Evidence for Creation

Image of a city worker with a pick hammer digging a hole.

Click tabs for more info

Home
References
Update
Videos

Just about everyone has heard about Noah’s Flood. The main objection to it being true is that there is not enough water to flood the whole earth to the highest mountain. And this objection has gone unanswered for years because no one really knows how much water is on and underneath the crust of this planet. Or do they?

There has been testing and research done on the upper mantle of the earth. A mineral called “wadsleyite”, holds about 3% water by weight. Does not sound like much but the estimated amount of wadsleyite that exists, the water contained in it works out to be about 30 of our oceans. 30 oceans worth of water is more than enough to flood the earth to the highest mountain.

Suddenly, there was somewhere to put water deep inside the mantle. “You can have oceans and oceans of water stored in the transition zone,” says Jay Bass of the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign. “It’s sopping wet stuff.” Researchers think wadsleyite can hold as much as 33 per cent water by weight. It may not sound like much, but there could be an awful lot of wadsleyite.

According to Smyth, models of the mantle’s composition suggest that at the depths where wadsleyite is stable, between half and three-quarters of the material is the right stuff for making this mineral. “If the region between 400 and 525 kilometers were, say, 60 per cent wadsleyite, and that phase was saturated at 33 weight per cent, that’s ten oceans of water,” says Smyth. But Dan Frost, an experimental petrologist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington’s Geophysical Laboratory in Washington DC, thinks the mantle could contain even more water.

Frost says that solidified lava that has erupted at mid-ocean ridges contains glass that can be analyzed for water content. His research team has calculated how much water the lava’s parent material in the mantle must have contained. “It ends up being between 100 and 500 parts per million,” he says. And if the whole mantle contained 500 parts per million of water, Frost calculates that would be the equivalent of 30 oceans of water.

Reference: Click the white area to visit reference sites.

New Evidence for Oceans of Water Deep in the Earth

Based in part on studies at Brookhaven Lab’s National Synchrotron Light Source, researchers from Northwestern University and the University of New Mexico report evidence for the ingredients of water bound up in rock deep in Earth’s mantle.

www.bnl.gov

A seismologist at Washington University in St. Louis has made the first 3-D model of seismic wave damping diminishing deep in the Earth’s mantle and has revealed the existence of an underground water reservoir at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean. It is the first evidence for water existing in the Earth’s deep mantle.

Reference: Physorg

3-D model shows big body of water in Earth’s mantle

A seismologist at Washington University in St. Louis has made the first 3-D model of seismic wave damping — diminishing — deep in the Earth’s mantle and has revealed the existence of an underground water reservoir at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean. It is the first evidence for water existing i…

phys.org

A seismologist has made the first 3-D model of seismic wave damping, or diminishing, deep in the Earth’s mantle and has revealed the existence of an underground water reservoir at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean.

Reference: Washington University in St Louis

This is an image of water that's been fused to rock.

Massive ‘ocean’ discovered towards Earth’s core

A huge expanse of water trapped in a layer of the Earth’s mantle could help explain the origin of our oceans

www.newscientist.com

The question is, why has not science shared this information with creationists? Can you guess why? It’s because it support Noah’s flood of the whole earth to the highest mountain, and not Evolution. This does away with the ideas of a local flood and shows that God knew before science did, that there was enough water. He created it.

But science also over looked something else while trying to debunk Noah’s Flood. When that much water comes up, the surface area of the earth decreases by a great amount making it to where a lot less actual water is needed to flood the earth to the point the Bible speaks of. But there is more. They try to claim that subduction put all that water in the upper mantle of the earth. If subduction pulls that much water into the upper mantle, by now there would not be any water left on the surface of this planet. So the flood is the only working mechanism that could have placed it there.

How can the water go into the mantle without boiling off?Solution: The water for the flood was 7 miles above the earth’s crust (sea level), and 6 miles to the deepest ocean. Pressure applied to water increases the boiling point. According to scuba diving books, every 33 feet you descend into water equals 1 atmosphere. One atmosphere = 14.7 psi. So you take how many feet are in a mile. Divide that by 33. And you get how many atmospheres are in one mile. Times that times 13 miles and you get the least amount of pressure for the least amount of water required to cover the earth for the flood. After you have the amount of atmospheres in 13 miles of water, you times that times 14.7 and you get the actual pressure at the bottom of the ocean during the flood.

From there you can figure a boiling point. But remember, water can only reach a certain boiling point and can go no higher regardless of pressure. You can research this on the web. The other point is that salt raises this boiling point (much like antifreeze raises the boiling point of water in a car radiator) along with any other mineral that was present. So if would be safe to add 10 – 30% higher boiling point when figuring this up. I did not figure up the math for this here because I think people should see this for themselves.

Side notes: Black smokers shoot water out at over 700 degrees F. This is due to the black smoker being deep in the water where great pressure exists (several atmospheres). And it has been known that some upper mantle minerals have held water at temps around 1000 degree C. This is due to extreme pressures, and the mineral’s capability to increase the boiling point.

What does this prove?
That the water receding after the flood can go into the upper mantle without boiling off. And it is not being able to come back up without broiling the earth fulfills a promise God made. He told Noah that he would never flood the whole earth again. So the water being locked in that mineral proves God’s promise.

So explain away as they might try, we now have enough water, and a working mechanism to get the water down there.

Update: Since there is overwhelming evidence of a watery death for dinosaurs science has decided to take a peek at the idea:

Watery secret of the dinosaur death pose

Dinosaur skeletons are often found with head thrown back and tail arched. This may simply be because they have been immersed in water

www.newscientist.com

Clams die they open so if deep time killed them, they would be wide open. Flood would have buried them where they could not open because they were under sediments under the weight of the sediments.

But don’t hold your breathe.

Massive Cache of Dangerous Carnivores Found

Recently, a new study published in the journal ZooKeys has claimed to have found the most dangerous location to live in Earth’s history.1 And it is possible they are entirely correct, but for the wrong reasons. Fossil discoveries in eastern Morocco’s Kem Kem beds have been fascinating paleontologis…

www.icr.org

Cahes of fossils is proof of a Flood.

No Evolutionist likes to talk about the Ashley Phosphate beds because they have every fossil from every layer in it. The video above talks about this and shows the list of fossils that have been found there. if you Google it or YouTube search it, only creationist talk about it because what they find there totally destroys the evolution timeline,

Video

Some videos on this subject

Video

Home: Just about everyone has heard about Noah’s Flood. The main objection to it being true is that there is not enough water to flood the whole earth to the highest mountain. And this objection has gone unanswered for years because no one really knows how much water is on and underneath the crust of this planet. Or do they?
There has been testing and research done on the upper mantle of the earth. A mineral called “wadsleyite”, holds about 3% water by weight. Does not sound like much but the estimated amount of wadsleyite that exists, the water contained in it works out to be about 30 of our oceans. 30 oceans worth of water is more than enough to flood the earth to the highest mountain.
Suddenly, there was somewhere to put water deep inside the mantle. “You can have oceans and oceans of water stored in the transition zone,” says Jay Bass of the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign. “It’s sopping wet stuff.” Researchers think wadsleyite can hold as much as 33 per cent water by weight. It may not sound like much, but there could be an awful lot of wadsleyite.
According to Smyth, models of the mantle’s composition suggest that at the depths where wadsleyite is stable, between half and three-quarters of the material is the right stuff for making this mineral. “If the region between 400 and 525 kilometers were, say, 60 per cent wadsleyite, and that phase was saturated at 33 weight per cent, that’s ten oceans of water,” says Smyth. But Dan Frost, an experimental petrologist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington’s Geophysical Laboratory in Washington DC, thinks the mantle could contain even more water.
References: Frost says that solidified lava that has erupted at mid-ocean ridges contains glass that can be analyzed for water content. His research team has calculated how much water the lava’s parent material in the mantle must have contained. “It ends up being between 100 and 500 parts per million,” he says. And if the whole mantle contained 500 parts per million of water, Frost calculates that would be the equivalent of 30 oceans of water.
Reference: Click the white area to visit reference sites.
New Evidence for Oceans of Water Deep in the Earth
Based in part on studies at Brookhaven Lab’s National Synchrotron Light Source, researchers from Northwestern University and the University of New Mexico report evidence for the ingredients of water bound up in rock deep in Earth’s mantle.
Read More
www.bnl.gov
A seismologist at Washington University in St. Louis has made the first 3-D model of seismic wave damping diminishing deep in the Earth’s mantle and has revealed the existence of an underground water reservoir at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean. It is the first evidence for water existing in the Earth’s deep mantle.
Reference: Physorg
3-D model shows big body of water in Earth’s mantle
A seismologist at Washington University in St. Louis has made the first 3-D model of seismic wave damping — diminishing — deep in the Earth’s mantle and has revealed the existence of an underground water reservoir at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean. It is the first evidence for water existing i…
Read More
phys.org
A seismologist has made the first 3-D model of seismic wave damping, or diminishing, deep in the Earth’s mantle and has revealed the existence of an underground water reservoir at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean.
Reference: Washington University in St Louis
Massive ‘ocean’ discovered towards Earth’s core
A huge expanse of water trapped in a layer of the Earth’s mantle could help explain the origin of our oceans
Read More
www.newscientist.com
The question is, why has not science shared this information with creationists? Can you guess why? It’s because it support Noah’s flood of the whole earth to the highest mountain, and not Evolution. This does away with the ideas of a local flood and shows that God knew before science did, that there was enough water. He created it.
But science also over looked something else while trying to debunk Noah’s Flood. When that much water comes up, the surface area of the earth decreases by a great amount making it to where a lot less actual water is needed to flood the earth to the point the Bible speaks of. But there is more. They try to claim that subduction put all that water in the upper mantle of the earth. If subduction pulls that much water into the upper mantle, by now there would not be any water left on the surface of this planet. So the flood is the only working mechanism that could have placed it there.
How can the water go into the mantle without boiling off?Solution: The water for the flood was 7 miles above the earth’s crust (sea level), and 6 miles to the deepest ocean. Pressure applied to water increases the boiling point. According to scuba diving books, every 33 feet you descend into water equals 1 atmosphere. One atmosphere = 14.7 psi. So you take how many feet are in a mile. Divide that by 33. And you get how many atmospheres are in one mile. Times that times 13 miles and you get the least amount of pressure for the least amount of water required to cover the earth for the flood. After you have the amount of atmospheres in 13 miles of water, you times that times 14.7 and you get the actual pressure at the bottom of the ocean during the flood.
From there you can figure a boiling point. But remember, water can only reach a certain boiling point and can go no higher regardless of pressure. You can research this on the web. The other point is that salt raises this boiling point (much like antifreeze raises the boiling point of water in a car radiator) along with any other mineral that was present. So if would be safe to add 10 – 30% higher boiling point when figuring this up. I did not figure up the math for this here because I think people should see this for themselves.
Side notes: Black smokers shoot water out at over 700 degrees F. This is due to the black smoker being deep in the water where great pressure exists (several atmospheres). And it has been known that some upper mantle minerals have held water at temps around 1000 degree C. This is due to extreme pressures, and the mineral’s capability to increase the boiling point.
What does this prove?
That the water receding after the flood can go into the upper mantle without boiling off. And it is not being able to come back up without broiling the earth fulfills a promise God made. He told Noah that he would never flood the whole earth again. So the water being locked in that mineral proves God’s promise.
So explain away as they might try, we now have enough water, and a working mechanism to get the water down there.
Update: Update: Since there is overwhelming evidence of a watery death for dinosaurs science has decided to take a peek at the idea:
Watery secret of the dinosaur death pose
Dinosaur skeletons are often found with head thrown back and tail arched. This may simply be because they have been immersed in water
Read More
www.newscientist.com
Clams die they open so if deep time killed them, they would be wide open. Flood would have buried them where they could not open because they were under sediments under the weight of the sediments.
But don’t hold your breathe.
Massive Cache of Dangerous Carnivores Found
Recently, a new study published in the journal ZooKeys has claimed to have found the most dangerous location to live in Earth’s history.1 And it is possible they are entirely correct, but for the wrong reasons. Fossil discoveries in eastern Morocco’s Kem Kem beds have been fascinating paleontologis…
Read More
www.icr.org
Cahes of fossils is proof of a Flood.

No Evolutionist likes to talk about the Ashley Phosphate beds because they have every fossil from every layer in it. The video above talks about this and shows the list of fossils that have been found there. if you Google it or YouTube search it, only creationist talk about it because what they find there totally destroys the evolution timeline,
Videos: Video

Some videos on this subject

Video

Evidence for Creation

Video

As you will notice in this interview, there is no explanation of the find. There is no way that blood and tissue can survive 70 million years. They know this and it makes them feel uncomfortable. The woman is almost speechless in explaining it as she grasps for words that do not make her look incompetent in her field of work. She also knows that she cannot slip up and imply that the time-line of the Bible might be true. That would be job self destruction.

This is an image that shows the woman who discovered soft tissue and red blood cells inside dinosaur bone. Her name is Dr Mary Schweitzer. She says: if you take a blood sample and stick it on the Shelf you have nothing recognizable in about a week. So why would there be anything left in dinosaurs? End of quote.

I could see blood and tissue lasting 4400 years (since flood) rather than 70 million years. Maybe they should drill, not break, into the bones in some of the museums and see if there is blood and tissue there also. The reason they won’t is because as long as there is only one like this, they can claim a fluke of circumstances that allowed this to happen. Find another one and that option goes away.

If I were a scientist looking for “real” truth. I could not wait to look inside another dinosaur bone to see. But all evolutionists are avoiding the issue like the plague. For they know that a find like this can destroy the very foundation evolution sets upon, which is the amount of time require for it to happen. Which puts into question whether science is about conforming to the accepted theory, or following the evidence where ever it may lead. Because if they could prove that this took millions of years, it would be a feather in their cap. But they are afraid. If evolution is the true proven fact with mountains of evidence like they claim, then what is there to be afraid of? If they believed those claims they would be running to drill into those bones to see. But there is not enough faith in those words because they know they are just words.

Cannot wait until someone splits another bone open like that.

Update! The woman who discovered the tissue, blood and blood vessels was able retest her findings under the same conditions using different bones from other dinosaurs and birds from the same time period to find that she got the same exact results. She had to find someone who would work with her allowing her to do this test on other bones. Not one of her regualr peers from her peer group would allow her to confirm her work. In fact many attacked her because her findings did not totally support the evolution theory. She was able to work with a man who has one of the biggest collection of T-Rex bones among other types of fossils.
And now since she is able to confirm her findings on several different dinosaurs from the same time period her find can no longer be considered a one time fluke. In fact because she has repeated it several times, it can be now considered empirical evidence.
But the problem still remains. How does blood and tissue last 80 million years? It don’t. 6,000 years is more likely for blood and tissue to last encased in bone.
The video below proves scientific bias towards any one who finds evidence that does not solely support evolution. This woman basically works alone because of this with help from the one person who helped her confirm her findings. And because she still believes in evolution, it shows that it does not matter what side you are own. Just come up with evidence against evolution and you are basically banished.

Video

A list of over 40 dinosaur blood and soft tissue finds that were hidden

Creationist gets fired for finding creation evidence aka dinosaur blood

Video

Creationist wins lawsuit against evolutionists.

Evidence for Creation

This is the picture of a bubble that's caught in Amber. And when they test the bubble it always has twice the pressure of our atmosphere plus twice the oxygen. These conditions are believed to be the conditions of the atmosphere before the blood.

According to what Young Earth Creationists believe about the earth having a Crystalline Canopy before the flood. Which was a semi solid dome that surrounded the earth. The weight of this canopy doubled the barometric pressure from what we currently observe. And because it was mainly consisted of Metallic hydrogen, there was more free oxygen (double the amount found in atmosphere today) in our atmosphere. This would explain why the air bubbles, found in amber, are rich in oxygen compared to today’s atmosphere.

There are 3 planets and 1 gas giant aka Jupiter, that have canopies in out solar system.

This is an image of the different planets that still have a canopy. Uranus Venus Saturn and Jupiter all have canopies. But there canopies are not clear they are cloudy.

The Crystalline Canopy would surround the earth much like the ozone layer does as shown in this picture:

This is an image of the Earth with what's known as the crystalline canopy. It's a clear semi-solid layer of the atmosphere that surrounds the Earth, Before the Flood.

The Crystalline Canopy being able to exist is confirmed every time NASA sends something up into space. You see the exhaust from the rocket engines of every spacecraft sent up, put out a whole lot of moisture. When the rocket goes through the outer atmosphere, this moisture creates an ice cloud that is very different from any other type cloud known. This is because in that phase water is at it’s triple point. Which means it trying to freeze, be liquid, and gas at the same time. It creates the clouds as you see below:

This is an image of what's known as an ice cloud that is produced by a shuttle when it passes through the upper atmosphere. The moisture from the shuttle fuel creates This Cloud and it's a multicolored cloud because as the sun shines through it the ice crystals act like a prism.

And because ice has a magnetic field, the cloud formed by the moisture from the rocket fuel “always” makes a path to the North magnetic pole, this is because NASA is closer to the North pole than the South pole. So the pull to the North is stronger. You will also notice that these clouds have the ability to put out light even at night. And their light can be clearly seen in the daytime as well. If this is a preview of what the canopy looked like, then it would also explain why there were strange things said about the sky in the Bible in the Old Testament. Example:

job 37:18 Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?

The sky, while the canopy was in place, was not blue as we see it now. The sun shining on the canopy would make it glow a bright redish pink color. Much like what we see during some sunsets.

This is the image of a pink sky at sunset.

Does that not look like hot molten glass as the Bible says? The spectra of hydrogen gas when used in a neon tube for lighting looks like this:

This is an image of different colors which is known as the hydrogen gas Spectra. You have red green blue and purple.

Further supporting the idea of the Crystalline canopy.

Side note: If you want to do a simple test to see if ice reacts to a magnetic field. Take a ice cube and tie a string around it. Hang it. Then pass a magnet under it and you will see it move without touching it. A strong magnet will work best.

Why is ice having a magnetic field important? When the earth was created, it was completely covered with water. The water had to go under the earth’s crust for dry land to appear (Genesis 1:9). But while the water covered the whole earth, it was subject to the conditions of space. Being in a vacuum, it was trying to boil. Water will boil at any temperature in a perfect vacuum. Boiling means it’s moving. Water, as long as it’s moving, will not freeze as easy. But because of the boiling, small water droplets were being expelled from the water’s surface and exposed to the absolute zero of space, which would freeze it almost instantly. Now because we are talking about an event that is happening at the same time around the whole planet. Imagine a planet wide ice cloud that suddenly comes together like a huge magnet because of the earth’s magnetic field. Now imagine how strong a magnet that big would be, and now you can see where the pressures came from to created a Metallic Hydrogen Canopy came from.

The canopy would create the conditions of twice the oxygen, and twice the barometric pressures because the hydrogen molecules that exist today were caught up in the canopy making more free oxygen which also means less water. And the canopy has weight, it would increase the atmospheric pressure (barometric pressure) about twice what it is now. This would make the earth like living in a barometric oxygen chamber. There are even medical treatments now being used this way as explained below.

HBOT (Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment) has been being used and experimented with as treatment for many ailments, diseases, injuries etc… These treatments are very near to the conditions before the flood. These Doctors – researchers are documenting their finds on the internet because mainstream medical science rejects most of what this treatment can do because it can replace many pharmaceutical drugs.

The theory behind how HBOT works as treatments is that once the pressure pushes more oxygen into the cells of the body. The body goes into a type of repair mode to where it actually heals itself. When we sleep, the body repairs itself and is why it is important that we get good sleep and enough of it. But this treatment goes beyond that by enabling the body to do “major” repairs as well as minor repairs. Currently our body only does minor repairs as we sleep.

Examples of this are in the YouTube videos below:

Video

How did people live so long in the Old Testament?

In the video above the teenager has had his brain damaged in an accident. Medical science gave up and he could not speak or walk. After several HBOT treatment he is now able to do both as shown in the video.

Video

It’s good for strokes.

Video

And it’s showing very positive results for Autism. There are many documented videos on Youtube. Now imagine you live in an HBOT type condition 24 hours a day. Your body is able to do major repairs everyday. How much would that extend your life? Well the Old Testament people live to almost a 1000 years old. So your life span would extend to almost 10 times.

Video

This would also explain why, after the flood, people did not live as long. Once the HBOT condition was remove, their bodies quit doing the major repairs and they quit living such long lifespans.

Professional sports players are now using HBOT to heal injuries in “half” the time. Ever wonder why some players get back into the game so quick? Here’s why.

Aquatic life, Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates, Nasa, Space

Most evolutionists will tell you that evolution is about life that “adapts to it’s ever changing surroundings”. But what if there were a life form that could change it’s surroundings to suite it’s needs? One that could actually control the weather so that the heat from the sun in the summer time won’t kill it. Is this possible? Yes it is. Meet plankton.

What clouds look like made by what plankton do. They are much whiter therefore reflecting more of the sun's rays back into space cooling the planet.

It’s almost hard to believe, but new NASA-funded research confirms an old theory that plankton can indirectly create clouds that block some of the Sun’s harmful rays. The study was conducted by Dierdre Toole of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) and David Siegel of the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB).

The study finds that in summer when the Sun beats down on the top layer of ocean where plankton live, harmful rays in the form of ultraviolet (UV) radiation bother the little plants. When they are bothered, or stressed, plankton try to protect themselves by producing a compound called dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP). Though no one knows for sure, some scientists believe DMSP helps strengthen the plankton’s cell walls. This chemical gets broken down in the water by bacteria, and it changes into another substance called dimethylsulfide (DMS).

DMS then filters from the ocean into the air, where it reacts with oxygen, to form different sulfur compounds. Sulfur in the DMS sticks together in the air and creates tiny dust-like particles. These particles are just the right size for water to condense on, which is the beginning of how clouds are formed. So, indirectly, plankton help create more clouds, and more clouds mean less direct light reaches the ocean surface. This relieves the stress put on plankton by the Sun’s harmful UV rays.

For years now scientists have been studying related processes in the lab, but this is the first time scientists have shown how variations in light impact plankton in a natural environment. The research was done in the Sargasso Sea, off the coast of Bermuda.

Previous research also found that the cloud producing compound peaks in the summer in the ocean, when UV rays are high, but plankton numbers are at their lowest.

“Plankton levels are at a minimum in the summer but DMS is at its peak,” said Toole.

In the warmest months, the top layer of the ocean warms as well. This heating of the top 25 meters (around 80 feet) creates a contrast with cooler deeper layers. The deeper layers hold many of the nutrients that plankton need to live on. Like how oil separates from water, the warmer upper layer creates almost a barrier from the cooler lower layers and less mixing occurs. Also, the shallow upper layer exposes the plankton to more UV light. Under conditions where there are low nutrients in the water and levels of UV light are high, plankton create more DMS.

DMS levels peak from June through the end of September. During the season, the study found that a whopping 77 percent of the changes in amounts of DMS were due to exposure to UV radiation. The researchers found it amazing that a single factor could have such a big affect on this process.

“For someone studying marine biology and ecology, this type of variation is absolutely incredible,” Siegel said.

The researchers were also surprised to find that the DMS molecules completely refresh themselves after only three to five days. That means the plankton may react to UV rays quickly enough to impact their own weather. Toole and Siegel were surprised by the lightning-fast rate of turnover for DMS. To give an example for comparison, when carbon dioxide gets into the atmosphere where it acts as a greenhouse gas and traps heat, it may last for decades. Toole adds that the cycles that break down DMS scream along at these very fast rates, even though overall amounts over the course of the year remain pretty stable with a slow increase over summer and a gradual decline over winter.

The next step for the researchers will be to see how much the added clouds from plankton actually impact climate. By figuring out how plankton react to light, scientists now have the information they need to use computer models to recreate the impacts of plankton on cloud cover. Since the white clouds can reflect sunlight back out to space, the researchers believe the plankton-made clouds may have some affect on global temperatures.

This is important in light of man-made greenhouse gas production that warms the planet, and ozone depletion that allows more life-threatening UV radiation to strike Earth.

“There is the potential that this cycle could slow global warming,” said Siegel. “But right now we have no idea of the size of it or even what it means.”

In order to measure how much plankton may alter the climate, computer models would need to simulate different scenarios. One scenario would show our climate without clouds due to plankton, and another would show the climate with the increased cloud cover. Then researchers could begin to compare the differences between each scenario.

The researchers add that this effect may help to slow or lessen climate change, but would in no way reverse the trend or stop it altogether.

The research took place in the Sargasso Sea, where a wide range ocean data has been collected since the 1950s. A 1998 study relying on data from this area contained a 1992 to 1994 time series that focused on the cycling of organic sulfur from DMS in the ocean. Siegel has also been collecting data of changes in sea surface temperatures over seasons, variations in both visible light and UV light in the water, and the relationships between these solar variations and DMS levels. All of these measurements have been taken from research vessels and buoys in the Sargasso Sea.

In the future, the paper’s
authors look forward to incorporating satellite data from NASA’s Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) mission into this line of research. SeaWIFS will provide comprehensive data on shifts in visible light reaching the ocean’s surface.

The study was funded by NASA. Studies of DMS have been funded by the National Science Foundation. The study appeared in a recent issue of Geophysical Research Letters.

References:
NASA
Space Daily

Questions:
1) How does such an ability evolve?
2) What is the process of this type of so called evolution?

Also, is this the answer to Global Warming? According to link below, because of the ability of Plankton to make clouds, that we should grow it to cool the earth.
MSNBC

Why is plankton important? Click image to play Video.

This is an image that shows just one plankton life form. Plankton comes in many shapes. They are microscopic creatures.

5 reasons plankton is important to all life. Click image to play Video.

This is an image that is showing plankton.

Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

The Coccyx not only has nerves that go through, but several muscles in the buttocks area are connected to this. Including some that help you evacuate. So with it removed you would have some problems.

The evolutionists are trying to claim that the Coccyx (part of our tail bone) is left over from us evolving from Chimps. And that it has basically no function in our bodies. You can read more about this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coccyx You will also notice their attempt to use this for evolution. In every instance you find this done on any site promoting evolution, you will notice that what muscles connect to the Coccyx are omitted. Leaving out known information like this is a planned deception by evolutionists. For why else do they do this? To sell to the masses what is not true. Giving only half of the information is lying. And in a court of law, withholding truth is breaking the law.

So when atheist bring this up, here are some memes you can use to show how stupid this idea really is.

Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

This shows where the pancreas is located inside the human body.

The pancreas has to produce just the right amount of insulin at all times. To much blood sugar drops and death occurs. To little and blood sugar rises and death can occur. Anyone who has diabetes can tell you how vital it is to keep blood sugar under control.

Improper blood sugar also leads to secondary problems. Circulation problems, wound healing problems, kidney problems, and eye damage. How would evolution deal with being able to evolve a system that would tell the pancreas what to excrete, when to excrete it, and exactly how much to excrete?

Video

Video

Video

Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

This shows the organs inside of a human and the systems as well.

There are 11 systems in the human body as shown above. Each system is interdependent upon another in order to work. Which means they could not have evolved separately over long periods of time. They had to be there all at once, ready to work at the very same second all the other systems were. But the evolution excuse is: They all evolved at the same time. There are 2 problems with that answer.

1) It’s not scientific, and is more about making said evidence conform to the current accepted theory. Which is more or less conformism. Conformism is not science.
2) No 2 systems have the same complexity. What this means is that every system would require a different number of mutations in order to form. This means that there is no possible way for all the systems to evolve at the very same time.

Video

Video

Video

Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation

1) Neurological communication (nervous system)
2) Biophysical communication (pulse wave)
3) Biochemical communication (hormones)
4) Energetic communication (electromagnetic fields)

This would explain why our heart hurts when we lose some one near and dear to us. And it is now believed that one of the functions of the heart deals with our emotions and attitude. But because heart transplants have become more of the norm for a failing heart. Another unexpected side effect has come up. The people who received the donor heart can often experience:

1) The other person’s memories.
2) The other person’s food cravings.
3) Some of the other person’s attitudes.
4) And some of the fears, hates, and loves of different things.

Model of the Heart Brain and where it is located.

Testimonies of people who've received a heart, and the other person's abilities, memories, and gifts.

This would explain why Christ resides in a person’s heart when they are saved. It also explains why God said that He hardened Pharaoh’s heart towards Moses instead of changing his mind. God knew, even before medical science, that emotion of love and hate reside in the heart and not in our minds. If you would like to do more study on this new area of research. Google these words: Heart brain, Heart brain connection, Heart math , Heart transplant memories. Those who would like to do a Biblical research, just use a Bible search engine and search for the word heart. You will see the word of God start to make sense in this area, when before this information came out, it did not.

Does medical science prove this as well?

When you take an antidepressant. What is the main side effect that is a warning if you try and get off of it all at once? Heart attack. Now are we treating the heart or the brain for depression? If the side effect is a heart attack, and not a brain meltdown, what do you think is most affected by the antidepressant drug? The heart is. So even though I have read many atheist blogs and websites that make fun of the claim about the heart playing a big role in our emotions. They cannot deny the fact that their own research supports it. Because there is not one ingredient in antidepressants that affect the heart muscle in any way. So what is it that causes the heat attack any how? Proof of what is claimed here but denied by those who know such proof proves design and not random chance.

Heart muscle a special design?

The heart has to pump blood 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Or you will die. In order for the heart to achieve this, it has to have a muscle that never gets tired. If you have ever done anything where you got tired and had to sit and rest, think of how it would be if your heart had to quit beating to take a rest? But yet people can work all day, run marathons, work out, sleep etc… And the heart just keeps on beating. So if the muscle of the heart is not the type that allows the continued use of this organ once life needed it. The species dies and becomes extinct. The heart’s function requires that each ability to be there and fully functioning. And because it will cause death if it is not, there is no room for error that is required for natural selection or survival of the fittest. And “TIME” does not help because “TIME” is not the factor. Being perfect upon it’s creation, the very first time, is. And that leaves no room for it to have evolved. How long can one survive with a heart that does not have this special muscle? One day. Which does not support the millions of years that evolution requires.

Heart rate control disproves evolution?

Upon the heart being able to function comes a problem of how it should function. Such things as:
1) At what rate should it beat?
2) How hard should it beat?
3) What rhythm should it beat?

Why is this important? Continued high blood pressure can damage many things in the body. Every organ can be damaged including the brain. The blood vessels suffer damage as high blood pressure makes them stretch and expand as they try to hold in the high pressure. This damage to the blood vessels causes aneurysms as blood vessels burst. And on the other extreme, to low of a blood pressure can make you pass out, weak, and unable to function. So a variable heart rate controller has to be in place and functioning “correctly” once the heart is functioning. Anyone who has to take meds to control their heart because of a malfunction in this area can relate to what I am speaking of.

Does medical science prove this as well?
Yes, there are several medications available for all kinds of heart problems:
1) Ace inhibitors.
2) Beta blockers.
3) Calcium Channel blockers.
4) Nitrates.
etc…
None of these were available during the evolution process which means the life form would die, or suffer all it’s life

Heart valve design disproves evolution?

Anyone who has had a heart valve replacement can relate to what I am about to speak of. The heart valve has to be designed correctly in order to not allow back flow or leakage as the blood flows in one direction. It also has to not damage the blood cells that flow through it as it opens and closes. If the blood cells become damaged, the body reacts to this as bleeding in that area. At which point blood clots will be made to try and correct what the body thinks is where bleeding is going on. But what this does is send blood clots to the brain, legs, and other organs. Which can cause death or organ damage. This is why heart valve replacement recipients have to take blood thinners to block the clotting process. So what this proves is that if the heart valve is not perfectly designed the very first time, clots will form and the offspring dies. There is no room for “TIME” to be a factor, and therefore natural selection and survival of the fittest will not work when millions of years are not available for something that has to be perfect the very first time.

The design of the heart itself

This is an image that shows the human heart, then it shows the Hebrew sign for the heart. And how when you superimpose the symbol over the heart it shows that the bottom of the heart Is Made in the same shape as symbol.

The Shin is shaped like an English W. Ironically, it also has the shape of a human heart. The lower, larger left ventricle (which supplies the full body) and the smaller right ventricle (which supplies the lungs) are positioned like the lines of the letter Shin. This is said to remind us that we are to love the Lord our God with all of our heart….

In Hebrew, this letter stands for one of the names of God. El Shadaii. The Almighty. It also stands for Shalom, the common Jewish greeting which means “perfect peace.” It is also the first letter in the Shekinah which was the Spirit of God that descended upon the earthly tabernacle of the Israelites, the Ruach Ha Kodesh, the consuming fire, and amazingly enough the letter also looks like a fire.

The Shin is also the letter printed on Mezuzah, that graces the doorposts of every Jewish home. The Jews literally obey the command of God to bind the law of God onto their doorposts. In every Jewish home there is a Mezuzah beside the doorway. When they leave their home they touch this Mezuzah and kiss their fingertips. Why? On the Mezuzah is the letter Shin to represent the name of God and inside the Mezuzhah is a tiny scroll on which is written, “Hear O Israel, the Lord our God is One Lord……” Deuteronomy 6:4-9 When they leave their home they touch that letter that represents the name of God, and kiss their fingertips as a sign of reverence to God and His word.

The Shin is also represented by a hand sign. This hand sign is held up at certain times during Jewish synagogue services by the priests and Rabbi. Most of you will recognize this handsign as made famous by Spock from Star Trek, of course. The directors told him to come up with some type of hand sign to use in the movie. Being Jewish, this was the first thing Spock thought of, and they just went with it. When you have a chance, please watch this fascinating interview with Leonard Nimoy.

Live Long and Prosper: The Jewish Story Behind Spock, Leonard Nimoy’s Star Trek Character

To watch the full interview, visit: http://www.yiddishbookcenter.org/oral...Leonard Nimoy - Jewish actor best known for his role as Spock on the Star Trek sc…

www.youtube.com

Evidence against evolution, Evidence for Creation, Evolution vs creation debates

This shows the human brain. It's not a real image it's a graphic.

Think about it. If the blood brain barrier does not filter out the harmful stuff, then how is the species supposed to develop a learning capability? A damaged brain cannot develop. And if the blood brain barrier filters out to much, the brain will starve of the nutrients needed to function and quit functioning. So it has to function correctly the first time it’s needed or the species dies.

Video

The blood-brain barrier, How the body keeps toxins out of the brain.

Video

Video

Evidence for Creation

Before the beginning, there was no time. Only eternity (which does not require time). For if there was a time, “in the beginning” (a beginning), would not be needed. For what else would require a beginning but time? Time always has to have a starting point, and eventually, a ending point (Alpha and Omega). Creation of time also means that anything to do with time was already doing it upon being created. How? When day and night were created. It was never said that the earth was put into motion (made to spin). But because the earth has always been used as a timepiece to measure what a day is (how God created it to work), then knowing that time is already in motion (in the beginning), upon each object being created, they were in motion to keep time upon their creation. The earth was spinning upon creation so that when light was added, and then divided, so that day and night were automatically created.

Does Eternity have time?

After doing more research through the word of God, I have come to the conclusion that eternity does have time. Now that might surprise some of you about this. But after reading this verse and pondering things (all words mentioned in that verse):

2pet 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

This is a time comparison. How can you compare time as we know it, with a place where time does not exist? Which brings up another question. What makes time eternal in one place but not another? Between when time was created (in the beginning), and the first sin. Time did not have the curse of death. In fact the bible makes it clear that death did not occur until man sinned. So the only thing that makes one place eternal, and one not, is sin.

To sum it up: Time before the first sin upon the earth, “was in eternity time” (no aging no death). Not time as we know it (age + death because of sin). Because how can you have regular time with death, when sin that caused death has not happened yet? So when was the first sin committed?

So how long was earth in the eternity time-line?

From day 1 of creation to day 6. Why? The first sin was committed on day 6. This is why God told man to multiply the same day he was created. Man sinned the same day he was created. Can this be confirmed?

Genesis 2:

1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
Explanation: God has finished His creation at this point. And even says that the host of his creation is also finished (the creation of life is the host). So what comes next is a recount of how God created man, and what man did.

Genesis 2:

4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,

Explanation: Now how do you get generations when only 6 days have past? Notice that the generations only apply to heaven and earth. It does not say generations of man. I will go more into detail about this further down. To talk about it here would mess up the explanation of when the first sin happened.

Genesis 2:

5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.
Explanation: So how do you have no man to till the ground when Genesis 1 day 6 was the creation of man? What you have here is the recount of how man was created on day 6. And what man did on day 6.

So here we are back at day six in Genesis 2 explaining in more detail what happened on the day man was created. So what I will do here is do a side by side comparison of Genesis 1, and Genesis 2, in the creation of man to show that this is a recount of how man was created. Which means that man sinned on day six.

Genesis 3:

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

So how can Adam and Eve be fruitful and multiply until they sinned, and Eve has the sorrow of conception placed upon her? So this proves that Man’s first sin happens on the same day man was created. And to back this up even further, with more advanced Christian information….

Dead matter: If the sun were born in eternity. When would it age enough to become stable enough to support life upon this planet? If the earth were born in eternity, when would it ever cool down enough so that life could exist upon it?

So all living matter was created with age so that it could survive and take care of itself. And all dead matter was created with age so that it would not destroy the living matter. Other wise, what was the point of the creation of life, if life were going to be killed as soon as it was created?

So is there a verse to confirm that things were created in eternity time with age, but no passage of time?

Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
Explanation: Now when you first read this, you think that generations is a reference to life (age of life). Problem is, no life (man or animal) is mentioned. The only thing mentioned is heaven and earth. And then it says that they were this old in the day that they were created. So what day was the heaven and earth created? Day 1.

Need physical evidence of things that are evidence of a young earth even though it dates old?

a illustration image of pollium halos and their half life.

Polonium halos with a half life of less than 3 minutes embedded in granite rock. There were two types found as shown in the above picture. How do you get Polonium Halos, with a half life less than 3 minute, in granite rock that took millions of years to cool and form?

Dr. Gentry looking through an electron microscope at pollium halos in granite.

Dr. Gentry looking through his microscope at the evidence. He is a creation scientist that brought this evidence to light. But it was rejected by the scientific community and there is even a lawsuit ongoing over this . In the eternal time creation, nothing dies, nothing ages, and nothing decays. Which means that the Polonium Halos would have lasted for the 6 days of creation, in eternal time, instead of less than 3 minutes in the non-eternal time we now live in.

So God created the earthed aged to 4.5 billion years old 6 thousand years ago. Which explains why it dates that old, but young evidence can be found. And it all has to do with our misunderstanding of how eternal time worked for the 6 days of creation. Because when you can make the evidence mesh, what have you found. Because as long as there is conflicting evidence, then the whole truth has not been found.

So what we have is that science found 1/2 of the truth: A 4.5 billion year old earth, which has conflicting evidence.

And the biblical time line which says 6 thousands years old. Which is the other half of the truth. And it also has conflicting evidence.

Take the two, add Eternal time creation. And there is no more conflict. Because both the old earth dating becomes correct, and the young earth evidence becomes correct. Combined you get truth.

Also when you melt granite rock it changes it’s properties and it’s no longer granite rock. This means the idea that the earth and everything came from molten matter is a fallacy and that is easy to prove.

Video

And to prove this further, no one has seen or can duplicate how granite rock is made. This is why only an animation exists on how they “think” granite rock forms. And because animation is not evidence they are selling the idea and not proving it. And selling an idea is not scientific. Neither is getting people to agree to make you think it’s true which is a fallacy called majority view.