Dinosaur eggs with embryos
Yunnan Province, China holds some very special eggs, containing the tiny bones of unborn sauropod dinosaurs. Within the Lufeng Formation, a relatively thin bed of red sediment contains these fossil eggs, mixed and buried amidst other fossils. While perhaps providing new clues to the ways sauropod dinosaurs developed from embryos, they also bear distinct marks of very recent flooding.
How to destroy evolution
For each illustration, you ask: Provide me a list of the names of the people who observed the thousands of claims made about these illustrations? And then say: I’ll make it easy for you. List just one person who observed one claim. Just one.
Nobody saw any of the claims, not even the person who drew them. So when you draw something no one saw, you are basically drawing from your imagination. Prove me wrong, and provide the names of those who observed the claims?
The evolution tree of life has thousands of claims that evolution did this and that. Can you name just one person who saw just one claim? Did the person who drew it see anything? 100% imagination:
Less than 1% of the claims made about evolution from a single cell to all that we see is observable. Prove me wrong:
Less than 1% of evolution from a single cell to all that we see today is observable. That means that the other 99% is not and therefore has to be interpreted to conform to the theory. Conformity is not science.
When they use the excuse of time:
Response for attempted rebuttals
When they use the: You don't understand evolution excuse:
If they use a response that sounds canned:
If they cuss you or call you names. And you add: Please do this some more and prove my points:
And if they do do it some more. Just say: Thanks for proving my points. Do that again please. They get their power from getting you to react. So you don’t, you just reverse their tactics to work against them and you take that power away:
And if they start attacking the Bible:
To watch videos from YouTube in the FaceBook feeds, click on YouTube link in the text
Science really does not reveal how complex DNA really is. It's more than just code and programming. It's a data storage system that can store the whole internet on 1 gram of DNA. No joke. In fact in the field of making synthetic DNA, they are trying to accomplish this.
So if a random change process created this complexity, and it is beyond our intelligent being comprehension. Then what does that tell us about this claim? That the random process that is supposed to be as unintelligent as a rock, is actually more intelligent? Is the rock in your front yard smarter than you are? No? then why is a higher education needed to understand what that rock did? Or maybe this has all be a hoax to begin with?
So as science finds out more about DNA it supports creation and a Creator. Why? Because it shows irreducible complexity. There is a reason there is no evolution tree for DNA. ~ Issac
And if you are a techy with knowledge in biology, here's a video that breaks this down. Click the link: www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBvd7OSDGgQ
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvI_nzBU6MA
The reason water has never been on mars, can never exist on mars, is a 4 fold answer.
1) The atmosphere is 98% CO2. Which means there are only trace amounts of hydrogen. It takes 2 molecules of hydrogen and 1 oxygen (H2O) to make water. And there are no physical laws of physics that allow you to go around that.
So if there were oceans or reservoirs, the evidence of evaporation would mean more hydrogen in the atmosphere. Not trace amounts. So NASA is trying to sell you the idea that water exist on mars not proving it.
2) The barometric pressures on a planet govern the boiling point of water on a planet. Mars is about 1/16 to 1/32 of ours which means water boils at about 50 degrees F. And the temps around the equator reach 70 degrees plus which is 20 degrees over the boiling point. Boiling water is evaporating water which means again, the evidence of hydrogen would be in the atmosphere, and not in trace amounts either.
3) But what about the ice caps? What NASA refuses to tell you. hoping you won't go look this up. But there are 2 types of ice that can exist on mars. H2O ice, and because of the 98% CO2 atmosphere, CO2 ice aka dry ice. So since there are only trace amounts of hydrogen, which do you think the air molecules in the atmosphere support existing on mars? CO2 Ice.
Now how would that happen? When the concentration of CO2 is as high as it is on mars. And if it gets cold enough on the poles, and it does. The CO2 can freeze in mid air and fall like snow giving the appearance of H2O ice when it's not.
4) Also, the ice on the poles has seasonal changes where the ice content goes through a melting stage where ice caps get smaller. And a grow stage where the ice caps get bigger, Here's the problem with all the ice being H2O ice.
On the ice caps, it does not get above freezing ever. So if all the ice were H2O ice that would be no melting and refreezing. It would stay the same. But since CO2 ice has a lower liquid to gas melting point or phase point. The CO2 ice caps growing and melting fit the facts while H2O ice does not.
So why would NASA lie about this? it's going to cost a trillion dollars to send *people* to mars. And they want that money. So whatever lie they have to tell they will.
**If you disagree with the 4 facts above. Prove me wrong. I'm not above apologizing for being wrong and deleting this post.**
Facts are facts, and the laws of physics cannot be broken. ~ Issac
www.foxnews.com/science/mars-ancient-reservoirs-of-water-underground
Ancient Mars had 2 reservoirs of water deep underground, study claims
www.foxnews.com
Scientists have discovered that two unique reservoirs of ancient water once flowed deep beneath the surface of Mars.
Interesting. ~ Issac
www.youtube.com/watch?v=igb5tih13Rw&list=PLcKJYjnEtaO4lO6RBxWmZCmagkKuFb6Oa&index=24
People often accuse me of being mean to unbelievers. But when they come to this page to scoff and scorn, then they will get a response they won't like. The proud will never listen, but the simple who rarely respond will. And that's who you will reach even though you may never know they were even there. ~ Issac
If you are going to be a young earth creationist who supports literal creation as the Word of God explains it. Then you will get hatred from both sides.
1) The atheists.
2) The fake Christians.
To deny creation just the way God said it happened, is to deny the Creator. And you cannot have salvation and deny Father God. ~ Issac
Watch for free during the stay at home bc of virus. Free streaming. In case you didn't know, most cell phone providers have given their customer unlimited data. Mine is T-mobile and I have unlimited data for 2 months because of the stay at home.
Click the link at the bottom of the text.
www.facebook.com/IllustraMedia/photos/a.394351737275623/3275549282489173/?type=3&theaterTurn quarantines into quality time with God. During this time of lockdowns and uncertainty, focus on God’s unwavering truths. For the next 60 days Illustra Media is offering FREE STREAMING of all our most popular documentaries. Click below to start watching now.
illustramedia.com/view-videos-free/
Bible verse of the day
King James Version
To those who make the millions and billions off certain illnesses. To find a cure is to cut off income. And make all the drugs, and equipment, and the people trained to use that equipment, and the hospitals and employees etc... all useless. Is more important than the suffering people who die from it. This is what medical science has turned into. And why you'll never see a full complete cure, only something that gives you more hope that you'll survive. ~ Issac
Atheists claim it, draw it, and hope you believe it. Why not just go all the way and claim it sprouted hands feet and painted it nails too? LOL ~ Issac
www.foxnews.com/science/fish-sprouted-fingers-before-they-ventured-onto-land-fossil-shows
Fish sprouted fingers before they ventured onto land, fossil shows
www.foxnews.com
A 380-million-year-old fossil of a fish has revealed that fingers evolved in vertebrates before the creatures wriggled out of the sea and evolved into land-dwelling creatures, as a new study describes.
And my likes still do not grow from 830 range. Been 2 months and I see people liking my page all the time. Yet FB seems to be un liking them. Same problem with the number of follows. ~ Issac
More and more atheists keep jumping ship because evolution just keeps getting silly sounding. ~ Issac
www.thecollegefix.com/famed-yale-computer-science-professor-quits-believing-darwins-theories/
Famed Yale computer science professor quits believing Darwin’s theories | The College Fix
www.thecollegefix.com
The origin of species is exactly what Darwin cannot explain.
If you move the timer play thingy to time 20:30, you will find a guy that thinks raping children for fun is okay because he creates his own morals. No joke. This is what happens when you take away a anchor for morals and create your own with a: If it feels good do it thinking. Or if I say it's alright, then it's alright because I say attitude, Either way it's just wrong. ~ Issac
www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZYSJaS0HH8
It's funny that if you apply the laws of physics that frozen water expands, and contracts when it melts. Means that in solid form it takes up *more volume of space in our waters*.
And when the ice melts is *takes up less volume or space in our waters*.
This is why that even though the climate changers are saying all this ice has melted, and all the land will be covered. Water levels have not really risen from this. You cannot defeat a law that is observable, repeatable, and therefore empirical just because you want something to be true.
Again: Frozen water expands, so it takes up *more space*. *When it melts it contracts taking up less space in our oceans*. Google it. ~ Issac
www.foxnews.com/science/ice-loss-in-antarctica-and-greenland-increased-sixfold-in-the-last-30-years
Ice loss in Antarctica and Greenland increased sixfold in the last 30 years
www.foxnews.com
Antarctica and Greenland are losing ice six times faster than in the 1990s, a pair of studies in the journal Nature show.If you don't think atheist evangelize. look at the rules of this atheist page I came across.
The OTCA is for atheists, agnostics, & secular humanists to have a place to come together.
**If you are a Doubting Theist seeking conversation, you are most welcome here as well**.
Me: Free thinkers who allow all voices like I hear atheists always claim that they are? Nope don;t think so...
**Sermonizing is 100 & 50-10 percent FORBIDDEN. Attempts to do so will be shut down & the offending party removed & banned**.
Me: And also a parrot page. As well as a militant atheist teaching page.
The OTCA is meant to be more than just another typical atheist group, with little to set it apart from the majority of others. I would like it to become more of a community, where atheists can come together for humor, **a resource for learning, solidarity & support**, & Esprit de Corps. I also want it to become somewhat of a center for **activism**, not just atheistic, but humanistic & others as well.
Me: Funny how we are being told how bias etc... we are. Yet they do it. What's the word? Oh yeah, hypocrites.
And they are a religion as well.
yecheadquarters.org/2017/01/atheism-a-religion/
yecheadquarters.org
To believe in something you cannot prove (God does not exist) makes what you believe require faith to believe it. And because faith makes a religion, then religion will compete with religion.