Is evolution based in Satanism?

Share this page!

To start off I am going to show a YouTube video on the subject. The person speaking is an Ex-Satanist Priest.

Video

In order for the Theory of Evolution (TOE) to be a representation of Satanism (all that is evil). It would have to be the exact opposite of what the standard for good is. Which is God and all that represents God. So let’s test this and see.

1) The Bible says that everything was created supernaturally 6,ooo years ago (short time period)… Evolution says that all came into being naturally 15 billion years ago (long time period).
2) The bible says that all life was created supernaturally fully formed and ready to reproduce (instant life)…Evolution says that life started from a single cell life form and formed naturally. And had to evolve into what we see now.
3) The Bible says that all life must reproduce after it’s kind (birds reproduce birds etc…)…Evolution says that given enough time you can get any life to evolve into another kind of life (Whales to cows, then cows back to whales).
4) The Bible says that God breathed life into man, and man become a living soul (a part that can go to Heaven)…Evolution says there is no soul. Once we die that’s it (no heaven, no Hell, no soul).
5) The Bible says that the earth existed before the sun…Evolution says that the sun existed before the earth.
6) The Bible says oceans before land…Evolution says land before oceans.
7) The Bible says light existed before the sun…Evolution says that sun existed before light.
8. The Bible says land plants were first…Evolution says marine life first.
9) The Bible says that the atmosphere was created whole and ready to use…Evolution says the atmosphere developed in stages.
10) The Bible says that God created man…Evolution says that man created God.
11) The bible says plants before sun…Evolution says plants after sun.
12) The Bible says bird before reptiles…Evolution says reptile before birds.
13) The Bible says fish before insects…Evolution says insect before fish.
14) The Bible says fruit tree before fish…Evolution says fish before fruit tree.
15) The Bible says that man brought death into the world through sin…Evolution says that death brought man into the world and sin does not exist.

And on and on it goes. How can something on the “same subject” be so opposite to something else unless that was the intention? And for Darwin to do this he would have to know a lot about the Bible, correct? Well having a theology degree would mean he had this knowledge. Plus, how could a person make up a theory that is the exact opposite of God when they knew nothing of God? You can make your own conclusions from that.

The idea of animals changing into humans has been around way before Darwin. Back during Egyptian times. They believed that all life came from the slime of the Nile River (abiogenesis). And that what animal you evolved from determined what race you are and you status in life. Their God’s were often half man half human. And they even depicted themselves on their walls with bird, wolf, dog, cat, heads etc… Each animal determined your lineage tree just like the evolution tree. Each god had it’s own animal mutation, and their mutations determined their powers over this life, and the afterlife.

So is evolution basically Satanism because it is the exact opposite of God and has it’s roots based in Paganism?

Share this page!

 

 

 

 

 

 

FaceBook Feed
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

... See MoreSee Less

Thousands not Billions: How Old is the Earth?

For our friends and supporters near St. Louis, the CUS Society of Creation is hosting its 7th annual conference 14 and 15 June. 

http://www.societyofcreation.org/conferences.php

Several CRS members are speaking, and we’d love to have you there.

Thousands not Billions: How Old is the Earth?

For our friends and supporters near St. Louis, the CUS Society of Creation is hosting its 7th annual conference 14 and 15 June.

http://www.societyofcreation.org/conferences.php

Several CRS members are speaking, and we’d love to have you there.
... See MoreSee Less

This is something you don't see everyday. 2 dolphins and 2 whales playing together. ~ Issac

https://facebook.com/SciencePhileOfficial/videos/…
... See MoreSee Less

The Living Quarters on the ark are practical but comfortable.

The Living Quarters on the ark are practical but comfortable. ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

i have driven by a cattle farm...i bet that place stunk bad lol

Just remember, this is all artistic license...

Does everyone see the irony in the ark flooding? Wasn’t it suppose to survive the great flood? Do you not know unless you have flood insurance, you are not covered. Flooding is an “act of God”. Ask Louisiana residents how they faired after the flood. How about Puerto Rico? Maybe Missouri or even your neighbor, WV. Did you donate money to help those flood victims? Were the dinosaurs ok???

I'm sorry but I just don't think the ark was that comfortable....In fact I doubt that Noah's home was that comfortable.

They were probably better and more comfortable than my quarters on board the USS Abraham Lincoln! 😂

I doubt it.

It doesn’t seem they would’ve been that comfortable.

View more comments

Video image

May we be as bold as this young lady to speak up at our city council meetings: https://youtu.be/oQ8eob45f1I ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Indeed such a strong faith!

I also would not be here Miriam!

love her.

Ray Comfort has mental retardation ... See MoreSee Less

n case you did not know this. ~ Issac

n case you did not know this. ~ IssacIn case you did not know this. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until its rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/living-fossils.html
The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australias earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or little mountain monkey - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina.
Reference: http://www.create.unsw.edu.au/news/2008-03-25_monito.html
The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”
reference: http://www.eartharchives.org/articles/scientists-uncover-two-new-species-of-elusive-south-american-marsupial/

Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until it's rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/…
"The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australia's earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or "little mountain monkey" - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina."
Reference: http://create.unsw.edu.au/news/…
"The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”"
reference: http://eartharchives.org/articles/…
... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Your picture makes it seem like the two species shown are found 55 Ma apart even though they are both modern species. Rather, it was the genus Djarthia (whose exact taxonomic position is uncertain) that occurs in the Paleocene, as noted in the PLOS paper you provided. This graphic is either a misunderstanding or diliberate misrepresentation of the references cited. May I ask what formal training in paleontology the admin of this page has had?

We didn't claim the skulls were from a 55 million year old fossil, it is the references that claim Monito del Monte is regarded as a living fossil and thought to exist: 55 million years ago.

Colby, please stop spamming the contrasts. There is no need to post the same link multiple times, Thank you.

I was just doing a one shot on each post. I didnt even think anyone even looked at this page anymore. I apologize.

Looks like the Colbinator deleted his post 😭

View more comments