FaceBook Shadowing banning

Share this page!

The latest banning as of October 7 for 30 days is for posting this, or so they say.

This keeps me from posting conservative stuff until after the election. I wonder how many other conservatives they did this to as well?

Scroll to the bottom of page and you will see what FaceBook allow atheists to post which is much much worse. Such as Teen suicide pages encouraging teens with autism to just kill themselves. No joke. I had to get close to 100 people to complain to get this suicide page removed. Then they told the guy who did this and he sent me some nasty comments along with threats.

FaceBooks latest excuse is that they claim it’s a broken AI (artificial intelligence program) that does things wrong. LOL. No your AI targets one group and one group only. So it’s doing exactly what FaceBook programmed it to do.

Shadow Banning is when FB puts AI’s on your page to filter what you post and how many see it. If very few people see it (being hidden from their view) then it’s like you never even posted it. How does it work?

If you block someone or ban someone you no longer see their comments or posts, correct? So you take that ability and modify the code to include when certain words are used instead of people names.

Example: Like if you want to filter all that is Trump, you add the word Trump to this filter, set the guidelines aka how much filtering you want and all the parameters to this filtering and the AI (artificial intelligent programming) filters everything to what you set it to do. Let’s say you want to filter out 80% of all the posts that have the word Trump in it.

That means that only 20% see that post than would normally see it. Let’s say you want to filter the post to where only that person’s friends see it and only 20% of those friends see it and zero public. That would mean that your views and free speech are being restricted to your friends and the public sees nothing. This is done in the background so you do not even know it.

How does this work? Let’s say they are pro-choice and a very important vote is coming up that pro-choice advocates need people to vote yes on. What FB would do is set up a word filter that stops every comment or post by 90% from the public seeing it. To get put in the filtering category with a comment or post, all you have to do is use certain words or number or a combination of the 2.

Example: Lets say the thing to vote on is called pl-1718 that supports pro-life. Okay now all FB has to do is enter into the filter pl-1718 and the word pro-life. Add how much to filter by percentage, add who gets to see and who does not and every post and comment containing these things gets filtered. So if the filtering was 90% then what you said concerning that would only get 10% of the views it normally would if it were not being filtered.

So let’s say they want to filter God and Jesus because FB is anti-Christian. So they enter those words, and either filter by a percentage, put you in a filtering category, or make it to were only certain worldview groups can see what you say.

So let’s say they want to filter Alex Jones positive material, Trump positive material. They would those two names. Add a list of positive words usually used and set a filter up to do this. While all the negative stuff gets posted and seen freely, all the positive stuff does not.

How do you get around this? you use informative memes.

You make you main message in a meme. Memes take longer for the filtering AI’s to catch. So you shorten your message as much as you can, then use non filtering names and words in your posts aka neutral words. like don’t use Trump in the text you type, but use Trump in your meme.

The example picture above shows where one of my posts gets 8,000 views. Not through boosting but through organic interaction aka on it’s own. But even though the supposed interest generated through shares (70), only 5 people comment out of 8,000? Really, only 5 people commenting?

What’s wrong with Shadow Banning?

Facebook is covertly flagging and effectively censoring people who actively oppose mainstream media’s viewpoint on various social topics. They are doing this to manipulate the world’s perception of these topics by limiting people’s exposure to alternate opinions. This is a very powerful and **dangerous ability that can easily sway public opinion one way or another to accomplish their agenda and control the people**. We cannot allow them to continue doing this or they will use manipulation of what is seen on Facebook to alter the perception (“reality”) of millions of people.

This dangerous abuse of power by a social media giant gives them the ability to spawn massive mobs of people almost overnight, or completely extinguish the voice of millions… All without Facebook staff posting a single word or anyone even realizing that it’s happening. We have coined the term ShadowBanning to represent the covert censorship of millions of people. Examples of ShadowBanning includes, but is not limited to: * severely delaying the display of posts or comments that are flagged as opposition to their agenda so that all initial exposure on a post is only that of what they support; * disappearing comments and likes; * banning, suspending, or limiting people’s ability to use their Facebook account (happened to me recently for 30 days and I was not told why), for no reason or for questionable reasons, and with no opportunity to challenge the decision (yep they put up fake pages making you think you can complain, that either do not send nothing to nobody, or come up and say that this option is broken try again late to only find it stays broken. Which makes one question was it ever working to begone with?); filtering posts out of your news feed so you see everything your friends and pages post except for specific social topics that you are known to oppose and which conflicts with Facebook executive opinions.

The list goes on and on. It has been extremely difficult to get the word out, as Facebook has begun flagging actual accounts instead of just key statements in posts, and so effectively that account is invisible to majority of people who even follow unless they are direct friends. If we don’t stop this it will most definitely have a terribly negative effect on the United States and even the world. This is communist type censorship, plain and simple. We need your help before it’s too late. Facebook may be censoring your opinion without your knowledge. Get the facts and investigate it with your own posts and comments and you’ll see without a doubt that this is very real.

Other proof FB is against Christians.

Above is a graph of the performance of my page on FB. The dark spots are where the performance of the paid when I paid for the ad which did not really improve it much. Before I complained to FB about my page being filtered, I was only guaranteed 1,000 to 2,000 views per 10 dollars spent. As soon as I complained and told them I would post all the evidence I had on this website, my views skyrocketed and the promise made for 10 bucks spent did also. From 1,000 to 2,000 views to over 10,000 views for the same 10 bucks. Proof that FB controls and filters all posts.

Since having this problem and with the banning of Alex Jones totally from the social media, FB have become extremely brave. They are banning suspending christians and conservatives pages left and right. I’m getting complaints all over my timeline about this is how I know. While at the atheist liberals cheering this on the end of free speech is is here.

The above picture is of a page of a person who is misrepresenting a non-profit. They have zero to do with the non=profit which I have confirmed by talking to the non-profit. ICR told me that they have placed a complaint and FB will do zero about it. Which sounds about right because FB no longer allows believers to complain. They leave link for us to click on that go no where. Or to pages that have text boxes you can type your complaint only to find that upon sending, it always says: it’s broken came back later. And if you do come back it only says it’s broken over and over. There is a reason it’s always broken because only those who agree with their worldviews are the onces they will listen to.

Prager U is a Christian FB page that does videos exposing the evils of the left. Like every other conservative Christian page, they get censored like everyone else.

Activist mommy exposes things from the left that attack family and Christians. Like everyone else that falls along these line she gets censored also.

I asked just a few people on my friends list if they experience FB doing somethings I was experiencing. And guess what? They are. What were they experiencing that did not used to happen on FB? Over on the right where you get suggested pages and ads etc… FB is now allowing ads for LGBT, Satanism, Paganism etc… to pop up on every Christian’s time line. And to top it off, if you try and block the page so you don;t see it anymore, it continues and in some cases with more frequency.

How to tell when you are being filtered on posts.

When you click the button to post, the background turns yellow for a second or two and goes onto your page. This is the FB AI’s scanning your posts words for words FB likes to filter. how much you get filtered is determined by which words you use. you also as a page or individual can be put into different filtering categories.

If your comments are getting filtered, it works the same way.

How do I know all this stuff about filtering?

I used to admin several forums. And I would set up the filtering for them. The filters I set up were for the trouble makers who would show up and cuss people out. Or use certain words that only trolls used. And I also set up filtering where certain parts of the forum could be seen while others could not if I, as the admin, put you in that filtered category.

Let’s say I can’t get a certain person attention on the forum who’s breaking the commenting rules because he’s ignoring me. And as an admin I need to talk to him. So I would put him in the time out section of the forum which makes the rest of the forum disappear and only him and me are in this section. So now he either talks to me or I ban him.

I would also set up invisible admin sections, and database sections where I would move trouble makes posts to keep a record of what they did. So if they came back using a different name I could compare notes and figure out who they were and then ban the IP address as well. If a person was bad enough I would block a whole grid of IP addresses for 30 days to ensure they get the message they cannot hack back in.

But unlike FB, I never shadow banned people because I did not like their views. Unless it was something offensive like being vulgar or too graphic.

So how do I know beside all this that FB is extremely bias to Christians and Conservatives?

What could a Christian page post text or picture wise that would get them suspended or kicked off FB? Maybe tell some people to go to Hell or too graphic abortion pictures, right? And I would expect FB to do that because of what they said. But let’s look at what is acceptable to FB under a atheist secular person page. One I had to rally several hundred people to complain about to get it removed. What was it about? It was a teen suicide page that told teens with Autism to go kill themselves. And even had pics on many ways this could be done. I will post these pics.

Side note: This page no longer exists. But it took a lot of effort on my part to get it removed. And what if someone did kill themselves because of that page? Would FB even care? Not that I saw on how much effort had to be taken to get it removed when Christian pages get removed for almost anything.

More examples of FB bias and hatred against Christians

If any of the pages were against any other group, it would be taken down. Click on images to go to the actual sites.

etc…etc…etc…

Activist Mommy gets suspended again, free speech being tested

Share this page!

 

 

 

YouTube

 

 

 

FaceBook Feed
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Good Fight Ministries
Good Fight Ministries

Joe Schimmel’s Testimony

Blessed Hope Chapel
Wed. May 22, 2019 – Wednesday Night Bible Study led by Pastor Joe Schimmel.
... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Thank you for sharing Pastor Joe!!

Ark Encounter
Ark Encounter
Veterans receive free admission on Memorial Day (May 27)!

Veterans receive free admission on Memorial Day (May 27)! ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Ruthann Blizzard Michael Blizzard

Uh, that's not nearly enough manpower for a ship that size.

See ya'll next weekend! Can't wait!

Creation Research Society
Creation Research Society
The Role of Epigenetics in Adaptation, Part 1

The following Matters of Fact column by CRS board member Dr. Jean Lightner appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 23, No. 3, May/June 2018.

Q.  Does epigenetics play a role in adaptation? 
A.  Physiologist: YES! Evolutionary biologist: Maybe…. 

Adaptation, in the sense that we will discuss, can be defined as changes which help an organism become better suited to its environment. It is related to one of the foundational characteristics of life: the ability to respond to the environment. Physiological adaptation relies on epigenetics, or modifications that can affect gene expression. This does not change the sequence of DNA, but allows genes to be up or down regulated to suit the needs of the organism (see Lightner, 2013). 

There are several known mechanisms of epigenetic regulation (Figure 1): 

1) histone modification (including acetylation, phosphorylation, and methylation) 

2) cytosine methylation in DNA 

3) various non-coding RNA molecules (miRNA, siRNA, piRNA, and lncRNA) 

These mechanisms vary in the timeframe over which they typically act, allowing for both rapid changes and more stable, long-term changes. 

Scientists had assumed that these types of changes could not be inherited by offspring. The basis for this was largely philosophical: the Modern Synthesis (aka Neo-Darwinism) was predicated on the idea that the environment could not direct phenotypic change. Instead, the source of phenotypic variation is claimed to be from random genetic mutations; natural selection then reduces or eliminates less fit variants. To support the conjecture that epigenetic changes are not heritable, some scientists pointed to the observation that DNA methylation patterns are reset in pathways leading to offspring (i.e., germ cell formation and fertilization). However, it is now recognized that the reset of DNA methylation isn’t always complete, and it is not the only mechanism involved in trans-generational epigenetic inheritance (Morgan et al., 1999; Rassoulzadegan et al., 2006). 

For several decades now, it has been known that epigenetic inheritance can provide a source of heritable variation. However, it is not yet clear how often it does so, and what role it plays in adaptation of populations. Research has increased on this important topic, but much remains to be learned. One recent review article identified a web of potential interactions. It also pointed out that understanding patterns of natural epigenetic variation, the causes of that variation, and the consequences of it are necessary to adequately address the role it may have in adaptation (Richards et al., 2017). 

Factors influencing epigenetic variation 

In some studies it appears that DNA methylation differences are associated with underlying genetic differences. This raises the possibility of genetic control of epigenetic variability. It is also possible that a stable epimutation (heritable epigenetic change) could be inherited along with the underlying genetic sequence, thus causing the correlation. It has also been noted that epigenetic changes can influence genetic variation, specifically as it relates to silencing transposable elements, whose movement can change the sequence of a gene or its promoter (Richards et al., 2017). 

Some epimutations appear to arise stochastically. If these are stable over multiple generations, then natural selection may affect the pattern of variation. It is also known that environmental factors can effect heritable epigenetic changes, but the pattern and extent of this is not well known. Significant work needs to be done across different species, especially wild plants and animals, before reasonable generalizations can be made (Balao et al. 2018; Richards et al., 2017). 

FIGURE 1. A chromosome is made up of DNA coiled around proteins, called histones. There are three basic mechanisms by which epigenetic changes can be made. First, the tail of the histone proteins can undergo several types of modification (A), including phosphorylation (Ph), methylation (Me), and acetylation (Ac), that can affect accessibility of specific genes. Secondly, cytosine residues in DNA can be methylated (red dot) or un– methylated (green dot), the details of which are represented in section B of the figure. This affects gene transcription (the copying of DNA to make mRNA). Finally, various microRNAs (C) can bind mRNA to prevent synthesis into proteins. All of these mechanisms play a role in changing gene expression without affecting the DNA sequence. (Illustration is from Gómez-Díaz et al., 2012, and is used herein according to the CC BY license. )

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

The Role of Epigenetics in Adaptation, Part 1

The following Matters of Fact column by CRS board member Dr. Jean Lightner appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 23, No. 3, May/June 2018.

Q. Does epigenetics play a role in adaptation?
A. Physiologist: YES! Evolutionary biologist: Maybe….

Adaptation, in the sense that we will discuss, can be defined as changes which help an organism become better suited to its environment. It is related to one of the foundational characteristics of life: the ability to respond to the environment. Physiological adaptation relies on epigenetics, or modifications that can affect gene expression. This does not change the sequence of DNA, but allows genes to be up or down regulated to suit the needs of the organism (see Lightner, 2013).

There are several known mechanisms of epigenetic regulation (Figure 1):

1) histone modification (including acetylation, phosphorylation, and methylation)

2) cytosine methylation in DNA

3) various non-coding RNA molecules (miRNA, siRNA, piRNA, and lncRNA)

These mechanisms vary in the timeframe over which they typically act, allowing for both rapid changes and more stable, long-term changes.

Scientists had assumed that these types of changes could not be inherited by offspring. The basis for this was largely philosophical: the Modern Synthesis (aka Neo-Darwinism) was predicated on the idea that the environment could not direct phenotypic change. Instead, the source of phenotypic variation is claimed to be from random genetic mutations; natural selection then reduces or eliminates less fit variants. To support the conjecture that epigenetic changes are not heritable, some scientists pointed to the observation that DNA methylation patterns are reset in pathways leading to offspring (i.e., germ cell formation and fertilization). However, it is now recognized that the reset of DNA methylation isn’t always complete, and it is not the only mechanism involved in trans-generational epigenetic inheritance (Morgan et al., 1999; Rassoulzadegan et al., 2006).

For several decades now, it has been known that epigenetic inheritance can provide a source of heritable variation. However, it is not yet clear how often it does so, and what role it plays in adaptation of populations. Research has increased on this important topic, but much remains to be learned. One recent review article identified a web of potential interactions. It also pointed out that understanding patterns of natural epigenetic variation, the causes of that variation, and the consequences of it are necessary to adequately address the role it may have in adaptation (Richards et al., 2017).

Factors influencing epigenetic variation

In some studies it appears that DNA methylation differences are associated with underlying genetic differences. This raises the possibility of genetic control of epigenetic variability. It is also possible that a stable epimutation (heritable epigenetic change) could be inherited along with the underlying genetic sequence, thus causing the correlation. It has also been noted that epigenetic changes can influence genetic variation, specifically as it relates to silencing transposable elements, whose movement can change the sequence of a gene or its promoter (Richards et al., 2017).

Some epimutations appear to arise stochastically. If these are stable over multiple generations, then natural selection may affect the pattern of variation. It is also known that environmental factors can effect heritable epigenetic changes, but the pattern and extent of this is not well known. Significant work needs to be done across different species, especially wild plants and animals, before reasonable generalizations can be made (Balao et al. 2018; Richards et al., 2017).

FIGURE 1. A chromosome is made up of DNA coiled around proteins, called histones. There are three basic mechanisms by which epigenetic changes can be made. First, the tail of the histone proteins can undergo several types of modification (A), including phosphorylation (Ph), methylation (Me), and acetylation (Ac), that can affect accessibility of specific genes. Secondly, cytosine residues in DNA can be methylated (red dot) or un– methylated (green dot), the details of which are represented in section B of the figure. This affects gene transcription (the copying of DNA to make mRNA). Finally, various microRNAs (C) can bind mRNA to prevent synthesis into proteins. All of these mechanisms play a role in changing gene expression without affecting the DNA sequence. (Illustration is from Gómez-Díaz et al., 2012, and is used herein according to the CC BY license. )

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Hidden History of Evolution
Hidden History of Evolution
~ Issac

~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Evolution is a lie, based on unsupported assumptions.

Science leads to God
Science leads to God
Had to stop the test, cant have evolution proven wrong. ~ Issac

Had to stop the test, can't have evolution proven wrong. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

180 Movie
180 Movie

Are you one of the over 49,500 views who’s watched “7 Reasons” on YouTube since its release a week ago?

We’ve been so encouraged to read the many online comments, such as this one from YouTube:

"This is THE first time I’ve ever cried (quietly flowing down my cheeks and dripping off my chin kinda tears), regarding the abortion I had 9 years ago. I’ve LITERALLY NEVER felt convicted, not once before…And after watching this.. well, yeh.. I’ve just sat here frowning, now my eyes have dried, and thinking to myself, “Wow, what IS happening to me?!”…I’m a feminist, pro-choice (I thought), equality, love and peace to all kinda person. I guess I better think again................. Mind = blown. Thank you for this video."

If you haven't watched and shared it yet, watch "7 Reasons" free on YouTube at 7ReasonsMovie.com
... See MoreSee Less

Ray Comfort has mental retardation ... See MoreSee Less

Pray for Militant Atheist Page.
Pray for Militant Atheist Page.
n case you did not know this. ~ Issac

n case you did not know this. ~ IssacIn case you did not know this. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Where is the evolution?
Where is the evolution?
Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until its rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/living-fossils.html
The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australias earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or little mountain monkey - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina.
Reference: http://www.create.unsw.edu.au/news/2008-03-25_monito.html
The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”
reference: http://www.eartharchives.org/articles/scientists-uncover-two-new-species-of-elusive-south-american-marsupial/

Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until it's rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/…
"The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australia's earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or "little mountain monkey" - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina."
Reference: http://create.unsw.edu.au/news/…
"The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”"
reference: http://eartharchives.org/articles/…
... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Your picture makes it seem like the two species shown are found 55 Ma apart even though they are both modern species. Rather, it was the genus Djarthia (whose exact taxonomic position is uncertain) that occurs in the Paleocene, as noted in the PLOS paper you provided. This graphic is either a misunderstanding or diliberate misrepresentation of the references cited. May I ask what formal training in paleontology the admin of this page has had?

We didn't claim the skulls were from a 55 million year old fossil, it is the references that claim Monito del Monte is regarded as a living fossil and thought to exist: 55 million years ago.

Colby, please stop spamming the contrasts. There is no need to post the same link multiple times, Thank you.

I was just doing a one shot on each post. I didnt even think anyone even looked at this page anymore. I apologize.

Looks like the Colbinator deleted his post 😭

View more comments

Load more