Category: Evidence against evolution

Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

If Evolution theory is true why does every documentary on how it happened contain 80-100% animation?

Video

Animation on how evolution is supposed to work.

If Evolution theory were true and had tons of evidence why does that evidence require so much interpretation? Because if you take away the interpretation of all supposed evolution evidence what would you have left? But because the evidence requires interpretation without actual observation of what really happened, the interpretation is actually an assumption. And this assumption is based on evolution being a true proven fact which bars any other idea from ever being considered or even pondered. It also means that assuming evolution is a true proven fact as so many evolutionists will claim means that the supposed science that it’s based on is more about conformism than anything else. Conformism is not science.

Example: Let’s say this is like a horse race. Evolution and all the other ideas are set to race. The horn sounds for the race to begin but the only door that opens is the one that allows the evolution horse to run the race. The other horses (ideas) are not even allowed on the track. So evolution horse not only gets to run the race but is the only idea that is allowed to win every race. In an actual horse race that would be known as cheating (conformism).

If Evolution theory were true, why do evolutionists make complexity sound easy? If you think about it, that is an oxymoron statement. Complexity means exactly what is says and there is nothing easy about it. Here are the problems to making complexity sound easy for evolution to achieve concerning evolution of the eye.

  1. The more complex something is the more mutations required to achieve the final goal.
  2. With mutations, each mutation has to mutate in the correct order to eventually evolve the final product. What is it in evolution that guides each individual mutation to be just right? Because if even one mutation if off it will affect all the mutations that come after it which in turn affects what it is that evolves. Example: Let’s look at the evolution of the eye as a scientific flow chart in an experiment. To get to the last stage of this flow chart and get the desired result, you have to follow the flow chart exactly. Which means you cannot have one deviation or even one mess up or the experiment is ruined. So what is it in evolution that makes every mutation perfect, regardless of how many it takes, to achieve the finished product? The reason this question is avoided is because to venture here would make one realize that only intelligence can have a guiding hand in what happens. Random chance and mistakes don;t do that.
  3. Which evolved first? The eye or the vision center of the brain? The reason this question is so important is because one cannot work without the other. So an eye without the vision center of the brain would be useless. The most common answer is that they evolved at the same time. For evolution to be able to know when to evolve 2 things at the precise moments they are needed is to say evolution can tell time. Which again means there was intelligence involved. So this answer does not go along with random chance and accident mechanism of evolution.
  4. What programmed the vision center of the brain to be able to process what is seen by the eye so that we could process it and react to our surroundings? The vision center of the brain with no programming to process the information sent to it by the eye is like having a computer that has no operating system on it. It won’t work. Programing by random chance and accident is like claiming windows 95 evolved into windows 8 by accident while the computer sat in Bill Gates office for 20 years and no one touched it. Not going to happen.
  5. Claiming that the eye is not a design when it’s made just the right size, and the lens is curved at the right angles for us to focus and see, is like saying the Hubble Telescope is not a design either.Design: A plan or drawing produced to show the look and function or workings of a building, garment, or other object before it is built or made.

The math that can be used to show how the eye is the right size, and the lens is curved at the right angles so things are in focus shows by math itself that the eye was designed. And if not then evolutionists need to show how math that includes size and angles is done with no intelligence.

  • If we the most intelligent life on this planet cannot duplicate what exist or even life itself, why would we think that a non-intelligent force could do it? If you think about that, that’s an oxymoron logic. To claim that non-intelligence can do what intelligence cannot. So is being dumb smarter than smart?  Does not make any sense now does it?
    • Atheist extreme bias, Evidence against evolution, Evolution vs creation debates

    Quote from website “‘The Unbelievers’ follows renowned scientists Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss across the globe as they speak publicly about the importance of science and reason in the modern world – encouraging others to cast off antiquated religious and politically motivated approaches toward important current issues.”

    These 2 people are on the forefront of everything anti-God. I deem them as the God haters – Christian haters. They support classifying being a Christian as a mental disorder. And that raising children in a Christian home is child abuse. They also agree with a group know as the Rational Response Squad that wants the Christian faith wiped from the face of the planet in less than 10 years. Yet by themselves, and their followers, they consider themselves the smartest people who ever walked the face of this planet. One could say that they both have a God complex. For they believe that every word spoken by them makes new truths and changes realities when they are spoken by them.

    But when someone has an attitude like this, it’s not really that hard to make them look stupid. Because no mere man can be God no matter how smart they become. So it was not hard for this one YouTube user to make a video using their own words to do just that.

    Video

    Richard Dawkins God complex and hatred towards anyone whom might disagree with him can be summed up in the next video where he tells one of his own to F off for disagreeing with him. And all others watching to F off as well for disagreeing with him. But being the coward that Dawkins is. To tell Tyson and everyone else to F off he uses a quote from New Scientists to do this. This is so if anyone tries to pin that comment to him he can always point the finger at someone else. Also notice how Tyson practically kisses Dawkins toes as he tries to relay something that Dawkins takes as a rebuke.

    Video

    I find it ironic that even though they claim not to believe in God their actions actually prove God exists. Because either they have to admit that God exists and they hate Him, or that they are really wasting their time going after something that does not exist. I guess it’s like their failed attempts to explain how something comes from nothing. Or that life comes from non-life when all that has been observed is life from life. Because if what they truly had as evidence was so convincing do you think anyone would buy into the existence of God? I don’t think so. So as usual this is the atheist attempt sell the masses what is not provable so the need to resort to hate and demonizing is needed. Because if they truly had the convincing science that they claim to have would such tactics need to be resorted to? Of course not. As to the reason it has to be done.

    Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

    Because evolutionists have found that claiming we came from primates turns people off. They have adopted a replacement for that which is called “Common Ancestor”. So if you happen to bring up that we came from chimps etc…, they will quickly correct you and say: No we share a common ancestor. Yet while trying to cover up what they really mean, which is that we supposedly did come from primates. They will also often use the:

    • The percentage difference in DNA between us and chimps. apes etc…
    • That the #2 chromosome is fused between us and chimps supposedly proving we evolved from chimps.
    • They will compare features between us and chimps etc…

    Yet it is wrong to say we evolved from Chimps?

    Common ancestor is also said to prove the evolution tree. Which supposedly also supports the fossil record etc… But there is one major problem that they hope you won’t see. One that they hide so well that even most evolutionists don’t know this problem exist. And that is what is said in the pic below.

    Hide this as they may try, it is a huge problem they cannot solve. Feel free to use the pic above to post on blogs, forums. and websites. Watch how short the debate will be because they cannot deny this. In fact more than likely you will have a bunch of hate spewed at you for bringing this up. It’s what they do best when they cannot counter what is said or shown. So expect the worst when you use this pic.

    Now there are websites and the Wikipedia will try to say that there are common ancestors to dinosaurs. But if you look at how it’s worded, they don’t really commit to it and they are basically taking a guess to try to fill a huge gap in hopes no one notices. How they claim it between human and chimps is not only DNA percentage of closeness. but the fused #2 chromosome. They don’t have anything like that to test for the common ancestor for dinosaurs is it’s all a guess at best. Yet they will try to pass it off as fact.

    And if they try to derail the debate by bringing up the problems with YEC (Young Earth Creation). Post this pic:

    How does on debate something that supposedly has no evidence?

    Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

    How much of Lucy is real and how much is implied fabrication? The pic below shows just how much evolutionists had to fabricate Lucy to make her support their beloved theory.

    Lucy is the perfect find for evolution. Why? Because there are no real exacts in the evidence in what the bones tell us, it allows the evolutionists to speculate. Example:

    1. Lucy has no feet. This allows the evolutionists to speculate, and form Lucy to support evolution by putting fully formed human feet on her.
    2. Lucy has no hands. This again allows evolutionists to speculate, and form Lucy to support evolution by putting fully formed human hands on her.
    3. Lucy has no facial bones. This again allows evolutionists to speculate, and form Lucy to support evolution by putting a near fully formed human face on her.
    4. Lucy pelvic bone and hips are not complete and broken. This again allows evolutionists to speculate, and form Lucy to support evolution by claiming she stood upright.

    How far would evolutionists go in their speculation in the attempt to make Lucy look like a missing link to support evolution? Let’s take a look at a wax figure that is in a museum and show what they already had in mind even though no real evidence without speculation supports the picture below.

    But this is not the worst of the desperation to form Lucy to support the evolution theory. On a NOVA program Dr. Lovejoy, a well known evolutionist. Took a cast of the pelvic bones and hip and reformed them with a power saw so that they would work for Lucy to stand upright. Here is the video which starts out with Dr. David Menton speaking then goes to the NOVA video.

    Video

    So what real evidence was there to add all these things to Lucy to make her nearly human to support evolution? Just imagination. To those of us who do not know the background of Lucy and how much real evidence there really was, would be fooled by this representation (deception). So actually in a comparison I can compare this method to selling used cars. A used car salesman is only going to tell and show you what he wants you to see (because the rest would ruin his attempt to sell you the car). He will never tell you the real history of the car he wants to sell you if he wants you to buy. So using his imagination and deception he’s going to plant positive thoughts into your imagination to make you buy what he is selling. He will even use the tactic of appealing to your ego by saying:

    • You would be stupid not to buy this deal today.
    • There are a couple of other prospects that want to buy this item I’m selling.
    • You’d really look cool and be in the in crowd if you buy this item.

    It’s all a con game. Because if they were totally honest as they will always claim to be. Beside the display at the Smithsonian and beside the wax figure would have been what was actually found. Giving the onlooker a chance to make up his or her mind as to whether the actual evidence was what they implied it to be or not. But because they know that the actual evidence does not support their speculation this was not done on either display. Proving that it is more important to sell the idea of evolution then it is to prove it.

    Atheist extreme bias, Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

    1) You make sure that only atheists are allowed to determine anything in science.
    2) You put atheists in all-controlling positions.
    3) You put guards at the door to make sure no one but atheists ever get in.
    4) And you form organizations that make sure any opposing views from any opposing group get removed so they no longer have a voice.
    5) And then you attack anyone whom would dare challenge evolution to try to shut them up.

    Can any atheists name one person that did not suffer character assassination trying to challenge evolution? Just one person. You guys cannot because you attack relentlessly until the person is destroyed. The one thing they fear most in this world is not death, but that they might actually be wrong and have to admit they were wrong. Most would rather die then have to do that, and that is why in their arrogance print such an article in the paper.

    You see atheists believe there are to many gullible people in the world that might not agree with them and become ignorant and agree with the opposing side. Atheists….I think that’s called freedom of choice. But they do not think so. what they do think is that anyone, even with any education whom dares to disagree is retarded, brain-damaged, etc…

    My rule of thumb is: The more desperate they get the more of a fools they will make of themselves as they expose their real agenda through evolution. I’m going to show with examples what this agenda is.

    This is an image that is cartoonish and has two people standing behind pulpits yelling at one another. And shows how silly it is for the atheist to call the Christian a bunch of names when they can address the creation evidence or the creation questions.

    Added: The story now even goes further to prove a point. Bill Nye AKA The science guy on PBS. Has decided to speak out against creation and all Christians. He made comments that any parent that teaches creation to their kids is making them illiterate and to do so should be considered child abuse (a crime that a parent can be arrested for and their kids removed from the home). His one mistake like so many atheists is that he makes statements that he is unwilling to back up. Some creation scientists from Answers in Genesis challenged him to a debate because of his comments. Bill Nye, like so many atheists do as of lately, cowardly declined. So Ken Ham (owner and CEO of AIG) made some videos along with the scientists who challenged Bill Nye.

    Video

    You see from the very beginning the goal was to remove anything to do with Christians from ever being considered as science. That is why one of the very first court battles that involved evolution was removing creation from schools. A theory cannot be falsifiable if what opposes it is silenced. What are atheists afraid of?

    Video

    And then we have the response from Ken Ham on the hatred, name calling and outright cussing from the people who support what Bill Nye said and did:

    Their idea of changing the world is corrupting it. The example here is to exchange the Bible for Porn.

    This is a button that is for sale on one of their websites. And this is just the mild stuff. Some is very X-rated. Atheists hate not only God but all Christians. And they use the tool of evolution to spread that hatred. Now you might get an atheists who says: But I have some really good Christian friends so I don’t hate them. Really? Name one atheist that speaks out against this stuff that goes on…It cannot be done. And when men do nothing there are just as guilty as doing it themselves.

    And after seeing what this site promotes listing in the pic above, here is what the site says on the issue of hatred: the intent of this site is not to spread hatred for those who believe in Jesus as God; end of quote. They lie so much they no longer know what an oxymoron is.

    I have archived on my old site some of the worst stuff that they have. And yes some is X-rated. So you have been warned before you click on this link. https://yecheadquarters.org/evo_hate.html Also make sure to click next at the bottom of each page. That will take you to the next page in that section. The stuff gets worse as it goes.

    Why do atheists want so much control? This is how communism, socialism, fascism etc… work. They have to have total control and take away the freedom of the people. Yet while all along claiming that what they offer is more freedom when in actuality it’s not. Don;t believe me? Name one government that was ever a communist state that was Christian? History shows that they were “always atheists”. Even unto this day. So for atheists to gain control to push their communist agenda they have to do what first?

    1) Remove the freedoms of the opposing side to take away their voice while along claiming to do so will bring more freedom.
    2) Putting their people in all key positions of control in every facet of propaganda that can be controlled so that their side always gets their message across in a positive light while either telling lies about the other side, and not reporting anything bad about their own side. They have control over the TV media but don’t have control over the radio media. But because the radio media is a huge thorn in their side they would like to pass legislation (the fairness act) to get that control. Notice how their control always sounds harmless. Taking control over radio media is an example of fairness? etc…

    They also like to blow stuff out of proportion on the other side so that there side looks like some type of saint hood. They often like to bring up the Christian crusades as to what kind of control would dominate. The fact of History is that Constantine controlled the armies that were supposed to be Christian. Constantine objective was to bring out of hiding the Christians so the government would know who they were and their number. He never went against Caesars rule. In fact he secretly worshiped the sun-god Sol. The soldiers he commanded were not saved but were made to believe that they were and that sprinkling holy water on them gave them protection and the authority to do what they did in God’s name. Yet no part of God was ever in it. The goal was to make sure the Christians got blamed for what happened so to ensure that everyone would deem this to be true they made shields with crosses on them as their symbol of in whose name they did their killings, rape etc… So basically we have an atheist who duped other atheists into believing they were doing God’s will and were saved. Only the top men in the military with Constantine had any idea of what he was doing.

    Truth be told, Constantine took the Christians that he thought were the most dangerous to Caesar. Who had them dipped in oil, tied to a pole and burned alive at night so to light up Caesar’s rose garden. Caesar would often play the violin why they burned to death. So this was all a deception to bring out the Christians while in the mean time making sure the Christians got blamed for all the bad stuff they did. Under the history of their it has been recorded that over 100,million people have been murdered for the sole reason they would not concede to total dominance and rule by the current government in power. Here are the murders we do know about.

    128,168,000 VICTIMS: THE DEKA-MEGAMURDERERS
    61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State.
    35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill.
    20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State.
    10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime.

    19,178,000 VICTIMS: THE LESSER MEGA-MURDERERS
    5,964,000 Murdered: Japans Savage Military.
    2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State.
    1,883,000 Murdered: Turkeys Genocidal Purges.
    1,670,000 Murdered: The Vietnamese War State.
    1,585,000 Murdered: Polands Ethnic Cleansing.
    1,503,000 Murdered: The Pakistani Cutthroat State.
    1,072,000 Murdered: Titos Slaughterhouse.

    4,145,000 VICTIMS: SUSPECTED MEGAMURDERERS
    1,663,000 Murdered? Orwellian North Korea.
    1,417,000 Murdered? Barbarous Mexico.
    1,066,000 Murdered? Feudal Russia.

    The objective to rule effectively once control is taken is to always rule with fear. The fear that offers the most control over a multitude of people is the fear of death and imprisonment. To basically have prisons similar to the holocaust conditions where no one ever leaves alive. The numbers above you won’t find on any of their own websites. In fact these numbers are so well hidden that almost all on their side have never even seen this much less even know this exists. The propaganda they are constantly fed is that one side is totally evil while their side is not. To do this they have to run a massive deception machine which not only includes out right lying, but suppressing of the truth.

    Want another example of how atheists in the past have told lies to make an opposing side look worse than they were? Atheists often like to use the term Flat Earth believers when it comes to addressing Christians. This idea extends from the supposed historical fact that the main reason it took so long for Columbus to get approval from the Queen to sail around the world was that the Christians had instilled this fear of flat earth and that if they sailed to far they would fall the end of the edge of the earth and never been found or seen again. And many of you reading this were actually taught this as historical fact in school and believed it. What if I told you that this supposed historical fact was actually more propaganda thought up by a writer named Washington Irving?

    Who by the way was an atheist who did not like Christians. He even admitted to adding this fiction to his book for the cause of making all Christians look stupid. And because of this he has lost his historian status and his fiction about Columbus is slowly being removed from all modern books and any updated books. Just Google “Washington Irving flat earth” and read all about it for yourselves. Major encyclopedias like Britannica have removed all mentions of the fiction that was in Washington Irving book as historical fact. The historical fact was that the Queen did not want to invest in such a voyage because of the money involved. Columbus goal was to convince the queen that the money would be a good investment that would show a shorter trade route that would allow their ships to trade more often giving them an advantage in the trade market. This would equal more income for the government and would pay for itself. After many attempts by Columbus to convince the queen she was finally convinced and gave Columbus the okay and the money needed to do it. There is no mention of Flat Earth being a problem.

    atheism a religion, Atheist extreme bias, creation ministries, Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

    We all know that evil is the opposite of good. And it has been concluded by many Christians that evolution opposes creation for the very reason that it is considered evil. Evil also means in Biblical terms to be of Satan. Now something directly from Satan always the direct opposite of God and basically a deception also known as a counterfeit. This is because Satan is opposing God so he has to be the direct opposite. So for Satan to be the direct opposite of the Tree of Life that represents eternal life, he has to come up with a tree of death that has no possible way to become eternal.

    In the Bible it speaks of the Tree of Life:

    Revelation 2:7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.

    Revelation 22:2 In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.

    Revelation 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

    Living to have an eternal life is the goal that is presented in the Bible. The goal of evolution is the death of an inferior species so that a better one can evolve. And all die and there is no eternal life because in evolution the possibility of a soul cannot be explained through natural causes. So basically evolution is Satan’s counterfeit for God’s Tree of Life (eternity) and His Creation. Basically counterfeiting and denying all that God represents.

    Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

    Atheists often ask: Where is the evidence for God? Most of the time the question cannot be answered. But when it is answered it’s also ignored…. We humans have a unique ID that leaves evidence where ever we go and everything we touch. Our finger prints are not the same even with billions of people on the planet no two finger prints are alike. So did God leave His finger print to show us that He created all that we see? Is it so unique that it can only be explained through an intelligent Creator? Something that science cannot explain. What you will see in the videos below will show you that math itself was used in every part of creation and out of all the variations that could exist one just happens to pop up all over the place. Making the odds of random chance not possible which means only an intelligent being could have done this.

    Video

    Video

    Video

    atheism a religion, Evidence against evolution, Evolution vs creation debates
    And this image it shows the teacher forcing down the word evolution down the students' throat.

    For those who don’t know what Theistic Evolution belief is. It’s where a person believes that God’s creation was controlled by natural forces. And that God used evolution to create all that we see. And that the Biblical time-line is a myth. Believing in Theistic Evolution has many problems. One of the main problems is they cannot answer when, in the evolution process, that man obtained a soul that could be saved. It even denies the first sin by denying the existence of the Garden in which Adam and Eve sinned. So along with everything else, the plan of redemption is denied because for what sin did Christ die for?

    The danger the theistic evolutionist puts themselves into is called: To err from the truth.

    James 5:19 Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him;
    20 Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.

    There are several key words here that would apply to a Theistic Evolutionist.
    1) Brethren = believer.
    2) If any of you = all believers.
    3) err from the truth = you have to know the truth before you can err from it.
    4) Convert = having to be brought unto salvation again. What else do you convert the brethren to for erring from the truth?
    5) Save a soul from death = the lake of fire.
    6) Hide a multitude of sins = the brethren sin was no longer forgiven because they fell from salvation. So it has to be redone.

    Why does this apply to Theistic Evolutionists? Because erring from the truth (what the bible says) means that they knew what the truth was. And since they preferred the lie instead, and called it truth. They were also indirectly calling God a liar as well. What is it that has to be said every time someone brings up: That’s not what the Bible says? What you say not only applies to the word, but also applies to God. That is why erring from the truth is bad, and puts the person who does it in danger of losing salvation.

    Side note:Can you lose salvation? That is a whole different post subject, but one question will sum it up. In the Judgment Throne of Christ, who are the goats that get thrown into the fire? If you say: Unsaved sinners. Then find in God’s word where it ever refers to unsaved sinners as goats? And where did the goats come from to be judged? The goats being unsaved sinners is not there because the goats are the Christians who did not do what they were supposed to. Why do you think both sides were not being judged on whether they had salvation or not? It’s because they “all” already had it. So what the judgment was, was whether they did the kingdom works to help bring in the harvest.

    Those who lost their salvation while on this earth are not at that judgment. This is because they are considered unsaved sinners because they no longer have the blood of Christ. This is the danger TE’s put themselves in by choosing to believe what the world says is true while still trying to have God and salvation. Salvation is not a have your cake and eat it too covenant. Also, If anyone can find the verse that says that unsaved sinners are goats, you are welcome to post it. I have no problem being corrected. To be corrected is to be closer to truth.

    Still don’t think TE belief puts you in danger of losing salvation? Let’s put it in Biblical prospective. The Bible says:

    mt 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

    1) I have yet to see a unsaved sinner brought to salvation using the message of TE as a salvation message.
    2) I have yet to see TE street preachers.
    3) Where are the TE bible studies?
    4) Where are the TE crusades for Christ?

    Evolution cannot be a part of the plan of redemption, or it would have been already added and there would have been people saved by it. But the numbers are ZERO for a reason.

    jn 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

    Father God controls the drawing power unto the son for salvation. So if the Father does not approve, the drawing power won’t be there, and no one will get saved. This is why there are ZERO TE salvation testimonies from previous unsaved people. And all TE’s know better than to take their message and try and hold a crusade for Christ. Nothing will happen because God won’t be behind it. And if you are the type of person who has to see in order to believe. Go stand on a street corner and try to save people with the message of God using evolution to create. See how many people you can get to convert.

    So what does TE belief really mean?
    1) A Christian that wants to fit in with the world will convert to this.
    2) A Christian who wants God on their own terms will convert to this.
    3) A Christian who gets tired of being called stupid for their belief, will convert to this to look smart.
    4) A Christian that wants to slowly leave their faith will convert to this, then atheism.

    Maybe someone can post a list of what TE belief does for God? Anyone? But let’s be honest, Theory of Evolution has it’s roots in Paganism and Satanism as video below will show.

    Video

    Evidence against evolution, Evolution vs creation debates

    It did not matter what race you were, if you were mainly black they stuck you in the human zoo.

    The second half of the title to Darwins book was removed to cover up that it was based in racism.

    watch?v=JjU3Bob8IFA
    Evolution the cause of scientific racism? Watch the video name? Science's dirty secret. Has actual footage of the human zoos used to help make people think evolution is true, and white men are superior.
    Read More
    www.youtube.com
    Another evolution chart on humans that illustrates we came out of Africa and once we came out of Africa we became white men supposedly.
    This is an image where it shows a teacher teaching human evolution from the human evolution chart. Then a black man that is watching him ask him the question about Evolution being racist. It's a cartoon Type image.
    This is the human evolution chart that shows that we supposedly came from primates then evolved into white men.

    In the youtube video above, you will notice that the term “natural selection” is used in the first 2 minutes. It is what both Dylan and Eric based their racist hatred on. And it’s directly from Eric’s journal. Then 3 minutes and 55 seconds into the film the word evolve is used. As Eric claims that they have evolved above other humans at school.

    Evolution is even linked to Jeffery Dahmer as the video below shows:

    Jeffrey Dahmer rejects evolution and accepts Jesus. And claims that evolution helped give him the mindset that allowed him to think that killing people was okay. Click the image to play the video.
    What if Jeffery had found Jesus Sooner?
    See how evolution helped warp the mind of Jeffery Dahmer.
    Read More
    www.youtube.com

    And even worse than that, evolution has ties to Hitler. This was done through Ernst Haeckel who was a German. In his attempt to convince everyone that evolution is true, he went all over Germany giving lectures using his faked embryo drawings like the one in the picture below.

    This image is called Hitler's hit list. It shows how he saw the races and how they compared to Apes. It also shows that the goal is to create an Aryan race.

    This is how Hitler heard about evolution, and made this hit list for the races around the world. Comparing them to how ape like he assumed they were. And he based his murdering spree on this by trying to exterminate the race at the bottom of that list because he deemed them as near to pure ape. A picture of the cover of the book this list came from is below as well.

    And this is another image that shows how the human evolution chart is racist regardless of how you do it AKA draw it. Because it always starts out with a primate advances to a dark-skinned man, then the final conclusion is white man.
    This is an image of Darwin, his friends, and his book. And how they all support racism. It's quotes from Darwin, quote from two friends that helped him with this Theory, it shows the cover of his book which has a racist comment on it as part of the title.

    “In every European country between 1870 and 1914 there was a war party demanding armaments, an individualist party demanding ruthless competition, an imperialist party demanding a free hand over backward peoples, a socialist party demanding the conquest of power, and a racialist party demanding internal purges against aliensall of them, when appeals to greed and glory failed, or even before, invoked Spencer and Darwin, which was to say, science incarnate . . Race was biological, it was sociological; it was Darwinian.”*Jacques Barzun, Darwin, Marx, Wagner (1958), pp. 92-95.

    The Franco-Prussian War of 1870 was the first large conflict in which both sides used Darwinism as an excuse for their attempts to murder one another in organized warfare. *Nordau says it well:
    The greatest authority of all the advocates of war is Darwin. Since the theory of evolution has been promulgated, they can cover their natural barbarism with the name of Darwin and proclaim the sanguinary instincts of their inmost hearts as the last word of science.*Max Nordau, “The Philosophy and Morals of War,” in North American Review 169 (1889), p. 794.

    And the list can go on and on.

    Side note: Some reading this might ask the question: What is the point of all this? Or, do you just hate science? The answer to both of these questions is that when the atheists-evolutionists started telling lies about Christians and religion in general. And in turn used those lies to make evolution look like some type of saint hood that would save the world. It was time to set the record straight. So this page is done because of what they have done. So basically, it’s their own fault it exists. Would you not rather know the actual truth instead of their form of it?

    Evidence against evolution, Evolution vs creation debates

    There really was not much to go on with the Lucy find. But as usual, evolutionists were willing to make assumptions based on zero evidence. Did Lucy have fully formed human feet and hands? What do you see in the evidence above that would indicate either? Nothing right? But the St Louis Zoo does not think so. They had a wax figure made for display of what Lucy supposedly looked like from the evidence found. And guess what? The wax figure had fully formed human hands and feet. Basically depicting what was not even there. Here are a couple of pictures of the wax figure.

    Video

    Dr. David Menton (in the videos below) talks about why Lucy has been given human hands and feet and why this is wrong. It is another example of how evolutionists will make the evidence “conform” to the theory. This is what happens in science when a theory is deemed as a true proven fact. But doing this makes the theory unflasifiable, and therefore no longer a theory.

    Video

    Video

    When evolution evidence is exposed as a fraud, the justification that evolutionist use is that another evolutionist exposed it. Showing that science is about self correction. The truth be told, only another evolutionist can correct another evolutionist. And even that is hard to accomplish because evolutionists never like to admit being wrong. I first exposed this deception on Saturday, May 12, 2007. Now if it comes up as a fraud, watch who gets credit for exposing this.

    You see to allow a creationist to correct an evolutionist is to give creation credibility. A evolutionist would rather die a horrible death than to do this because creation and the Creator are their worst enemy. So it will never happen. So when a evolutionist boasts about it was another evolutionist that exposed a fraud, just remind them that only another evolutionist can correct another evolutionist. And they cannot prove otherwise because throughout evolution history, it has always been this way. So I guess you could say that this would be the direct definition of “self” correcting. Because only those who think as they do can correct them. It’s an oxymoron to use deception to try and prove a supposed true proven fact.