Dinosaur eggs with embryos

Yunnan Province, China holds some very special eggs, containing the tiny bones of unborn sauropod dinosaurs. Within the Lufeng Formation, a relatively thin bed of red sediment contains these fossil eggs, mixed and buried amidst other fossils. While perhaps providing new clues to the ways sauropod dinosaurs developed from embryos, they also bear distinct marks of very recent flooding.

Most all pictures on this page link to videos when you click on them.

When you click the videos play from a popup screen. So to take a look does not mean that you leave the site.

Youtube

How to destroy evolution

For each illustration, you ask: Provide me a list of the names of the people who observed the thousands of claims made about these illustrations? And then say: I’ll make it easy for you. List just one person who observed one claim. Just one.
Nobody saw any of the claims, not even the person who drew them. So when you draw something no one saw, you are basically drawing from your imagination. Prove me wrong, and provide the names of those who observed the claims?
The evolution tree of life has thousands of claims that evolution did this and that. Can you name just one person who saw just one claim? Did the person who drew it see anything? 100% imagination:
Less that 1% of the claims made about evolution from a singles cell to all that we see is observable. Prove me wrong:
Less than 1% of evolution from a single cell to all that we see today is observable. That means that the other 99% is not and therefore has to be interpreted to conform to the theory. Conformity is not science.

Response for attempted rebuttals

When they use the excuse of time:

When they use the: You don't understand evolution excuse:

If they use a response that sounds canned:

If they cuss you or call you names. And you add: Please do this some more and prove my points:

And if they do do it some more. Just say: Thanks for proving my points. Do that again please. They get their power from getting you to react. So you don’t, you just reverse their tactics to work against them and you take that power away:

And if they start attacking the Bible:

FaceBook

Posts

Memes to debate with

Living fossils

Nearly 200 living fossils known and that number grows every year.↓

Frozen in time amber

Nearly 300 frozen in time amber amber evidence, and that number grows every year.↓

Blood and soft tissue.

Over 100 known soft tissue and blood evidences found and nearly 50 of these finds were published.↓

Human and Dinosaur evidence found together

Human & Dinosaur prints

Human + dinosaur footprint found together
These prints were found in Glenrose Texas at the Dinosaur Valley Park, They were under a rock slab that weighed several tons but was washed away during a flash flood in the river. Many lies have been told about these prints which is basically atheists not wanting to face reality. None of the false accusations panned out and in a court of law would be considered hearsay. The lie about this print is that a creationist names Carl Baugh carved it. No proof, no witness, just hearsay. My question is, a print much smaller then almost 2 feet long would have been more convincing. So why carve one that big?
Taylor Trail prints. The first e images are the same prints.
Because atheists did not want anything to do with them, they did not use any of their grant monies to try and preserve them. Today they are so degraded that one cannot even tell what they are. much to the atheists happiness. Again they cannot face reality.
default 1
default 2
default 1
default 2
default 1
default 2
This is the burdick print
it is part of Texas history. back during the depression. the government started a get back to work program. Where they hired men to do odd jobs. One was removing rock slabs to display in museums. Nobody wanted human footprints in their slab displays. And that's how these prints were created. The workers were told to cut them off. They asked the foreman if they could keep them and that's where the problem started. Atheist told lies about these and made false accusations. All of which in a court of law would be considered hearsay.
Drawing of what the government wanted the workers to do
Once done these would be moved by commercial flatbed trucks to museums all over the U.S.
The workers actually cutting the slabs from the river bed.
The largest went to the American Museum. The museum still displays it with a T-Rex on top of the prints. But on the page from their site the slab is barely visible. https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent-exhibitions/hall-of-saurischian-dinosaurs/tyrannosaurus-rex
Fake Christians like Glen Kuban claim that all of this is fake.
Yet he or no other atheist has produced absolute evidence to prove it. Only opinions and hearsay. Because if the had evidence of fraud they could have taken those whom they told lies about to court. Because defacing government property is a federal offense. Yet no one is in jail to that false accusation of someone carving the human prints. Again, only hearsay.
On and on these false accusations are made
Yet no one person from the atheist side ever proved anything. No one. And I challenge an atheist to do so. And not with hearsay. Still waiting for someone to go to jail over the accusations of defacing government property. Carl Baugh is still alive and there has been no court case. No witnesses produced. Nothing. Lying fo evolution has become common, but if evolution is a true proven fact that makes the accusations a oxymoron because truth never needs lies because it was true to begin with. Atheists don;t get the concept and never will.

Inca burial stone aka Ica stones

Inca stones match the later found dinosaur skin
Atheist consider this evidence debunked. And will not accept new evidence that proves otherwise. They are not interested in truth and reality, only that their stance that evolution is true and their worldview that God does not exist remans looking true without actually proving it true.
A closer look at how the dinosaur skin matches the carved stone.
How did the carver know what the dinosaur skin looked like when no one has ever seen a live dinosaur to even know?
Another view of how the skin matches the carving
Atheists do not want truth and reality or they would take a closer look. But they refuse to talk about it since this find.
The original stone that the new evidence was compared to.
default 2
A picture taken of the Inca Burial stones museum.
There are thousands of these stones. They were found in a cave on a beach. The last image in this section is a video on the stone's history. Click to watch it.
The main reason these stones are truly hated by atheists
they defy the fake history of evolution.
The atheists went as far as to discredit these stones by
hiring so called experts, who by the way already believed evolution is a true proven fact, to examine the stones with only one goal in mind. Discredit them anyway they could.
So to discredit them they again made false accusations that were not proven in a court of law.
Accusations that the Peru government would have been happy to jail someone over because they have very strict laws on Peru artifacts because so many people steal them
Here's a pic of the person who owns the Ica Stone museum.
default 2
They paid this guy, who makes replicas for the tourist. To claim he carved all of them. Question:
If no man has ever seen a dinosaur, how did this man know the exact designs on the skin that would be found after all this was done? Chance? No, he saw the original ones so he knew exactly what to draw. The thing that the atheist leave out is how strict the laws are about having any Peru artifacts. They will arrest you, you'll get sentenced to 5-10 years in prison. And because the prisons are so bad, most only live 3 years because they starve to death or catch a disease. So why would this man admit to ever owning an original Inca stone when it would mean certain death? They don;t tell you that in the BBC documentary. Because they are not used to telling the truth.
A video. The history of the Inca burial stones.
Click on image to see video the atheist call a lie.

Human misc. out of place evidence

Coal is supposed to take 300 million years to form.
Yet here we have door knobs caught up in it. Did dinos have door knobs on their cave doors? https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/coal/
Coal is supposed to take 300 million years to form. Yet we find human artifacts embedded in it.
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/coal/
Who knew how to carve this dinosaur if no one saw it back then?
Maybe aliens? LOL
To fossilize something it's supposed to take 10,000 years.
But yet here's a human finger. There is also a human foot inside a cowboy boot. both the boot and the foot are fossilized.
A huge bird and dinosaur or a huge snake attack a horse.
Maybe aliens? LOL
Finding this flat round metal thing inside a rock?
Maybe aliens? LOL
So did dinosaurs draws themselves on the walls in caves?
How did humans know what they looked like to draw them unless they saw them?
More drawings of dinosaurs by men who were not supposed to have seen one.
But yet here's a human finger. There is also a human foot inside a cowboy boot. both the boot and the foot are fossilized.
Humans carving dinosaurs they were not supposed to have seen.
But yet here's a human finger. There is also a human foot inside a cowboy boot. both the boot and the foot are fossilized.
Humans carving dinosaurs they were not supposed to have seen.
Lying for a true proven fact is a oxymoron.
Dinosaur evidence dating in human time era?
default 2
This happens all to often. hiding the truth again?
Lying for a true proven fact is a oxymoron.
No evolution through the whole time if took the supposed Fossil Record to form?
And no common ancestors? Sounds like no evolution at all.