Skip to content

Words to use in search box: creation, evolution, flood, nasa etc...

YecHeadquarters

Literal 6 day creation

  • Home
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
  • Bible
    • Bible Search Engine
  • Creation 1
    • Creation 2
      • Forest fires make more trees then they destroy?
      • Fused #2 chromosome
      • God left His signature in our DNA
      • Granite Rock proves Creation
      • Ica stones, are they real?
      • Ice rings (layers) are not the same as tree rings
      • If Evolution Theory is true…..
      • Is Age Dating correct?
      • Is evolution a religion?
      • Is evolution based in Satanism?
      • Is Evolution falsifiable?
      • Lucy display at the Smithsonian a deception?
      • Lucy, is she really near human?
      • Mars Rover finds water on Mars?
    • 90,000 generations of E coli prove evolution wrong
    • Age dating is inaccurate?
    • Can Theistic Evolution belief make a Christian lose their salvation?
    • Common Ancestor?
    • Creation Memes you can use for debates!
    • Does the sun praise it’s Creator?
    • Earth, Moon, and Sun. Proof of creation
    • Evolution mentioned indirectly in the Bible?
    • Evolution of fish?
    • Evolution, a test of our faith?
    • Evolution, conform or fail?
    • Evolution, problems with first life
    • Evolutionists contradict themselves often
    • Fibonacci numbers, The Golden Ratio, The finger print of God.
  • Evolution 1
    • Evolution 2
      • Evolution debate will soon be history?
      • Evolution mentioned indirectly in the Bible?
      • Evolution of fish?
      • Evolution supports Bestiality?
      • Evolution, conform or fail?
      • Evolution, problems with first life
      • Evolutionists contradict themselves often
      • Fused #2 chromosome
      • If Evolution Theory is true…..
      • Is Age Dating correct?
      • Is evolution a religion?
      • Is evolution based in Satanism?
      • Is Evolution falsifiable?
      • Is science extremely bias?
      • Laws of Physics, where did they come from?
      • Lucy display at the Smithsonian a deception?
      • Lucy, is she really near human?
      • Octopus defies evolution
      • Pangea in the bible?
    • 90,000 generations of E coli prove evolution wrong
    • Age dating is inaccurate?
    • Another planet found that can support life?
    • Answers for God questions
    • Can Richard Dawkins be corrected?
    • Common Ancestor?
    • Dinosaur mummified guts included.
    • Do atheist-leftist agendas control science to make non-scientific decisions?
  • Atheism
    • Answers for God questions
    • Atheism a religion?
    • Atheist mass murder
    • Atheist response on FaceBook to creation meme
    • Atheist war
    • Atheists and NPD mental disorder
    • Atheists claim you have to be raised in a Christian home to be one
    • Atheists run scared of creationist Ken Ham?
    • Bill Nye and Ken Ham live debate
    • Bill Nye vs Ken Ham debate at AIG
    • Do atheist-leftist agendas control science to make non-scientific decisions?
    • Does Heaven and Hell really exist?
    • Professor defends evolution and uses several fallacies
    • Questions: Atheist, evolutionists, and old earthers refuse to answer
    • Richard Dawkins 747 Gambit.
    • Richard Dawkins cannot answer a simple question
    • Richard Dawkins dumps Fossil Record
    • The Unbelievers Movie
    • There is no God says Stephen Hawking in final book
    • UCONN Professor goes ape during campus open air preaching
    • Why atheists cuss during debates
    • Why do we have wisdom teeth?
  • Evolution 3
    • Professor defends evolution and uses several fallacies
    • Racism, is evolution based in racism?
    • T-Rex blood and soft tissue find has now been confirmed!
    • Tardigrades aka water bears defy evolution
    • The Abiogenesis arguments
    • The immortal jelly fish. Infinite lives
  • Flood
    • Empirical evidences for World Wide Flood
    • Grand Canyon, Did Noah’s Flood create it?
    • Is Age Dating correct?
    • Noah’s Flood Living Waters Ministry Full Movie
    • Noah’s Flood, where’s the water?
    • Pangea in the bible?
    • Richard Dawkins dumps Fossil Record
    • What is the mechanism for the Geologic Column layering?
  • Climate Change
    • Birds catch fire because of solar panels
    • Climate change, what they won’t tell you.
    • Global Warming or Global farce?
    • Proof that Climate Change and Global Warming is nothing more than money scams.
  • Science & NASA
    • An Ancient Virus May Be Responsible for Human Consciousness
    • Another planet found that can support life?
    • Aussie student finds universe missing mass?
    • Earth at night ISS NASA
    • Forest fires make more trees then they destroy?
    • Fused #2 chromosome
    • Is Age Dating correct?
    • Is NASA telling bald faced lies to get a trillion dollars?
    • Is science extremely bias?
    • Laws of Physics, where did they come from?
    • Lucy display at the Smithsonian a deception?
    • Mars Rover finds water on Mars?
    • NASA live feeds
    • Robot dog open doors
    • Speed of light is no longer a constant
    • Speed of sound observed going faster then the speed of light?
  • Social Media
    • Atheist response on FaceBook to creation meme
    • Facebook cover photos for creation pages
    • FaceBook drops to a new low allowing art that promotes violence against children
    • FaceBook Shadowing banning
    • FaceBook trolls
  • Creation Ministries
    • Answers in Genesis AIG
    • Creation Ministries International
    • Institute for Creation Research
    • Living Waters Ray Comfort
    • Christian homeschooling youtube channels
    • Noah’s Flood Living Waters Ministry Full Movie
    • Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron vs. The Atheists
    • Ray Comfort’s “180 movie”
  • Home
  • Atheist extreme bias

Category: Atheist extreme bias

Atheist extreme bias, Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation

Animals that use tools

Animals using tools.

Evolutionists used to claim that the reason that primates could use tools was because they were related to us so they shared some of our intelligence. But they cannot claim that anymore because many animals have been found to use tools and they keep finding more.

Will the evolutionist admit they were wrong and accept correction? Of course not. For they know that the more negative the information becomes for evolution the less people will believe it. So they are not about to admit the truth.

Top 10 AMAZING Animals That Use TOOLS!!
AMAZING Animals That Use TOOLS!! From hunting for food to collecting water…stay tuned to number 1 to find out animals you had no idea used tools!This top 10…
Read More
www.youtube.com
Atheist extreme bias

Click image to read story

Yep, you heard it right. Not only clothing but because jewelry is also considered a part of your attire, that will be banned also. Atheists cannot prove God does not exist, so the next best thing is to silence us. Poor atheists. As to why they censor everyone.

Atheist extreme bias

Tony Reed makes anti creationist videos and baits believers into watching them by implying he’s a believer himself. by naming all his videos: How a creationism taught me real science. Then when you watch the video, you find you that what he implies is a lie. I’ll list the videos below.

With the repeat of the same phrase in each video, the intent is more than clear. To bait and convert.

Evolution is nothing more than a religion and Darwin was not the first to think up the idea that man came from animals. It’s a pagan belief that dates back to Egyptian times.

The YouTube conversation

See how small his response was to mine? It was much larger but he edited it to either cover up what he said. Or cover up he was using the Atheos App.(link) Which is an app to help atheists debate. Yep even though they call use stupid uneducated morons, they need an app to keep up.

The comment image below proves what he did because he refers to points as in plural when his response after edit is a single point. So he will also edit to cover for his lies. The fallacy he committed with the edit will be the 3rd image in this section. This is also why it’s a better idea to take screen shots of conversations with atheists. Some are serial liars aka they’ll say and do anything to look right, without actually proving that they are right.

I very rarely have to use the edit fallacy meme. But when someone has such an image problem that they have to edit what they said to cover for what they did (lie), it shows they have a major problem.

1) A superiority complex. Editing what made them look lower than their debate opponent so they can look higher is an extreme ego complex. I suspect he’s trying to look above me in front of his over 7,000 subscribers. As to the reason he did the edit quite quickly after I pointed a few things out.

2) It also shows that he might have NPD disorder. Where he thinks so highly of himself that anything that makes him look otherwise, he has to cover for which means he goes to great lengths to look above anyone that would dare to disagree aka the superiority complex. Below is what the NPD disorder is, and it’s symptoms. I suspect all apply.

One thing you have to learn on the internet if you are going to engage people in debates. People will say and think what they want. There is nothing you can do about that. It’s called free speech. I have several atheist blogs, websites, and even atheist wikis that have pages on me. They say nasty stuff, make false accusations, and even threaten me with bodily harm and supposed legal harm (I’m gonna sue you etc…).

If I let all that bother me I’d probably be 6 foot under because I do not deal with this type of stuff to well. So I had to learn to just ignore it, and I have, and I don’t really care. But I don’t think Tony Reed can do this (I also believe this is a fake name. People like this like to hide in the bushes, it makes them feel safe as they attack others and tell lies).

When a debate opponent commits these 2 fallacies, it is a 100% waste of time to debate them. They are what the Bible calls a reprobate mind. Not being able to tell truth from lie, neither right from wrong. And they are always searching for truth but can never find it. To gain such a person’s respect to where they will even listen to you, you have to think like they do and agree with them. Otherwise they put you in a box and plug their ears. And even though some will not say it, this is what they think.

Another deception tactic is to play the guessing game. It’s where they never commit to any worldview, and they won’t tell you what their worldview is either. This allows them to stay above their debate opponent trying to make them look stupid while they feel superior. That’s what he’s done by saying: I never said i was Christian, and I never said I was an atheist.

Mind games is a tell tell sign they cannot debate and they like to play games. They know that when they come up upon someone who really does know how to debate that this person will make them look like a fool. Because if Tony Reed had all the scientific answers as he implies in every fake video he has made, he’d just mow me over with the science and the debate would be over. But with atheists, that never happens. They instead use these mind games to save face on what they know they cannot do.

**Well he did something I did not expect him to do, which was re-address the points. Then he took it even further by asking: What edit? Here’s what he said then I post the comment where he redid what he deleted. he tried to make it really long by making spaces in between the text lines thinking I would not screenshot all of it, but I did.

This is where he brought my attention to the edit.

This is the readdress to cover up the deleted points he made. He's trying to claim he did not do it.

This guy was not only the perfect example of a militant atheist, but he took it further than I expected. The only thing that was really different was that most of the time, most atheists like this are cussing up a storm. But i do feel he’s restraining himself so I don;t want to push him over the edge. So this is the last segment of this page. I’m not bothering with this guy anymore.

It’s has become a one up game aka tit for tat. Where he’ll go on forever. So i’m going to let him have the last word on YouTube and be done with it.

Atheist extreme bias

And the media is worried about a few muslims that got killed?

Christians continue to be the most persecuted believers in the world with over 90,000 followers of Christ being killed in the last year, according to prominent Italian sociologist and author Massimo Introvigne.

In an interview with Vatican Radio, Introvigne, the founder of the independent Center for Studies on New Religions based in Turin, Italy, cited statistics compiled by the Center for Study of Global Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary for a annual report that is expected to be released next month.

Introvigne said that there are between 500 to 600 Christians throughout the world that can’t profess their faith in Christ freely without fear of persecution.

Meanwhile, over 90,000 Christians have been killed in the past year, which equates to one death every 6 minutes on average, Introvigne added.

The total number of Christians killed in 2016 has actually decreased from last year’s findings of about 105,000, Introvigne relayed, adding that 70 percent of the Christians killed this year were slain in tribal conflicts in Africa. The other 30 percent was killed in terror attacks, government persecution and attacks on Christian villages across the globe.

As the attacks on Nigeria’s Christians continued in full force this past week, a particularly grisly attack saw fifty believers burned to death at their pastor’s home, where they had fled for refuge from a terrorist attack.

Reports disclosed that over 100 people were killed by armed terrorists this past week, who went on a 12-village killing spree in Nigeria’s Plateau state. Islamic extremist group Boko Haram has once again taken responsibility for the assaults.

Different sources have shared various reports of the number of lost lives from last week’s assault on Christians, which have been occurring on a weekly basis for many months in Nigeria. But a story last week by the The Christian Post confirmed that about 50 members of the Church of Christ in Nigeria in the village of Maseh were burned alive after they took refuge in their pastor’s house following a terrorist raid.

“Fifty of our church members were killed in the church building where they had fled to take refuge. They were killed alongside the wife of the pastor and children,” said the Rev. Dachollom Datiri, vice president of the Church of Christ in Nigeria, in a July 11 interview.

Officials from the church confirmed that over 100 members were killed through various

villages in Nigeria, which included Maseh, Ninchah, Kakkuruk, Kuzen, Negon, Pwabiduk, Kai, Ngyo, Kura Falls, Dogo, Kufang, and Ruk.

“Nigeria is truly becoming the new killing field for Christians. Hundreds of Christians have already been brutally murdered – including women and children – by the Boko Haram,” said Open Doors, USA spokesman Jerry Dykst. “The Boko Haram earlier this week said that all Christians need to turn to Islam or ‘they would never know peace again.’ Their goal is make all of Nigeria a country run and dominated by Shariah law.”

Some Nigerian security officials have claimed that Muslim Fulani tribesmen, who populate the Plateau State, could have aided Boko Haram in their bid to get rid of Christians from the North and establish Islamic dominance over all of Nigeria.

“I don’t think that Boko Haram could, out of nowhere, have raided these villages. They couldn’t do that without local support and collaboration,” said Nigerian criminal justice consultant Innocent Chukwuma.

“Attacks on Christian villages are not new in Plateau State, as Fulani tribesmen are known to have raided Christian communities in the past,” further explained Heritage Foundation Africa analyst Morgan Roach.

“Should Boko Haram be responsible, this would deviate from its past tactics, which have tended to be more sophisticated,” he added.

Nigeria’s citizens have been critical of the government’s response to the on-going attacks, and have called for more to be done to counter Boko Haram’s terrorism activities.

“This would be the equivalent of designating Bin Laden as a terrorist, but failing to designate al-Qaida as a terrorist organization,” Ortisejafor told the committee in response to only select members of Boko Haram being branded as terrorists.

“There are certain Muslim extremists who believe that Nigeria must be an Islamic nation [and] Boko Haram is the body that is fronting for this group of persons… [Nigeria] has a very well divided population among the two major religions [Christianity and Islam], so it’s not possible to Islamize Nigeria,” the pastor added.

Atheist extreme bias

Deeming themselves wise, they became fools. Worshiping the creation more than the Creator.

If Hawking had proved what he claimed before he died, like every other atheist before and after him has, he would have won a Nobel Prize for solving one of the biggest mysteries and arguments mankind has ever known. But he did not get one, and neither did anyone else. So these 2 things will continue, and atheists will continue to claim what they cannot even prove.

Atheist extreme bias, Evolution vs creation debates

The main reason atheists get mad during a debate about evolution is because of their frustrations when we make a point they cannot refute, and it makes them face the reality that what they believe is really a lie. Proof? Out of all the claims made about evolution from a single cell to all that we see, less then 1% is actually observable. And the reason for this is time constraints. To observe the 99%, one would have to have a time machine.

The *claimed* Tree of Life is nothing more than an interpretation of the evidence. There is *zero* observation because of time constraints. That makes the drawing more of an opinion than fact. And because on evolutionists are allowed to:

1) Dig up the evidence.
2) Interpret the evidence.
3) Peer review the evidence.
4) Make any conclusion concerning the evidence.

It makes the evidence not only unobserved due to time constraints, but extremely bias considering that those who already believe that it’s a true proven fact are the only ones allowed to do any work concerning the theory

And the proof that this goes well beyond science, is that atheists use it to support their worldviews and agendas, which makes the theory personal, which ensures there will *always be bias* concerning it. The only way one can approach either idea (creation or evolution) from a non-biased stand point is to:

1) Remove the theist from creation.
2) Remove the atheist from evolution.

In this way the evidence for both ideas stand on it’s own, and can be tested on it’s merits alone which 100% supports what the scientific method is all about. The question is: Who would be willing to do this, and would both sides accept the conclusions?

As one atheist said, that I brought this up to: You ask the impossible. No one can become that neutral to the subject, no one… Was he saying this because it’s true, or because he’s unwilling to give up his biases because he knows the outcome would not be in his favor?

Now do I say that because I am bias towards what I believe? Nope. After 25 years of debating atheists on the subject of C vs. E, one thing I have found is that if you are truly searching for truth. You have to consider everything. And be willing to step back from you belief and say: Prove what you claim, and I’ll convert right here right now. And I have done this on several occasions much to the surprise of my debate opponents who then say: Even if I did prove it you’d still reject it.

To which I respond: Then prove it and let’s see. Go get as many people as you need to do this and return and let’s see who’s really bias. And they never do. They either leave, call me names etc…. But the challenge is never ever met. That is because the challenge is a put up or shut up type challenge. And because people are not really looking for truth from either side to any degree, because they have made their belief personal. They cannot accept being wrong.

The perfect example is this episode of friends where Ross and Pheobe have an argument over the subject of evolution. And Ross cannot accept that Pheobe has a different opinion and that he might be wrong.

Click image to watch this short video

Atheist extreme bias, Evidence against evolution, Evolution vs creation debates

My responses to Dawkins challenge as a creationist.

Argument #1:
Premise #1. Every existing entity that shows evidence of design requires a designer superior to itself
Premise #2. God shows evidence of design in himself
Conclusion #1. Hence God requires a designer (another God) superior to himself

Response: Being “eternal” means has always existed. If God needs to be created He is not eternal. If eternal things require a first cause to exist then they are not eternal in every sense of the word and it’s meaning.

Physical things require a first cause, such as evolution. But even evolution has no first cause to start the causation process. If it does then several questions need to be addressed.

1) What is the first cause?
2) Who observed it?
3) And can this claim be repeated in a lab to prove it?

Why is this important? Evolution is called a “Scientific Theory”. right? Which means one of the criteria’s to become such a high level theory should be a provable “First Cause”. Because in the causation process, the First Cause starts the causation process for all the other causes to work and become viable possibilities. Without that First Cause no process claimed have a viable possibility.

Argument #2:

Premise #3. Infinite regressions are not possible
Conclusion #1 implies an infinite regression (an infinite number of gods)
Conclusion #2. Hence, Conclusion #1 is not possible, so no god can exist.

Response: Infinite regression cannot be disproved or proved because it cannot be tested, right? So this claim either way would be more of an opinion then fact without proof, right? Now logic and reason would say and I agree that no, this cannot happen. But you are putting upon an infinite God finite restrictions. Apply the rules that we live under as finite beings to a infinite God who lives in a infinite time dimension.

So the question is a fallacy because you forgot that it does not apply to a eternal infinite Heaven where there is no death or aging.

This is also why, in your 100% physical belief of we just evolved, we die and that’s it. That you must also believe that something comes from nothing. You know infinite regression does not work in the physical universe where the laws of thermal dynamics would exist. But God solves this problem by living in a realm where these things do not exist. So how would the infinite regression problem apply to an eternal – infinite God?

So where you claim a problem exists, becomes an answer that fits better than the one you give for what you believe.

To better understand this I think a little about creation needs to be explained.
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

3 things are needed to create a universe. Time, Space, and Matter.

1) In the beginning = Time.
2) God created the heaven = our physical heaven aka space.
3) And the earth = matter.

If time was not always then there was a time where time did not exist. Which means what did exist did not require time in order to exist. Which also, by the way, eliminates infinite regression. Because how can you have infinity of anything where time itself is infinite and already solves the problem just by being so?

Atheist extreme bias

This post on Facebook reveals a lot about evolution and evolutionists. What does it reveal?

1) That time solves all problems not facts on whether something can happen or not.
2) The comparison of the flood and what they claim is no where near each other but this person thinks that it is.

a) They believe life came from lifeless matter aka life coming from something dead like raising the dead.
b) That once this happened and a single cell life form came from the dead.matter.
c) That even though in the tests done to try and replicate this, not only did not life get created. But what was required for life to happened was a little over 80% there. So how does life form form a soup that only contains 80% of what required to have life, and where would the rest of the needed substance come from?

Answer: It just happens because we say so.

d) That this single cell evolved trillions of times with trillions of changes in all different directions to create all that we see.

And that because time solves all problems concerning complexity etc…It’s more than likely one thing happened over another because there was more time to do it. So the hero of the idea is not really scientific. No possibilities really matter *only that there is enough time*.

So time not only becomes their cop out excuse for not addressing probability math. *But time performs miracles* and will evolve anything into anything as long as the time god has enough time to do it.

**If you got what I was saying then read on because you will find this next part even more interesting,

Time god makes unintelligent processes intelligent as to what they imply time will allow evolution to do. But here’s the problem.

A intelligent inventor or creator has a learning curve (Not referring to the actual Creator). When they make a mistake that did not work they learn from that (a learning curve) and do not repeat that mistake. So they move onto the next probable thing that might work.

A unintelligent process does not have a learning curve, So when it makes the mistake it does not *learn from the mistake*. Therefore how many times it can get repeated is infinite. And time does not fix the unintelligent infinite repeating of mistakes.

Exactly what does push the unintelligent process to try something else? Atheist can’t tell you they just some how know that environmental pressures will do it, given enough time so that their time god can work.

So their faith is in the time god that given enough time random chance and environmental pressure will make the unintelligent process create complexity so complex that intelligent beings will have to go to school to learn how the unintelligent processes and time did all this.

Did you catch all the oxymoron’s in that? ~ Issac

Atheist extreme bias, Evolution vs creation debates

Video

Richard is trying to push the idea that being similar is unique and only applies to evolution period. That genes being almost alike is mutually exclusive to the evolution idea and could never apply to Creation or a Creator.

In engineering where intelligent designers create things, build things etc… When things are made that serve one purpose, are they really really that much different even though it maybe an original creation? Examples:

1) Cars. Made and created by intelligent designers, do they really differ that much from the original design even with technologies changing everyday?

2) Bridges. Made and created by intelligent designers, do they really differ that much from the first bridge even with all the technology changes?

3) Houses. Do they really change much from the original first house design?

The problem that Dawkins refuses to see with his answer is that DNA is required baseline for all life. So all life (like the car, bridge and house), are similar because with DNA how far could you really go from the original code that allowed life to exist?

If you think about it, evolving with no direction from intelligence would really produce a non-similar code instead of a related code where all life has code that is related.

The idea is basically lame and Dawkins is promoting a falsehood of an idea. Intelligent design of physical things prove over and over and over again. That the original was the base, and the base will “always” be part of any upgrades, new technologies, or even redesigns.

Let’s take programming for computer operating systems for example. Whether it’s Windows, Linux, Apple or whatever. Is not all the designs based on the first one aka DOS? And regardless of how they upgrade it, does not all still require some type of BIOS programming to help the hardware communicate with the software?

And where did DOS go? I bet many of you still think that Windows 10 does not have DOS. Well it does it’s just hidden. I repair hardware, software, and build computers. I also design website like the one you are on. So I’m going to bring up a DOS screen in my Windows 10 just to show you the programming never really got rid of it. The pic of the DOS screen is below.

The Dos is the black screen and I put the system information screen in front to show that it’s really Windows 10. I can type commands in the DOS and it will execute them. Did computer coding for operating system evolve naturally, or were they designed?

So saying or claiming similarities = evolution only is about as lame as the picture above is funny. Because randomness has no direction therefore cannot produce similar things. That’s why in biology…

You don’t stray much from the base programming because a designer original design is the template for everything else.

And you don’t get program without a programmer. In programming the programmer often leaves the mark aka signature to show who programmed this program. Who do you think was the first to do that? God was.

So no Dawkins, it’s not that we don’t listen and have our fingers in our ears going la la la, I can’t hear you. It’s you and those like you that do this.

Atheist extreme bias, Social meda

This is a page to report FaceBook trolls aka those who love yo stir up trouble. Know a trouble maker? Send me a message about the person and the link and if this person fits the bill. I’ll post hie FB account here.

How do you report them? Next to the message button in the main picture at the top of the page. There are 3 dots (…). You click on that and select “Report this profie” in the drop down menu. Then you select what applies. If you are not sure select “This is a fake account”. Then in the next screen select to report to FaceBook.

His name is just a play on saying God D*M without actually saying it. So click on his picture to go to his account and report him.

Bible Verse of the Day

Wait on the LORD: be of good courage, and he shall strengthen thine heart: wait, I say, on the LORD.
Psalm 27:14
DailyVerses.net

Facebook private group.

This is an image that links to the Facebook private group of this website. You just click on it and it'll take you to the group page. And because it's private you'll have to join in order to see anything. It's private to keep the haters out because I vet everyone by looking at their personal profile page to make sure they're not troublemakers. Then after vetting I either let them in or I don't. The majority of people who asked to get in get in. And that's around 80%. It's only 20% that I see are troublemakers and I don't let them in.

Recent Posts