Share this page!

Dinosaur eggs with embryos

Click image for more information.

Yunnan Province, China holds some very special eggs, containing the tiny bones of unborn sauropod dinosaurs. Within the Lufeng Formation, a relatively thin bed of red sediment contains these fossil eggs, mixed and buried amidst other fossils. While perhaps providing new clues to the ways sauropod dinosaurs developed from embryos, they also bear distinct marks of very recent flooding.

All pictures on this page link to videos when you click on them.

When you click the videos play from a popup screen. So to take a look does not mean that you leave the site.

Youtube

Videos

Click to watch video
How does evolution explain this? it's don't.
Creationist gets fired for finding creation evidence
So he sues and they settle out of court because the judge tells his employer that if it goes to court, they will lose. because he has all the evidence of what they did.
Butterfly's use scales to bend light to create color like how a rainbow works
Butterfly's also use Nano technology to accomplish this.
Tree of life a bush?
Watch as a panel of atheists get mad as one of them, who's an expert in the field, admits the truth.
The full atheist meeting of logic and reason of the video above.
How plants communicate with each other and insects
Plants can wage war, defend themselves, and even call for help.
Is God a mathematician?
The whole universe works like a math equation.
Time constraints for no observation is not an answer
It's an excuse for not having one.
Science is not about worldviews and agendas
Worldviews and agendas are the individual's choice, science has zero to do with it.
Atheism is a religion
If not then why do so many atheists work so hard to *convert* people to their way of believing? Conversion is not scientific.
Probability math is not used in proving evolution because it proves it wrong!
Math proves absolutes or near absolutes. The probability of evolution does not even come close.
You cannot change the laws of physics on how things work.
Just because you want it to be true. That's called a divine fallacy. Making the evidence "conform" to your worldview. Conformity is not science.

FaceBook

These are actual embedded FB pages you can interact with just like you do on FB

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
YecHeadquarters
YecHeadquarters
WTF lol

Monkeys can drive? Evolutionists will try to use this as evidence of monkeys using tools. I hope they do. Because if you watch closely you can tell it's remotely controlled. But it could be used for laughs baiting evolutionists to accept this to show they'll accept anything that seems to support evolution. 🤣 ~ Issac

https://facebook.com/BlackGlaam/videos/… ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

You can clearly see in the video that the monkey in the driver seat had both hands off the wheel,while the toy car was backing up and going forward.

Hidden History of Evolution
Hidden History of Evolution

This is something you don't see everyday. 2 dolphins and 2 whales playing together. ~ Issac

https://facebook.com/SciencePhileOfficial/videos/… ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Good Fight Ministries
Good Fight Ministries
Sunday Morning Service

... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Creation Research Society
Creation Research Society
Thousands not Billions: How Old is the Earth? For our friends and supporters near St. Louis, the CUS Society of Creation is hosting its 7th annual conference 14 and 15 June. http://www.societyofcreation.org/conferences.php Several CRS members are speaking, and we’d love to have you there.

Thousands not Billions: How Old is the Earth?

For our friends and supporters near St. Louis, the CUS Society of Creation is hosting its 7th annual conference 14 and 15 June.

http://www.societyofcreation.org/conferences.php

Several CRS members are speaking, and we’d love to have you there. ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Science leads to God
Science leads to God

This is something you don't see everyday. 2 dolphins and 2 whales playing together. ~ Issac

https://facebook.com/SciencePhileOfficial/videos/… ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Ark Encounter
Ark Encounter
The Living Quarters on the ark are practical but comfortable.

The Living Quarters on the ark are practical but comfortable. ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 157
  • Shares: 8
  • Comments: 7

Comment on Facebook

i have driven by a cattle farm...i bet that place stunk bad lol

Just remember, this is all artistic license...

Does everyone see the irony in the ark flooding? Wasn’t it suppose to survive the great flood? Do you not know unless you have flood insurance, you are not covered. Flooding is an “act of God”. Ask Louisiana residents how they faired after the flood. How about Puerto Rico? Maybe Missouri or even your neighbor, WV. Did you donate money to help those flood victims? Were the dinosaurs ok???

I'm sorry but I just don't think the ark was that comfortable....In fact I doubt that Noah's home was that comfortable.

They were probably better and more comfortable than my quarters on board the USS Abraham Lincoln! 😂

I doubt it.

It doesn’t seem they would’ve been that comfortable.

View more comments

180 Movie
180 Movie
Video image

May we be as bold as this young lady to speak up at our city council meetings: https://youtu.be/oQ8eob45f1I ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 40
  • Shares: 21
  • Comments: 3

Comment on Facebook

Indeed such a strong faith!

I also would not be here Miriam!

love her.

Ray Comfort has mental retardation ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Pray for Militant Atheist Page.
Pray for Militant Atheist Page.
n case you did not know this. ~ Issac

n case you did not know this. ~ IssacIn case you did not know this. ~ Issac ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Where is the evolution?
Where is the evolution?
Name: Monito del Monte Status: Thought to be extinct until its rediscovery. Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes. Thought to exist: 55 million years ago. Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/living-fossils.html The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australias earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or little mountain monkey - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina. Reference: http://www.create.unsw.edu.au/news/2008-03-25_monito.html The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.” reference: http://www.eartharchives.org/articles/scientists-uncover-two-new-species-of-elusive-south-american-marsupial/

Name: Monito del Monte
Status: Thought to be extinct until it's rediscovery.
Information: A remarkable, diminutive marsupial thought to have been extinct until one was discovered in a thicket of Chilean bamboo in the southern Andes.
Thought to exist: 55 million years ago.
Reference: http://historysevidenceofdinosaursandmen.weebly.com/…
"The fossilised ankle and ear bones are those of Australia's earliest known marsupial, Djarthia, a primitive mouse-like creature that lived 55 million years ago. ..a new study in the journal PLoS ONE [http://www.plosone.org/] has confirmed that Djarthia is also a primitive relative of the small marsupial known as the Monito del Monte - or "little mountain monkey" - from the dense humid forests of Chile and Argentina."
Reference: http://create.unsw.edu.au/news/…
"The monito del monte, Spanish for ‘little bush monkey’, named after its monkey-like partially prehensile tail, is a diminutive marsupial native to South America in the Valdivian temperate rain forests of the southern Andes (Chile and Argentina). It is the only extant species in the ancient order of Microbiotheria. ...Genetic studies show that this species retains the most primitive characteristics of its group, and thus is regarded as a “living fossil.”"
reference: http://eartharchives.org/articles/… ... See MoreSee Less

  • Likes: 56
  • Shares: 10
  • Comments: 6

Comment on Facebook

Your picture makes it seem like the two species shown are found 55 Ma apart even though they are both modern species. Rather, it was the genus Djarthia (whose exact taxonomic position is uncertain) that occurs in the Paleocene, as noted in the PLOS paper you provided. This graphic is either a misunderstanding or diliberate misrepresentation of the references cited. May I ask what formal training in paleontology the admin of this page has had?

We didn't claim the skulls were from a 55 million year old fossil, it is the references that claim Monito del Monte is regarded as a living fossil and thought to exist: 55 million years ago.

Colby, please stop spamming the contrasts. There is no need to post the same link multiple times, Thank you.

I was just doing a one shot on each post. I didnt even think anyone even looked at this page anymore. I apologize.

Looks like the Colbinator deleted his post 😭

View more comments

Post

Memes to debate with

Living fossils

Nearly 200 living fossils known and that number grows every year.↓

Frozen in time amber

Nearly 300 frozen in time amber amber evidence, and that number grows every year.↓

Blood and soft tissue.

Over 100 known soft tissue and blood evidences found and nearly 50 of these finds were published.↓

Human and Dinosaur evidence found together

Human & Dinosaur prints

Human + dinosaur footprint found together
These prints were found in Glenrose Texas at the Dinosaur Valley Park, They were under a rock slab that weighed several tons but was washed away during a flash flood in the river. Many lies have been told about these prints which is basically atheists not wanting to face reality. None of the false accusations panned out and in a court of law would be considered hearsay. The lie about this print is that a creationist names Carl Baugh carved it. No proof, no witness, just hearsay. My question is, a print much smaller then almost 2 feet long would have been more convincing. So why carve one that big?
Taylor Trail prints. The first e images are the same prints.
Because atheists did not want anything to do with them, they did not use any of their grant monies to try and preserve them. Today they are so degraded that one cannot even tell what they are. much to the atheists happiness. Again they cannot face reality.
default 1
default 2
default 1
default 2
default 1
default 2
This is the burdick print
it is part of Texas history. back during the depression. the government started a get back to work program. Where they hired men to do odd jobs. One was removing rock slabs to display in museums. Nobody wanted human footprints in their slab displays. And that's how these prints were created. The workers were told to cut them off. They asked the foreman if they could keep them and that's where the problem started. Atheist told lies about these and made false accusations. All of which in a court of law would be considered hearsay.
Drawing of what the government wanted the workers to do
Once done these would be moved by commercial flatbed trucks to museums all over the U.S.
The workers actually cutting the slabs from the river bed.
The largest went to the American Museum. The museum still displays it with a T-Rex on top of the prints. But on the page from their site the slab is barely visible. https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent-exhibitions/hall-of-saurischian-dinosaurs/tyrannosaurus-rex
Fake Christians like Glen Kuban claim that all of this is fake.
Yet he or no other atheist has produced absolute evidence to prove it. Only opinions and hearsay. Because if the had evidence of fraud they could have taken those whom they told lies about to court. Because defacing government property is a federal offense. Yet no one is in jail to that false accusation of someone carving the human prints. Again, only hearsay.
On and on these false accusations are made
Yet no one person from the atheist side ever proved anything. No one. And I challenge an atheist to do so. And not with hearsay. Still waiting for someone to go to jail over the accusations of defacing government property. Carl Baugh is still alive and there has been no court case. No witnesses produced. Nothing. Lying fo evolution has become common, but if evolution is a true proven fact that makes the accusations a oxymoron because truth never needs lies because it was true to begin with. Atheists don;t get the concept and never will.

Inca burial stone aka Ica stones

Inca stones match the later found dinosaur skin
Atheist consider this evidence debunked. And will not accept new evidence that proves otherwise. They are not interested in truth and reality, only that their stance that evolution is true and their worldview that God does not exist remans looking true without actually proving it true.
A closer look at how the dinosaur skin matches the carved stone.
How did the carver know what the dinosaur skin looked like when no one has ever seen a live dinosaur to even know?
Another view of how the skin matches the carving
Atheists do not want truth and reality or they would take a closer look. But they refuse to talk about it since this find.
The original stone that the new evidence was compared to.
default 2
A picture taken of the Inca Burial stones museum.
There are thousands of these stones. They were found in a cave on a beach. The last image in this section is a video on the stone's history. Click to watch it.
The main reason these stones are truly hated by atheists
they defy the fake history of evolution.
The atheists went as far as to discredit these stones by
hiring so called experts, who by the way already believed evolution is a true proven fact, to examine the stones with only one goal in mind. Discredit them anyway they could.
So to discredit them they again made false accusations that were not proven in a court of law.
Accusations that the Peru government would have been happy to jail someone over because they have very strict laws on Peru artifacts because so many people steal them
default 1
default 2
They paid this guy, who makes replicas for the tourist. To claim he carved all of them. Question:
If no man has ever seen a dinosaur, how did this man know the exact designs on the skin that would be found after all this was done? Chance? No, he saw the original ones so he knew exactly what to draw. The thing that the atheist leave out is how strict the laws are about having any Peru artifacts. They will arrest you, you'll get sentenced to 5-10 years in prison. And because the prisons are so bad, most only live 3 years because they starve to death or catch a disease. So why would this man admit to ever owning an original Inca stone when it would mean certain death? They don;t tell you that in the BBC documentary. Because they are not used to telling the truth.
A video. The history of the Inca burial stones.
Click on image to see video the atheist call a lie.

Human misc. out of place evidence

Coal is supposed to take 300 million years to form.
Yet here we have door knobs caught up in it. Did dinos have door knobs on their cave doors? https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/coal/
Coal is supposed to take 300 million years to form. Yet we find human artifacts embedded in it.
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/coal/
Who knew how to carve this dinosaur if no one saw it back then?
Maybe aliens? LOL
To fossilize something it's supposed to take 10,000 years.
But yet here's a human finger. There is also a human foot inside a cowboy boot. both the boot and the foot are fossilized.
A huge bird and dinosaur or a huge snake attack a horse.
Maybe aliens? LOL
Finding this flat round metal thing inside a rock?
Maybe aliens? LOL
So did dinosaurs draws themselves on the walls in caves?
How did humans know what they looked like to draw them unless they saw them?
More drawings of dinosaurs by men who were not supposed to have seen one.
But yet here's a human finger. There is also a human foot inside a cowboy boot. both the boot and the foot are fossilized.
Humans carving dinosaurs they were not supposed to have seen.
But yet here's a human finger. There is also a human foot inside a cowboy boot. both the boot and the foot are fossilized.
Humans carving dinosaurs they were not supposed to have seen.
Lying for a true proven fact is a oxymoron.
Dinosaur evidence dating in human time era?
default 2
This happens all to often. hiding the truth again?
Lying for a true proven fact is a oxymoron.
No evolution through the whole time if took the supposed Fossil Record to form?
And no common ancestors? Sounds like no evolution at all.
Share this page!