Dinosaur eggs with embryos
Yunnan Province, China holds some very special eggs, containing the tiny bones of unborn sauropod dinosaurs. Within the Lufeng Formation, a relatively thin bed of red sediment contains these fossil eggs, mixed and buried amidst other fossils. While perhaps providing new clues to the ways sauropod dinosaurs developed from embryos, they also bear distinct marks of very recent flooding.
How to destroy evolution
For each illustration, you ask: Provide me a list of the names of the people who observed the thousands of claims made about these illustrations? And then say: I’ll make it easy for you. List just one person who observed one claim. Just one.
Nobody saw any of the claims, not even the person who drew them. So when you draw something no one saw, you are basically drawing from your imagination. Prove me wrong, and provide the names of those who observed the claims?
The evolution tree of life has thousands of claims that evolution did this and that. Can you name just one person who saw just one claim? Did the person who drew it see anything? 100% imagination:
Less than 1% of the claims made about evolution from a single cell to all that we see is observable. Prove me wrong:
Less than 1% of evolution from a single cell to all that we see today is observable. That means that the other 99% is not and therefore has to be interpreted to conform to the theory. Conformity is not science.
When they use the excuse of time:
Response for attempted rebuttals
When they use the: You don't understand evolution excuse:
If they use a response that sounds canned:
If they cuss you or call you names. And you add: Please do this some more and prove my points:
And if they do do it some more. Just say: Thanks for proving my points. Do that again please. They get their power from getting you to react. So you don’t, you just reverse their tactics to work against them and you take that power away:
And if they start attacking the Bible:
To watch videos from YouTube in the FaceBook feeds, click on YouTube link in the text
Atheists still pushing for life to exist on other planets. They so badly want aliens to exist. So they can promote their idea that life was seeded here by them.
www.foxnews.com/science/neptune-size-exoplanet-found-close-earth
Exoplanet slightly larger than Neptune found close to Earth
www.foxnews.com
Researchers have discovered a new exoplanet the size of Neptune, approximately 32 light-years away from Earth.
Is the middle finger a sign of superior intelligence? The atheist experience seems to think so. ~ Issac
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rahw_YwTfZ0
Do you believe in Darwin’s theory?
Whatever your answer was, please read this story: bit.ly/2MEQi4K
What amazing me is how NASA knows this from a distance? LOL.
www.foxnews.com/science/6-billion-earth-like-planets-milky-way-galaxy
6 billion 'Earth-like' planets in the Milky Way galaxy, study suggests
www.foxnews.com
There could be as many as 6 billion "Earth-like" planets in the Milky Way galaxy, according to a new study.This is how silly the virus scare tactics have become. What's next? How far a fart will spread this? ~ Issac
www.foxnews.com/science/flushing-the-toilet-may-push-coronavirus-aerosols-3-feet-into-the-air-stu...
Flushing the toilet may push coronavirus aerosols 3 feet into air, study reveals
www.foxnews.com
In a world still reeling from the coronavirus pandemic, going to the bathroom may never be quite the same.
And who conducted this study? People who already believe Climate change is true. So what conclusions did anyone expect? Do you really expect a climate changer to come to any other conclusion? ~ Issac
www.foxnews.com/science/hurricanes-growing-stronger-climate-warms
Hurricanes are growing stronger as climate warms, new NOAA study shows
www.foxnews.com
Hurricanes are reportedly strengthening as the Earth's climate grows warmer, according to a new study.
Sounds like 100% of the atheists I debate. They turn into cry babies when what they dish get dished back.
***Here's an argument that you won't hear often, but has merit in proving evolution wrong along with it's supposed timeline. Plate tectonics. How?***
The crust recycles itself completely every so many years. Evolutionists have sold us on the idea that this only happens every 2 billion years because they know that in order to make evolution work, that's how long this needs to be. Which is making a process conform to the theory so that the theory can work which is not science. It's lying.
Why? If the crust recycled itself sooner, then it means most all of the evidence that dates older would be gone because the part of the crust that it's in would have been recycled destroying it. Think of it like a murder case. The evidence is in the road which is being ground up, and redone. in 24 hours, the murder scene is no more because of this. Which also means all the evidence is destroyed because of this process of road repair.
This is what happens with tectonic plates. How often they get recycled = how much evidence is found, how old the evidence can be, and the cut off point concerning that.
Well, the new revised time to recycle is 500 million years. Which means anything older than that should have gone through the recycle process and no longer exist. But yet it does.
Now how much is the error from 2 billion years to 500 million? A 1.5 billion year error. So either the smartest people don't know how to do the math, or they lied on purpose.
And 500 million = 4 times recycled in 2 billion years. So nothing should exist, at the most, beyond 1 billion years. No fossils older than that. Nothing. So correcting their supposed error exposes another lie.
And here's another thought to ponder. Since they made such a huger error already, who's not to say that this error still exist and the 500 million year claim is even shorter time than that? Because look how long it takes them to admit this error when they have been observing this for several years not, trying to predict earthquakes? Makes it more point to a lie on purpose than a honest mistake.
And another thought to ponder. Since the ground is constantly moving towards the areas where recycling takes place, which are the separation points in the plates. Then all of the oldest evidence should be the nearest to these places while the newest evidence should not be. In other words, the evidence in the geologic column should be at an angles because of this constant movement to recycle. The newest being further away, while the oldest being closer to getting recycled.
But instead all os the supposed evidence for evolution is always found in the same area and usually in a straight angle down.
What does this prove? A instant laying of the sediments and fossils which supports the flood, not deep time. And I am sure that those who understand this, you brains just started turning the wheels and more ideas will get commented on underneath this post.
Bottom line is: We have evidence that dates in the billions of years, which should have already been recycled already aka should not exist. I gave a 500 million year leeway which equal 1 billion years to recycle all, and evolution still does not work.
World's oldest fossil: A December 2017 report stated that 3.465-billion-year-old Australian Apex chert rocks once contained microorganisms, the earliest direct evidence of life on Earth. A 2013 publication announced the discovery of microbial mat fossils in 3.48 billion-year-old sandstone in Western Australia.
500 million year recycle process = almost 7 times this evidence should have been recycled. 7 times. Add the 500 million year leeway I gave = 3.5 times this evidence should have been recycled. Leave the 2 billion year error in place = about 1.7 times it should have been recycled. So not evidence that old should exist where the plates recycle.
www.livescience.com/15512-earth-crust-cycling-faster.html
Earth's Surface 'Recycled' Surprisingly Quickly
www.livescience.com
The cycling of Earth's crust from oceanic crust plunging into the mantle, melting, then re-emerging through the eruption of volcanoes happens at a pace four times faster than previously thought.Bible verse of the day
King James Version
Soon they will be able to tell how something looks, regardless of age, from a toenail LOL. ~ Issac
Science is not about worldviews. Worldviews are the individual's choice. So when one get mixed with the other, it becomes a religion.
Well got my first verbal threat on them doing something about me out debating them here. It's the usually dribble. They take screenshots of what's said, either put their spin on it or edit what I said to try and get back at me. After 25 years of this, I'm used to it. Nothing new really.
I'm already on several atheist websites, wikis, blogs. A few more is just more advertisement for me to reach others in places I normally could not. So atheists, keep up the good work like you always do. Troll, get banned, get mad, take screenshots. Then put your spin on them, edit them. lie about about me, then claim victory (always have to have the last word. Always).
The guy thinks I'm going to try and defend myself. Nope. The thing I learned after 25 years is: People will think what they want to think. Nothing anyone can do to change that. And those who know me know better, and that's all that counts. ! Issac
What haters do when they cannot win the discussion they are having with you. ~ Issac
Evolutionists had to stop this test because, proving evolution wrong would have meant losing their funding. ~ Issac
Even though it has been proven that the speed of light is not constant, and never was. Light years are still being used as a scientific bases for how far away something is. Proof that science does not always correct itself when it's not in their best interest to admit they are wrong.
Speed of light not constant:https://yecheadquarters.org/2018/10/speed-of-light-is-no-longer-a-constant/
www.foxnews.com/science/black-hole-1000-light-years-from-earth-discovered
Black hole, 1,000 light-years from Earth, discovered
www.foxnews.com
Researchers have discovered a black hole 1,000 light-years from Earth, the closest one known so far.