Category: Evidence against evolution

Aquatic life, Evidence against evolution

Evolution is about change in order to survive. correct? Then what was the octopus evolving blue blood (copper base instead of iron base), 9 brains and 3 hearts for to require a type of survival that it needed?

There is a reason the octopus never comes up on evolution websites is because evolution cannot begin to even explain all this. If evolution did this then here are the questions that need to be answered.

1) Every other animal on this planet has iron based blood (red blood). So why would the octopus evolve a copper base blood (blue blood), and what are the advantages of this and why was it needed for the octopus to survive and can you prove this?

2) 9 brains? Really? So what would make this the only creature that requires 9 brains, and what advantage for survival would 9 brain give it?

3) 3 hearts? Really? Maybe you think that it’s because for some reason this is required to flow more blood? A whale would benefit from multiple hearts because it’s so big but it only has one. It may be as big as a golf cart and weight 400 pounds but that one heart gets the job done. So what in the survival process made this a requirement to survive?

Atheist extreme bias, Evidence against evolution, Evolution vs creation debates

My responses to Dawkins challenge as a creationist.

Argument #1:
Premise #1. Every existing entity that shows evidence of design requires a designer superior to itself
Premise #2. God shows evidence of design in himself
Conclusion #1. Hence God requires a designer (another God) superior to himself

Response: Being “eternal” means has always existed. If God needs to be created He is not eternal. If eternal things require a first cause to exist then they are not eternal in every sense of the word and it’s meaning.

Physical things require a first cause, such as evolution. But even evolution has no first cause to start the causation process. If it does then several questions need to be addressed.

1) What is the first cause?
2) Who observed it?
3) And can this claim be repeated in a lab to prove it?

Why is this important? Evolution is called a “Scientific Theory”. right? Which means one of the criteria’s to become such a high level theory should be a provable “First Cause”. Because in the causation process, the First Cause starts the causation process for all the other causes to work and become viable possibilities. Without that First Cause no process claimed have a viable possibility.

Argument #2:

Premise #3. Infinite regressions are not possible
Conclusion #1 implies an infinite regression (an infinite number of gods)
Conclusion #2. Hence, Conclusion #1 is not possible, so no god can exist.

Response: Infinite regression cannot be disproved or proved because it cannot be tested, right? So this claim either way would be more of an opinion then fact without proof, right? Now logic and reason would say and I agree that no, this cannot happen. But you are putting upon an infinite God finite restrictions. Apply the rules that we live under as finite beings to a infinite God who lives in a infinite time dimension.

So the question is a fallacy because you forgot that it does not apply to a eternal infinite Heaven where there is no death or aging.

This is also why, in your 100% physical belief of we just evolved, we die and that’s it. That you must also believe that something comes from nothing. You know infinite regression does not work in the physical universe where the laws of thermal dynamics would exist. But God solves this problem by living in a realm where these things do not exist. So how would the infinite regression problem apply to an eternal – infinite God?

So where you claim a problem exists, becomes an answer that fits better than the one you give for what you believe.

To better understand this I think a little about creation needs to be explained.
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

3 things are needed to create a universe. Time, Space, and Matter.

1) In the beginning = Time.
2) God created the heaven = our physical heaven aka space.
3) And the earth = matter.

If time was not always then there was a time where time did not exist. Which means what did exist did not require time in order to exist. Which also, by the way, eliminates infinite regression. Because how can you have infinity of anything where time itself is infinite and already solves the problem just by being so?

DNA, Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation
This is an image of the inside of a human cell.

The most detailed model of a human cell to date, obtained using x-rays, nuclear magnetic resonance and cryoelectronic microscopy data sets.

Source and Credit: Cell landscape transformation via eucarotic cell by Evan Ingersoll Ingersoll Gael McGill – Digizyme’s custom Molecular Maya Software.

Programmers leave their mark in their programming to tell other programmers this program was created by them. Kinda like the reason a painter signs a painting.

So who do you think was the first programmer to do this? The first to write aka create the program for all life. And his signature is in the DNA. As it is in all of creation.

This signature is in everything ever created. Science cannot explain why. Why is that it’s God claiming what He created as His own. So that the day of judgment there is no excuse.

God never forces Himself on any man. But He does reveal Himself to those who are willing to listen.*Click on an image below to watch videos*.

Video

Video

Video

The math of the universe.

Video

A video by the physicist Michio Kaku talking about God being a mathematician because math is all through the universe.
Atheist extreme bias, Evidence against evolution

Video

Learning how to debate an atheist often requires learning their tactics. Below I will list the tactics and provide some memes that can be used to combat them when you run into them while debating.

1) The girl mentioned what Darwin said in his book. So the professor does not like what he hears so he denies this was said. This tactic is called: Destroying the messenger in order to destroy the message so you don’t really have to address the message to the degree that they should.

2) He questions the claim that evolution is just a theory. Another atheist tactic which is called Semantics aka a Play on words. The problem with semantics using the word theory is that a theory is neither a truth or a lie. This is because with a theory nothing has to be absolute. And you cannot define what a truth is of a lie because to have either without absolutes is a oxymoron.

3) Comparing several theory that everyone can “see”, observe and can be repeated daily along with it’s effects, to another that over 99% cannot be seen due to time constraints. Example: Gravitational and germ theory. The 2 do not compare to evolution because the claims made about evolution are in the 10’s of thousands. While the other theories have less then fifty and do not have the same problem of no observation due to time constraints.

Evolution is more comparable to theories like the Big Bang, abiopgenesis etc… Which also have a lot of assuming, and a problem with no observation due to time constraints. And does not require someone defending it to use what’s known as a divine fallacy. Where you want something to be true so bad, that you;ll compare it to something that is, then claim that these 2 things are the same. This one has several fallacies that apply.

4) The evolution is a fact not a theory claim. Facts require truth. And truth requires absolutes and observational evidence where the claims made can be observed. Example: If you dig up a bone and date it. Then observe it and make claims to what it is. That;s about all there is to observe.

But when you claim that it evolved, ate certain foods, lived a certain way etc… You then make the evidence and claims a interpretation. And you can’t prove or observe a interpretation. Because if you could, the interpretation would not be needed.

5) Next he is referring to experts as if experts are infallible. That’s another fallacy. And he is using partisan sources as well.

Here is a video that demonstrates how biased atheists are. It does not matter how educated you are, the only evidence you are allowed to find is evidence that supports evolution. Not only did the guy below find creation evidence, but he got published on it and was fired for it.

Video

6) Now he goes into a salesman rant. Where he using the argument that because the smartest and very best people in science agree and research all this, that this makes it all true. Well the question I would ask is: Are they all atheists? Of course he will say: Christians are allowed in science. Which I would respond: In the ratio of 99% compared to 1% right? And when do they get to talk about their beliefs in science, and when is this ever approved of?

6) The critical argument. LOL, I laugh every time I hear it. Oh we are so critical on ourselves. Nope, if you were critical you would have a panel of non-biased people making sure decisions were not based on the majorities worldviews of the evolutionist group which is 99% atheists. And you would also allow several ideas to run along side of evolution in competition to keep tabs on all claims.

But instead only one theory is allowed to run the race, and only one theory is allowed to win the race.

If evolution were the name of a horse in a horse race. It would be the only one allowed in the starting gates, the only one allowed to run the race, which would always insure it to be the only one allowed to win and never be beaten. And that how evolution is allowed to be top dog theory because nothing is allowed to challenge it because nothing is allowed to be researched that would ever challenge it? If you disagree, send me a message and name 10 things allowed to Challenge evolution. It should be easy if evolution were falsifiable like all theories are supposed to be<

I;ll post the list on this page if any atheist can come up with it.

7) Then he goes into the human skull evolution idea. As if the skull alone explains the whole body aka how it looked and how evolved the human was aka a whole bunch of assuming. But skulls proving evolution is easily debunked. Picture below shows how.

Yep, it’s just that easy. If I dug up graves at a crematory I bet I could line up some skulls of all those humans and find some that make it look like we evolved from primate, to human. Yet they would all be human skulls but that does not matter does it?

Debating atheists is a mind and word game more than an evidence game. You have to learn how to play if you want to keep up. Learn what all the fallacies are, learn the tricks and tactics. Learn how to expose and combat extreme biases.

Evidence against evolution

Science now claims a virus may have caused our minds to work. Anything they can think of in their minds to where they do not have to believe in God.

Image of virus.
An Ancient Virus May Be Responsible for Human Consciousness
You’ve got an ancient virus in your brain. In fact, you’ve got an ancient virus at the very root of your conscious thought.
Read More
www.livescience.com
Evidence against Big Bang, Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

For age dating to be correct, time has to be a “constant”. In other words it has to pass at the same rate from the time that time began. If time can be altered along with the Laws of Physics that mostly require constants, then aging is not a constant either.

Watch the video below given by AreoSpace Engineer to get a better idea of how time and age can be altered then you will understand the rest of what I am about to discuss below.

[/vc_column]

Now, if you listened to the video above then you heard him talk about the Atomic Clocks and how they differ in time keeping because they are at different elevations. Time is different at different elevations for 2 reasons.

1) Gravity is different because the further away you move from the center of the earth, the less stronger gravity becomes. And the lesser the strength the more time becomes altered compared to how it works from our stand point.

How does gravity work? Watch the video below, it’s not how you think because it’s not an attraction.

2) Motion also alters time. The faster you go the slower time passes. And because the earth is rotating the further out from the center you are the faster you are moving

How does this work? In the video below they use a bicycle wheel as a demonstration model to show that the further out you are on a spinning object, the faster you must move in order to make the same rotation as objects closer to the center.

In the Atomic Clocks, what made time pass differently? Because the altering of time through Time Dilation is not out perception of time (an illusion), the reality is that the radiation cycles of how a Atomic Clock works is altered aka the Laws of Physics gets altered (not an illusion). Time Dilation can be observed and repeated which makes it empirical evidence. There is even a math equation to working this out so that time displacement can be measured.

The way the earth orbits the sun, along with the moon is not what you think when put into actual reality that one thing is orbiting another thing that is orbiting something else. Even the speeds of orbital motion and rotation are not totally constant as the video below shows.

If we take and add the Fossil Record to the bicycle wheel, it becomes more apparent the point I am making. The fossil record as one piece, is 24 miles deep. At 24 miles down the gravity would be stronger, and the motion would be slower. Which means the record is time dilated.

But this does not just apply to the fossils. The sediments that make up the geologic column would be time dilated also. And all the magma that is in the earth’s core that comes up through volcanic activity, would be time dilated as well.

Why is all this important? If we apply what we observe on earth concerning how time passes without taking into factor that everything is in motion and they do not all move at the same speed. Most every object has gravity, and that gravity is not the same. Then we really do not understand how the universe works, or we choose to be ignorant, or because of our arrogance. We have chosen not to admit we were wrong about everything which includes: Time, age dating, and evolution.

Here are just a few examples (going into more detail).
Motion:

1) The orbital speed of the earth going around the sun is:108,000 km/h, ~70,000 mph.
2) The sun and the whole solar system that contains all of the planets moves with the spiral arm of the Galaxy we exist in at:720,000 km/h, 450,000 mph.
3) The Milky Way Galaxy in which we live in one of it’s spiral arms, the whole moves through the universe at:1.3 million miles per hour (2.1 million km/hr)!
4) The rotation speed of our planet is around 1,000 mph.

Gravity:

1) Gravity of out planet itself.
2) Gravity of our moon.
3) Gravity of our sun.
4) Gravity of our galaxy.

The bottom line is, you take away the ability for Evolutionist to use the excuse of millions and billions of years and the whole theory falls apart.