The picture below is of the man who found the footprints, Mr. Taylor.
Since then several more pictures have surfaced, including those altered by evolutionists in the attempt to discredit them.
How these foot prints were uncovered, was that the river that runs through Dinosaur Valley State Park, washed away a huge slab of rock because of heavy rains. The size of the slab can bee seen if you look at the edges of the rock that is higher than the actual foot prints. More of the slab was cleared away to show more of the foot prints as shown in the picture below. To stop this from exposing even more human foot prints that evolutionists would have to explain, a “hurt the river law” was passed making it basically illegal to remove anymore of the slab rock to expose more human and dinosaur foot prints.
Here are the ones altered to make them look fake. The original picture is first. how you can tell they are all the same picture are 2 things. 1) The measuring string that runs through the dinosaur print is in each one. 2) The shadow in the upper right hand corner is in each one. All of these pictures were cropped out (cut out) of the picture that is 3 pictures above this paragraph.
In this particular instance, some creationists bought into the human footprints being fake. They did not know these pics were altered. At the time the very first picture I have posted was not available. Creation organizations such as AIG (AIG has removed their page on the Taylor trail) and ICR (link) tell their readers not to use this evidence. To bad they allowed the evolutionists to debunk such good evidence so easily. In my opinion, they are to worried about what world thinks, and they are trying to hard to fit in. Point made, atheistic evolution science is never going to accept them or their evidence. Even if they help supposedly debunk it as some have. It should only matter what God thinks. Besides, of science is truly about finding truth regardless of where it leads. Why all the deception to keep the course of so called truth going in one direction only?
My logic about this: Only a deception requires more deception to make it sound believable. Just like a lie requires more lies for the same reason.
