Yearly Archives: "2013"

Evolution mentioned indirectly in the Bible?

Adding evolution to creation is man’s attempt to not fully commit to God. He wants to be friends with the world and what does God say about that? A friend of this world is an enemy of God. So you can make all the arguments you want. But the only one that is going to count is when you stand before God. But you have freewill, but you have to decide whether that freewill will help you or condemn you. And if you know exactly what Gods word says on this issue, then there is no excuse.

In the verses in Romans 1, evolution is given a Biblical name. It’s called Creature Worship.

Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

Evolution supports Bestiality?

Warning: What you read below is of an adult subject and there is cussing in some of it.

Here is an example of one conversation. Remember this is not for kids.

Atheist: While I personally don’t condone bestiality, I think religion is more of an offense to our status and dignity as human beings than bestiality.

Me: So if your friend starts talking about having sex with his pet and that evolution proves it’s okay you are not going to have a problem with it?

Atheist: I would respond with: I don’t see how evolution proves that it’s okay for you to have sex with your pet. But don’t do it if your pet doesn’t want to. It has the right to refuse, too.

Other shocking comments:

Atheist: why should it be illegal? If that’s what floats your boat go for it as long as the animal isn’t being hurt. What goes on behind closed doors is their business.

Christian: This had BETTER be a joke

Me: It’s not it’s what society and school teaches kids today. If it feels good do it.

Atheist: Its funny the term “what goes on behind closed doors is their business” Is given all the time. The people who d*mn the idea of a God and his word yet still say “as long as no one gets hurt the whatever people do behind closed doors is their business” what a load of sh*t. This is why Americans are all f*cked up. We have laid down the corner stone of truth and rules for kim Kardashian and jay z.

Atheist: So what you’re saying is that God makes people gay. Isn’t is funny how in the USA, bestiality is considered legal in many states, and yet you claim to be a Christian country. Yet again showing the world how you Christians have no morals.

Atheist: what if wer came from the other world, from alien civilizations,,,
from alien theorist claim?
and the bible is true?
that,, we never know…
it’s too early for the evolutionist in that claims

Side note: I will add more when more comments become available if post is not deleted first.

Empirical evidences for World Wide Flood

This will be undeniable evidence that any creationist can use to prove that the Flood did create a lot of what we see, and not “Deep Time” like the evolutionists claim. I will try to put all the information in an order that is easy to understand along with being as brief as possible without leaving the important stuff out.

  • Is there enough water for a World Wide Flood? Yes there is. In the past few years using seismic tools. They have found that a mineral called ” wadsleyite” holds 2% water by weight. That may not sound like much until you realize how much wadsleyite exists in the upper mantle of the earth. Figures show that 2% would work out to be somewhere around 30 oceans worth added to the water that we already know exists. And this has been tested in more than one place by more than one scientist which makes the results observable and repeatable which is empirical evidence. Which means evolutionists can no longer deny the possibility that a flood of this magnitude could happen.
    References:
    http://www.livescience.com/1312-huge-ocean-discovered-earth.htmlhttp://phys.org/news90171847.htmlhttp://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/8749.aspx
  • Can the waters from the flood lay out the Geologic Column as we see it today? The evolutionist side has no observable mechanism to do this so all they have is the claim that “Deep Time” did it. But water will sort sediments and is observable and repeatable. The video below shows this and shows how every sediment pattern formed that exists today. And this is observable and repeatable which makes it empirical evidence. Evolutionists have nothing. Empirical evidence beats the “Deep Time” claim any day.

Video

Here is a more simple method using a sand picture that shows how sand will always layer in water.

Video

Side note: There are more than 60 Living Fossils the list is below.

List of Living Fossils:

Plants

Amborellaceae
Araucaria araucana the Monkey Puzzle tree
CycadsGinkgo tree (Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis)
Horsetails Equisetum (Equisetaceae)
Metasequoia Dawn Redwood (Cupressaceae)
Sciadopitys tree (Sciadopityaceae)
Whisk ferns Psilotum (Psilotaceae)
Welwitschia (Welwitschiaceae)
Wollemia tree (Araucariaceae)
Fungi
Neolecta

Animals

Aardvark (Orycteropus afer)
Cypriot mouse (Mus cypriacus)
Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens)
Okapi (Okapia johnstoni)
Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus)
Laotian Rock Rat (Laonastes aenigmamus)
Volcano rabbit (Romerolagus diazi)
Amami rabbit (Pentalagus furnessi)
Iriomote cat (Prionailurus iriomotensis)
Monito del Monte (Dromiciops gliroides)
monotremes (the platypus and echidna)
Mountain Beaver (Aplodontia rufa)
Opossums
Acanthisittidae (New Zealand “wrens”)
Hoatzin(Ophisthocomus hoazin)
Broad-billed Sapayoa (Sapayoa aenigma)
Bearded Reedling (Panurus biarmicus)
Coliiformes (mousebirds, 6 living species in 2 genera)
Magpie-goose (Anseranas semipalmata)

Reptiles

Pig-nosed turtle
Crocodilia (crocodiles, gavials and alligators)
Tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus and Sphenodon guntheri)

Amphibians

Purple frog (Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis)
Bony fish
Bowfin (Amia calva)
Coelacanth (the lobed-finned Latimeria menadoensis and Latimeria chalumnae)
Queensland lungfish (Neoceratodus fosteri)
Sturgeons and paddlefish (Acipenseriformes)

Sharks

Frilled shark (Chlamydoselachus anguineus)

Insects

Mantophasmatodea (gladiators; a few living species)
Mymarommatid wasps (10 living species in genus Palaeomymar)
Nevrorthidae (3 species-poor genera)
Notiothauma reedi (a scorpionfly relative)
Orussidae (parasitic wood wasps; about 70 living species in 16 genera)
Peloridiidae (peloridiid bugs; fewer than 30 living species in 13 genera)
Sikhotealinia zhiltzovae (a jurodid beetle)
Syntexis libocedrii (Anaxyelidae cedar wood wasp)

Crustaceans

glypheoid lobsters (3 living species: Neoglyphea inopinata, N. neocaledonica, and Laurentaeglyphea neocaledonica)
Stomatopods (Mantis shrimp)
Triops cancriformis (also known as Tadpole shrimp) (a notostracid crustacean)
Molluscs
Nautilina (e.g. Nautilus pompilius)
Neopilina galateae, a monoplacophorid mollusc
Ennucula superba (Nut clam)

Other invertebrates

crinoids
Horseshoe crab (only 4 living species of the class Xiphosura, family Limulidae: Limulus polyphemus,Tachypleus gigas, Tachypleus tridentatus and Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda)
Lingula anatina (an inarticulate brachiopod)
onychophorans
Valdiviathyris quenstedti (a craniforman brachiopod)

A company named Changing World Technologies has developed a way to make a bio diesel fuel in less than a day using discarded turkey and chicken parts.
http://discovermagazine.com/2006/apr/anything-oil#.UkkTN3-JkVc

So as we can see claiming that oil takes millions of years to form was based more on an assumption than fact.

  • If the flood happened and formed coal then coal should not take 60 millions years to form as science claims. An experiment was done on a piece of wood where it was subject to heat that was hot enough to create steam. And water was added to make the steam. The piece of wood was subjected to these conditions for 2 weeks. And in 2 weeks the coalifacation process started as seen in the pic below.
  • Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron vs. The Atheists

    It would seem that the war against God is alive and well as the atheists, who claim there is no God, make extreme efforts to stop these two men from promoting God through their ministries. The Atheists latest attempts to stop these two has actually backfired on them. Because it had the opposite effect of what they wanted to happen. How?

    Ray Comfort just came out with a video documentary showing that when Atheists are pinned down to answer a question directly, and not allowed to dodge or squirm their way out of it, they really have no answer. It shows evolution is not what it’s all put up to be. The Documentary Ray did is called: “Evolution vs God”. I have purchased and seen the movie. It’s well worth the money.

    Down load it here: Evolution vs God

    Trailer:

    And the full documentary is now out on youtube:

    Video

    Ray Comfort has also put out videos named: 180 and Genius. That has made the Atheists community mad. The full viewing of these videos can be viewed here

    Video

    Video

    The backfire for the Atheists here is that their hatred for anyone who would dare to challenge them or just disagree publicly is to post that hatred on the internet. This is turn works as free advertisement for the Christians as doing so put the documentaries on the top rankings with top search engines. They have gone as far as to make false reports to YouTube and FaceBook to get the videos removed. Put up fake accounts using their names or a variation of it posing as them and making unchristian like comments making people think it was them. But the response from the Christian side got the accounts put back up and all the efforts just got the documentaries more fame through the free hatred advertisement they were getting from the Atheists haters.

    Kirk Cameron has faced the same onslaught of hatred from atheists for his own documentaries, some actually co-starring with Ray Comfort. His latest movie named: Unstoppable. Was attacked every way imaginable just like Ray’s was. The picture below pretty much sums it up.

    You may use the image above to post on social media sites, blogs, forums, and websites. Here is the link for embedding: http://i1.wp.com/www.yecheadquarters.org/creation3/upl1234/2013/07/A_kirkCamaron.jpg?resize=560%2C420

    Here is the tailor for the movie “Unstoppable” in which I understand will be in theaters soon.

    Video

    This is a perfect example for all the Christians who are already coming up against the atheists, or are thinking of doing this. Their hatred is your free advertisement. And if you are worried about what is said or posted don’t. Everyone has the right to their opinion and there is really nothing you can do about it. So you have to take the good with the bad and realize that people will think what they want regardless, and you can waste more time worrying about things you can do nothing about. When I see hate stuff being posted about me I say: Thanks, it’s because of your efforts and your peers that has made me as popular as I am. I did not have to pay a dime for advertisement because you guys put me on the board because of your hatred.

    Now one might think that Atheists reading this might just stop doing this then we would have to advertise. Fat chance. They cannot resist hating Christians so it’s basically guaranteed that if you bump heads with enough of them. They will make you popular indirectly because of their excessive hatred towards God and all of His followers. So if you are thinking of putting up a website, blog, forum etc… Just do it and post stuff that disagrees with what they believe, and they will come. And if they don’t like you, which most won’t, they will post about you, your site, what you said etc…. So they can all join in, in a hate fest just for you. This will get you a better ranking on search engines which makes you easier to find in searches on subjects concerning your comments. So basically you endure the hatred to get the popularity so that what you do makes a bigger difference on the internet all thanks to the Atheists who cannot help but to hate you.

    Richard Dawkins dumps Fossil Record

    In my research of the fossil record, it brings up more questions than it answers. As to the reason I believe Dawkins has decided to give it up as evidence for evolution.

    1. Living fossils: There are nearly 200 known living fossils of plants and animals, yet each one has the same problem. They are found in one layer of the supposed record, and alive. For some fossils that is a gap as big as 10 layers. These gaps exist for “every living fossil”. So 30 times there are 30 gaps of the record not recording the fossils surviving until present time.
    2. The layering of the Geologic Column: There is no observable or explainable mechanism to show how the layers the fossil are found in got laid over millions of years. Yet water will sort the layered sediments like this and is observable and repeatable (empirical evidence).
    3. Polystrate Fossils: Trees that run through several layers that are supposed to take millions of years to form. How does a tree not rot away while waiting to be buried in the millions of years it took to do this? It could be explained away if only a few were found but these Polystrate Fossils are found all over the world.
    4. Cross contamination of dating markers: Fossils can be cross contaminated by the layers they are buried in. Example: If you bury a bone that dates 1000 years bury it in a layer that dates 300 million years. Over a period of time the markers from the layer will cross contaminate the fossil and make it date the same as the layer even though it never was the same age. This raises several questions and answers why all fossils will “always” date the same age as the layer. There is no other option after so many years.
    5. The Geologic Column or the fossil record does not exist in one piece anywhere in the world. It is estimated that if it did it would be just under 15 miles deep. So the record is only connected together by the age each layer dates and the fossils found in that layer. So an assumption has to be made here.
    If Evolution Theory is true…..

    If Evolution theory is true why does every documentary on how it happened contain 80-100% animation?

    Video

    If Evolution theory were true and had tons of evidence why does that evidence require so much interpretation? Because if you take away the interpretation of all supposed evolution evidence what would you have left? But because the evidence requires interpretation without actual observation of what really happened, the interpretation is actually an assumption. And this assumption is based on evolution being a true proven fact which bars any other idea from ever being considered or even pondered. It also means that assuming evolution is a true proven fact as so many evolutionists will claim means that the supposed science that it’s based on is more about conformism than anything else. Conformism is not science.

    Example: Let’s say this is like a horse race. Evolution and all the other ideas are set to race. The horn sounds for the race to begin but the only door that opens is the one that allows the evolution horse to run the race. The other horses (ideas) are not even allowed on the track. So evolution horse not only gets to run the race but is the only idea that is allowed to win every race. In an actual horse race that would be known as cheating (conformism).

    If Evolution theory were true, why do evolutionists make complexity sound easy? If you think about it, that is an oxymoron statement. Complexity means exactly what is says and there is nothing easy about it. Here are the problems to making complexity sound easy for evolution to achieve concerning evolution of the eye.

    1. The more complex something is the more mutations required to achieve the final goal.
    2. With mutations, each mutation has to mutate in the correct order to eventually evolve the final product. What is it in evolution that guides each individual mutation to be just right? Because if even one mutation if off it will affect all the mutations that come after it which in turn affects what it is that evolves. Example: Let’s look at the evolution of the eye as a scientific flow chart in an experiment. To get to the last stage of this flow chart and get the desired result, you have to follow the flow chart exactly. Which means you cannot have one deviation or even one mess up or the experiment is ruined. So what is it in evolution that makes every mutation perfect, regardless of how many it takes, to achieve the finished product? The reason this question is avoided is because to venture here would make one realize that only intelligence can have a guiding hand in what happens. Random chance and mistakes don;t do that.
    3. Which evolved first? The eye or the vision center of the brain? The reason this question is so important is because one cannot work without the other. So an eye without the vision center of the brain would be useless. The most common answer is that they evolved at the same time. For evolution to be able to know when to evolve 2 things at the precise moments they are needed is to say evolution can tell time. Which again means there was intelligence involved. So this answer does not go along with random chance and accident mechanism of evolution.
    4. What programmed the vision center of the brain to be able to process what is seen by the eye so that we could process it and react to our surroundings? The vision center of the brain with no programming to process the information sent to it by the eye is like having a computer that has no operating system on it. It won’t work. Programing by random chance and accident is like claiming windows 95 evolved into windows 8 by accident while the computer sat in Bill Gates office for 20 years and no one touched it. Not going to happen.
    5. Claiming that the eye is not a design when it’s made just the right size, and the lens is curved at the right angles for us to focus and see, is like saying the Hubble Telescope is not a design either.Design: A plan or drawing produced to show the look and function or workings of a building, garment, or other object before it is built or made.

    The math that can be used to show how the eye is the right size, and the lens is curved at the right angles so things are in focus shows by math itself that the eye was designed. And if not then evolutionists need to show how math that includes size and angles is done with no intelligence.

  • If we the most intelligent life on this planet cannot duplicate what exist or even life itself, why would we think that a non-intelligent force could do it? If you think about that, that’s an oxymoron logic. To claim that non-intelligence can do what intelligence cannot. So is being dumb smarter than smart?  Does not make any sense now does it?
  • The Unbelievers Movie

    Quote from website “‘The Unbelievers’ follows renowned scientists Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss across the globe as they speak publicly about the importance of science and reason in the modern world – encouraging others to cast off antiquated religious and politically motivated approaches toward important current issues.”

    These 2 people are on the forefront of everything anti-God. I deem them as the God haters – Christian haters. They support classifying being a Christian as a mental disorder. And that raising children in a Christian home is child abuse. They also agree with a group know as the Rational Response Squad that wants the Christian faith wiped from the face of the planet in less than 10 years. Yet by themselves, and their followers, they consider themselves the smartest people who ever walked the face of this planet. One could say that they both have a God complex. For they believe that every word spoken by them makes new truths and changes realities when they are spoken by them.

    But when someone has an attitude like this, it’s not really that hard to make them look stupid. Because no mere man can be God no matter how smart they become. So it was not hard for this one YouTube user to make a video using their own words to do just that.

    Video

    Richard Dawkins God complex and hatred towards anyone whom might disagree with him can be summed up in the next video where he tells one of his own to F off for disagreeing with him. And all others watching to F off as well for disagreeing with him. But being the coward that Dawkins is. To tell Tyson and everyone else to F off he uses a quote from New Scientists to do this. This is so if anyone tries to pin that comment to him he can always point the finger at someone else. Also notice how Tyson practically kisses Dawkins toes as he tries to relay something that Dawkins takes as a rebuke.

    Video

    I find it ironic that even though they claim not to believe in God their actions actually prove God exists. Because either they have to admit that God exists and they hate Him, or that they are really wasting their time going after something that does not exist. I guess it’s like their failed attempts to explain how something comes from nothing. Or that life comes from non-life when all that has been observed is life from life. Because if what they truly had as evidence was so convincing do you think anyone would buy into the existence of God? I don’t think so. So as usual this is the atheist attempt sell the masses what is not provable so the need to resort to hate and demonizing is needed. Because if they truly had the convincing science that they claim to have would such tactics need to be resorted to? Of course not. As to the reason it has to be done.

    Common Ancestor?

    Because evolutionists have found that claiming we came from primates turns people off. They have adopted a replacement for that which is called “Common Ancestor”. So if you happen to bring up that we came from chimps etc…, they will quickly correct you and say: No we share a common ancestor. Yet while trying to cover up what they really mean, which is that we supposedly did come from primates. They will also often use the:

    • The percentage difference in DNA between us and chimps. apes etc…
    • That the #2 chromosome is fused between us and chimps supposedly proving we evolved from chimps.
    • They will compare features between us and chimps etc…

    Yet it is wrong to say we evolved from Chimps?

    Common ancestor is also said to prove the evolution tree. Which supposedly also supports the fossil record etc… But there is one major problem that they hope you won’t see. One that they hide so well that even most evolutionists don’t know this problem exist. And that is what is said in the pic below.

    Hide this as they may try, it is a huge problem they cannot solve. Feel free to use the pic above to post on blogs, forums. and websites. Watch how short the debate will be because they cannot deny this. In fact more than likely you will have a bunch of hate spewed at you for bringing this up. It’s what they do best when they cannot counter what is said or shown. So expect the worst when you use this pic.

    Now there are websites and the Wikipedia will try to say that there are common ancestors to dinosaurs. But if you look at how it’s worded, they don’t really commit to it and they are basically taking a guess to try to fill a huge gap in hopes no one notices. How they claim it between human and chimps is not only DNA percentage of closeness. but the fused #2 chromosome. They don’t have anything like that to test for the common ancestor for dinosaurs is it’s all a guess at best. Yet they will try to pass it off as fact.

    And if they try to derail the debate by bringing up the problems with YEC (Young Earth Creation). Post this pic:

    How does on debate something that supposedly has no evidence?

    christianforums.com, a fake Christian site?

    As the atheists get bolder and more cunning in their ways to convert the believing to disbelief comes a trend of fake Christian ministries. These ministries are run mainly by x-christians who know the christian lingo and can pass off the ministry as real without much effort. These fake ministries always have the same thing in common.

    • They allow atheists, in certain sections of the forum, to have free run. This is to weaken the faith of the believing.
    • They allow evolution to be spoken of as fact while God’s creation to be mocked and made out to be lies.
    • They will be full of supposed Christians that love to compromise the word of God and will try to promote it in others.
    • They will allow conversion to disbelief on their forums and will refuse to lift a finger to stop it.
    • They will have sections of their forums that they can call Christian, where they will allow Christians to congregate, because they need to have these sections so they can always use these section to hide behind when someone points out what goes on in the other sections that is not Godly.
    • The rules will be enforced more so on the side of the atheists, while Christians get bashed constantly for believing the Word of God on areas the atheists have the most problems with.
    • If you point out the problems to the forum admins and mods they will either have excuses to justify what they do, or ignore what you say as if nothing was said at all. You might even get into trouble as you may get accused of challenging their authority.
    • They will allow Christians who live a certain lifestyle that God makes clear is an abomination to push their agendas as if it’s right. And to try and recruit others to live the same way to make sin look righteous and Holy.
    • They will allow new age believers to have free roam to spew there new age beliefs and fool the unsuspecting, and the new in Christ.
    • etc…

    There are many forums ministries such as this that are not interested in being a place of protection for the believer, but a place of danger where Satan is allowed to rip one’s faith to shreds. If you are Christian and have run into such a forum use the message center to the right to send me the link of such a forum so I can check it out and leave the link here so Christians can beware of such ministries that have nothing to do with promoting God, but everything to do with promoting Satan.

    Now some of you might get offended by this page because maybe you have become attached to this forum or another that will be listed here as people send me links. But any ministry that allows discouragement of it’s followers, and allows atheists to mock God and believers for believing in the word is doing the work of Satan. Example: If you brought you children to church, and they went to Sunday school while you went to another function. Would you expect your child to end up in a class full of just as many atheists that will challenge you child’s faith, call God and His creation a lie, and make fun of them for what they believe? What would you call a church that allowed that? Would you take your child back for another dose or until their faith was destroyed?

    Just because a ministry is online does not give it leeway to misrepresent itself while having other agendas. And because getting a website, running a forum etc… is so easy for anyone to do. Do you not think that atheists would soon be using it just like this? So if you don’t believe sites like this exists go to the one listed above and join it and find out. Bring up a subject that has something to do with same sex marriage and watch who comes in there to defend the subject and calls themselves believers. Post a subject on God’s creation in the evolution section and watch how many atheists jump in to try and destroy what you have posted with pure hate more so than any evidence. Call you a liar over and over and if you say anything back you get into trouble not them. And if you post a really good thread and debate them really well, how they will gang up on you to get everything you posted removed.

    In a supposed Christian forum evil is given the advantage at every turn. Would you go to a church that operated like this? Would you even call it a Christian church? If your answer is no then you have also answered what such ministries are really about, Nothing about God. Any ministry that allows that promotion of what Satan uses as tools to weaken the faith of the believing is doing Satan’s work which means they are Satanic. And every person involved will have the blood on their hands of any person that lost their faith and ended up in Hell because of the supposed ministry.