Monthly Archives: "December, 2011"

Global Warming or Global farce?

It has been claimed since the idea of Global Warning that CO2 gas is the main cause because it creates a “green house” effect. A green house effect is where heat radiation gets trap in instead of it refection back into space. And global-alarmist blame man solely for the problem. Since the Global alarm has been sounded, billions of dollars have been made selling Global Warming product to quote: Save the planet. Now when there is that much money involved what do you think is really going on?

Especially since the major outspoken Global Alarmist have been caught doing what would be considered Global damage. One of the most outspoken people on Global Warming is Al Gore. He flies everywhere in his private jet that pollutes the air several times more per person than if he had taken a commercial jet or drove. Gore also owns a mansion that consumes the more electricity in one month than the average American consumes in a whole year. No solar panels, no solar water heater. But only after he was made red faced by being exposed as a major contributor to Global Warming, Gore decided to make his house more energy efficient. Why did it take someone to embarrass Gore before took notice? It’s because the Global Alarmists know that Global Warming is a farce so what should they take it serious and cramp their lifestyle when they can force it upon everyone else? Their motto: Do as I say not as I do.

Then we have the proof that Global Warming is a farce by the Global Alarmists and their own e-mails accounts that got hacked. They were discussing fudging the numbers to make Global warming sound more feasible.

Click image to read more.

Video below shows 2 of the same plants. One given more CO2 then the other.
T-Rex blood and soft tissue find has now been confirmed!

Updated 6-2-2013 There is new evidence listed at bottom of page.
The video below explains the find:



Now notice the discoverer of this evidence said she was attacked for her findings. What this proves is that regardless of who you are or what you believe (she believes in evolution), if you find evidence that has the ability to put evolution into question “you” not your evidence will be attacked. Why? When an idea like the theory of evolution needs to be protected from all challengers, even if the evidence happens to be a good find against the idea. The only way to discredit the evidence is to discredit the discoverer of it first. Once done the evidence is basically debunked by default. That is conformism, which by the way, is not science. Protecting an idea from all challengers in this manner shows that the idea (evolution) is not what it is claimed to be. Here is another video that makes it more clear that if you find something that does not conform to evolution you will be attacked.

Truth can stand on it’s on merit and its evidence is able to stand up against all challengers without the need to use tactics of the destruction of a person’s reputation. Control through fear is not science, it’s a dictatorship. Which says: Conform or be destroyed. Evolutionist has this power because they “control” science. Absolute control equals absolute corruption. This makes one wonder just how much creation evidence has been found by evolutionists but they were reluctant to come forward for fear of being attacked and reputations destroyed. The pictures below are from the first find of T-Rex blood and soft tissue.

This evidence (the pictures above) is what the evolutionists were saying was a fluke but were unwilling to confirm this either way because they know that this supports a “young earth” and not an old one. How? They could maybe explain away one find or maybe two that certain conditions may have allowed this evidence to survive 80 million years. But since the discoverer is finding this same evidence in every fossil she finds there are no loop-hole explanation, no cop-out answers, and no special conditions excuse. This is because all the fossils seem to have this because there has not been one tested that does not have this evidence.

  • Fluke becomes empirical evidence:

And because these results are repeatable under the same conditions, what was considered a fluke now becomes “empirical evidence”. Empirical evidence that goes against the evolution time-line that evolutionist can no longer dodge. So what’s the best alternative for them concerning this evidence? Ignore that it even exists. Ignorance on purpose is not good scientific practice. But what else can one do when one considers God and truth to be a worse alternative? They continue to believe in what now has been put into question.

What happens when science is actually asked to prove something:

But now let’s look at what happens when people in science are actually challenged to prove a find to support their current claims. Here is a video where the Jack Horner was asked to do a test that would prove whether the whole fossil, tissue and all, was millions of years old. Listen to how he squirms out of it.


Update: And because evidence like this and others against evolution are mounting. There is even a country that has now banned evolution from being taught. South Korea has decided to remove evolution from its schools in favor of the teachings of creation.

On the pages where comments can be left on this subject. Notice how the evolutionists counter this decision. It’s basically anyone whom dares do disagree with evolution is not worth the scum found at the bottom of a pound. What’s ironic about this tactic is that it’s not even scientific. Yet 99% of all evolutionists responding to this issue will use it.

  • New: Blood from a 10,000 year old Woolly Mammoth found,

Scientists in Siberia find a female Woolly Mammoth buried in the ice and were able to obtain a blood sample.

So blood found from two sets of dinosaur bones one dating as old as 86 million years. Blood found from a 10,000 year old Woolly Mammoth. That’s times now. So when you going to give it up evolutionists? Blood and tissue don;t last 86 million years.

Possibility to this problem?

That God created with age already added to everything. Why? According to what the Bible says, death did not happen until the first sin was committed. And the first sin was not committed until late in the day of the 6th day. And time minus death = eternity. So for 6 days creation was done under eternal laws instead of the laws we now observe. And for everything to be eternal nothing can age because aging results in death for all life. So if things don’t age, then age has to be added upon creation.

How different is eternity to our own time and laws?

Because eternity does not allow aging because aging results in death, life being born cannot happen either. This is because development requires aging and aging does not exist. Hence the need for creation of life because life cannot be born.

Does time exist in heaven, and if so how does time exist without the aging process?

Where we are time and aging exist as one process. Both moving forward together, one effecting the results of the other. In eternity they are separate. Time moves forward but age stays a constant. Which is the very reason all things have to be created with age because the age they are created with is the age that will remain. That is until our case which was until sin and everything changed.

rev 8:1 And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven about the space of half an hour.

Time cannot be measured where time does not exist.

Dinosaur blood has been found more than 40 times & published. It was all hidden

Atheists cannot accept the truth that does not conform to their wanted reality.

The problem with evolution’s ever changing evidence and ideas

According to how the evolutionists find supposed truth about evolution requires them to constantly change the evidence and ideas. What is not realized are the problems and advantages to this for the evolutionist. Advantages are:

1) A evolutionist always gets to look right regardless of what the evidence may be: If a creationist was debating a evolutionist and the evolutionist used a certain kind of evidence to claim the creationist is wrong and is basically a liar. And tomorrow that same evidence the evolutionist used gets debunked and replaced, who was really wrong and a liar? The evolutionist answer will be, but that’s how science works. Really? A person can be wrong but yet be right? A person can use evidence or ideas to call someone else a liar but when proven wrong he is not a liar because that’s how science works?

2) The evolutionist gets to win every debate: How do you compete with someone who by their own rules is never wrong because that’s how science works?

But let’s look into the problems with this ever changing idea.

1) School: I graduated in 1980. Back at that time we were taught evolution and I believed it to a point. We were also taught about Piltdown man (a known fraud for more than 50 years), Java Man (who was an extinct ape not a man). Plus ideas that are no longer used. Since I was taught things that were fraud and debunked was I not deceived and lied to? Was not all my classmates as well? Or is this how science works so that makes it okay to lie to Children in school about this?

2) Court cases: A perfect example of how court cases should become null and void is the Scopes Trial. Piltdown Man and Java man were used to win that case. Plus some evolution ideas were used that are now considered debunked. Should the court cases won on evidence and ideas proven wrong still stand because “that is how science works”? Should science dictate to the court how they perceive things according to their will to fudge the truth where ever they please and call it science? That is exactly what it is when one group is allowed to change what they deem as truth.

Let me put it another way. Let’s say you (the reader) were accused of a crime. The witness against you changes his testimony everyday. When asked he says: My testimony is being improved everyday because I am correcting it as I tell the truth. Should that court allow that witness? Would it be fair to you if they did because he said his testimony was getting better and he was correcting the mistakes he made on the first few days? No? Well that’s how science works in our court rooms. They are never required to come up with any sustaining truth, and their supposed truth is allowed to change. And their frauds, debunks, etc… in which cases were decided upon are allowed to stay because quote: That is how science works.

Just to show how this also works in evolutionists always being right, below is a video that is an example of how evolutionists just change the truth according to what debate situation they are in. So watch the video and see how science works.


Do you think the guys know what they are doing when they do this? Of course. Would they admit it? Of course not. Why? Because that is how science works.