Skip to content

Words to use in search box: creation, evolution, flood, nasa etc...

YecHeadquarters

Literal 6 day creation

  • Home
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
  • Bible
    • Bible Search Engine
  • Creation 1
    • Creation 2
      • Forest fires make more trees then they destroy?
      • Fused #2 chromosome
      • God left His signature in our DNA
      • Granite Rock proves Creation
      • Ica stones, are they real?
      • Ice rings (layers) are not the same as tree rings
      • If Evolution Theory is true…..
      • Is Age Dating correct?
      • Is evolution a religion?
      • Is evolution based in Satanism?
      • Is Evolution falsifiable?
      • Lucy display at the Smithsonian a deception?
      • Lucy, is she really near human?
      • Mars Rover finds water on Mars?
    • 90,000 generations of E coli prove evolution wrong
    • Age dating is inaccurate?
    • Can Theistic Evolution belief make a Christian lose their salvation?
    • Common Ancestor?
    • Creation Memes you can use for debates!
    • Does the sun praise it’s Creator?
    • Earth, Moon, and Sun. Proof of creation
    • Evolution mentioned indirectly in the Bible?
    • Evolution of fish?
    • Evolution, a test of our faith?
    • Evolution, conform or fail?
    • Evolution, problems with first life
    • Evolutionists contradict themselves often
    • Fibonacci numbers, The Golden Ratio, The finger print of God.
  • Evolution 1
    • Evolution 2
      • Evolution debate will soon be history?
      • Evolution mentioned indirectly in the Bible?
      • Evolution of fish?
      • Evolution supports Bestiality?
      • Evolution, conform or fail?
      • Evolution, problems with first life
      • Evolutionists contradict themselves often
      • Fused #2 chromosome
      • If Evolution Theory is true…..
      • Is Age Dating correct?
      • Is evolution a religion?
      • Is evolution based in Satanism?
      • Is Evolution falsifiable?
      • Is science extremely bias?
      • Laws of Physics, where did they come from?
      • Lucy display at the Smithsonian a deception?
      • Lucy, is she really near human?
      • Octopus defies evolution
      • Pangea in the bible?
    • 90,000 generations of E coli prove evolution wrong
    • Age dating is inaccurate?
    • Another planet found that can support life?
    • Answers for God questions
    • Can Richard Dawkins be corrected?
    • Common Ancestor?
    • Dinosaur mummified guts included.
    • Do atheist-leftist agendas control science to make non-scientific decisions?
  • Atheism
    • Answers for God questions
    • Atheism a religion?
    • Atheist mass murder
    • Atheist response on FaceBook to creation meme
    • Atheist war
    • Atheists and NPD mental disorder
    • Atheists claim you have to be raised in a Christian home to be one
    • Atheists run scared of creationist Ken Ham?
    • Bill Nye and Ken Ham live debate
    • Bill Nye vs Ken Ham debate at AIG
    • Do atheist-leftist agendas control science to make non-scientific decisions?
    • Does Heaven and Hell really exist?
    • Professor defends evolution and uses several fallacies
    • Questions: Atheist, evolutionists, and old earthers refuse to answer
    • Richard Dawkins 747 Gambit.
    • Richard Dawkins cannot answer a simple question
    • Richard Dawkins dumps Fossil Record
    • The Unbelievers Movie
    • There is no God says Stephen Hawking in final book
    • UCONN Professor goes ape during campus open air preaching
    • Why atheists cuss during debates
    • Why do we have wisdom teeth?
  • Evolution 3
    • Professor defends evolution and uses several fallacies
    • Racism, is evolution based in racism?
    • T-Rex blood and soft tissue find has now been confirmed!
    • Tardigrades aka water bears defy evolution
    • The Abiogenesis arguments
    • The immortal jelly fish. Infinite lives
  • Flood
    • Empirical evidences for World Wide Flood
    • Grand Canyon, Did Noah’s Flood create it?
    • Is Age Dating correct?
    • Noah’s Flood Living Waters Ministry Full Movie
    • Noah’s Flood, where’s the water?
    • Pangea in the bible?
    • Richard Dawkins dumps Fossil Record
    • What is the mechanism for the Geologic Column layering?
  • Climate Change
    • Birds catch fire because of solar panels
    • Climate change, what they won’t tell you.
    • Global Warming or Global farce?
    • Proof that Climate Change and Global Warming is nothing more than money scams.
  • Science & NASA
    • An Ancient Virus May Be Responsible for Human Consciousness
    • Another planet found that can support life?
    • Aussie student finds universe missing mass?
    • Earth at night ISS NASA
    • Forest fires make more trees then they destroy?
    • Fused #2 chromosome
    • Is Age Dating correct?
    • Is NASA telling bald faced lies to get a trillion dollars?
    • Is science extremely bias?
    • Laws of Physics, where did they come from?
    • Lucy display at the Smithsonian a deception?
    • Mars Rover finds water on Mars?
    • NASA live feeds
    • Robot dog open doors
    • Speed of light is no longer a constant
    • Speed of sound observed going faster then the speed of light?
  • Social Media
    • Atheist response on FaceBook to creation meme
    • Facebook cover photos for creation pages
    • FaceBook drops to a new low allowing art that promotes violence against children
    • FaceBook Shadowing banning
    • FaceBook trolls
  • Creation Ministries
    • Answers in Genesis AIG
    • Creation Ministries International
    • Institute for Creation Research
    • Living Waters Ray Comfort
    • Christian homeschooling youtube channels
    • Noah’s Flood Living Waters Ministry Full Movie
    • Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron vs. The Atheists
    • Ray Comfort’s “180 movie”
  • Home
  • Nasa

Category: Nasa

NASA tries to recreate life (abiogenesis)

Posted on March 3, 2019July 8, 2024 By ikester7579
Abiogenesis, Evidence for Creation, Nasa

All scientists, no matter how smart or well educated, never create life that walks out of that jar. All they create is a reason to be in denial of God. The problems of actually create life remain the same. They have to remove oxygen to do this. The problem is, without oxygen you cannot make rain that rains on the rocks and creates the primordial soup. They would have to change the laws of physics and chemistry because H2O is how you make water. No O aka oxygen and you get nothing. Why remove the oxygen? Because when the supposed amino acid come together tho start the creation of life process, oxygen becomes that newly formed life’s enemy because oxygen break the DNA down.

Evolutionists claim that abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution. but if you break down what has to happen for life to form it’s proven otherwise. Non-living matter becoming alive is a biological change process that matter has to go through to become living. Which is one of the very definitions of evolution. Let’s not forget the *name* of Darwin’s book..,.

Origin of Species aka the Origin of all Life. So yes Darwin even agrees. But the main reason evolutionists deny abiogenesis being a part of evolution is because it exposes the truth about evolution and that is that it fails before it even gets started.

Evolution, since it’s conception, has always been about removing God from the equation. Why? Because atheists need a reason to deny God. This is the reason they used evolution to remove God from our public schools. Those who helped Darwin agree with this as their comments on the issue are recorded in history.

When all the amino acids are created in the lab, the one problem they never mention is that they only created a little over 80% of the amino acids needed to create life. Not all amino acids occur naturally in nature. So when the experiment is done to the near fashion of looking like what would happen in nature, in the results, they never show you a check off list of what needs to be created to create life aka hiding the truth. So they need to come up with 20% more amino acids but no matter how many times they repeat this, they never get closer. So nothing new here.

This is why the idea called Pamspermia has been thought up. It’s the idea that we were either seeded here by aliens, or our DNA and Amino Acids arrived here from another planet that had life. As if what cannot happen here naturally occurred somewhere else. Or that it took intelligent beings (aliens), just not God. The fact of the matter is, is that without God science always falls short of creating life from lifeless matter and always will. Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and *breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul* God on purpose, made this a *supernatural event* so that those who do not believe will have no excuse not to believe. Man cannot recreate this supernatural event. For if man could do it then God is not God. Understand? Do you have the breath of life? And that’s why you’ll never create life from non-living matter, ever.

There used to be a time when aliens and spaceships were tin foil hat time. Today it’s now science and you are considered scientific if you accept that. So crazy went to being smart without any evidence that can be tested using the scientific method all because atheists are desperate to have an excuse to always deny God. So if creation is true and evolution is a lie, why does God allow evolution to exist? Easy, in the Bible it called sifting the wheat from the chaff. Freewill means that you have a choice. So God gives that choice just like in the garden with Adam and Eve. The choice exists because during judgment you can never claim you were forced to do anything. Which makes you responsible for all that you do.

Some memes you can use to debate with.

Speed of light is no longer a constant

Posted on October 22, 2018July 8, 2024 By ikester7579
Arguments against Bible, Evidence against Big Bang, Evidence for Creation, Nasa, Space

Youtube Videos

The reason it has been claimed for years that the speed of light is constant is because this idea supports the deep time required to make Big Bang and Evolution work. Without it it’s less proof that there is evidence for this. So science hid for the longest that they knew the speed of light was not constant and never was.

Reference: New Scientist

Click image to read more

Physicist stop light for one whole minute

The sun.

Click image to read more

Speed of light slowed

This image shows the Sun compared to Jupiter.

Click image to read more

Speed of light may not be constant.

A image of earth from space with the sun rising over the top.

This makes light years wrong, the distant of stars and planets base on the speed of light wrong. Every theory and paper written using this idea that the speed of light is constant wrong.

NASA live feeds

Posted on October 16, 2018July 8, 2024 By ikester7579
Nasa, Space

Live video click to watch, Note: most live streaming has ended. These are videos of the livestreams.

The first video the link changes from time to time. So if video does not work you can watch the other 2 videos.

Live video click to watch

Earth at night ISS NASA

Posted on July 7, 2017July 11, 2024 By ikester7579
Nasa

Earth from space.

Video

Is NASA telling bald faced lies to get a trillion dollars?

Posted on October 4, 2012July 15, 2024 By ikester7579
Nasa

Why do I say a trillion dollars? That is what it will take to send a person to mars. Now if any sites found in Google searches has false information about mars please list which ones they are and what the correct information is in your posts below. The reason I say this is because I know this page is going to generate a bunch of hate posts. Hate posts show that scientifically what is said here cannot be disproven. So the more hate that is posted shows how right the information on this page is and how frustrated some people get when they cannot debunk grade school science.

Now why did I post this with such an attitude? Because I can prove they are lying as I have done here, and they just keep doing it. It would not bother me as much except these are supposed to be the smartest minds on this planet working at NASA so they know better. So if they know better then they are doing it on purpose. On purpose is a bald face lie. But then again, with due respect, they also did send the Hubble Telescope up without testing it. Had to make a special trip to fix it. The things that make you go Hmmmm.

Here are some of the examples of how they are trying to convince themselves and the population that water is on Mars:

Oceans on Mars?
A NASA simulation of Mars with Oceans
Read More
www.youtube.com

Notice how they use the wear of “rock” to claim water was once on Mars. Why no use the atmospheric conditions also? Because they know that the atmosphere will not support their claim. Next video is where NASA gets involved in claiming “oceans of water” used to exist on Mars.

watch?v=ROiWIwP_pJs?mut
NASA rover Curiosity finds waht appears to be an ancient riverbed on Mars. CNN’s Chad Myers has more.For more CNN videos, check out our YouTube channel at ht…
Read More
www.youtube.com

Here again no mention of the atmospheric conditions. Because the atmosphere proves water “never existed” on mars Is animation evidence? Like if a Scientist can animate oceans of water on any planet does that makes it true? It seems to be so because if you ever notice any evolution video on how evolution happens has about 80-90% animation and most scientists accept that as proof. What does it really prove? On both counts (water on mars and evolution is true) is that both are only provable in a virtual world. A virtual world where all you have to do is imagine it, animate it and it’s true.

So now we need to redefine what empirical evidence means. It means something you can observe, something that can be repeated in a lab, or something you can imagine and animate in a virtual world. This is how science works when they cannot get actual physical evidence to support what they “claim is true”. And because most of the population likes good animation they will accept it as being true, Claiming there is life and water on mars is about as lame as claiming they found the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy on mars. Because both of those you have to animate as well so it puts that claim on the same level.

Mars Rover finds water on Mars?

Posted on May 28, 2011July 19, 2024 By ikester7579
Nasa, Space

In Oct 2010, NASA claims to find water on Mars, or did they? Here’s the story: Discovery news (link). Notice the wording: Mar Rover Spirit finds “evidence” of water on Mars.

Next claim: Mars rover finds “puddles” on the planet’s surface (New Scientist Link). Then there is an update on the page that says: Update: The researchers have retracted their claim about the possibility of standing water on Mars after readers pointed out the terrain lies on the sloped wall of a crater. It takes readers from a blog to point out NASA’s mistake? Or maybe attempted deception? Why deception? Well there is about a trillion dollars involved in sending a manned space ship. That much money can corrupt most people.

No oceans, flowing streams, waterfalls? NASA is ready to commit to anything as evidence for water on mars, and here’s why:

They have already committed to oceans of water being on mars. Spent money to animate it, and they want to spend a trillion dollars to send a manned spaceship there. So there is a lot of grant money involved in selling the idea to the public and to the government. But selling is not proving. Anyone can animate an idea to sell the idea, but only finding evidence of what could have been on mars, is not proving what has been on mars.

Video

Video

Water on Mars? Click image to listen to video

Also, when you make claims better not forget the laws of physics. To sustain water a planet has to have certain conditions. Mars does not have this.

1) The right barometric pressures aka atmospheric pressures. Mars has 1/32 the pressure of earth. That means water boils at 50 degrees F. or less. And mars gets as high as 70 degrees.

2) Mars has to have the right molecules (H2O) on the air to make water. But mars atmosphere is 98% CO2. Which means there is only enough hydrogen in the atnosphere to make a pond of water not a ocean.

3) Water boiling means if there were evidence of water it would be in the atmosphere. 98% CO2 = no evidence, ZERO!

4) As far as life goes. There is no ozone layer so full rays of the sun would strike the surface. UV rays not being filtered at all would sterilize the planet. And that’s what we see since there has been no soil microbes found anywhere on the planet.

5) What about the ice? A atmosphere that has 98% CO2, and if it gets cold enough at the poles and it does. Will freeze CO2 in mid air and it will fall to the ground like snow and look like H2O ice when it’s not.

6) What NASA fails to tell people because they are trying to sell life on other planets. And that planets can have 2 different types of ice. H2O and CO2 ice. The ice you see on mars is 100% CO2, and that’s provable by the atmosphere having 98% CO2 and not enough hydrogen to even mention. Google it if you do not believe me.

NASA Lies.

CO2 aka Dry ice, looks just like regular ice.

CO2 ice AKA dry ice is what's on Mars. Not H2O ice.

So what would be more feasible type ice on mars with a 98% CO2 atmosphere?

1) H2O ice?
2) CO2 ice?

If you choose #1, I have to ask: Where did the 2 parts hydrogen come from to make enough water to create oceans of water when there is only a trace of hydrogen?

Another planet found that can support life?

Posted on May 28, 2011July 19, 2024 By ikester7579
Nasa, Space

Example: If I tell you there is a suitcase in a cave with a million bucks in it, and all you have to do is go get it. But upon entering you find a bear with her cubs. And as the mother bear mauls you, you holler out why did you not tell me? I holler back: It was not important. But it was wasn’t it? Same thing here. They want you to make the step towards believing that life exists on other planets, and probably exists on the one they found. But leave out what is required for life to exist which goes way beyond a planet just being in the goldilocks zone.

Video

Deep Space Telescope.

If you watch the video above, you would have heard that NASA believes they have found another planet to support life. My question is: They can barely see the planet Pluto, how do they see this one enough to make this claim?

Pictures of Pluto from the Hubble telescope.

Plankton prove evolution wrong!

Posted on April 16, 2011July 19, 2024 By ikester7579
Aquatic life, Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates, Nasa, Space

Most evolutionists will tell you that evolution is about life that “adapts to it’s ever changing surroundings”. But what if there were a life form that could change it’s surroundings to suite it’s needs? One that could actually control the weather so that the heat from the sun in the summer time won’t kill it. Is this possible? Yes it is. Meet plankton.

What clouds look like made by what plankton do. They are much whiter therefore reflecting more of the sun's rays back into space cooling the planet.

It’s almost hard to believe, but new NASA-funded research confirms an old theory that plankton can indirectly create clouds that block some of the Sun’s harmful rays. The study was conducted by Dierdre Toole of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) and David Siegel of the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB).

The study finds that in summer when the Sun beats down on the top layer of ocean where plankton live, harmful rays in the form of ultraviolet (UV) radiation bother the little plants. When they are bothered, or stressed, plankton try to protect themselves by producing a compound called dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP). Though no one knows for sure, some scientists believe DMSP helps strengthen the plankton’s cell walls. This chemical gets broken down in the water by bacteria, and it changes into another substance called dimethylsulfide (DMS).

DMS then filters from the ocean into the air, where it reacts with oxygen, to form different sulfur compounds. Sulfur in the DMS sticks together in the air and creates tiny dust-like particles. These particles are just the right size for water to condense on, which is the beginning of how clouds are formed. So, indirectly, plankton help create more clouds, and more clouds mean less direct light reaches the ocean surface. This relieves the stress put on plankton by the Sun’s harmful UV rays.

For years now scientists have been studying related processes in the lab, but this is the first time scientists have shown how variations in light impact plankton in a natural environment. The research was done in the Sargasso Sea, off the coast of Bermuda.

Previous research also found that the cloud producing compound peaks in the summer in the ocean, when UV rays are high, but plankton numbers are at their lowest.

“Plankton levels are at a minimum in the summer but DMS is at its peak,” said Toole.

In the warmest months, the top layer of the ocean warms as well. This heating of the top 25 meters (around 80 feet) creates a contrast with cooler deeper layers. The deeper layers hold many of the nutrients that plankton need to live on. Like how oil separates from water, the warmer upper layer creates almost a barrier from the cooler lower layers and less mixing occurs. Also, the shallow upper layer exposes the plankton to more UV light. Under conditions where there are low nutrients in the water and levels of UV light are high, plankton create more DMS.

DMS levels peak from June through the end of September. During the season, the study found that a whopping 77 percent of the changes in amounts of DMS were due to exposure to UV radiation. The researchers found it amazing that a single factor could have such a big affect on this process.

“For someone studying marine biology and ecology, this type of variation is absolutely incredible,” Siegel said.

The researchers were also surprised to find that the DMS molecules completely refresh themselves after only three to five days. That means the plankton may react to UV rays quickly enough to impact their own weather. Toole and Siegel were surprised by the lightning-fast rate of turnover for DMS. To give an example for comparison, when carbon dioxide gets into the atmosphere where it acts as a greenhouse gas and traps heat, it may last for decades. Toole adds that the cycles that break down DMS scream along at these very fast rates, even though overall amounts over the course of the year remain pretty stable with a slow increase over summer and a gradual decline over winter.

The next step for the researchers will be to see how much the added clouds from plankton actually impact climate. By figuring out how plankton react to light, scientists now have the information they need to use computer models to recreate the impacts of plankton on cloud cover. Since the white clouds can reflect sunlight back out to space, the researchers believe the plankton-made clouds may have some affect on global temperatures.

This is important in light of man-made greenhouse gas production that warms the planet, and ozone depletion that allows more life-threatening UV radiation to strike Earth.

“There is the potential that this cycle could slow global warming,” said Siegel. “But right now we have no idea of the size of it or even what it means.”

In order to measure how much plankton may alter the climate, computer models would need to simulate different scenarios. One scenario would show our climate without clouds due to plankton, and another would show the climate with the increased cloud cover. Then researchers could begin to compare the differences between each scenario.

The researchers add that this effect may help to slow or lessen climate change, but would in no way reverse the trend or stop it altogether.

The research took place in the Sargasso Sea, where a wide range ocean data has been collected since the 1950s. A 1998 study relying on data from this area contained a 1992 to 1994 time series that focused on the cycling of organic sulfur from DMS in the ocean. Siegel has also been collecting data of changes in sea surface temperatures over seasons, variations in both visible light and UV light in the water, and the relationships between these solar variations and DMS levels. All of these measurements have been taken from research vessels and buoys in the Sargasso Sea.

In the future, the paper’s
authors look forward to incorporating satellite data from NASA’s Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) mission into this line of research. SeaWIFS will provide comprehensive data on shifts in visible light reaching the ocean’s surface.

The study was funded by NASA. Studies of DMS have been funded by the National Science Foundation. The study appeared in a recent issue of Geophysical Research Letters.

References:
NASA
Space Daily

Questions:
1) How does such an ability evolve?
2) What is the process of this type of so called evolution?

Also, is this the answer to Global Warming? According to link below, because of the ability of Plankton to make clouds, that we should grow it to cool the earth.
MSNBC

Why is plankton important? Click image to play Video.

This is an image that shows just one plankton life form. Plankton comes in many shapes. They are microscopic creatures.

5 reasons plankton is important to all life. Click image to play Video.

This is an image that is showing plankton.

Mission to Mars?

Posted on April 1, 2011July 23, 2024 By ikester7579
Nasa, Space

There also have been several failed missions to Mars:

In 1964, NASAs Mariner 3 was launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. In space, its solar panels failed to open and the batteries went flat. Now its orbiting the Sun, dead. In 1965, Russian controllers lost contact with Zond 2 after it lost one of its solar panels. It lifelessly floated past Mars in the August of that year, only 1,500 km away from the planet. In March and April, 1969, the twin probes in the Soviet Mars 1969 program both suffered launch failure, 1969A exploded minutes after launch and 1969B took a U-turn and crashed to earth. More recently, NASAs Mars Climate Orbiter crashed into the Red Planet in 1999 after an embarrassing measurement unit mix-up caused the satellite to enter the atmosphere too low. On Christmas 2003, the world waited for a signal from the UK Mars lander, Beagle 2, after it separated from ESAs Mars Express. To this day, theres been no word.

Reference: Mars failed missions (link).

Something from nothing?

Posted on March 28, 2011July 26, 2024 By ikester7579
Nasa, Old earth creation, Space, Uncategorized
Big Bang illustration,

In the big bang theory, it’s basically something from nothing. Science does not know where the matter came from, or the energy that made it expand (inflate or blow apart). In fact if you ask 10 different people, you will get at least 3 different stories about how the origins of everything happened. So what is believed is that matter and energy come from nothing. Why believe something they cannot even begin to prove empirically? It is because the alternative points to an intelligent being. But since most everyone knows about the big bang, let’s see how many answers the intelligent creation can answer that big bang does not and cannot.

1) Because God is eternal, He lives in a eternal dimension. Using matter and energy from that dimension to form this dimension answers many questions.
a) Where did the matter and energy come from? It always existed because it came from a dimension that has always existed.
b) How do laws come into being fully balanced to create order and not chaos? An intelligent being from an eternal dimension created them and balanced them.
etc…

When using deductive logic and reasoning, and you remove all that will not work. What is left is creation by an intelligent being. Science is supposed to follow the evidence where ever it leads, yet it is taboo to follow any evidence that points to the supernatural. Basically that rule makes science more about conformism, in the effect that all evidence has to conform to the naturalistic view of evolution or be rejected. Science cannot find the Creator because their own rules won’t allow it.

Comedian Pete Holmes make a good point. Click image to play video.
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
Read More
www.youtube.com

In the something from nothing argument below, both Krauss and Dawkins only prove they can B.S. with the best of them. Why do I say that? With all that talk there is zero evidence and a whole lot of assuming going on. Which by the way does not even qualify this as a hypothesis aka educated guess. That is because it’s more about opinions and a worldview then it is about science.

When something takes over 2 hours to explain and yet no one can observe this. It becomes more of selling it then proving it. And there is a big difference between the two.

Video

And if you do not think this is about worldviews, then explain why most atheists cannot leave out trying to discredit God?

Video

My response to Aron Ra is that even your side’s beliefs existed before you claimed them to be science. The belief that man came from animals existed back in Egyptians times and by the way, was called science. They even had an abiogenesis type belief where they thought all life came from the slime that existed around the water’s edge of the Nile River. Hence the reason it was often referred to as the life giver as often worshiped as a deity of sorts.

Darwin having zero scientific degrees but one degree in theology, where do you think his theory came from anyway? He just took one of the pagan beliefs that he read about, repackaged it as science, and you guys bought it.

Bible Verse of the Day

The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints.
Ephesians 1:18
DailyVerses.net

Facebook private group.

This is an image that links to the Facebook private group of this website. You just click on it and it'll take you to the group page. And because it's private you'll have to join in order to see anything. It's private to keep the haters out because I vet everyone by looking at their personal profile page to make sure they're not troublemakers. Then after vetting I either let them in or I don't. The majority of people who asked to get in get in. And that's around 80%. It's only 20% that I see are troublemakers and I don't let them in.

Recent Posts

  • The truth about the Christian Crusades
  • Junk DNA has a function, and proves evolution wrong.
  • 3 possible outcomes for creation of universe
  • Birds take bath in ants (Bird anting)?
  • World’s oldest fish, found alive. 60 million years old!
  • A horse has 5 hearts?
  • The attributes of God and why they matter
  • Tools that animals use
  • Universe is 92 billion light years wide?
  • Math proves God
  • Animals that use tools
  • Red lipped BatFish
  • The Bag Moth makes its house designed using math aka the Golden Ratio
  • Frog makes it’s own anti freeze.
  • Icebergs prove the flood because the frozen water is pure.
  • Scientists now claim that humans lived with dinosaurs?
  • What is irreducible complexity?
  • Losing information is not Evolution
  • Worldwide Flood evidence and the Fossil Record.
  • YouTuber Raging Atheist becomes a Christian
  • Planet vibrations create a musical scale
  • God’s name written in our DNA
  • The light of conception
  • Lightening bugs
  • Making lifeless matter come alive
  • Something from nothing Dawkins and Krauss
  • The Mandelbrot Set: Atheists worst nightmare
  • The 4 miracles of atheism
  • Is animation evidence for evolution?
  • Lace bug God’s created beauty
The Atheist Delusion Movie FaceBook page. The Atheist delusion is a movie that you can find on YouTube is free to watch.
180 movie FaceBook page.
Noah the movie is a Facebook page and also you can watch it as a movie on YouTube. This is a Living Waters Ministry movie.
Ark encounter is a display of Noah's Ark in its actual size at Answers in Genesis Creation Museum. You can go inside the ark and tour it it has several displays.
Where is the evolution is a Facebook page that shows that living fossils, and fossils found in Amber. Defy the evolution process.
This is a Facebook page of Ray comfort. He's the CEO of Living Waters Ministry. They do open-air preaching, they make movies. And on YouTube he has hundreds of videos on open air preaching and how to evangelize. If you go to The Living Waters Ministry website, they just started a streaming section where you can get all their teaching videos to watch for a small fee.
This is the answer in Genesis creation Ministry official Facebook page. You can donate from here, you can comment on there post on that page. And that page links to their websites other Facebook pages.
This is good fight Ministries Facebook page. They also have a really good informative YouTube channel. They specialize in exposing secular music and the Bands for worshiping Satan. They also have a podcast on YouTube. The videos are professionally done and most of them have the footage that proves that many secular bands do worship Satan.
This is the creation research Society Ministry Facebook page. It links to their website and you can comment on their posts.
This is the Institute for creation research for icr Facebook page. It links to their website and you can comment on their posts.
This is the young Earth's creation Facebook page that goes with this website that you're now viewing. I quit running it because Facebook started heavily censoring everything. But you can go there and post on the comments Henry the post if you like. It's too bad that Facebook feels the need to censor a Christians.
Hidden History of Evolution Facebook page. This gives the hidden history of racism that evolution is steeped in.

Copyright © 2025 YecHeadquarters.
All images and text are free to use to
promote creation.
Owner & webmaster: Issac Bourne