This might be my favorite quote from the booklet.
“As previously stated, the worldviews concerning us here are theism and atheism, with a special emphasis on biblical theism.”
Yes. There are only TWO possible worldviews that could be true. No one on earth believes in any other “Gods”, and everyone who believes in the “God” of the Bible rejects evolution.
I have never read anything more intellectually dishonest.
You want to reach Millennials? Start with a shred of evidence.
Have a great evening, Ray!
I actually just received mine, can’t wait to get out there.
Adam Koppin; Kris Lapata
I’m a millennial, but stuff like that didn’t work well with me. It was the early church fathers that got me back into the swing of things. It helped me see the Catholic Church more clearly. I now know for sure that the Catholic Church is the church that is talked about in the Bible.
the creation > space /time/ matter < is bound by the laws of physics and math which is the language of creation ..the days of the week 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the 7th Day Sabbath..Genesis thru Revelation has many things listed / spoken of/ symbol is of numbers /times/days/ months/ years which is part of present day language/ view of the past/ view of prophecy .... math / DNA/ everything is inter connected .. seasons, age, the phases of the moon...The creatures and nature needed to know when to do things...
To manifest change that comes with time in this dimension.
Time is an actual physical dimension like width, breadth height that define our mortal physical existence. Without it nothing material would be here.
Because He felt like it
Maybe to help us measure time.
So that the earth and seasons and time would all coincide.
Your picture makes it seem like the two species shown are found 55 Ma apart even though they are both modern species. Rather, it was the genus Djarthia (whose exact taxonomic position is uncertain) that occurs in the Paleocene, as noted in the PLOS paper you provided. This graphic is either a misunderstanding or diliberate misrepresentation of the references cited.
May I ask what formal training in paleontology the admin of this page has had?
We didn't claim the skulls were from a 55 million year old fossil, it is the references that claim Monito del Monte is regarded as a living fossil and thought to exist: 55 million years ago.