Challenge to YECs? Part 8

Before I start answering questions in this section, I want to point out what was written at the end of this section where the person who wrote this was indirectly admitting that the age dating process is not accurate. And was making an excuse as to why and justifying why it’s used anyway. The reason this was done is because this person knows very well what is going to be pointed out by most creationists. But this creationist (Me) also approaches from a different angle not only pointing out what has already been established by us that the evolutionist cannot address but like to instead ignore. But that simple logic proves that one cannot trust the current age dating methods. Here is what was said at the bottom of this section of the questions.

Like all scientific methods of analysis, radiometric dating techniques are not perfect and are subject to interferences that can sometimes produce false results. Analysis of inappropriate and/or improperly prepared samples gives erroneous values. Nonetheless, how does the YEC model account for the high level of consistency observed from using a variety of methods of analysis that place the age of the Earth far in excess of the biblical limit of about 10,000 years.

If you have been reading this since part one you will remember an analogy I did where I proved that evolutionists can be right and wrong at the same time. I will do it again because what is said above is an illustration of a person justifying they can be right and wrong at the same time and it does not matter.

The analogy: Let’s say an evolutionist is using certain evidence today to claim I am lying about my belief being true. Tomorrow that same evidence gets proven wrong, who was really the liar? Yet the evolutionist will justify his being wrong by saying: That’s how science works. Never having to admit to being wrong but always being able to justify that even though he was wrong it does not matter so actually he was right regardless and on both counts. So in other words the logic is that the old evidence made him right and the new evidence made him right as well. So the evolutionist will always be right even when wrong because their logic allows it. This is how science has rewritten what truth and lies are because in science they are both on the same level. But yet they will use the standard of right and wrong when judging or comparing themselves to everyone else. Basically science through evolution has a double standard. Where they can say and claim evolution is true but never really have to prove it to the same criteria they will require of everyone else. They cannot even define truth scientifically so why should they be required to tell it?

If a teacher would take this same logic on grading tests, where the truth can change so one can be right and wrong at the same time. The whole class would ace the test regardless of what their answer was or if they answered at all. While the class next door applies the criteria of what truth really is so therefore people will be right and wrong so some will pass and some will fail. In real reality do we live in a world where truth does not matter and there is no right and wrong questions or answers? Or do we live in a world where the real reality is what we live, what we see, not what we want to be true? So with really no criteria of ever having to meet real truth on any level, how could evolution or any of its support mechanism ever look wrong, or be wrong? There is a reason only an evolutionist can point out something that is a fraud in evolution. It’s because on all matters of evolution a evolutionist is close minded to anyone whom does not agree. This is also why only evolutionists can be scientists because first you have to believe there can be no absolutes so that therefore truth can be whatever you want it to be.

The reason that science requires different rules from real reality is so their ideas can look like another reality or truth if you buy into the supposed fact that there is another reality that is made up. Why else go to all the trouble to sell such logic and philosophy if the evidence itself is supposed to be empirical? It’s done this way because the real truth of the matter is that less than 5% of evolution can actually meet the real criteria of being empirical. Being empirical means the evidence has to be testable in a lab. The results and conclusions repeatable under real world conditions. The supposed fossil record that is often implied to be empirical evidence cannot meet being empirical. Neither can more than 95% of the rest of evolution. Why is it this way? Because 98-99% of evolution has to be interpreted. Which means words are the only real thing that says evolution happened. Why do you think it takes soooo many words to explain it? And when someone disagrees after soooo many words are used they are referred to as being ignorant and uneducated.

How can one tell that something is a made up reality? It’s when in its defense one must go outside the realm of actually proving it to actually making you feel that if you don’t believe you are lower than pond scum. And that is what we observe in every aspect of anyone whom dares to not believe, or dares to challenge evolution. How often does this occur? 100% of the time anyone dares to do either. It also has several names that has nothing to do with science. Bullying, which is what evolutionist like to do with the new in Christ to convert them (conversion is not science). Peer pressure which is to appeal to one’s ego, pride, or self-confidence. And then there is just plain hatefulness. This is where person is hated solely for what they believe that does not conform to evolution and nothing else. Which is another form of peer pressure that basically states that to belong and be accepted you must believe evolution. What is also used to convince more than using evidence is that the idea that “majority view” of what is considered the smartest minds in the world makes it so regardless of what anyone else may or could prove. They exalt themselves as the elite in everything they do while looking down upon everyone else except their peers (Stereotyping to belittle) . When something makes a person feel superior to everyone else, this is the example of the attitude that evolution breeds from a superiority complex. This is also why they will never accept anything a creationist says because to do so would be lowering themselves to pond scum level (in their opinion). Which is bigotry at it’s finest Now to the questions:

8. OBSERVATIONS FROM AGE DATING STUDIES

  • Essentially all radioactive isotopes with half-lives shorter than half a billion years are no longer in existence. For the most part, the only radioactive isotopes present are those with half-lives close to a billion years or longer. The only radioactive isotopes present with shorter half-lives are those that are being constantly replenished by natural means. This distribution of isotopes is in good agreement with the other evidence that shows Earth is about 4.56 billion years old. How does the YEC model account for this current isotopic distribution?
  • Response: 1) If something is no longer in existence how does one tell it was ever there? 2) So one point the isotopes are accurate because they have half-lives close to a billions years, yet on the other hand they can also be replenished by natural means? Does anyone besides me see the problem here? 3) How does one tell by the isotopes that the earth is 4.56 billion years old when: a) they can be replenished. b) They don’t last 4,56 billion years. c) How can one tell how long one isotope has been replenished?

YECs can accept the age dating as accurate because we know the Creator had to create with age in order to make what was created work under the laws that existed before and after sin. You see time without sin is eternal or infinite. Which means creation was done under different laws of physics because the first 6 days where without sin and therefore infinite. This is the main reason when we use the laws that exist after sin they cannot explain it nor will it make any sense. But when one realizes what has to be different in the laws of physics to make an infinite time-line work, then the pieces and evidence for creation start to fit. So what has to be different to make an infinite time-line work?1) You first have to understand that time exists in the infinite time-line which is proven by this verse: rev 8:1 And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven about the space of half an hour…. Time cannot be measured where time does not exist.
2) Time and aging are two separate processes. In other words time continues while age remains a constant (the age of all matter remains constant). In this way all that is created has to be created with age already added. This is because as long as the infinite laws exist, nothing get’s older. We are so used to time and age moving as one that it is hard to comprehend time moving forward yet nothing ages.
3) This is why all matter, both living and dead, were created with age already added. Ageless matter passing from the infinite time-line would not work under finite laws that we currently observe. Adam and Eve plus all the plants and animals were created with age. This is shown in the Bible because all were told to go forth and multiply right after being created. Offspring cannot do that.
4) Why create the whole universe with age already added? Because man had a choice to sin or remain sinless. God had to make a creation that would work under the laws that would exist in either time-line (infinite or finite). If not, man’s sin would have destroyed what was created which would have made for an imperfect creation.
5) Would not that make for a deceptive Creator? No. This is because in the infinite time-line, time does not have to pass for age to increase. So leaving the dating markers on how old God created everything was relaying just how creation was done. The attempt here to make the Creator sound deceptive is only justification to continue disbelieving because this method fits and explains everything so their only come back is to say this. These types of answers are only used when science cannot debunk what is claimed. Because if there were any science to use they would have used it.

  • There are in excess of forty different radiometric dating methods, and a number of other methods such as those involving thermoluminescence, electron spin resonance, and tree-ring, varve, and ice-core measurements. These methods are in agreement the great majority of the time covering time spans encompassing millions of years.
  • Response: The only methods used and accepted are those who support evolution. 1)There are no trees that have tree rings that go beyond 10,000 years because trees don;t live that long. 2) Ice annual rings are not made by seasonal changes only like a tree because ice is not a biological life form. So because of this the rings are formed through temperature changes that go from above freezing to below freezing. And because this can happen from night to day and not years, a supposed annual ring can be made in a 24 hour period. Besides that was there ever any test done to confirm one ice core ring takes approximately one year to make? No. it was accepted as fact only because claiming it takes a year makes it fit in the evolution time-line. Because if there was a test done to confirm this the test results and how it was done would have been released. But there is zero confirmation on this. And if not any evolutionist can send me the test results and how it was done and I will post it right here. But because this was “never” done I don’t have to worry about this. But this does bring up an important question. How was it established that rings found in ice are annual? Being that there is not test to confirm this means it was based in opinion and not fact. And because it’s still accepted as fact, makes one wonder just how science can let this continue when it’s actually fraudulent? Of course like I said before they can be right and wrong at the same time so using fraudulent evidence makes not difference. It’s how science works.
  • Vast amounts of data overwhelmingly lend support to the old Earth model. Several hundred laboratories around the world are active in radiometric dating. Their results consistently agree with an old Earth scenario. Over a thousand papers on radiometric dating are normally published in scientific, peer-reviewed journals in a year, and hundreds of thousands of dates have been published in the last 50 years. Essentially all of these strongly favor an old Earth.
  • Response: You see here is the perfect example of majority view makes new truths and reality. Hundreds of laboratories agree so it’s true. Peer review by other evolutionists agree the evolution is true. Problem is with all of this is that age dating is flawed from the beginning. According to their origins of everything, all matter came from the same source 15 billion years ago. So should not there be a trace back to that age if all matter is related to the source? of course. But does it? Nope. In fact not one planet, not one star, or anything else date as old as 15 billion. This is because age dating markers are not left until the said matter cools down enough to leave them. So our planet that came from a source 15 billion years ago will only date 4.5 billion years old means there is 10 billion years to account for. Get the picture?

So to cover up the possibility that God created everything with age, which the evidence of age dating supports, they ignore this really big difference in age dating and treat it as if the problem does not exist. So what accounts for 10 billion years of missing age? So what this means is that the matter that made the earth is actually 15 billion years old because it’s source (the dot) is supposed to be that old even though it only dates 4.5 billion years.

  • When radiometric dating techniques are applied to meteorites, they consistently give values close to 4.6 billion years.
  • Response: But the actual age dating back to the supposed origins of matter is 15 billion, so the age dating is wrong again/
  • Radioactive decay rates have been measured for over sixty years now for many of the decay clocks without any observed changes. And it has been close to a hundred years since the uranium-238 decay rate was first determined. Radioisotopes commonly used in dating techniques have been subjected to extremes of heat, cold, pressure, vacuum, acceleration, and corrosive chemical treatment without causing any significant changes in rates of radioactive decay. Both long-range and short-range dating methods have been successfully verified by dating lavas of historically known ages over a range of several thousand years.
  • Response: Still wrong since the source of all matter is supposed to be 15 billion years old.
  • Using the current, observed rate of motion of the Pacific Plate and the distances between the modern Hawaiian Islands, it is possible to calculate the relative age differences between the Islands. The ages determined by this method are in good agreement with those obtained by K-Ar radiometric dating.
  • Response: That is if one could prove that the plates moved at a constant rate throughout all time. That cannot be done.
  • Carbon-14 dates of about 38,000 years ago have been correlated with several other methods (ice layers, tree rings, uranium-thorium isotope ratios, etc.) to within about 5% agreement.
  • Response: So there are now trees that date 38,000 years old through tree rings? I’d like to see that. And again, ice is not a biological life form to seasonal changes from summer to winter don’t make the ring, changes in temperature does. And all matter comes from a 15 billion year old source so all matter is actually 15 billion years old.
...8
FaceBook feeds

 

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

4 hours ago

Hidden History of Evolution

It's the simple things that show how much a deception evolution is. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Its the simple things that show how much a deception evolution is. ~ Issac

4 hours ago

Science leads to God

It's the simple things that show how much a deception evolution is. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Its the simple things that show how much a deception evolution is. ~ Issac

5 hours ago

Ray Comfort

Gratitude is the high octane fuel that drives us to do the will of God. ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Gratuity you mean?

Yeah you need some gratitude so you can go out and take other people's rights away...

Amen. Gratitude because of the grace bestowed upon us in gift of Jesus Christ. ❤❤❤

Yes for the unmerited grace of God! So thankful for my salvation. I can't imagine living a day without Jesus in my life 💯

💯

Gratitude for its own sake is a wonderful thing.

And how exactly does one “know” the supposed “will of God”?

Well said brother Ray! ♥️✝️♥️🙏

Love is a motivator, we don't want sinners to go to hell forever!

Let me rephrase... Gratuity is the high octane fuel that drives us to do the will of Big Foot.

View more comments

6 hours ago

Answers in Genesis

In today's world, it is hard to distinguish the truth from a lie. Join women from all seasons of life as we seek to discover the truth of God's Word at Answers for Women 2020. Register today: bit.ly/34WYNjm ... See MoreSee Less

In todays world, it is hard to distinguish the truth from a lie. Join women from all seasons of life as we seek to discover the truth of Gods Word at Answers for Women 2020. Register today: http://bit.ly/34WYNjm

On today's episode we look at the typology of Abraham and Isaac in Genesis 22, and how this is a typology or picture of the relationship of our Heavenly Father and His Son, and what Jesus would ultimately do for us on the cross. ... See MoreSee Less

Video image

Comment on Facebook

James Davis

yes

14 hours ago

YecHeadquarters

This is why evolution is not science. The evidence never leads anyone to that conclusion, because the truth be told. No one saw anything.

And that is also why only those who believe evolution, are the only ones allowed to interpret the evidence. But conformity is not science either. ~ Issac
... See MoreSee Less

This is why evolution is not science. The evidence never leads anyone to that conclusion, because the truth be told. No one saw anything.

And that is also why only those who believe evolution, are the only ones allowed to interpret the evidence. But conformity is not science either. ~ Issac

22 hours ago

YecHeadquarters

**Teaching post for atheists debates**

When a atheist cannot refute the claims made in what you said. They will ignore the claims and make fun of you instead. This is called attacking the messenger because you cannot refute the message. In hopes that your attack on the messenger discredits the message so they don't have to admit they cannot refute it. it's a fallacy to use this but never worry when they do. Because it only proves that what you posted was beyond their intelligent, so to *save face*, they had to mock and ridicule you.

Nice going M.A., giving me this teaching example.

Example: Notice he did not address anything I said. Just the part that stung. Why? He knows I can prove 99% of evolution is not observable, and M.A. does not want to go down that road. But if you do M.A., just let me know and I will just to show that it can be done. Send one of your cronies over here to challenge this and I'll show you. If he turns out to be a hateful troll he'll go away just like everyone else does off your page.

I don't mind banter, that's makes it not boring. But insults and mockery does nothing in proving anything. But BS from a troll will not be tolerated. And yes I know when I'm debating one of you I'm actually debating 10 or more that I cannot see. You guys either use a forum, blog, or even the messenger to look smarter. Been there seen that when you guys thought I was not smart enough to use google and find where I was being discussed, and where the debate was on atheist discussion sites. And how everyone was chiming in so the one person debating me so they could sound smarter and more educated than what they were.

About 50% can hold their own, the rest go look for help. Then the 50% of those who hold their own *at first*, find that as the debate progresses, they need help also. Not all, about half of the 50%.

M.A., it's more than apparent with each counter post on your page that you need help, but you don't seek it because you would rather mock and ridicule than refute anything. Because if you could refute, you would. But you don't because you cannot. That's another reason I laugh at evolution. You only try to look smarter using mockery, instead of actually being smarter using science. Prove me wrong...Refute the points I made in the meme. Or let the mockery stand from your page proving my points. Read the meme again, pull out the points made, then refute them. ~ Issac
... See MoreSee Less

**Teaching post for atheists debates**

When a atheist cannot refute the claims made in what you said. They will ignore the claims and make fun of you instead. This is called attacking the messenger because you cannot refute the message. In hopes that your attack on the messenger discredits the message so they dont have to admit they cannot refute it. its a fallacy to use this but never worry when they do. Because it only proves that what you posted was beyond their intelligent, so to *save face*, they had to mock and ridicule you.

Nice going M.A., giving me this teaching example.

Example: Notice he did not address anything I said. Just the part that stung. Why? He knows I can prove 99% of evolution is not observable, and M.A. does not want to go down that road. But if you do M.A., just let me know and I will just to show that it can be done. Send one of your cronies over here to challenge this and Ill show you. If he turns out to be a hateful troll hell go away just like everyone else does off your page.

I dont mind banter, thats makes it not boring. But insults and mockery does nothing in proving anything. But BS from a troll will not be tolerated. And yes I know when Im debating one of you Im actually debating 10 or more that I cannot see. You guys either use a forum, blog, or even the messenger to look smarter. Been there seen that when you guys thought I was not smart enough to use google and find where I was being discussed, and where the debate was on atheist discussion sites. And how everyone was chiming in so the one person debating me so they could sound smarter and more educated than what they were.

About 50% can hold their own, the rest go look for help. Then the 50% of those who hold their own *at first*, find that as the debate progresses, they need help also. Not all, about half of the 50%.

M.A., its more than apparent with each counter post on your page that you need help, but you dont seek it because you would rather mock and ridicule than refute anything. Because if you could refute, you would. But you dont because you cannot. Thats another reason I laugh at evolution. You only try to look smarter using mockery, instead of actually being smarter using science. Prove me wrong...Refute the points I made in the meme. Or let the mockery stand from your page proving my points. Read the meme again, pull out the points made, then refute them. ~ Issac

1 day ago

Ray Comfort

Pity the man who rests his salvation solely on his belief in God and not on the God-given Savior. ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Pity the man that puts the servant of GOD above GOD and as God's Not Dead

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. John 14:6 NKJV

God is the God-given Savior! 😉

Isn't belief in the correct God (like Abraham) a belief in Jesus? Or does the Trinity not exist?

Even demons believe and confess that Jesus is the Son of God. There is more to it. Be more than what the demons are. Be Holy! Hear Believe Confess Repent Be Baptized

My son was just approached by someone the other day asking if he knew of God the Mother....oh my.....misguided

Pope Francis is trying to unite all religions as one. A one world religion that doesn't claim Jesus as the only way.

So who should we love more??

Pity the man who doesn't require sufficient evidence

Warning , Rapture is near for those in Jesus Christ. Great tribulation like never before , for those left behind . People who mock God living in homosexuality, abortions, looking at porn and so forth will pay the penalty. Repent and have faith in Jesus Christ by the grace of God and turn from all sin. It is almost finished for the world.I stand for God , America and Trump who supports Israel.

Pity the god who has to resort to threats of eternal torment to beings who do not unquestionably obey itself. Such a god (or "God-given Savior," if that is the preferred euphemism) is cruel and unworthy of respect.

The devil believes in God and shudders! He certainly isn't saved. It's about knowing Jesus and trusting in Him alone as your Savior and repenting of sin. When we do this, we become a new creation in Him.

Amen. Doing a study right now about how prophecy was searchable but the mystery that Paul was sent you Proclaim is unsearchable. Never spoken of before. Sad how many people miss it. They live in that prophecy don't know a thing about the mystery.

It's important to use Jesus or Yeshua, by name. Same with Yahweh. "God" is not a name, it is an ontological term of what something is. There are multiple gods, demons are gods, angels are gods, dismembered human souls that have passed on are gods etc. The word 'g-o-d' comes from the Hebrew word 'elohim' and while this word is used to refer to Yahweh over 1000 times in the Bible, elohim is also used to refer to demons, angels, and dismembered human souls within the biblical text. A god (elohim) is a spirit body, and doesn't necessarily refer to a being that is omnipotent and all powerful. This is why Yahweh is refered to of the Lord of lords, the Elohim of elohim. Most people don't understand this. It's important to know and say the name of the one true Elohim, the one true God, because if you just say 'god'...well your prayer could be going to something you weren't intending it to

Pity the man that worships a narcissist.

So many need understanding and wisdom which God gives freely.

You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble! James 2:19

The Bible is a compendium of folk tales and fables recounted orally for generations by primitive tribes from the stone age. This is the Old Testament. The new Testes is hearsay since these gospels were written by the faithful not by objective historians of that particular time. There are no gods! === onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cogs.12138 Keep the Lies of gods away from children! Forcing religion onto minors is essentially a form of child abuse, which scars their ability to reason and also limits their ability to consider the world in an unbiased manner. ''...exposure to religious ideas has a powerful impact on children's differentiation between reality and fiction, not just for religious stories but also for fantastical stories.''

Ray, I feel you’ve exposed the major problem with all religions. It’s not enough for folks to hold their own beliefs; or to believe in a god; or even believe in the same god as yourself; it’s not enough that they even believe in the major doctrines as yourself. No. They must believe exactly as you do. They must understand the texts as you understand them. Those who agree are the in-group; those who don’t are the out-group, and pity those in this group. The thinly-veiled threat that underlies your post will only hold people long enough until they have the courage to challenge its veracity and morality.

WHY NOT??? God is the SAVIOUR?!

Salvation from what...gtfoh

Brennan Brenz

I so agree

View more comments

Amazing “Feats”

This All By Design column by the late CRS board member Dr. Glen Wolfrom appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 23, No. 6, November/December 2018.

Birds are among God’s most fascinating creations, certainly worthy of study — from their annual migrations to nest-building, colorful plumage, communication, and more. One important aspect of these wonderments is the unique and varied design of their feet, used in many ways, including walking, catching prey, preening, and even defense.[1]

The American Coot (Figure 1) has feet that are so odd-looking that Shweta Karikehalli, the author of an online Audubon article,[2] described the bird’s appearance as “wacky.” Each of its oversized toes has two or three greenish-to-yellowish “fleshy lobes” that are connected to its long legs. When in water, these lobes function much like the webbing on ducks’ feet. But on land, walking is assisted by the lobes’ folding out of the way. According to Karikehalli,the coot’s uniquely-designed foot thus makes the bird more adept than most other waterfowl at getting around on both land and water. A few other water birds (some grebes and phalaropes) also have lobed toes, but none have lobes that are as large as those of the coot.

The coot also uses its lobed feet for other purposes.[3] They assist the bird in
becoming airborne — which requires the bird to run across the water’s surface. Also, the feet are used in battles among the male coots. One professor indicated that coots are more prone to hostility than is suggested by their “goofy appearance.”[4]

Here is an example of a unique design for birds’ feet that, unlike those of ducks, render coots capable of efficient transportation, whether on land or water. Unless the lobes appeared suddenly, fully formed and retractable, their evolution in stages would have offered no advantage. We maintain that the “sudden appearance” occurred at creation.

[1] Anonymous. 2018. Adaptations — Feet. Project BEAK. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from projectbeak.org/adaptations/feet.htm
[2] Karikehalli, S. (2018. August 13) Better know a bird: The American coot and its wonderfully weird feet. Audubon. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from www.audubon.org/news/better-know-bird-americancoot-and-its-wonderfully-weird-feet?ms=digital-enge...
ce=ea&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20180829_cootfeet_engagement&utm_content=medium
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ibid.

FIGURE 1. American coot, Fulica americana. Adapted from Lip Kee Yap,
2010. CCA-SA 2.0
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fulica_americana_1.jpg

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Amazing “Feats”

This All By Design column by the late CRS board member Dr. Glen Wolfrom appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 23, No. 6, November/December 2018.

Birds are among God’s most fascinating creations, certainly worthy of study — from their annual migrations to nest-building, colorful plumage, communication, and more. One important aspect of these wonderments is the unique and varied design of their feet, used in many ways, including walking, catching prey, preening, and even defense.[1] 

The American Coot (Figure 1) has feet that are so odd-looking that Shweta Karikehalli, the author of an online Audubon article,[2] described the bird’s appearance as “wacky.” Each of its oversized toes has two or three greenish-to-yellowish “fleshy lobes” that are connected to its long legs. When in water, these lobes function much like the webbing on ducks’ feet. But on land, walking is assisted by the lobes’ folding out of the way. According to Karikehalli,the coot’s uniquely-designed foot thus makes the bird more adept than most other waterfowl at getting around on both land and water. A few other water birds (some grebes and phalaropes) also have lobed toes, but none have lobes that are as large as those of the coot.

The coot also uses its lobed feet for other purposes.[3] They assist the bird in
becoming airborne — which requires the bird to run across the water’s surface. Also, the feet are used in battles among the male coots. One professor indicated that coots are more prone to hostility than is suggested by their “goofy appearance.”[4]

Here is an example of a unique design for birds’ feet that, unlike those of ducks, render coots capable of efficient transportation, whether on land or water. Unless the lobes appeared suddenly, fully formed and retractable, their evolution in stages would have offered no advantage. We maintain that the “sudden appearance” occurred at creation.

[1] Anonymous. 2018. Adaptations — Feet. Project BEAK. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from http://projectbeak.org/adaptations/feet.htm
[2] Karikehalli, S. (2018. August 13) Better know a bird: The American coot and its wonderfully weird feet. Audubon. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from www.audubon.org/news/better-know-bird-americancoot-and-its-wonderfully-weird-feet?ms=digital-engemail-ea-20180829_cootfeet_engagement_medium&utm_sour
ce=ea&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20180829_cootfeet_engagement&utm_content=medium
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ibid.

FIGURE 1. American coot, Fulica americana. Adapted from Lip Kee Yap,
2010. CCA-SA 2.0
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fulica_americana_1.jpg

Learn more about creation  www.creationresearch.org

Can I get an AMEN!!?!!! ... See MoreSee Less

Can I get an AMEN!!?!!!

Comment on Facebook

I listened to a sermon the other day that was against Christmas. It mentioned how similar Santa was to what scripture says about Jesus, the sermon took this as mocking, but I wonder if its paying homage as opposed to mocking. I wonder if it would be beneficial to teach children about the similarities of Santa and Jesus?

AMEN!!

Amen.

So was jesus born in December 25th or nah?

Amen

Amen

Amen!

Amen!

I agree and I also would like a firetruck please

Amen!!!

Amen.

Yes Only the Truth can save them Recently many antichrist events happening around the world. Even the prosecution of true Christians in many countries. Many false prophets claiming Jesus is not Son of God. I am saddened that even the fact is put in front of people and they still deny it. We are living in the end times and return of our Savoir is soon. I truly believe this

Santa was a nice man paying tribute to the real St Nickolas be cause they love children and follows Christ’s love. It worked for us.

It's odd that Santa also spells Satan.......

Amen !!!!!!

TRUE.....

Amen.

Amen

Amen

My nieces sometimes come across these santa cartoons but i tell them he is not real, and the real Superhero and the gift of Christmas is our Jesus.

Yessssss! AMEN!!!

I’m very disappointed that my church (Assembly of God) had Santa & Mrs. Clause for the kids. Instead it would have been better to have a live nativity! I pray they would do this in the future, there’s plenty of people to do it.

Its wrong lie. Lie is a lie. Thou shall not lie.

Amen..lying about santa will only make them believe you lie about Jesus..

Amen

View more comments

1 day ago

Ray Comfort

You’ll enjoy this interview I recently had with Janet Parshall. www.moodyradio.org/radioplayer.aspx?episode=286506&hour=2 ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

7 Reasons You Can’t Do Everything the Bible Says We cannot obey everything the Bible commands. Of course, this is easier done than said. People (including the type of people with college degrees) claim to do everything the Bible says, but do not. If someone claims to do everything the Bible says, they are either ignorant of its content, or just simply lying. Certainly, we should desire to obey everything that God commands us, but not everything God commands is to us as the church. No matter how much desire a person has, it is simply impossible to obey everything in the Bible. Here are a few reasons why. 1. Where you live Many commands in the scripture concern the nation Israel and specific geography. Unless you live in the Middle East you simply cannot obey commands about land division, going to a city, respecting the land, etc. 2. Your parents It is likely you are not a Jew by birth. It is less likely you are a Levitical Jew. If you were not born a Jew (you were not born to Jewish parents) then there are many commands that are simply not for you to obey being Gentile. The law was given to the Jews. 3. The temple is not built Orthodox Jews who make it their practice to follow the law of Moses do not follow every law today. Why? Many laws require the temple to be built. If the temple is not built, they cannot obey the laws of sacrifices, tithing, and the priesthood. 4. You should do right Your desire to do right by God means that you cannot do everything the Bible says. There are devilish doctrines, lies, and the actions of sinful men recorded in the Bible. It is important to make sure what you are trying to do was actually instructed by God, and not by his enemies. The Bible is often used to justify wrong teachings and behaviors by taking Biblical instructions out of their context. 5. You are human There are things in the Bible that only God could do, that is, God manifest in the flesh. You cannot die on the cross for the sins of the world. You cannot be water baptized without sin. There are other commands God gives angels to do, and you are no angel. While we’re on the topic, the Bible teaches that there is none good, and none righteous. We are all sinners, which means none of us obey everything God instructs by nature. Even if you are saved today, your old man is still present in your flesh fighting against the spirit. 6. God changes his instructions There are many opposite and contradictory commands in the Bible (see Luke 10:4-5 and Luke 22:35-36). If God says pork is forbidden in one place, and in another place says it is allowed, which do you obey? No matter which you choose, you cannot do both, and so cannot do everything the Bible says. 7. Who you are in Christ If you are saved today it is by the preaching of the cross, and you are a member of the church, the body of Christ. The doctrine of the church, the body of Christ, was a mystery throughout the prophets of your Bible until first revealed to the apostle Paul. This mystery church and its instructions can only be found in Paul’s epistles alone. Trying to obey the instructions to God’s nation, while being God’s church is a sure way to confusion. These are only seven reasons. There are many more, but these reasons emphasize the need to rightly divide the Bible to know what God wants us to do. You should read everything in the Bible, and can learn from every passage in the Bible. All scripture is profitable, but not all is for you to obey. You can’t do everything the Bible says, but you should sincerely try to do everything the Bible says to you.

Ray I loved your interview with Janet and found it so encouraging. Since then I’ve watched and learned from your videos which have eased my fear of witnessing to the lost. I appreciate you!

FaceBook Pages

 

Youtube