How to debate a evolutionist part two.

Please read parts one (link) before you read this… Making scientific evidence solely support evolution is more of an agenda and strategy which is not science but is conformism. To make the evidence look like it supports evolution only, the evolutionist scientists “leave out” the information that would leave the Theory of Evolution in question. This page will be compiled of such information which will only touch the surface of how far this goes. The reason for this is because this is done so much that to list all of it would be a website in it self. And who would want to read that much anyway? So this page will consists mainly of the major lists that will give the reader an idea of what is going on. Making people believe in evolution is basically a selling game that most some evolutionists are not even aware of. Example: If you go to a used car salesman, what information will he tell you about the car, and what information will he not tell you in order to make the sale? Only the good stuff. What you will see below is that only the good stuff gets told. The bad stuff they will withhold, and in some cases even deny it. You see once you are sold on something, un-selling you on the idea is much harder.

  • The DNA percentage comparison between Man and Chimps is probably the worst of it all. According to who you talk to the difference can be anywhere from 12% to .2%, and seems to change every 6 months going up and down. But percentages are simple math, right? So why leave out the main number in which the percentage was taken from? It’s because it puts evolution into question. The number the percent comes from is 3 billion. Knowing that the number is 3 billion (3,000,000,000) makes that percent look bigger, and us as humans not as close to chimps as was implied. The object of the sale was to not allow you to see that. Ask any evolutionist why the main number is hidden, and all you will get is excuses. How well is it hidden? More than half of the evolutionist I ask don’t know that number. They had the idea sold to them and never checked up on it.
  • The immune system problem. Google the “immune system and evolution” to see if any sites address how evolution works around the immune system. You will not find one, instead what you will find is sites on how the immune system evolved. The reason they won’t address this is because the immune system actually fights change. And knowing that animals immune systems are stronger than ours shows that change would be fought even harder in the lower evolved species. Example: If the immune system were weak enough to allow the changes evolutionists claim happened, we would all die from cancer. Why? Cancer is our own cells rebelling against the system by changing. Cancer cells mutate in our systems all the time. Our immune system kills them making it to where most of us won’t get cancer. So if the immune system was weaker back in time, all offspring would be sickly if not born dead. And not many parents would make it to an age to reproduce. Extinction would be favored more so than survival. This would keep life from evolving into things as complex as humans or any other animals that are complex.
  • Interdependent systems in animals and humans. Every system in the human body is dependent upon another system in order to work. There is no explanation on how each system evolved and worked until the other systems evolved to support them. Nor is there any way for evolutionist to tell us in what order did these systems evolved. Their salesman answer to convince us is that they all evolved at the same time. Knowing that each system has a different complexity (a word they do not like), means that no two systems would require the same number of mutations. Which means no two systems would evolve in the same amount of time to even remotely evolved together as implied. So to claim this is to also claim that evolution has perfect timing. Which boarders on intelligence because how does any evolution processes keep time to when to evolve something? Telling time = intelligence.
  • They will claim that time made the layers in the geologic column. Yet they cannot demonstrate the mechanism that causes time to form and “sort” layers. Yet water, like from a flood, will sort sediments into layers when shaken in a glass every time. And because this process can be tested in a lab, and retested with the same results every time. The claim that water sorted the layers from a flood would be empirical, while time “sorting” the layers is not. Age dating is not an absolute which means other possibilities have to be considered. And because evolutionists refuse to consider anything outside of supporting evolution, the belief becomes a form of conformism. Conformism is the main reason evolution is being sold more than it’s being proven. Conformism is not science.
  • Butterflies can only be created. Putting aside the process of what makes a butterfly, and focus on the results. You would think that in the evolution process that the colors on the wings are just colors. Much like colors on the hairs of other animals and insects. But that is not the case. Butterflies have microscopic scales on their wings that work very much the same way a prism separates sun light into colors. The scales reflect light, but only a certain wavelength of that light. Which means it’s not actual color that gives the butterfly it’s beauty, but how it’s wings refracts light into wavelengths of colors. There is absolutely no pressures from the environment that would make such an ability to evolve, nor is there any intelligence in the evolution process that would cause this.
  • The human eye. It’s not so much the complexity of the eye, but the design. How does the process that allowed it to evolve know:

1) What size it should be and where to put it?
2) That clear fluid is required to fill the eye?
3) What pressure to keep the fluid so the eye will stay inflated and not become damaged (too much pressure stops blood flow, to little and the eye shrinks)?
4) What angle to make the lens that would have to match the size of the eye?
5) How to focus that lens?
6) That the image would have to be upside down and the vision center of the brain would have to correct that?
7) That each eyeball would have to follow the other when the person looks to the left or right, up or down?
8. That a blood vessel needs to be in part of the vision center area to filter out UV rays?
9) That rods and cons are needed to see in the day and night?
10) That vision has to be processed in milliseconds. Example: If it took just 3 seconds to process what you see, then you could not hit a baseball. You could not drive a car because if one pulled out in front of you and you did not see it until 3 seconds later. You already hit it.
etc…

  • The human heart… The human is not only by design, but because it is essential for life it has to be in working order when it supposedly evolved. No chance for trial and error until it evolves correctly. Here is a list of a few things that has to be exactly right or the life dies.

1) The muscle of the heart has to be a type that never grows tired. So it’s different from every other muscle in the body. If this type of muscle was not used in the supposed first evolution attempt offspring would die in less than 24 hour. And no genes of what was needed next would be passed on to correct this.
2) The heart valves have to be in place to keep blood flowing in one direction.
3) The heart valves have to be made just so, so that the opening and closing section of it does not damage blood cells. If not this will cause the body to send blood clots out which are deadly because they cause everything from strokes to organ damage by cutting off blood flow. So the heart valve has to be right the first time, or death will occur.
4) The heart rhythm has to be just right as well. Wrong rhythm and the heart will not pump enough blood for the life to survive. Wrong rhythms can also cause extreme high or low blood pressure which is deadly as well.
5) The speed has to be variable that responds to the body’s need for oxygen.
6) In order for the tireless muscle to work for the heart, a balance is needed in the body of: Potassium, calcium, magnesium, CoQ10 enzyme, and adequate blood supply for oxygen. If any one of these things are off, irregular heart beat and heart damage can occur and death can be the result.
etc…

  • The origins of life. Abiogenesis is implied to have proven that life was created from dead matter. No life has ever been created from dead matter. This one problem in itself disproves evolution because it disproves that life arose naturally then evolved. If life cannot happen naturally, then a Godless evolution cannot happen either. Why is that important? Evolution is solely based on non-intelligent Godless creation of life from dead matter. So when life cannot be proven to have arisen any other way than a God filled creation, then by default evolution is proven wrong.
  • The blood brain barrier (BBB). The BBB filters out almost all harmful chemicals that can do damage to the brain. Without the BBB the brain could not develop and would be damage. Intelligence for survival would be impossible with a damaged brain therefore life would die. So the BBB would have to be fully functional the first time or life dies.
  • The pancreas. The pancreas puts out insulin which is very important for survival. But, to much and life dies, to little and life dies. Anyone with diabetes knows this very well because they have to deal with regulating what their pancreas cannot.

There are also support mechanism of evolution that have problems. Such as what they claim takes millions of years yet in recent years has been proven wrong. More of the selling of time that evolution requires in order not to put evolution into question. More of what evolutionist won’t tell you so that you will believe.

  • Oil takes millions of years to form, or does it?
  • Coal takes millions of years to form, or does it?
  • Blood, tissue and DNA will not last millions of years, or did a million years pass?

More to come….

...9
FaceBook feeds

 

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

1 day ago

Ray Comfort

... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Simply Beautiful! Thank you Ray for sharing💗

I also love Unplanned by Matthew West

I am so glad I kept my son, especially when I learned about the different methods of abortion are done.

This song is incredible! Thank you for sharing, Ray. I will also post.

✅✅💯💯

TOP Fan Badge! But how 🤷‍♂️? (Pro-Choice 💯)

I dont know how i could be one of Ray comforts top fans i have been nasty to Ray because i didn't want to accept the truth so i attacked his personality and mocked him i have received this fan badge because Ray is so humble and forgiving i wish oneday to talk to him aswell as Justin Peters im in shock and apologize again for my arrogance and nastiness towards Ray and living waters the speak the truth and r for God

❤😊

View more comments

1 day ago

180 Movie

... See MoreSee Less

1 day ago

Ark Encounter

You can now get up close to the Ararat Ridge Zoo kangaroos in our new walkabout! There is also a viewing area where guests will be able to see our kangaroos when they have to go inside to stay warm during the winter months. 🦘 Learn more: bit.ly/32nzo0Q ... See MoreSee Less

You can now get up close to the Ararat Ridge Zoo kangaroos in our new walkabout! There is also a viewing area where guests will be able to see our kangaroos when they have to go inside to stay warm during the winter months. 🦘 Learn more: https://bit.ly/32nzo0Q

Comment on Facebook

This is an awesome attraction at the Ark Encounter! The handler allowed us to pet the Joey! Very cool guy!

Great theming

Why Were Dinosaurs so Large?

The following Math Matters article by Dr. Don DeYoung was published in Creation Matters, Vol. 19, No. 3, May/June 2014.

Even though giant dinosaurs get the most publicity, many dinosaurs were smaller. Of the hundreds of known distinct species, the average adult size was that of a dog or sheep. For example the adult Compsognath weighed about 15 pounds, the size of a large cat. The Psittacosaur was smaller yet, similar in size to a squirrel.

With that qualifier, however, the sauropod dinosaurs were truly impressive with massive torsos, pillar-like legs, and long necks. The herbivore Argentinosaur may have been the heaviest beast ever to walk on land. Also found in Argentina, the largest predator may have been Gigantosaur, an economy-sized Tyrannosaur 42 feet long and weighing 8 tons (Schreeve, 1997).

Table 1 gives the weights of several representative animals (DeYoung, 2000). The values given for dinosaurs are estimates based on the size of their bones and on reconstructed models. Uncertainties in actual dinosaur body weights may be as much as 50 percent due to incomplete fossil remains.

Many reptiles grow throughout their lifetimes, gradually tapering off with age. An example is the Nile crocodile, the largest of the living reptiles. Some mammals, such as elephants, also grow slowly throughout their lives. The largest dinosaur fossils, therefore, may be from creatures that had lived for centuries.

Two evidences suggest a rapid early growth rate for the dinosaurs. First, few halfgrown dinosaur fossils have been found. Thus, dinosaurs may have rapidly passed through their juvenile phases. It may also be that specimens having smaller, fragile bones simply did not often survive the burial and fossilization process. Second, dinosaur bone texture, especially for the stegosaurs, shows evidence of rapid youthful growth. Robert Bakker estimates that stegosaurs may have grown from an egg to five tons in just one decade (Bakker, 1986).

The creation view sees purpose and design in nature, including the impressive size of some dinosaurs. The long necks of the sauropods may have allowed them to eat the foliage from tall trees. In this way dinosaur parents could reach a higher food source and avoid competition with their young. However, some paleontologists doubt that sauropods could dinosaur size also provided defense against attack from smaller foes. In the animal world there is a measure of safety in large size. Predators rarely attack something that is big and strong enough to injure them.

There are physical limits to the maximum size a creature can attain because the supporting bones and muscles must increase rapidly as the animal’s weight increases. Consider elephant bones which are so large that the legs themselves must be greatly thickened. Whales require smaller bones because of water buoyancy, but are in danger of fractured ribs if stranded out of water.

Suppose we double the size of an animal in all three dimensions including its length, height, and width. The animal’s volume and weight will then increase 8 times (2^3). However, the bone strength only increases 4 times (2^2). This is because the bones’ supporting strength depends on the cross-sectional area. The numerical comparison made here is between volume and area. If we could make a creature 10 times larger, its weight would increase 1,000 times (10^3) while its bone strength becomes only 100 times greater (10^2). The implication is that, for large animals, bone size must increase disproportionately more than body size. Galileo first wrote about this limitation on large size in 1638, nearly four centuries ago.

Table 2 gives some comparative bone diameters for a variety of relative animal sizes. Animals much larger than the dinosaurs would require bones too bulky to be practical. Notice that bone size must increase substantially out of proportion to animal size. King Kong and Godzilla can exist only in movies—not in the real world. The same area-volume reasoning also limits the possible size of trees. Perhaps you have seen the wide trunk needed to support a 350-foot redwood tree.

References

Bakker, R.T. 1986. The Dinosaur Heresies New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

DeYoung, D. 2000. Dinosaurs and Creation: Questions and Answers. Grand Rapids: Baker Books (Kindle edition).

Schreeve, J. 1997. Uncovering Patagonia’s lost world. National Geographic 192(6):120–137

Learn more about creation Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Why Were Dinosaurs so Large?

The following Math Matters article by Dr. Don DeYoung was published in Creation Matters, Vol. 19, No. 3, May/June 2014.

Even though giant dinosaurs get the most publicity, many dinosaurs were smaller. Of the hundreds of known distinct species, the average adult size was that of a dog or sheep. For example the adult Compsognath weighed about 15 pounds, the size of a large cat. The Psittacosaur was smaller yet, similar in size to a squirrel.

With that qualifier, however, the sauropod dinosaurs were truly impressive with massive torsos, pillar-like legs, and long necks. The herbivore Argentinosaur may have been the heaviest beast ever to walk on land. Also found in Argentina, the largest predator may have been Gigantosaur, an economy-sized Tyrannosaur 42 feet long and weighing 8 tons (Schreeve, 1997).

Table 1 gives the weights of several representative animals (DeYoung, 2000). The values given for dinosaurs are estimates based on the size of their bones and on reconstructed models. Uncertainties in actual dinosaur body weights may be as much as 50 percent due to incomplete fossil remains.

Many reptiles grow throughout their lifetimes, gradually tapering off with age. An example is the Nile crocodile, the largest of the living reptiles. Some mammals, such as elephants, also grow slowly throughout their lives. The largest dinosaur fossils, therefore, may be from creatures that had lived for centuries.

Two evidences suggest a rapid early growth rate for the dinosaurs. First, few halfgrown dinosaur fossils have been found. Thus, dinosaurs may have rapidly passed through their juvenile phases. It may also be that specimens having smaller, fragile bones simply did not often survive the burial and fossilization process. Second, dinosaur bone texture, especially for the stegosaurs, shows evidence of rapid youthful growth. Robert Bakker estimates that stegosaurs may have grown from an egg to five tons in just one decade (Bakker, 1986).

The creation view sees purpose and design in nature, including the impressive size of some dinosaurs. The long necks of the sauropods may have allowed them to eat the foliage from tall trees. In this way dinosaur parents could reach a higher food source and avoid competition with their young. However, some paleontologists doubt that sauropods could dinosaur size also provided defense against attack from smaller foes. In the animal world there is a measure of safety in large size. Predators rarely attack something that is big and strong enough to injure them.

There are physical limits to the maximum size a creature can attain because the supporting bones and muscles must increase rapidly as the animal’s weight increases. Consider elephant bones which are so large that the legs themselves must be greatly thickened. Whales require smaller bones because of water buoyancy, but are in danger of fractured ribs if stranded out of water.

Suppose we double the size of an animal in all three dimensions including its length, height, and width. The animal’s volume and weight will then increase 8 times (2^3). However, the bone strength only increases 4 times (2^2). This is because the bones’ supporting strength depends on the cross-sectional area. The numerical comparison made here is between volume and area. If we could make a creature 10 times larger, its weight would increase 1,000 times (10^3) while its bone strength becomes only 100 times greater (10^2). The implication is that, for large animals, bone size must increase disproportionately more than body size. Galileo first wrote about this limitation on large size in 1638, nearly four centuries ago.

Table 2 gives some comparative bone diameters for a variety of relative animal sizes. Animals much larger than the dinosaurs would require bones too bulky to be practical. Notice that bone size must increase substantially out of proportion to animal size. King Kong and Godzilla can exist only in movies—not in the real world. The same area-volume reasoning also limits the possible size of trees. Perhaps you have seen the wide trunk needed to support a 350-foot redwood tree.

References

Bakker, R.T. 1986. The Dinosaur Heresies New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

DeYoung, D. 2000. Dinosaurs and Creation: Questions and Answers. Grand Rapids: Baker Books (Kindle edition).

Schreeve, J. 1997. Uncovering Patagonia’s lost world. National Geographic 192(6):120–137

Learn more about creation Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

1 day ago

Ray Comfort

Ever wish people would come to YOUR DOOR to hear the gospel? Wish no longer...just wait till October 31. On Halloween droves of children will come by for candy, and a gospel tract. Be prepared (with both candy and tracts), here are some terrific options: store.livingwaters.com/gospel-tracts/halloween.html ... See MoreSee Less

Ever wish people would come to YOUR DOOR to hear the gospel? Wish no longer...just wait till October 31. On Halloween droves of children will come by for candy, and a gospel tract. Be prepared (with both candy and tracts), here are some terrific options: http://store.livingwaters.com/gospel-tracts/halloween.html

Comment on Facebook

When my kids were younger, I used to take every Halloween to teach them the concept of taxes. After they would trick or treat, I would gather them around and take 40% of their candy and explain that this is how it is when you grow up and the government gets 40% of your pay check. They didn’t seem to enjoy the lesson.😕

Better yet!! IF you have a home based business then stock up on your sample packages and hand them out to the people as they come to YOUR house on Halloween!!!

Curved illusions? Is that when people think they can see the horizon curve when looking out of a plane window?

This is repugnant and distasteful. How desperate.

Scripture tells us not to mix the Holy with the profane.

Caleb Carter

We don't miss this opportunity to share the gospel ✝️

I rubberband these to rocks and throw them at neighborhood kids...is that bad?😎

Be careful what you hand out in Canada, you can be charged with hate speech and given jail time for handing out tracts containing anything derogatory about homosexuality or abortion.

I so love this guy I wish I knew what he does.. he's a great man I so respect him... But even if he made a bad mistake and fell I know God would restore him and make him even better.. of course you only answer to god.. but Ray if you ever fall man please get back up and God will help ya get over the self condemnation..and all the stupid stuff.dont fall away in these last days.. remember the falling away in the last days that's not you don't you ever give up no matter what ok. Your gods man and millions need you..or I should say God working through you..please never stop being his tool I just know he wouldn't want that..your loved by God first and me and others second.. never stop your work for God.. and like I said even if ya ever messed up roaly it can be a better stepping stone.. not sure why I'm saying all this.. I guess it's because we and me never want you to stop what your greàt work is doing.. your appriciated and loved and you really need to know that

Need those here in Australia

❤️✝️

Sheree Wooten

Aloha Seitz Kelly Hebbe Sarah Ann Ploeg

I have always given out tracks to 'trick or treaters'. I know some people think it's not good to participate in Satan's holiday, if you will, BUT we have the Word of God to defeat him at his own game!! I would ALWAYS pray over them and for those who would get them. It's a WIN WIN for that day!!

Love it👍

View more comments

Hear from AiG-Canada director Calvin Smith about the upcoming Gospel Reset Mega Conference November 21-23, 2019, in Niagara Falls.

The gospel message never changes, but how we present the gospel needs to change, depending on the people we’re trying to reach. Get equipped to share your faith and discover practical strategies from Calvin Smith, Answers in Genesis’ CEO and founder Ken Ham, geneticist Dr. Georgia Purdom, and others.
... See MoreSee Less

**FaceBook, Cease and Desist harassing me, discriminating against me, and banning because of those 2 things. Turn off all permission filters in sharing, ads and who can see what I post.**

As of 10 - 18 - 2019

If you continue I have no other recourse than to obtain a lawyer, show them that this was posted. All mine evidence of your filtering of me.

What is a cease and desist letter?

A cease and desist letter is a document sent to an individual or business to stop purportedly illegal activity ("cease") and not to restart it ("desist"). The letter may warn that if the recipient does not discontinue specified conduct, or take certain actions, by deadlines set in the letter, that party may be sued.

These are legal terms. ~ Issac
... See MoreSee Less

**FaceBook, Cease and Desist harassing me, discriminating against me, and banning because of those 2 things. Turn off all permission filters in sharing, ads and who can see what I post.**

As of 10 - 18 - 2019

If you continue I have no other recourse than to obtain a lawyer, show them that this was posted. All mine evidence of your filtering of me.

What is a cease and desist letter?

A cease and desist letter is a document sent to an individual or business to stop purportedly illegal activity ("cease") and not to restart it ("desist"). The letter may warn that if the recipient does not discontinue specified conduct, or take certain actions, by deadlines set in the letter, that party may be sued.

These are legal terms. ~ Issac
... See MoreSee Less

Load more
FaceBook Pages

 

Youtube