Author: ikester7579
For age dating to be correct, time has to be a “constant”. In other words it has to pass at the same rate from the time that time began. If time can be altered along with the Laws of Physics that mostly require constants, then aging is not a constant either.
Watch the video below given by AreoSpace Engineer to get a better idea of how time and age can be altered then you will understand the rest of what I am about to discuss below.
Now, if you listened to the video above then you heard him talk about the Atomic Clocks and how they differ in time keeping because they are at different elevations. Time is different at different elevations for 2 reasons.
1) Gravity is different because the further away you move from the center of the earth, the less stronger gravity becomes. And the lesser the strength the more time becomes altered compared to how it works from our stand point.
How does gravity work? Watch the video below, it’s not how you think because it’s not an attraction.
2) Motion also alters time. The faster you go the slower time passes. And because the earth is rotating the further out from the center you are the faster you are moving
How does this work? In the video below they use a bicycle wheel as a demonstration model to show that the further out you are on a spinning object, the faster you must move in order to make the same rotation as objects closer to the center.
In the Atomic Clocks, what made time pass differently? Because the altering of time through Time Dilation is not out perception of time (an illusion), the reality is that the radiation cycles of how a Atomic Clock works is altered aka the Laws of Physics gets altered (not an illusion). Time Dilation can be observed and repeated which makes it empirical evidence. There is even a math equation to working this out so that time displacement can be measured.
The way the earth orbits the sun, along with the moon is not what you think when put into actual reality that one thing is orbiting another thing that is orbiting something else. Even the speeds of orbital motion and rotation are not totally constant as the video below shows.
If we take and add the Fossil Record to the bicycle wheel, it becomes more apparent the point I am making. The fossil record as one piece, is 24 miles deep. At 24 miles down the gravity would be stronger, and the motion would be slower. Which means the record is time dilated.
But this does not just apply to the fossils. The sediments that make up the geologic column would be time dilated also. And all the magma that is in the earth’s core that comes up through volcanic activity, would be time dilated as well.
Why is all this important? If we apply what we observe on earth concerning how time passes without taking into factor that everything is in motion and they do not all move at the same speed. Most every object has gravity, and that gravity is not the same. Then we really do not understand how the universe works, or we choose to be ignorant, or because of our arrogance. We have chosen not to admit we were wrong about everything which includes: Time, age dating, and evolution.
Here are just a few examples (going into more detail).
Motion:
1) The orbital speed of the earth going around the sun is:108,000 km/h, ~70,000 mph.
2) The sun and the whole solar system that contains all of the planets moves with the spiral arm of the Galaxy we exist in at:720,000 km/h, 450,000 mph.
3) The Milky Way Galaxy in which we live in one of it’s spiral arms, the whole moves through the universe at:1.3 million miles per hour (2.1 million km/hr)!
4) The rotation speed of our planet is around 1,000 mph.
Gravity:
1) Gravity of out planet itself.
2) Gravity of our moon.
3) Gravity of our sun.
4) Gravity of our galaxy.
The bottom line is, you take away the ability for Evolutionist to use the excuse of millions and billions of years and the whole theory falls apart.
click tabs to load more info
Video
Video
Video
Video
Churches are needed. A gospel needs to be preached. Well how about the gospel of evolution being preached from behind the pulpit? Yep that is what happens at this church. Some atheists might try to make you think this is rare. Problem is, mega atheist churches exists also.
And it has become to the point where it’s become so ironic that Christian comedians are making jokes of this.
So regardless of what atheists claim, the reason their worldview and their theory competes with religion is because it’s religion.
- Interview videos
Video
Video
Video
Video
- Mega churches
Churches are needed. A gospel needs to be preached. Well how about the gospel of evolution being preached from behind the pulpit? Yep that is what happens at this church. Some atheists might try to make you think this is rare. Problem is, mega atheist churches exists also.
- Comedians
And it has become to the point where it’s become so ironic that Christian comedians are making jokes of this.
- Atheist explanations
So regardless of what atheists claim, the reason their worldview and their theory competes with religion is because it’s religion.
The problem atheists have cause for themselves is that the same censorship they use against Christians now applies to them.
What do they preach?
Videos
- Images
The problem atheists have cause for themselves is that the same censorship they use against Christians now applies to them.
- What do they Preach?
What do they preach?
Videos
Narcissistic personality mental disorder is a common disorder among militant atheists. Here are the symptoms.
Having an exaggerated sense of self-importance
Expecting to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it
Exaggerating your achievements and talents
Being preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate
Believing that you are superior and can only be understood by or associate with equally special people
Requiring constant admiration
Having a sense of entitlement
Expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance with your expectations
Taking advantage of others to get what you want
Having an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others
Being envious of others and believing others envy you
Behaving in an arrogant or haughty manner
Although some features of narcissistic personality disorder may seem like having confidence, it’s not the same. Narcissistic personality disorder crosses the border of healthy confidence into thinking so highly of yourself that you put yourself on a pedestal and value yourself more than you value others.
Atheist social path tries to kill his father with a hammer
Video, this one will only play on the youtube site.
Jeffery Dahmer says evolution played a huge role in what he did
Video
Richard Dawkins and Peter Singer on eating humans, they agree with Dahmer
Video
Satanist priest says Darwin was tutored by Satan on Evolution to destroy the Bible without burning it
Video
Click on images to see text fully, and for the link to the articles that go with them that you can use. You can also get an idea of what kind of responses you will get from such an article and how to respond to them. If you use the articles make sure you put them in your own words. Unless you are sharing copy and pasting an exact copy is considered parroting from another source which is frowned upon on the internet. It’s one thing if you are quoting or sharing to copy directly. But another when you are not. Not that I have a problem with this but if you are debating and someone actually look up the original source. They will point out that you are using someone Else’s argument because you can’t think for yourself (an atheist tactic). So just change the wording a little (put it how you would say it). ~ Issac
Darwin was not the first to think up man evolving from animals.And his theory was based in racism. There were others who had the same idea, Darwin only published before they did to accept the credit.
But the idea of man coming from animals was a pagan idea originally. That can be traced back to Egyptian times.
And what proves this even more, is their recent return to their roots by opening churches in the name of Evolution.
Ever wonder why atheists always say:
1) Where is your creation evidence?
2) There is no creation evidence?
3) Get you creation evidence approved of by science?
4) Show us your peer reviews?
etc…
It’s because atheists run and control science. Which means science also has an atheist agenda. This agenda is to disprove God or at least keep the idea at bay. Above is a picture I made up that best explains this. Shows how science works today (bias) to protect the theory (evolution) that best fits the atheist agenda. And shows how science should work (non bias) if science were run with no agenda. It’s quite an eye opener. This is what atheists don’t want you to realize because this totally discredits science and all that they do. That’s because bias is not science and this clearly shows bias in it’s most extreme form exists. How extreme can this bias be?
This is the perfect example of how atheists have to bully everyone into believing what they believe. The professor tries to start a confrontation by getting up into the other guys face and invading what is known as another person’s personal space. Atheists are no interested in free speech of the individual, only if it’s free speech about what they believe.
What you see here is the perfect example of what also goes on the the classrooms of our colleges. If a Christian happens to be in the class he has 2 choices. One is to either sit quietly as the professor uses ridicule to counter what they believe, or speak up which ensures they will fail the class. Failing not because of their work on the subject they are taking, but for daring to come up against the professor’s ridicule of what they believe.
As the video on this page progresses, the professor is found surrounded by some atheists. In which he starts preaching the gospel of evolution. And then he does something that proves what we creationist have known all along about evolution. He praises Darwin by saying ” Praise Darwin” and gets the atheist crowd to repeat it. Then says Amen which is an ending to prayer. So they were praying praise to Darwin. Evolution is just a repackaged religion made to look like science.
The same happens in court rooms as this creationist sues one university over being fired for finding creation evidence.
Ignoring that evolution always misses steps to actually proving itself does not make it true. There is a reason that a person must first understand that there are no absolutes before they can understand evolution. The reality of believing there are no absolutes means truth becomes a huge grey area. And anyone can take an idea like evolution and make it look true without it actually being true.
The other problem associated with this, is that atheists like to make micro and macro evolution sound like the same thing. Or that micro to infinity proves macro. The problem with this logic is 2 fold.
- If they are one in the same, why give them different names?
- Claiming micro to infinity makes macro evolution leaves out one very important step. And that is to know if there are limitations to micro evolution that would keep it from equaling macro evolution. Because unless this can be tested and observed a huge assumption is being made that micro will = macro with no problems. That’s not science.
Assuming with no observation leaves a huge door open to be proven wrong.
Example: Light speed for years has been claimed to be a constant. The problem is that we live in a gravity environment, and light does not always travel under the influence of gravity as travels in space. So we don;t know if light changes speed when there is no gravity around. But recently science has been able to:
- Stop light:
- Slow down light: http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/02.18/light.html
- And make the speed of light infinite: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23050-light-hits-near-infinite-speed-in-silvercoated-glass.html#.U1osB6IVCzw
So all this means is that the speed of light is no longer constant. This puts into question every book, paper, theory etc…. That is based on the speed of light being constant. All of this is because some people wanted to make an assumption about light when they did not have all the facts. And because that assumption fits nicely with the theory of evolution and brings into question the Biblical creation. But now since all that’s in question the tide has turned and everything science has assumed on the speed of light being constant is now in question.
Some of what this puts into question are:
- How far stars and planets are away from us.
- How old stars or planets are because a light year no longer applies when the speed of light is no longer constant.
- Theories based on this no longer valid.
- All papers and books based on this no longer valid.
All because someone decided to assume. Now the question is: How long until science decides to admit to being wrong and correcting all this? From what has been witnessed with evolution and correcting mistakes there, I suspect it won;t be in our lifetime. 50 plus years is the norm for evolution.
Here we have a couple of videos on this experiment where the atheists tried to make it sound like this was the greatest achievement of proving evolution. Well E-coli remaining E-coli actually proves what we creationists have been claiming for a long time.
1) Changes have limitations.
2) Evolution to the point claimed (single cell to all that we see) is not observable and is a lie aka fallacy.
So watch the videos if you can stand their long winded attempt to make the failure sound like a success. So much effort in lying to only say: There is not God.
Video
Video
