Monthly Archives: "June, 2012"

YouTube Creation vs Evolution debate example
Share this page!

In the past I have debated quite a bit. Being kinda burned out on it I don’t debate that often anymore. And there are several reasons for that.

  1. It’s 99% of the time a waste of time unless there is another creationist you can help out.
  2. There is really no winning a debate from either side.
  3. The object of the YouTube Christian haters is to run everyone off along with showing how much they hate you just for what you believe. This I will actually show in the examples I will use.
  4. The only thing that you can hope for while debating on YouTube against the Christian haters is that you plant seeds in those whose hearts are not full of hatred and are glad they are bound for hell.

Once the debate started, one Christian hater went and got his friends because he could not hold up to the one creationist (me) he was facing. Surfing their forum I have often seen them come in while a debate is going on asking their friends to help them. What I find ironic is that if they can prove creation so easily wrong using science it should only take one person. I have debated up to 10 at one time as they tag team me because one could not handle me. Now I’m not bragging here is just a fact that once a creationist learns how to handle the evolutionist-Christian hating atheists they have to send out the smoke signals for help.

Here is where the debate started: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6GvolyF0vwThis is what I posted that started it all: Sorry to burst your evolution bubble here. But the Bible does admit that fish and birds came from the same place: Genesis 1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven…So it would only be logical that some fish could fly as there are birds that can swim underwater. And some fish that can breathe air. Both were created from the water.

Now did I insult anyone in anyway here? Nope. But watch what happens while the Christian haters get wind of this. First there are a couple of polite posts but it soon gets nasty as I post things the evolutionist-atheist Christian haters get mad at one creationist. In fact I can count on one hand how many comments were not hateful. The cussing starts almost immediately. Along with lying about the Bible.

Atheist: that’s the best shoehorning I’ve ever come across.

Me: And you cannot deny that it fits can you?

Atheist: See, this is the funny thing about some christians claiming atheists (and basically only atheists for some reason) don’t see the beauty in the world because we.. Came from.. Nothing? I don’t fucking know. But then again I flipped my lid when I found out about Mimosa pudica. Nature is awesome! And evil. But mostly awesome! Sure, ostriches evolved from haddock according to the bible, makes perfect sense.

Now more atheists join in:Atheist: Living things aren’t “built”, they “grow”. That’s the fundamental difference that creationists can’t seem to grasp. That’s why all the car and plane examples fall on their faces. No-one built a tree, it grew from something simple without any interference. Evolution of species was similar, biology at its basic is the study of how complexity arises from simple beginnings, and if you mention thermodynamics here you’re more of a moron than I already thought…

Me: Ever heard of building blocks? If things just grow that way then we should be able to grow what we want. So do we? No because DNA and RNA have limitations. And more than a ,01% in change at any given time can be deadly. Don;t believe me? Go get an organ transplant where the organ has a greater difference then what can work and see what happens. Also I like that you called me a moron because it means that name calling is the only way you can win a debate. So keep it up you just prove my point.

Atheist:The standard sturgeon general-type warning to creos: if your position requires you to be ignorant or dishonest about alternative positions, your position is sh*t. *yes, of course the T was on purpose

Side note: How you can tell your argument is doing any good is when they resort to calling you names, insults, stereotyping, cussing etc… This is done when there is not counter. And to cover up for their inability to debate you they have to do this. It’s either that or accept defeat which by the way would never happen. So from this point forward it only gets worse as they show their hate for someone they have never met, yet only hate for what i believe.

Me: What’s funny and ironic is that some claim that believing in God is stupid yet when it’s all boiled down it only their opinion. Because if science makes you so smart why did you not use it in your post? Like when man builds a plane to fly does he just do it with no intelligence, or does it take several steps of intelligence to build one to actually fly? Now explain to all of us how evolution just does it without any intelligence.

Atheist:That would be a waste of time. You are unwilling if not able to learn. Much better idea: you tell me what *you* think the evolutionary explanation is. At least one of us will get some belly-laughs out of that.

Me: That’s what you will always get, is that all evolutionists will ignore not being able to explain the specifics yet call us stupid. I guess when they cannot do any better than that calling someone else stupid to cover for it is all they have left. Which is ironic because I see more of that in debates than science. says a lot.

Atheist: They were the primary food source of the now extinct crocoduck.

Atheist: If I don’t get to hear your comically moronic version of what the ToE says in about 5 more minutes, I’m gonna track down your sister, accost her, and tell her she smells like cheese. Don’t make me do it, man. Make with the funny!

Atheist: Nah, mate, everyone knows the Earth is circle-shaped. Like the Bible says, right?

Atheist: we’re not debating, trust me. And before spouting off bollocks statistics it would help if you knew something about genetics and how DNA/RNA actually works. Replication, translation, transcription, learn how proteins fold and function, learn how the cell cycle acts, learn the fundamentals of biology. If every mutation resulted in instant death then individuals of any species would be identical, there would be no variation whatsoever, and then kiss my hairy MC1R mutated arse

Me: And that’s the best you can do for a cop-out when you cannot address what was said? How lame. But please do it again and prove my point. Maybe some people did not get it the first time.

Atheist: I need not address what was said. Eve
ry single thing we know about biology looks exactly like it should if all extant life evolved from a common ancestor. If that’s not how it all got here, then why was your god so very, obsessively careful to cover up the real story and create the impenetrable illusion of evolution? And why should I buy the explanation of a creation followed by a magical cover-up when I can just accept that what it looks like happened, happened?

Me: Exactly what is that suppose to prove? Cheetahs are clones? Clones can do the same thing because they are exact replicas.

Atheist: Cheetahs are NOT clones, Cheetah’s are inbred, really inbred. You are a moron 😛

Me: Never said they were clones. And calling me a moron just shows you cannot really address this. So keep it up and prove my point. But you can think of much worse names to call me, right? So show how much an expert you are in name calling when you cannot address the subject at hand. Come on you know you want to.

Atheist: Nah, mate, everyone knows the Earth is circle-shaped. Like the Bible says, right?

Me: What’s ironic is that it was not Christians who thought up the flat earth idea. It was an atheist named Washington Irving. He later admitted to his book on the voyages of Columbus being partly fiction due to this fact. So the idea of flat earth is not even connected to Christians. Irving wanted to discredit Christians back then so he lied to do it. Google flat earth Washington Irving and see for yourself.

Me: Education is just another lame cop-out. Ben Stein has several degrees did anyone listen to him? Nope. And these degrees were obtained from schools like Harvard. So it has nothing to do with education you are just trying every which way to wiggle out of answering any questions that make you ponder evolution might be wrong. So keep up the good work of making my points that you are an expert at avoidance. Make sure to bring up some more off topic things to show you cannot address anything said.

Atheist: Ben Stein is an economist. Would you go to Ben Stein to get your colon checked? No?? Why not? He has “several degrees,” right? Oh, that’s right. He is an economist, not a super genius with answers on every subject known to man. Seriously, at least come at us with someone like Behe or the like. That has more credibility than Stein. Worlds more credibility, not that Behe has a lot, but that is another matter.

Me: The other problem is sorting of the layers. You guys have no mechanism that involves time that sorts layers. Water will sort layers again and again which means it’s observable and repeatable which makes it empirical, And what do you have to compete with this? nothing.

Me: The second problem is that if you take the aquatic section of the fossil record and set it next to the ocean living habitats of where fish live in the ocean. The fossil record matches each habitat area. 1) bottom dwellers first, 2) mid dwellers second. 3) Top dwellers last. You see this is consistent with a how it would happen if life where buried quickly were it lived because of a flood. there is not reason for evolution to work in this exact order.

Side note: Here is the picture illustration of what I was talking about that I cannot post on YouTube.

Me: I see no body tried to address the problem with the fossil record I pointed out yet avoided the issue by trying to change the subject. If you cannot address those points there is no point in me continuing debating here because I’m wasting my time with people who have no answers. If you want to convince me show me. Avoidance only reaffirms my position in believing creation.

Atheist: you link me to the sources about those living fossils where you got your info, and I’ll answer. In turn you can answer how you think there’s variation within species to begin with if mutations aren’t possible or hereditary.

Me: Credibility is a matter of opinion. We were speaking of education. The opinions of atheists concerning creationists will always be negative. Anything beyond that would be the same as it snowing in Hell. So your point is lame.

Atheist: Oh, so when some quack comes on the TV and tells you the Earth is flat, you think that person’s credibility is a matter of opinion?

Atheist: I never claimed to be an expert. I just asserted that you are a moron because you suggested Cheetahs are clones. Cheetahs reproduce sexually. Regardless you asserted organ transplants, and Cheetahs disprove that man is only 6000-10,000 years from a population of 2. Sorry Charley.

Me: Explain just how long it takes and provide empirical evidence to prove this. If you cannot them what you claim is only an assumption that is not based in any empirical fact. So you prove nothing. Sorry Charley. I’m not a push over and green behind the ears in debating. If you are going to present evidence to debunk creation mere words are not going to do it. But then again mere words make it easy for me.

Atheist:“The myth that people in the Middle Ages thought the earth is flat appears to date from the 17th century as part of the campaign by Protestants against Catholic teaching.” James Hannam. I’m sure most of us are aware that Eratosthenes calculated the circumference of the Earth (40,000 km) in ~250 BCE, so what’s your point?

Me: What ironic is that after I proves Washington Irving who is an atheist lied about this, you want me to believe another atheist is telling the truth about this? I’m not about to buy ocean front
property in Arizona so your sell is a no sell.

Atheist: You “proves” it to me? Ahh, that doesn’t sound like good philosophy to me. Who’s the other atheist you’re referring to? And am I expected to accept your “Google it” source when you’re so dismissive of my source? I don’t see why I should accept yours either; and I don’t really care if you accept mine. Also, if you think atheists are liars, & Irving was a lying atheist, at what point did you decide he was telling the truth? Maybe his admission was a lie too.

Me: If you are so truthful and everyone else are liars as you try to imply. Why was it that no atheist ever wrote a moral code that sets the standard for what atheists should follow? It’s because if a standard did it exist then you could be held accountable and therefore look bad. But omitting this allows you to look good regardless as to the reason you would rather defend and justify lying then using it as an example of what not to do.

Atheist: If there were a world-wide flood then the carcasses of all species would be totally mixed up together. The mud (which would not have had a chance to dry for a year) would have been churned up by the mega tides that would result from the lack of continents to bump into. BTW, when the flood was drying out the Ark would have been smashed repeatedly on the bottom leaving no survivors.

Atheist: Species’ groups that remain in an unchanging environment are under no evolutionary pressure to change. They replicate as things normally do. Just because you’ve seen fossils of them doesn’t mean it didn’t take evolution for them to get to the stage when they first hit the scene. Find something OUT OF PLACE like a Cambrian whale

Atheist: The first problem with the second problem is that you utterly made it up out of thin air.

Atheist: UNLESS… you just want to say, “God did it.” At which point, I then am forced to ask, “Why would the God who claims to not be the author of confusion (1st Cor 14:33 KJV) create things in such a way as to look like they evolved over millions of years in direct contradiction to His holy text?” Seriously, at some point, when the evidence does not comport with your story, you are going to punt with “God did it” or something of the like, and run into this question. Might as well jump here now.

Atheist:The layers of the earth are not just stratification of a single liquified layer. That would produce one course to fine layer, but this is not what is there. It is course>fine>course>fine>course>fine>course>fine>…consisting of water born sediment, ash from volcanoes, sand, silt, clay, etc. alternating repeatedly which could not happen in one flood. I expect you will just ignore this and say it make no difference.Me: do living fossils exist or not? Are they found in more than one layer showing they survived or not? And the reason everything looks related is because everything that is alive uses the same template for life (RNA DNA). So what would one expect to find in creation that is being claimed as evidence for evolution? Google list living fossils. Show one that is found in other layers that proves it survived until present time.

Atheist: I prefer you stay a dumbass creatard. Its way more fun. Notice how you play the persecution card. No please stay a creatard, your not smart enough or brave enough to be an atheist. Your life is based on something for which there is no evidence of. I actually care that what I believe is true you don’t. Its that simple.

Atheist: No, he/she claims its an argument from ignorance, because it is. Know the term, the correct definition of the term, and understand why the term applies here.

Atheist: Common template doesn’t work, buddy. If it did, why are there so many different types of eyes? What about ERVs, which are viruses inserted in our DNA that we have in the same places, in the same way? Why is it that whenever one looks at inheritable traits or genes and traces them back, one gets the same nested hierarchy called the tree of life? Why do we not see a mammal with blue blood, like octopuses have? Why would the “designer” use a four legged mammal template for dolphins and whales?

Atheist: i dont imply a damned thing about it being absolute, its a method that has always been found accurate for the stuff we do know, and no one has come up with a reason it wouldnt be accurate for the stuff we dont. dont believe it all you want, it is the more trustworthy option and it does discredit YEC, no absolutes needed. I asked for a citation, and some EVIDENCE for your assertion. You seem to assert because Egypt had a religion, and Darwin studied religion, that Darin pulled his ideas from Egyption religion. You would need some evidence of that, like a history of his education in seminary. And I didn’t offer a rebuttal, I asked for a citation. You don’t have fine, then your assertions are dismissed as a conspiracy theory.

Me: Darwin also plagiarized just about everything he claimed as his own. Most of his ideas came from his grandfather’s book named: Zoonomia, the laws of organic life. Natural selection was thought up by Edward Blythe. He made racist comments and hung around racist people (Huxley and Haeckel). His theory was used to put Indians and Africans on displays in zoos and not one evolutionist spoke out against this why it went on.

Atheist:”Where do you think he got the idea while studying other religions for that degree?” What EVIDENCE do you have Darwin even studied Egyptian Mythology, or the study of other religions was required at Cambridge in the 19th century. That seems just a little far fetched. Near as I’m aware he majored in ANGLICAN THEOLOGY and naturalism, but if you have evidence he deviated beyond the required Greek and Latin required for theology, PROVIDE A F**&[email protected]$ CITATION. PS blocking you until morning.

Atheist: You’d have to ask a biologist on this, but if you want a phylogenetic tree of the trilobite you can hit the library, or google it. Like everyone else, I have NO fucking idea what the hell you’re talking about.Oh, if I block you, don’t mind it, I was a dumb ass and got a smart phone and your comments are waking me up damn it.

Me: The evolution idea actually came from Egyptian religions. They believed all humans came from animals. And what animal you came from determined you race and status in life. they also had a form of abiogenesis belief. Where they believed all life came from the slime ar
ound the Nile River. Being that Darwin had no scientific degrees but had a degree in theology. Where do you think he got the idea while studying other religions for that degree?

Atheist: That isn’t hate dude, that’s really was the alternative to evolution, alligators forming from logs. That IS what we believed well into the middle of the 19th century. And you’re just projecting on this fear business. You assert evolution precludes god(s), which is actually untrue, so evolution is false. In reality, you need to formulate a theory with empirical evidence, publish, and accept criticism. “And now everyone knows why evolution is not falsifiable” It is falsifiable 😛

Atheist:”Naturalism requires” Let’s review 1. Everything has a cause 2. Nothing can cause itself 3. Causes can’t be infinite 4. So there has to be a first cause. 5. God = first cause, god exists This is your assertion in a nutshell, and I personally don’t propose god’s exist or don’t exist. I dunno, and I don’t care. But 5 is a non sequitur. But this is so far outside the scope of this video which is evolution, not gods, creation, or naturalism.

Me: Now let me guess what you are going to say next. Let’s see…. something about actually proving something exists, right? I find this argument pops up when atheists have nothing left in the science to present so they go for the broad spectrum cop out response. Lame.

Atheist: Well, I mentioned “pre” Cambrian strata, which ought to clue you in to the fact that the Cambrian is not the oldest/lowest stratum. Trilobites are dated from the Cambrian to around 526 mya, but simpler, eyeless forms exist, like Spriggina floundersi from the Ediacaran period, which precedes the Cambrian, dated 550 mya. The earliest, single-celled organisms are dated to 3.5 bya. So, is three billion years long enough for you?

Special side note: What every evolutionist ignores or does not realize is that dating markers from the layers will cross contaminate the fossils in the layers. So if the flood sorted them and put them in that order, they will date the exact age of the layer not the exact age in which they lived. Why? Because there is more dating markers in the layer than the fossil. So the dating markers in the later overwhelm the ones on the fossil and change the date of the fossil so that the layer and the fossil match in every instance.

Example: If you bury a bone that came from a dead animal 20 years old in a layer that dates 3 million years old. Over time the bone, regardless of it’s age, will soon become cross contaminated by the layer and will now date the same age as the layer. This is why a fossil found will always date the same as the layer. All fossils have been in the ground long enough to become cross contaminated. This is also why they find blood and soft tissue in the bones of dinosaurs that date millions of year old. The date is wrong because the layers cross contaminated the fossil. And anyone with any sense knows that blood and soft tissue is not going to last that long regardless of how it’s protected. Because unknown to most evolutionists the same people who made the find which was deemed as a fluke, have reconfirmed the find on several other fossils as well.

So the find is not observable and repeatable which means evolutionists have a lot to explain here: http://yecheadquarters.org/?p=1135

Etc…

As the debate progresses forward more join the debate and the insults and name calling and stereotyping and cussing increase. At some point in the middle of all this where it now seems every response has some type of insult or name calling I decided I have made my point. Because I keep pointing out that this (cussing etc…) is the only thing they seem to be good at so keep it up and prove my point. And they did page after page. This debate was about 15 pages long. And once I left of course they all had to take their last little back stabs with more insults and name calling. The only thing I can gather is this is how you prove evolution. Don’t use science use bullying tactics.

So to counter such tactics one has to just point them out and how lame they really are. then encourage them to continue and show everybody how unscientific evolution is that all evolutionist must resort to this. So why do they hate someone they have never met? Their bias and need for absolute control and power over everyone’s thoughts and beliefs makes to where they have to hate anyone who disagrees. After all do you call a friend all the names and insults they made to me? Nope.

And people wonder why I don’t get involved in many debates anymore and this is why. The debates are no longer about any science. It’s about who can insult or call names better. And what does that scientifically prove? nothing. Only that evolution is moving towards teaching all whom believe it to hate all who don’t. Because if you ask them why they hate they suddenly don;t have an answer but will respond: I don’t hate you. But their actions never match their words.

Also the reason everything looks related is because of this:

Share this page!

 

 

 

 

 

 

FaceBook Feed
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Answers in Genesis has partnered with Children's Hunger Fund to make this a summer of hope for kids facing hunger. Watch this short video to learn more, and find out how you can help: ChildrensHungerFund.org/AiG ... See MoreSee Less

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 3

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.”

Statistical Study of Surficial Gravel Deposits

Gravel is one of the most important building materials in modern society, being the chief ingredient in concrete and the standard for structural fill to support buildings, roads, and structures. While the relative ability of a stream or creek to transport fine sediments such as clay and silt is well known, coarse sediments require significant stream power. Laboratory research has centered on sand, and empirical equations have been developed to relate grain size distribution to current speed and stream power.

Gravel is too large to be easily investigated in the laboratory, so most of the research for gravel has been based on observed flood events. Since moving gravel requires greater stream power or current strength, than sand and fines, it has been of special relevance to debates of catastrophic versus uniformitarian depositional interpretations.

The research involves entry of large numbers of existing data from a sizeable area to research patterns that may indicate the directions and relative strengths of the currents that formed the deposits, effectively testing the predictions of uniformitarian versus catastrophic models of earth history.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Current CRS-sponsored Research Projects, Part 3

Dr Gene Chaffin, vice-president of the Creation Research Society listed several of the current research projects that have been awarded grants from the Creation Research Society. He states, “Each grant is awarded based on review and vote by the members of the research committee. We are grateful to the donors who have made these grants possible.” 

Statistical Study of Surficial Gravel Deposits 

Gravel is one of the most important building materials in modern society, being the chief ingredient in concrete and the standard for structural fill to support buildings, roads, and structures. While the relative ability of a stream or creek to transport fine sediments such as clay and silt is well known, coarse sediments require significant stream power. Laboratory research has centered on sand, and empirical equations have been developed to relate grain size distribution to current speed and stream power. 

Gravel is too large to be easily investigated in the laboratory, so most of the research for gravel has been based on observed flood events. Since moving gravel requires greater stream power or current strength, than sand and fines, it has been of special relevance to debates of catastrophic versus uniformitarian depositional interpretations. 

The research involves entry of large numbers of existing data from a sizeable area to research patterns that may indicate the directions and relative strengths of the currents that formed the deposits, effectively testing the predictions of uniformitarian versus catastrophic models of earth history.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

Major announcement! We are excited to share that Keith and Kristyn Getty will join us for the Answers for Pastors and Christian Leaders Conference​ at the Ark Encounter​ October 9-10, 2019! This conference is for everyone, and this year’s topic is so important to be informed about.

Take advantage of our special early bird pricing and save 15% if you register by June 30, 2019 🐣➡️https://bit.ly/2XcJwdJ
... See MoreSee Less

Major announcement! We are excited to share that Keith and Kristyn Getty will join us for the Answers for Pastors and Christian Leaders Conference​ at the Ark Encounter​ October 9-10, 2019! This conference is for everyone, and this year’s topic is so important to be informed about.

Take advantage of our special early bird pricing and save 15% if you register by June 30, 2019 🐣➡️https://bit.ly/2XcJwdJ

Comment on Facebook

There also will be a separate concert later that evening on October 9, 2019 (details coming soon). Keep updated at bit.ly/2XcJwdJ.

Mandy Logan Liam Logan Brian McAuley

Olivia Renee

This is VERY disappointing. The gettys are in direct opposition to what you (AIG) are working for. They (the gettys) are strongly working toward the one-world church of anti-christ!!!!!!!!! PLEASE rethink bringing them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Too late for us being there. Shoot.

Are they charging an admission price to hear them speak ?

If you don't know who they are, you'll probably recognize the hymn they wrote which wasn't from the 1800s at all, but the 2000s youtu.be/YBNFNfH89SA

View more comments

Major announcement! We are excited to share that Keith and Kristyn Getty will be at the Ark Encounter for the Answers for Pastors and Christian Leaders Conference​​ October 9-10, 2019! This conference is for everyone, and this year’s topic is so important to be informed about.

Take advantage of our special early bird pricing and save 15% if you register by June 30, 2019 🐣➡️ https://bit.ly/2XcJwdJ
... See MoreSee Less

Major announcement! We are excited to share that Keith and Kristyn Getty will be at the Ark Encounter for the Answers for Pastors and Christian Leaders Conference​​ October 9-10, 2019! This conference is for everyone, and this year’s topic is so important to be informed about.

Take advantage of our special early bird pricing and save 15% if you register by June 30, 2019 🐣➡️ https://bit.ly/2XcJwdJ

Comment on Facebook

There also will be a separate concert later that evening on October 9, 2019 (details coming soon). Keep updated at bit.ly/2XcJwdJ.

Mark Shaw to tell Mom 🙂

Jason Odel

View more comments

That’s pretty funny!

We recognize that “...neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but God who causes the growth.” (1 Corinthians 3:7), but it is funny nonetheless!
... See MoreSee Less

That’s pretty funny! 

We recognize that “...neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but God who causes the growth.” (1 Corinthians 3:7), but it is funny nonetheless!

Comment on Facebook

Yip, it’s amazing when I get No, it’s not for me “. Oh my gosh 🤦🏻‍♀️

Yip, it’s amazing when I get No, it’s not for me “. Oh my gosh 🤦🏻‍♀️

I literally had that happen a couple of days ago.

Traffic tornadoes; Snapchat withdraws; UN deputy accuses prolifers of torture; Government funded research on aborted babies ends; Testing elephants with sunflower seeds; . . . . and more during today's episode of Answers News, broadcast live from the Creation Museum.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin." - Jesus (Luke 17:2)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

ARTICLES Pennsylvania man: Traffic circles are causing all of these tornadoes www.phillyvoice.com/pennsylva... Snapchat issues, quickly pulls ‘Love Has No Age’ filter for LGBT ‘Pride month’ www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/... UN human rights official: ‘It’s clear’ US pro-life laws are ‘torture’ www.lifesitenews.com/news/un-... Trump administration halts fetal tissue research by government scientists www.cbc.ca/news/health/fetal-... The elephant's mathematical trunk can smell numbers www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/june-... Pro-life Unplanned movie finally coming to Canada www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro... These parents are suing because their daughter with Down syndrome was ‘wrongfully born’ www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/th... Sloth’s Evolutionary Secret Shocks Scientists www.technologynetworks.com/pr... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Note: topics not covered during today's episode may be featured in a future Answers News broadcast. Get more answers @ AnswersinGenesis.org

Thank you for doing this. It is helping me and my children. For years I ask questions but no one in the church could give me a good answers. The Holy Spirit open my eyes and the Bible has all the answers.

Hello from Oklahoma, God bless.

This is infuriating. This beautiful girl is a gift from God and how dare they treat her as an inconvenience!

I would take her and raise her in a heartbeat, and she would be SO loved!

Thankful it will be in Canada!

Might be good to offer the child for adoption

If you enjoy good content like this and others, support them. The secular world is trying to silence any and all voices that don't support their worldview, as clearly seen in the news recently, including Pintrest labeling pro-life groups as pornography.

Being an older Mom, I had those tests for a different reason: to be prepared. My son is autistic and I wouldn't abort him if I knew ahead.

Ugh. I just found a Facebook group called Answers to Answers in Genesis. Basically, the sole purpose of the group is to debunk everything Answers in Genesis teaches and undermine the authority of God's Word. The terrible part is it is a so called Christian group!

My father would probably have been aborted, had he been conceived today. Yet he led a fulfilling life for over 80 years....

That poor girl. How is she going to feel, not being wanted? :'( I hope she gets adopted by someone who wants her. :'(

My daughter has 4 multiple needs diagnoses, and I wouldn't trade her for 10 "perfect" daughters!

This one grieves me. She is so beautiful and has such life!

That poor child. Such cruel parents.

Hello from IDAHO!!!

Hello from Oklahoma!

Amen 🙏🏿

I seen a statement that said, Liberals will murder their children but save puppies because it's cruel to kill them.

100 words a second

the pro choice crowd sounds quite a bit like the bunch that gave us Eugenics.

View more comments

TEEN Vogue?? This is suggested reading for 13 year olds? Articles on prostitution being a legitimate job? Pedophiles who pay for child sex slaves will be ecstatic about articles like this and their target audience. ... See MoreSee Less

TEEN Vogue?? This is suggested reading for 13 year olds? Articles on prostitution being a legitimate job? Pedophiles who pay for child sex slaves will be ecstatic about articles like this and their target audience.

Comment on Facebook

Teen Vogue is either ignorant or supports slavery. A lot of women in prostitution are forced into due to sex slavery. It is s horrible issue and isn’t work. Sex slavery is a huge problem and teen vogue supports making it worse.

Jesus, we long for your return.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

And the poor lady with the sign doesn't exactly look happy. Poor girl. Would love to talk to her.

Keep exposing the works of satan, brothers and sisters in Christ. We are near the end.

Nooo, y'all nooo! So, does that make us married guys volunteers? Sex is intended to be free, but only within the confines of marriages. Anything else is pure theft!

Very sad 😞

This is what the world thinks is appropriate.

Teen vogue has also run articles on sodomy and multiple articles promoting communism.

Depravity of man.

This is so evil .

Can the world just get any more ridiculous 🤦🏻‍♀️😡‼️

Prostitution is slavery

Zelka

🤦‍♂️

How awful!

😡😡😡

So, why should the folks at "teen vogue" have any peace when the go out in nyc? If anyone knows who the jokers are who write this bird cage liner, and sees them in a restaurant, go up to their table and tell them, with emphasis and compassion, that Jesus saves! "teen vogue" is a conde nast publication...boo...

View more comments

... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Eat 3x a day!!!

And when you get to the many immoral things attributed to God, how do you justify it? Slavery and human sacrifice and genocide. What horrible things

Amen! Everyday

But there are so many other Facebook posts to read!

Yes reading through everyday Year after year! So agree!

Ray’s unique selling point. But not necessarily true. The most fruitful Christians in the earlier centuries of the church didn’t have access to scripture, yet were fruitful and had power of the Holy Spirit, not just words.

Is there a time to focus on? 10 minutes? 15? 45? Or something you grow into?

Jesus is God's word not the bible.

It's allright if you read the bible every day, as long as you also read about sience too. Geology and astronomy for example.

Start off by reading a chapter a day. Surely that can be accomplished.

Truth.

Wow. That is discipline. Kudos, Ray!

And something that I had forgotten...before you do anything, talk to the One who loves you most. Thank Him that He let you wake up. Bring Him your troubles and leave them there. Ask for His protection and strength to overcome temptation (I too often fail here). After you’ve given Him your family, your leaders, your Pastors and your friends, ask Him to prepare your heart and mind as you read His word. Love ya, Ray. Hope you’re feeling better, and I really wish you’d hang out long enough one Sunday so I could say “Hi” before we’re off to AZ.

Very true. I’m not only reading each day, I’ve started memorizing books of the Bible. 2 Timothy, Colossians, Philippians, Ephesians, and today I am starting the longest endeavor yet. The book of John. It’s very hard to share the truth of God’s word, if you aren’t spending time reading and meditating on it yourself.

You don’t have all of God’s Word. You are missing seven books and parts of Daniel and Esther.

Amen 💜🕂😊

Ask God what book to read, then read a few chapters a day. Not one, as man put in the chapter breaks to make it easier to find bits. You need to read in larger chunks to get context.

I'm on 27 years at the moment.

You know what's been helping me? The One Year Bible Online Page. They have a facebook page and website. I've been doing it since Jan 1st. It's to read the bible in a year. I've never read the whole thing and it helps me to stick with the daily reading, which actually gets me to read more of it beyond the daily reading they have set each day. They also have an audio version with commentary to help you understand more. They post study questions to help you think about what you're reading as well. You don't need to start on Jan. 1st. Definitely check it out if you have trouble getting into the word. <3

Amen!

Fruit of Psalm-one✝️ love that Brother COMPLETELY AGREE

Is there any way I could interview you for my YouTube channel?

It's absolutely about faith and belief and so many bibles read different and I think a lot is lost in the written word, thus the reason for the scholars popes priest and nuns to translate hopfuly the correct version of the word of God !!

Amen!!

46 years?? Yet you are still blind as a bat preaching a works based Gospel and failing to rightly divide the word of God. Romans 1:22 (KJV) 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV) 15 STUDY to shew thyself approved UNTO God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, RIGHTLY DIVIDING the word of truth. Romans 2:16 (KJV) 16 In the day when God shall JUDGE the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to MY gospel. -PAUL

View more comments

Archie the camel recently celebrated his eighth birthday! Our keepers at the Ararat Ridge Zoo made him his very own version of a "birthday cake!" 🎂 ... See MoreSee Less

Archie the camel recently celebrated his eighth birthday! Our keepers at the Ararat Ridge Zoo made him his very own version of a birthday cake! 🎂

Comment on Facebook

Awww Happy Birthday Archie ! My granddaughters loved riding and petting you last year.

awwww, happy birthday, archie! hope your "cake" was good! 🙂

Awe ❤️. Happy Birthday Archie! 🎉🎂🎈🎁🕯️

Aww Happy Birthday Archie.

Yogi Bear would be jealous 🙂

Our recent visit to the Ark was wonderful however I was very concerned about the animals, the lack of shaded areas, water , greenery and very small enclosures. I really expected better from the makers of Creation Museum and The Ark Encounter. Hopefully this will get better.

Happy birthday archie

I think this was your camel Jerry-Debbie Hauser Peggy Vale Archie Happy Birthday 🎂

Terrific!!!!

I got to ride you last year it was one of the best days of my life

Lacey Sams. We need to go see Archie!

Mike, Mike , Mike ,Mike,,,, guess what day it is?.😂

View more comments

Say what? Now the alphabet is being blamed for things? ... See MoreSee Less

Say what? Now the alphabet is being blamed for things?

Comment on Facebook

I googled to see the writing and it literally makes no sense!! At least be a real poet for crying out loud. So easy to choose a pretty font these days, call yourself a trans and people take you seriously.

HIS alphabet starts like this IHAVEABROKENMINDANDNEEDGODSLOVEBUTINEVERLEARNEDFROMMYPARENTSHIWTOCOPEWITHLIFEBYGIVINGITTOGOD.

“For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.” ‭‭II Timothy‬ ‭1:7‬ ‭

I have my suspicions about numbers too. They can't really be counted on.

When they say "Trans-poet" does that mean (he/she/it/them) was not born a poet but is transitioning into one? hmmm

No matter what they do .. nothing will ever justify nor approve of what they are trying to do....not even the alphabet will agree with them.....! What a sad generation... Come Lord Jesus, come! Come soon please!!!

Is that a man or a woman?

Everyday I think I have heard it all, but then the next day comes and starts the process all over again.

🙄🙄🙄🙄 insanity at its saddest 😫😫😫

Normal people just like us.

It's getting harder to even keep track of all the lunacy going on.

When you hate yourself, you hate everything around you.

We’re all going crazy! It’s all of our fault for letting things get so out of hand!!!

What am I missing here?

Looney tunes

Needs help for that is insanity!

Yeah...that bigoted alphabet. Gotta watch out for that. It's probably narrow-minded too. Let's just let whichever letters want to be vowels be called vowels from now on. Also, let's pronounce them however we want to. Thay way nobody gets offended.

Can't deal with the insanity anymore

just come up with your own alphabet already...

Leave the Alphabet alone! Youve got everything you want and youre still not satisfied!

Sin can't be satisfied!!!

🤦🏻‍♂️

Sickening..🤦‍♀️

Im confused

View more comments