NASA tries to recreate life (abiogenesis)

Share this page!

All scientists, no matter how smart or well educate, never create life that walks out of that jar. All they create is a reason to be in denial of God. The problems of actually create life remain the same. They have to remove oxygen to do this. The problem is, without oxygen you cannot make rain that rains on the rocks and creates the primordial soup.

They would have to change the laws of physics and chemistry because H2O is how you make water. No O aka oxygen and you get nothing. Why remove the oxygen? Because when the supposed amino acid come together tho start the creation of life process, oxygen becomes that newly formed life’s enemy because oxygen break the DNA down.

Evolutionists claim that abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution. but if you break down what has to happen for life to form it’s proven otherwise. Non-living matter becoming alive is a biological change process that matter has to go through to become living. Which is one of the very definitions of evolution. Let’s not forget the *name* of Darwin’s book..,.

Origin of Species aka the Origin of all Life. So yes Darwin even agrees. But the main reason evolutionists deny abiogenesis being a part of evolution is because it exposes the truth about evolution and that is that it fails before it even gets started.

Evolution, since it’s conception, has always been about removing God from the equation. Why? Because atheists need a reason to deny God. This is the reason they used evolution to remove God from our public schools. Those who helped Darwin agree with this as their comments on the issue are recorded in history.

When all the amino acids are created in the lab, the one problem they never mention is that they only created a little over 80% of the amino acids needed to create life. Not all amino acids occur naturally in nature. So when the experiment is done to the near fashion of looking like what would happen in nature, in the results, they never show you a check off list of what needs to be created to create life aka hiding the truth. So they need to come up with 20% more amino acids but no matter how many times they repeat this, they never get closer. So nothing new here.

This is why the idea called Pamspermia has been thought up. It’s the idea that we were either seeded here by aliens, or our DNA and Amino Acids arrived here from another planet that had life. As if what cannot happen here naturally occurred somewhere else. Or that it took intelligent beings (aliens), just not God.

The fact of the matter is, is that without God science always falls short of creating life from lifeless matter and always will.

Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and *breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul*

God on purpose, made this a *supernatural event* so that those who do not believe will have no excuse not to believe. Man cannot recreate this supernatural event. For if man could do it then God is not God. Understand? Do you have the breath of life? And that’s why you’ll never create life from non-living matter, ever.

There used to be a time when aliens and spaceships were tin foil hat time. Today it’s now science and you are considered scientific if you accept that. So crazy went to being smart without any evidence that can be tested using the scientific method all because atheists are desperate to have an excuse to always deny God.

So if creation is true and evolution is a lie, why does God allow evolution to exist?

Easy, in the Bible it called sifting the wheat from the chaff. Freewill means that you have a choice. So God gives that choice just like in the garden with Adam and Eve. The choice exists because during judgment you can never claim you were forced to do anything. Which makes you responsible for all that you do.

Share this page!
...8

 

 

 

YouTube

 

 

 

FaceBook Feed
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Answers in Genesis is live now.
Answers in Genesis

Kowalchuk tells police where he's hiding; Meteorite used to tell stardust stories; Supreme Court case over men’s clothing; Chinese and Russian evolutionists think atmospheric oxygen explains Cambrian explosion; Argentine doctor on trial for refusing to commit abortion. . . and more during today's episode of Answers News, broadcast live from the Creation Museum. ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

ARTICLES: News flash morons, I'm in Edmonton: Wanted B.C. man arrested after revealing location to media www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis... Meteorite holds speck of stardust older than the solar system www.foxnews.com/science/this-... Opinion: EEOC uses my funeral homes to rewrite laws www.detroitnews.com/story/opi... Oxygen linked with the boom and bust of early animal evolution phys.org/news/2019-05-oxygen-... Harvard study explores genetics behind evolution of flightless birds news.harvard.edu/gazette/stor... Argentine doctor on trial for refusing to commit abortion on viable baby www.lifesitenews.com/news/arg... Icefish Study Adds Another Color to the Story of Blood www.scientificamerican.com/ar... How life on Earth could come back from a sterilizing asteroid impact www.foxnews.com/science/how-e... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Note: topics not covered during today's episode may be featured in a future Answers News broadcast. Get more answers @ AnswersinGenesis.org

Hello from Wyoming where it is snowing again today ❄️❄️

Texas is here!!!

Hello from Cleveland, ohio

Here...from Central Florida.

Good afternoon from Oklahoma, God bless.

Walton, KY here.

Hello from Wisconsin.

Hello from Michigan

Hello! Praying Blessings on y’all from California.

Abortion must be abolished. Watching in Kansas.

Hello from North Kingstown RI

Glad to be here from Amarillo, TX!

Freewill is simple, you can do whatever you want. Your actions have consequences. Part two is not negotiablie.

Hey AVery!

Louisiana is watching.

we are coming back up for our vacation to the creation museum and the ark. We had such a great time last year and learned so much. See yall soon

noahs fllod buried all the critters.....sorry ys all just cant see it!

Howdy from kansas

View more comments

Power In PrayerThis is Amazing! After Tim Tebow wrote John 3:16 under his eyes (3 years ago), his friend told him, in his football games he passed for 316 yards, averaged 31.6 yards per pass, and CBS rating peaked at 31.6 A lot of people said it's 'coincidence', but Tim Tebow said," Big God." ... See MoreSee Less

Ark Encounter
Ark Encounter
Truth is found in Gods holy word.

Truth is found in God's holy word. ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

It is worth the trip! I loved it!

I would love to go see this!

We'll be back in August!

Lori Ann Colf can’t wait to experience this again.

Amen. Chapter by chapter and verse by verse.

Amen!

View more comments

YecHeadquarters
YecHeadquarters
Scientific atheism: is the ability to stretch the claimed truth while never having to admit to ever being wrong about anything. ~ Issac

Scientific atheism: is the ability to stretch the claimed truth while never having to admit to ever being wrong about anything. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

I was going to post a pic of what the 'real' big bang looked like and not just what is commonly thought of, but apparently this page wont allow pics.?

Hidden History of Evolution
Hidden History of Evolution
~ Issac

~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Evolution is a lie, based on unsupported assumptions.

Science leads to God
Science leads to God
Had to stop the test, cant have evolution proven wrong. ~ Issac

Had to stop the test, can't have evolution proven wrong. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

180 Movie
180 Movie

Are you one of the over 49,500 views who’s watched “7 Reasons” on YouTube since its release a week ago?

We’ve been so encouraged to read the many online comments, such as this one from YouTube:

"This is THE first time I’ve ever cried (quietly flowing down my cheeks and dripping off my chin kinda tears), regarding the abortion I had 9 years ago. I’ve LITERALLY NEVER felt convicted, not once before…And after watching this.. well, yeh.. I’ve just sat here frowning, now my eyes have dried, and thinking to myself, “Wow, what IS happening to me?!”…I’m a feminist, pro-choice (I thought), equality, love and peace to all kinda person. I guess I better think again................. Mind = blown. Thank you for this video."

If you haven't watched and shared it yet, watch "7 Reasons" free on YouTube at 7ReasonsMovie.com
... See MoreSee Less

Creation Research Society
Creation Research Society
Contradictions, Part 7

The following article, Interdisciplinary Contradictions in Evolutionary Theory by Dave Woetzel, appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 23, No. 3, May/June 2018.

Creationists are sometimes accused of being “scientific generalists” who broadly discuss the origins issues. It is true that specialized experience often helps in understanding the context of an issue and having familiarity with the relevant literature prepares one to intelligently engage the issues, but it is also true that the era of specialization has brought an isolationism that can be unhealthy for largescale theoretical model building. Because interdisciplinary expertise is missing, it is easier for contradictions to be maintained in models. 

Paleontologists, for example, may not appreciate how their proposed accommodation to a particular problem stands in stark contradiction to historical scenarios envisioned by the biologists, who are working to resolve their own problems. Evolutionary theory has increasingly become a smorgasbord of competing theories, some of which are mutually exclusive. While multiauthored papers using experts from multiple disciplines are helpful, significant contradictions remain. 

We here surveyed half a dozen areas where opposing hypotheses are entertained by different evolutionary specialties.

Darwinists have been very creative in constructing endless hypotheses and numerous specialized scenarios which are designed to address particular challenges to evolutionary theory. While these tailored solutions might seem to patch over some specific problems, the various scenarios are not plausible within the broader origins model. The fact that such contradictions are allowed to persist should raise serious doubts about the validity of the entire theoretical structure. 

Acknowledgments: I want to express my appreciation to Jean Lightner, Matthew Speights and Walter ReMine for helpful comments.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org

Contradictions, Part 7

The following article, Interdisciplinary Contradictions in Evolutionary Theory by Dave Woetzel, appeared in Creation Matters, Vol. 23, No. 3, May/June 2018.

Creationists are sometimes accused of being “scientific generalists” who broadly discuss the origins issues. It is true that specialized experience often helps in understanding the context of an issue and having familiarity with the relevant literature prepares one to intelligently engage the issues, but it is also true that the era of specialization has brought an isolationism that can be unhealthy for largescale theoretical model building. Because interdisciplinary expertise is missing, it is easier for contradictions to be maintained in models.

Paleontologists, for example, may not appreciate how their proposed accommodation to a particular problem stands in stark contradiction to historical scenarios envisioned by the biologists, who are working to resolve their own problems. Evolutionary theory has increasingly become a smorgasbord of competing theories, some of which are mutually exclusive. While multiauthored papers using experts from multiple disciplines are helpful, significant contradictions remain.

We here surveyed half a dozen areas where opposing hypotheses are entertained by different evolutionary specialties.

Darwinists have been very creative in constructing endless hypotheses and numerous specialized scenarios which are designed to address particular challenges to evolutionary theory. While these tailored solutions might seem to patch over some specific problems, the various scenarios are not plausible within the broader origins model. The fact that such contradictions are allowed to persist should raise serious doubts about the validity of the entire theoretical structure.

Acknowledgments: I want to express my appreciation to Jean Lightner, Matthew Speights and Walter ReMine for helpful comments.

Learn more about creation www.creationresearch.org
... See MoreSee Less

Ray Comfort has mental retardation ... See MoreSee Less

Pray for Militant Atheist Page.
Pray for Militant Atheist Page.
n case you did not know this. ~ Issac

n case you did not know this. ~ IssacIn case you did not know this. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

Where is the evolution?
Where is the evolution?
Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until its rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/living-fossils.html
The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australias earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or little mountain monkey - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina.
Reference: http://www.create.unsw.edu.au/news/2008-03-25_monito.html
The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”
reference: http://www.eartharchives.org/articles/scientists-uncover-two-new-species-of-elusive-south-american-marsupial/

Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until it's rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/…
"The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australia's earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or "little mountain monkey" - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina."
Reference: http://create.unsw.edu.au/news/…
"The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”"
reference: http://eartharchives.org/articles/…
... See MoreSee Less

Comment on Facebook

Your picture makes it seem like the two species shown are found 55 Ma apart even though they are both modern species. Rather, it was the genus Djarthia (whose exact taxonomic position is uncertain) that occurs in the Paleocene, as noted in the PLOS paper you provided. This graphic is either a misunderstanding or diliberate misrepresentation of the references cited. May I ask what formal training in paleontology the admin of this page has had?

We didn't claim the skulls were from a 55 million year old fossil, it is the references that claim Monito del Monte is regarded as a living fossil and thought to exist: 55 million years ago.

Colby, please stop spamming the contrasts. There is no need to post the same link multiple times, Thank you.

I was just doing a one shot on each post. I didnt even think anyone even looked at this page anymore. I apologize.

Looks like the Colbinator deleted his post 😭

View more comments

Load more