks to clarify the occurrence pattern of the deposits and to interpret the timings and events involved.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

That is not what it means to be a believer.

1 John 1:5-6
This is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth

This poor woman is self-deceived:

James 1:22-25
But prove yourselves doers of the word, and not merely hearers who delude themselves. For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man who looks at his natural face in a mirror; for once he has looked at himself and gone away, he has immediately forgotten what kind of person he was. But one who looks intently at the perfect law, the law of liberty, and abides by it, not having become a forgetful hearer but an effectual doer, this man will be blessed in what he does.

This is not the grace that the Bible speaks about, this is the license of immorality WARNED about!

Jude 1:4
For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.
... See MoreSee Less

That is not what it means to be a believer. 

1 John 1:5-6
This is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth

This poor woman is self-deceived:

James 1:22-25
But prove yourselves doers of the word, and not merely hearers who delude themselves. For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man who looks at his natural face in a mirror; for once he has looked at himself and gone away, he has immediately forgotten what kind of person he was. But one who looks intently at the perfect law, the law of liberty, and abides by it, not having become a forgetful hearer but an effectual doer, this man will be blessed in what he does.

This is not the grace that the Bible speaks about, this is the license of immorality WARNED about!

Jude 1:4
For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.

Comment on Facebook

This is one of the biggest problems in Christianity, satan has perverted Paul's writing about being free from the law to the point where people think they can "do whatever". 2 Peter 3:15-16 New King James Version (NKJV) 15 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation—as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, 16 as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.

Miss guided children of God

Jesus also said “Go and sin no more”.

Thats Calvinism too... Luther: If you are a preacher of mercy, do not preach an imaginary but the true mercy. If the mercy is true, you must therefore bear the true, not an imaginary sin. God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong (or “Sin boldly”),

Jesus does still love you and you must confess your sins , if you are Saved you will know you have sinned and should want to ask forgiveness

This is exactly what it means to turn the grace of God into licentiousness (Jude 1:4). It is where the Grace of God is used as a license/reason to do planned sin, rather than a reason to fight sin and seek God for forgiveness/strength when one (unfortunately) falls into sin.

Keith VonEiff

I believe this is what most modern day Christians believe if they truly believe that would not waste this life with riotous living .

Oh yes He still loves you little man . He is just waiting on you to surrender.

If you look at the perfect its Jesus and you choose what is pure, not sin. The wages of sin is death.

I am guessing he has never read his bible, because we do not have freedom to sin.

Not surprised

Oh my!

New American Standard Bible Deuteronomy 6:16 "You shall not put the LORD your God to the test, as you tested Him at Massah. New American Standard Bible Luke 4:12 And Jesus answered and said to him, "It is said, 'YOU SHALL NOT PUT THE LORD YOUR GOD TO THE TEST.'"

THOSE WHO AGREE WITH THIS WOMAN IN THE VIDEO, LOOK THESE UP FOR YOURSELF.ALL WERE WRITTEN TO CHURCHES, NOT TO THE WORLD: 1 Cor 6:9-11, Eph 5:3-7, Gal 5:19-21, Col 3:5-6, Gal 5:24 "Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10 nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God." 1 Cor 6:9-11 But immorality or any impurity or greed must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints; and there must be no filthiness and silly talk, or coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. For this you know with certainty, that no immoral or impure person or covetous man, who is an idolater, has an inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. Therefore do not be partakers with them; " Eph 5:3-7 "Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions, envying, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these, of which I forewarn you, just as I have forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God." Gal 5:19-21 "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience:" Col 3:5-6

Just an FYI, SHE is the one who said this not him. She also curses (which is bleeped out) and made a scriptural reference at one of the “rose ceremonies”.... classic perversion of osas doctrine.

A Christian should not even partake in a show like this in the first place.

View more comments

Get an inside look at our greenhouses, see the result of our horticulture team’s hard work, and find out how you can take one of our plants home!Fathers can visit the Ark Encounter for free on Saturday and Sunday of Father's Day weekend! 👨🏽 ... See MoreSee Less

Get an inside look at our  greenhouses, see the result of our horticulture team’s hard work, and find out how you can take one of our plants home!

“I believe the Bible is the best gift God has ever given to man. All the good from the Savior of the world is communicated to us through this Book.” ―Abraham Lincoln

#WayoftheMaster is coming back to TV the ending of July! Learn more at WayoftheMaster.com
... See MoreSee Less

“I believe the Bible is the best gift God has ever given to man. All the good from the Savior of the world is communicated to us through this Book.” ―Abraham Lincoln

#WayoftheMaster is coming back to TV the ending of July! Learn more at WayoftheMaster.com

“I believe the Bible is the best gift God has ever given to man. All the good from the Savior of the world is communicated to us through this Book.” ―Abraham Lincoln

#WayoftheMaster is coming back to TV the ending of July! Learn more at WayoftheMaster.com
... See MoreSee Less

“I believe the Bible is the best gift God has ever given to man. All the good from the Savior of the world is communicated to us through this Book.” ―Abraham Lincoln

#WayoftheMaster is coming back to TV the ending of July! Learn more at WayoftheMaster.com

Comment on Facebook

Lincoln was a Deist, not a Theist like this meme makes him out to be.

Jesus was the BEST GIFT!!!!! Sorry Lincoln

Too bad he didn't follow it's teaching.

Yay. Excited about this. 😊

Cody Bush

Amen 🙏

Y’all need to calm down

Happy Juneteenth Day!

Is this Ray? Is he out of the hospital? Anyone?

Amen

Every single one of you, idiots.

Absolutely

Wait. I thought Lincoln was AGAINST slavery?🤔

Yes and AMEN To That Thank you Lord for the Living Word you Gave into Us

Amen

God is fake lol.

North America sure has come a long way since those days 😔

One and the same Jesus is the Word

Lincoln did not say this. He was not a religious man

People misquoting Lincoln? The internet has never heard of this!

Quotes are fun.

That is so true....

Not a big fan of Lincoln.

View more comments

Kidney Stone Update

I’m lying in a hospital bed hooked up to strange machines, listening to unfamiliar sounds, and thinking about the last week. I visited the ER five times in three days (one trip was in an ambulance). So far I’ve had two operations, with another two coming up.

There are two sets of surgeons. One is in charge of “plumbing,” and the other is stone removal. There have been complications, and it may take an angel to roll it away.

Meanwhile, I’m getting great opportunities to share the gospel. Brett (the paramedic in the ambulance) was very open, and there haven been other incidents in the hospital. One was with the man who wheeled me to the theater for the first operation. It’s quite a long ride so it gives time to witness. After we talked, I thanked him for listening and added that he had to give me that courtesy, because they may have been my last words. Sobering, but true.

I’ve been giving out many of our new YouTube promotional cards (pictured). They’re easy to give out, and almost everybody says that they will check out the channel.

Thank you all so much for your past (and continued) prayers and your kind well-wishes. Very grateful.

Blessings,
Ray Comfort
... See MoreSee Less

Kidney Stone Update 

I’m lying in a hospital bed hooked up to strange machines, listening to unfamiliar sounds, and thinking about the last week. I visited the ER five times in three days (one trip was in an ambulance). So far I’ve had two operations, with another two coming up. 

There are two sets of surgeons. One is in charge of “plumbing,” and the other is stone removal. There have been complications, and it may take an angel to roll it away.

Meanwhile, I’m getting great opportunities to share the gospel. Brett (the paramedic in the ambulance) was very open, and there haven been other incidents in the hospital. One was with the man who wheeled me to the theater for the first operation. It’s quite a long ride so it gives time to witness. After we talked, I thanked him for listening and added that he had to give me that courtesy, because they may have been my last words. Sobering, but true. 

I’ve been giving out many of our new YouTube promotional cards (pictured). They’re easy to give out, and almost everybody says that they will check out the channel. 

Thank you all so much for your past (and continued) prayers and your kind well-wishes. Very grateful. 

Blessings, 
Ray Comfort

Comment on Facebook

Heal fast Ray! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Get well soon

🙏🎁🌅

God bless you brother And Heal you!

Praying for your complete healing

Prayers Bro. Have had the same happen to me, Not fun by any means. Worse pain I ever felt. God be with you and get better soon.

Hope you feel better soon!

I hope you get better🙏

I hope you get better🙏

Get well soon Ray. GOD Bless you.

Hang in there, prayers for U

Bless you! Praying for swift recovery from all of this

God bless you, Ray!

Get well soon Ray! 🙌🏻

Healing in the name of JESUS 💓

Never met, but love who you are Brother Ray!

Bless you Ray

i can't stop watching your channel, <3 I hope you get well soon, God Bless u!

Prayers the great Healer will be with

Be well, best wishes from the Netherlands......

prayers

You get points for creativity with this new outreach program. Talk about going the extra mile! 🙂 May God continue to use you and I hope that complete healing is in the works.

Thoughts and Prayers ❤️

So sorry to hear, Ray. I hope you get to feeling better soon! I would say a prayer for you but I’m sure I don’t have access to the “big guy”. Wishing you all the best!

Praying Dear Brother!!!

View more comments

What's your favorite color of the rainbow? Visit the beautiful Rainbow Gardens when you come to the Ark Encounter. ... See MoreSee Less

Whats your favorite color of the rainbow? Visit the beautiful Rainbow Gardens when you come to the Ark Encounter.

Comment on Facebook

Let’s reclaim the rainbow!

Orange!!!

Blue

Blue

We have to go back, Alycia Briggs

Clever idea!

I love walking past the gardens everyday to go to work at the zoo. They attract so many butterflies and hummingbirds!

View more comments

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 4

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.”

Characterization of Mummified and Petrified Wood from an Eocene Deposit

This study experimentally investigates mummified wood, which is nondecomposed wood, and petrified wood from the same piece of material collected at a lignite mine. Chemical analysis reveals that the chemical compositions of mummified wood are similar to those of youthful wood (carbon based), and petrified wood is mainly composed of silicate (silicon based). From microscopic observations, it appears that the species of the original wood is a conifer. The research looks for DNA contained in nondecomposed wood on one side.

The research attempts to interpret the findings in terms of Flood geology. Ancient mummified wood provides the opportunity to study the structural and biological preservation of fiber (cellulose), proteins, and possibly deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 4

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.” 

Characterization of Mummified and Petrified Wood from an Eocene Deposit 

This study experimentally investigates mummified wood, which is nondecomposed wood, and petrified wood from the same piece of material collected at a lignite mine. Chemical analysis reveals that the chemical compositions of mummified wood are similar to those of youthful wood (carbon based), and petrified wood is mainly composed of silicate (silicon based). From microscopic observations, it appears that the species of the original wood is a conifer. The research looks for DNA contained in nondecomposed wood on one side. 

The research attempts to interpret the findings in terms of Flood geology. Ancient mummified wood provides the opportunity to study the structural and biological preservation of fiber (cellulose), proteins, and possibly deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

Visit the Village Market for food and shopping! ... See MoreSee Less

Visit the Village Market for food and shopping!