Can Richard Dawkins be corrected?

Richard Dawkins is probably the most outspoken atheist of this time. He sets the example for other atheists to follow. And that is to hate Christians just because they are Christians. Or anyone whom dares to challenge or disbelieve in the theory of evolution. For Dawkins to act this way shows what evolution is really all about. And that is hatred. In the video below, you will see that even though several people on the panel try to correct Dawkins about his attitude of hate, he will not listen. Look and see for yourself.

Richard Dawkins can dish it out but he cannot take it back. This is what happens when a theory is believed based more on what they imply happened, then what actually is observable as happening. Because truth does not require protection to the point that a person has to be required to exalt himself above others in order to “look” right. They look right because the evidence merits it, and therefore hatred in the degree Dawkins expresses would not be needed.

And this is demonstrated again when Dawkins is asked a simple question and shows hatred even unto a student at a university. He hates Christians because that is what evolution teaches him to do.

Video

And even another evolutionist gets the hatred as he is told to F-off for disagreeing. Dawkins is also such a coward when it comes to expressing himself that in this video he has to use what someone else says so that what he said cannot be tagged to him. In this way even though he told Tyson to F-off, he can always claim someone else said it because he quoted them. Which means he has it planned and was prepared to do this as you will see in the video below.

Video

And in the next video Richard Dawkins actually admits that evolution is hostile and corrosive to religion. Basically implying that the believers in evolution need to be hostile as well. Then Dawkins mentions militant atheism as if it were a joke. By the way, that is what Dawkins is.

Video

As you watch that video, he claims he is not going to preach evolution, right? Less than 6 minutes into it, he’s preaching it. So instead of mentioning what’s in the rest of the video, I’ll just let you, the reader, make your own conclusions. But I will add this. About 13 minutes into the video Dawkins compares what is printed on American money (in God we trust), to what is printed on British money (a picture of Darwin). What’s being implied here is Darwin is the god of atheism, and should replace the Christian God. So if you ever wondered why atheists have a need to exalt themselves above others, here’s why. They believe that evolution makes them gods. Why else would they exalt themselves above people whom disagree?

What I find ironic as well is that even though Dawkins and his followers of Christian haters claim there is no God, Heaven or Hell. They are obsessed with these ideas. So much so that Dawkins supports a group called the “Rational Response Squad (link). Their motto is to rid the world of Christians in less than 10 year. They also have another website called the Balsphemy Challenge (link). Where they get men, women and even children to blaspheme to Holy Spirit to seal their fate for Hell. Here is an example in the video below.

Video

Notice that Dawkins name is in that video, and the last person speaking is a child blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Shocked? You should not be. The Bible spoke of this happening, all thi
s is, is the anti-Christ spirit taking over people so that when the anti-Christ shows up he will be accepted with open arms. So this has to happen, as the bible says. The hate has to be so strong, it has to match the hate of the anti-Christ. Which basically means that instead of having one Hitler type mentality (like WW2), the world will be obsessed with this hatred. And people like Dawkins, and his group of Christian haters, will lead the way.





Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Wildlife Federation celebrates tiger success by demanding more government action; Fewer Americans report reading their Bibles; Rowling tries to reason with transgender advocates; Astrophysicists' measurements give different ages for the universe; Fulani Muslims burn, loot, rape and murder in yet another night raid; Unexpectedly lively seafloor microbes can not persuade dogmatic evolutionists . . . and more during this August 3, 2020, broadcast of Answers News

- - - - - - - - - - - -
"For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy." - God speaking to Moses (Exodus 20:11)
- - - - - - - - - - - -

Articles:

Endangered tigers making "remarkable comeback" in 5 countries
disrn.com/news/endangered-tigers-making-remarkable-comeback-in-five-countries/

2020 "State of the Bible" report reveals only 9% of Americans read Bible daily
disrn.com/news/new-state-of-the-bible-report-reveals-only-9-of-americans-read-bible-daily/

JK Rowling warns of coming ‘scandal’ amid transgender debate
uk.news.yahoo.com/jk-rowling-warns-coming-scandal-143223129.html

Universe might be 1.2B years younger than previously believed, experts say
www.foxnews.com/science/universe-1-2-billion-years-younger-than-previously-believed

New research of oldest light confirms age of the universe
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200715170541.htm

5-year-old boy, pastor among 10 Christians killed by Muslim Fulani herdsmen in Nigeria
disrn.com/news/5-year-old-boy-pastor-among-10-christians-killed-by-muslim-fulani-herdsmen-in-nigeria

These ancient seafloor microbes woke up after over 100 million years
www.sciencenews.org/article/ancient-seafloor-microbes-woke-up-after-over-100-million-years

Black holes are hiding movies of the universe in their glowing rings
www.newscientist.com/article/mg24732930-700-black-holes-are-hiding-movies-of-the-universe-in-thei...

Stunning new video reveals Mars in high-definition for the first time
disrn.com/news/stunning-new-video-reveals-mars-in-high-definition-for-the-first-time

- - - - - - - - - - -

Watch Answers.tv
Answers in Genesis videos, live streaming, and more—all in one place.

Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

Photo by Yun Xu - unsplash.com/photos/qZFCovYUBSo
... See MoreSee Less

In the midst of an increasingly evil world, Noah was a faithful man who walked with God. He obeyed God’s command to build a massive Ark for the saving of his family and all kinds of land-dwelling, air-breathing animals. After the worldwide Flood, Noah’s family repopulated the earth.

In the midst of an increasingly evil world, Noah was a faithful man who walked with God. He obeyed God’s command to build a massive Ark for the saving of his family and all kinds of land-dwelling, air-breathing animals. After the worldwide Flood, Noah’s family repopulated the earth. ... See MoreSee Less

Meet Delilah, another one of the Ararat Ridge Zoo’s new residents! She’s a seven-foot-long, 12-year-old Taiwan beauty snake, and she’s made her debut in our daily animal shows here at the Ark Encounter. 

This species is native to Taiwan, and they are also invasive on the island of Okinawa, Japan. They are known as beauty snakes because of their striking coloration, which changes pattern at the end of their bodies. 

Although she’s very long, she is harmless to people and enjoys climbing on her zookeepers while they walk around the zoo to meet guests!

Meet Delilah, another one of the Ararat Ridge Zoo’s new residents! She’s a seven-foot-long, 12-year-old Taiwan beauty snake, and she’s made her debut in our daily animal shows here at the Ark Encounter.

This species is native to Taiwan, and they are also invasive on the island of Okinawa, Japan. They are known as beauty snakes because of their striking coloration, which changes pattern at the end of their bodies.

Although she’s very long, she is harmless to people and enjoys climbing on her zookeepers while they walk around the zoo to meet guests!
... See MoreSee Less

Can you guess who is coming to the Ararat Ridge Zoo? 

Site development is hard at work finishing up our newest outdoor exhibit! Any guesses what new species will be arriving within the next few weeks?

Hint: that is netting over the top of the habitat and there is a river flowing.

Can you guess who is coming to the Ararat Ridge Zoo?

Site development is hard at work finishing up our newest outdoor exhibit! Any guesses what new species will be arriving within the next few weeks?

Hint: that is netting over the top of the habitat and there is a river flowing.
... See MoreSee Less

What about the geological column?

Originally, the geological column was conceived in the context of uniformitarianism. Not all uniformitarian assumptions are true and useful, and this is shown in the idea of the “geological column.” Uniformitarianism states that everything develops or changes gradually and slowly. In order to discredit creation, some naturalists applied this idea to geology and then Darwin applied this idea to biology.*

But not all interpretations are so straightforward. Geologists in the early-to-mid 1800s developed a sequence of changing organisms with time, reflected in the geological column. The time scale with its millions and billions of years was added later by various dating methods. The column was first developed mainly in the United Kingdom and then applied to the whole world. The geological column makes a lot of sense locally and regionally, but it must be shown to be a global sequence, including the ocean bottom sediments. We need to get away from the Grand Staircase and the Grand Canyon as the “proof area.”

Modern science has shown that the fossil changes between layers in the geological column is not an evolutionary progression, as secular scientists once hoped, assuming fossils changed from simple to complex with time. Modern science has shown that all these organisms are very complex—they are just different organisms, although a few general patterns are revealed. For instance, one of the earliest organisms in the geological column, the trilobite, had very complex eyes. Moreover, there is a lack of transitions between major kinds of organisms, as expected in the creation model (Bergman, 2017). The fossil record merely shows sudden appearances, stasis, and then disappearances.

Creation scientists view most fossils as having been buried in Noah’s Flood. Then is the geological column a useful interpretation? Creation scientists are divided on this issue. Even we are divided on the issue. That is why we attempted to resolve the issue, or at least start to resolve this issue, by publishing a forum on the subject (Reed and Oard, 2006). In this forum, advocates who believed the geological column was a precise, global burial sequence of Noah’s Flood; those who believed we should reject the geological column; and those in between, all wrote up their evidence. Then each participant read the papers of the others, and they were required to provide answers to their challenges. It was all done in charity, the way it should work, but unfortunately the question was not resolved. The project showed how to approach such problems. It will take much work and an ability to separate the wheat from the chaff in the literature. At a minimum, respecting each other’s opinions is required until more progress is made. Maybe another published forum is in order?

* Uniformitarianism was an arbitrary assumption developed to discredit and replace biblical history (Oard and Reed, 2017; in press). It seemed plausible in the 1800s, based mainly on three specific geological arguments that supposedly contradicted the Flood. These were: (1) volcanic deposits, (2) the erosion of valleys, and (3) the presence of thick sedimentary rocks. In retrospect, those arguments were simplistic, false, and better explained by the Flood (Oard and Reed, 2018).

In addition to significant logical shortcomings (Reed, 2010), uniformitarianism has run afoul of reality from its inception. Evidence of catastrophes in the rock record are indisputable, including the Ice Age, the Lake Missoula flood, and meteorite or comet impacts. After first rejecting these catastrophes, geologists now claim they are a part of the “uniform history” of earth, proving that self-contradiction is alive and well today. Despite such evidence, rocks and fossils are interpreted within a uniformitarian framework. But many characteristics of rocks and fossils demand a catastrophic interpretation. Sandstones are a good example (Reed and Oard, in press). Are there any aspects of the rock record that demand uniformitarianism? We might see a few. We must weigh possibilities using the principle laid down in 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (NASB): “But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.”

-----
This Why Geology Matters column (What Uniformitarian Interpretations Should Creation Scientists Accept?) by CRS board members Mike Oard and John Reed appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 24, No. 4, July/August/September 2019.

Learn more about creation  www.creationresearch.org

What about the geological column?

Originally, the geological column was conceived in the context of uniformitarianism. Not all uniformitarian assumptions are true and useful, and this is shown in the idea of the “geological column.” Uniformitarianism states that everything develops or changes gradually and slowly. In order to discredit creation, some naturalists applied this idea to geology and then Darwin applied this idea to biology.*

But not all interpretations are so straightforward. Geologists in the early-to-mid 1800s developed a sequence of changing organisms with time, reflected in the geological column. The time scale with its millions and billions of years was added later by various dating methods. The column was first developed mainly in the United Kingdom and then applied to the whole world. The geological column makes a lot of sense locally and regionally, but it must be shown to be a global sequence, including the ocean bottom sediments. We need to get away from the Grand Staircase and the Grand Canyon as the “proof area.”

Modern science has shown that the fossil changes between layers in the geological column is not an evolutionary progression, as secular scientists once hoped, assuming fossils changed from simple to complex with time. Modern science has shown that all these organisms are very complex—they are just different organisms, although a few general patterns are revealed. For instance, one of the earliest organisms in the geological column, the trilobite, had very complex eyes. Moreover, there is a lack of transitions between major kinds of organisms, as expected in the creation model (Bergman, 2017). The fossil record merely shows sudden appearances, stasis, and then disappearances.

Creation scientists view most fossils as having been buried in Noah’s Flood. Then is the geological column a useful interpretation? Creation scientists are divided on this issue. Even we are divided on the issue. That is why we attempted to resolve the issue, or at least start to resolve this issue, by publishing a forum on the subject (Reed and Oard, 2006). In this forum, advocates who believed the geological column was a precise, global burial sequence of Noah’s Flood; those who believed we should reject the geological column; and those in between, all wrote up their evidence. Then each participant read the papers of the others, and they were required to provide answers to their challenges. It was all done in charity, the way it should work, but unfortunately the question was not resolved. The project showed how to approach such problems. It will take much work and an ability to separate the wheat from the chaff in the literature. At a minimum, respecting each other’s opinions is required until more progress is made. Maybe another published forum is in order?

* Uniformitarianism was an arbitrary assumption developed to discredit and replace biblical history (Oard and Reed, 2017; in press). It seemed plausible in the 1800s, based mainly on three specific geological arguments that supposedly contradicted the Flood. These were: (1) volcanic deposits, (2) the erosion of valleys, and (3) the presence of thick sedimentary rocks. In retrospect, those arguments were simplistic, false, and better explained by the Flood (Oard and Reed, 2018).

In addition to significant logical shortcomings (Reed, 2010), uniformitarianism has run afoul of reality from its inception. Evidence of catastrophes in the rock record are indisputable, including the Ice Age, the Lake Missoula flood, and meteorite or comet impacts. After first rejecting these catastrophes, geologists now claim they are a part of the “uniform history” of earth, proving that self-contradiction is alive and well today. Despite such evidence, rocks and fossils are interpreted within a uniformitarian framework. But many characteristics of rocks and fossils demand a catastrophic interpretation. Sandstones are a good example (Reed and Oard, in press). Are there any aspects of the rock record that demand uniformitarianism? We might see a few. We must weigh possibilities using the principle laid down in 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (NASB): “But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.”

-----
This Why Geology Matters column (What Uniformitarian Interpretations Should Creation Scientists Accept?) by CRS board members Mike Oard and John Reed appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 24, No. 4, July/August/September 2019.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Early bird discount ends TOMORROW! The Bible is the most loved —and most hated—book of all time. Join us for a lineup of wonderful speakers to see how you can respond to the objections raised against it. Register today for the online conference: http://www.livingwaters.com/why-the-bible

Early bird discount ends TOMORROW! The Bible is the most loved —and most hated—book of all time. Join us for a lineup of wonderful speakers to see how you can respond to the objections raised against it. Register today for the online conference: www.livingwaters.com/why-the-bible ... See MoreSee Less